Fire Management: Lessons Learned From the Cerro Grande (Los Alamos) Fire
T-RCED-00-257
Published: Aug 14, 2000. Publicly Released: Aug 14, 2000.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the circumstances surrounding the Los Alamos wildfire, focusing on: (1) the events leading up to the prescribed fire and how it was managed; and (2) what fire management policies or practices need to be improved.
Recommendations
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Agriculture | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to require that, in risky situations like Cerro Grande, prescribed burn plans be peer-reviewed by qualified individuals outside the agency responsible for managing the burn. |
The Forest Service required that prescribed burn plans be peer-reviewed on a pilot basis in one region (Intermountain Region), and plans to require that burn plans be peer-reviewed in all regions by the end of calendar year 2004. The requirement for peer-review of prescribed burn plans will be included in Forest Manual 5140.
|
| Department of the Interior | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to require that, in risky situations like Cerro Grande, prescribed burn plans be peer-reviewed by qualified individuals outside the agency responsible for managing the burn. |
The Secretary of the Interior directed the heads of its land management agencies to require that prescribed burn plans be peer-reviewed by qualified individuals, independent of the preparation of the plan, and from another organization, if possible.
|
| Department of Agriculture | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to better define what is meant by the term "contingency resources," including clarifying the circumstances under which these resources can be used, the process for getting them, and the appropriate response time. |
The Forest Service and Interior are developing a common definition for "contingency resources". A common, interagency definition of "contingency resources" will be included in a draft interagency wildland fire handbook in fiscal year 2005.
|
| Department of the Interior | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to better define what is meant by the term "contingency resources," including clarifying the circumstances under which these resources can be used, the process for getting them, and the appropriate response time. |
The Secretary of the Interior directed the heads of its land management agencies to better define what is meant by the term "contingency resources". In 2002, each of these land management agencies developed a standardized definition for contingency resources for prescribed fires.
|
| Department of Agriculture | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to require that federal agencies better coordinate and cooperate in developing prescribed burn plans so that public and firefighter safety is the top priority, without regard to agencies' administrative of jurisdictional boundaries. |
In developing burn plans, the Forest Service has in place procedures to coordinate and cooperate burn plans with nearby, affected governmental agencies. The updated draft interagency fire management handbook, due October 1, 2004, will further emphasize the importance of coordinating burn plans with nearby, affected governmental agencies.
|
| Department of the Interior | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to require that federal agencies better coordinate and cooperate in developing prescribed burn plans so that public and firefighter safety is the top priority, without regard to agencies' administrative of jurisdictional boundaries. |
In 2000 and 2001, the Department of Interior's land management agencies (BIA, BLM, FWS, and NPS) implemented requirements that prescribed fire planning to include intra and interagency coordination, collaboration, and communication.
|
| Department of Agriculture | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to require that a decision to proceed with the ignition of a prescribed burn is fully justified by requiring the responsible officials to complete the analysis called for in the go/no-go checklist and requiring that the supporting analysis be documented and reviewed. |
The Forest Service will require the responsible officials for each burn plan to complete the analysis in the "go/no go" checklist and that the supporting analysis be documented and reviewed. The draft requirement is expected to be issued by October 1, 2004.
|
| Department of the Interior | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to require that a decision to proceed with the ignition of a prescribed burn is fully justified by requiring the responsible officials to complete the analysis called for in the go/no-go checklist and requiring that the supporting analysis be documented and reviewed. |
In 2000 and 2001, the Department of Interior's land management agencies (BIA, BLM, FWS, and NPS) implemented requirements that prior to ignition of a prescribed burn, a go/no-go checklist be completed, documented, and reviewed.
|
| Department of Agriculture | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to make clear, once a prescribed fire becomes a wildfire, the goal should be to suppress the fire as quickly as possible without compromising firefighter or public safety, even if suppression requires the use of mechanical means. |
The Fire Use Program Manager of the Forest Service stated that if a prescribed fire exceeds its project boundaries and the fire is not contained within a specific period, then suppression actions will be taken and the entire prescribed fire project will be declared a wildland fire with all subsequent action defined under a wildland fire plan.
|
| Department of the Interior | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to make clear, once a prescribed fire becomes a wildfire, the goal should be to suppress the fire as quickly as possible without compromising firefighter or public safety, even if suppression requires the use of mechanical means. |
The Department of Interior's land management agencies (BIA, BLM, FWS, and NPS) implemented requirements that if a prescribed fire exceeded its project boundaries and the fire is not contained within a specific period, then suppression actions will be taken and the entire prescribed fire project will be declared a wildland fire with all subsequent action defined under a wildland fire plan.
|
| Department of Agriculture | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to provide guidance to assist in making decisions about the amount and experience of personnel needed to properly manage and control prescribed fires. |
The Forest Service already has in place rules and standards for what experience and training is required at each "level of complexity" of a fire. The Forest Service standards are above and beyond interagency standards for fire positions. An interagency fire management handbook containing fire complexity assessments and the corresponding type, experience, and training required for fire personnel is expected to be issued by October 2005.
|
| Department of the Interior | The Secretaries of the Interior and of Agriculture should require that the current interagency policy for federal wildfire management and its implementing procedures, as well as those of the respective agencies that are signatories to it, be revised to provide guidance to assist in making decisions about the amount and experience of personnel needed to properly manage and control prescribed fires. |
In 2000 and 2001, the Department of Interior's land management agencies (BIA, BLM, FWS, and NPS) required that, for each prescribed fire, a firefighting organization be developed based upon the objectives, risk, and complexity of prescribed fires.
|
Full Report
Public Inquiries
Topics
Decision makingFire fightersForest managementInteragency relationsNational forestsSafety standardsForest firesWildfireLand managementNatural resources