Skip to main content

Exchange Programs: Observations on International Educational, Cultural, and Training Exchange Programs

T-NSIAD-93-7 Published: Mar 23, 1993. Publicly Released: Mar 23, 1993.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the federal government's support for international educational, cultural, and training exchange programs, focusing on the: (1) number and types of international exchange programs; (2) extent of duplicative or fragmented programs; (3) extent of program coordination and oversight; and (4) legal requirements that inhibit program flexibility. GAO noted that: (1) in 1992, 16 agencies spent about $660 million for about 80 international exchange programs for 41,000 participants; (2) the Agency for International Development, which trained about 14,000 participants and had program costs totalling $330 million, and the United States Information Agency (USIA), which had about 15,000 participants and spent about $198 million had the largest nonmilitary international training and exchange programs; (3) the Department of Defense spent $44.5 million on its International Military Education and Training Program which provided military skills and other defense-related training to over 6,000 foreign military and selected civilian personnel; (4) although international exchange program duplication, overlap, and fragmentation has increased due to legislation, it is not a serious problem; (5) USIA has not fulfilled its mission of providing interagency coordination or oversight and agencies have not conducted adequate program evaluations; and (6) legislation authorizing international exchange programs generally contained few restrictions and allowed adequate program flexibility, but some provisions created administrative problems, operational ineffectiveness, and management flexibility limitations.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Agency missionsCultural exchange programsForeign military trainingInteragency relationsInternal controlsInternational cooperationInternational relationsPublic diplomacyScientistsTeachers