Skip to main content

National Nuclear Security Administration: Assessments of Nuclear Weapon Acquisitions

GAO-25-106048 Published: Dec 17, 2024. Publicly Released: Dec 17, 2024.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

The National Nuclear Security Administration plans to invest more than $60 billion in programs to modernize the nation's aging nuclear weapons stockpile.

These programs face significant challenges, such as making sure that critical technologies are fully developed in time to meet production deadlines.

We found that NNSA does not have a formal process to identify which technologies are most critical, which could help it keep programs on track. We recommended that it develop one.

This report includes 2-page assessments of NNSA's 5 major modernization programs. This is our first biennial assessment.

F-35 aircraft dropping a test unit of the B61-12 nuclear bomb

F-35 aircraft dropping a test unit of the B61-12 nuclear bomb

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) uses several processes to manage its nuclear weapon acquisition programs. These processes include the Phase X and Phase 6.X processes, which provide a framework to coordinate NNSA's activities with those of the Department of Defense (DOD). NNSA also uses an internal process—called the product realization process—whereby an NNSA program office leads each program while multiple contractor teams of experts from NNSA's laboratories and production sites manage technical work.

NNSA's acquisition processes can be organized into three phases: (1) initiation, which explores options and early designs; (2) development, which covers the design, testing, and evaluation of technologies and the maturing of production processes; and (3) production. Within these phases, NNSA has established numerous requirements that its programs must follow regarding, among other things, the establishment of cost and schedule baselines and the assessment of technology readiness. However, NNSA has not documented, in a formal or comprehensive manner, the process that its programs must follow to identify which technologies are critical technologies—that is, technologies critical to meeting a system's operational requirements that are new or novel or are used in a new or novel way. By more formally and comprehensively documenting its process, NNSA may help ensure that its nuclear weapon programs do not waste valuable funding and schedule resources.

NNSA programs face several challenges in managing nuclear weapons acquisitions, including in maturing technologies, producing or procuring components, and overseeing contractors. For example, according to NNSA officials, it is difficult to estimate how long it will take to mature technologies to a manufacturing-ready state. As a result, NNSA's programs have had difficulty reaching technology readiness milestones. Specifically, of the technologies tracked by NNSA's Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation in the two NNSA programs for which data were available and which had reached the development phase, a majority had not reached NNSA's minimum required readiness level for critical technologies by the start of that phase (see table).

Number of Technologies in Nuclear Weapon Acquisition Programs Reaching NNSA's Technology Readiness Milestone at the Start of Development Phase

Acquisition program

Number of technologies

Number of technologies meeting NNSA's readiness milestone for critical technologies

B61-12 bomb

37

12

W80-4 warhead

42

5

Source: GAO analysis of National Nuclear Security Administration's (NNSA) Office of Cost Estimating and Program Evaluation information. │ GAO-25-106048

Partly to address this challenge, NNSA established an office in 2019 to perform early stage research and development activities to advance technologies to a higher level of readiness before passing them on to nuclear weapon acquisition programs for further development.

Why GAO Did This Study

The United States is investing tens of billions of dollars in nuclear weapon acquisition programs to modernize aging nuclear weapons. NNSA is currently managing seven such programs, in coordination with DOD.

Two Senate Armed Services Committee reports include provisions for GAO to review NNSA's management of its nuclear weapon acquisition programs, as well as the status of these programs biennially. This report assesses (1) the processes NNSA uses for managing these programs and (2) the challenges NNSA faces. The report also includes individual assessments of the five NNSA nuclear weapon acquisition programs under way at the start of GAO's review.

GAO reviewed NNSA documentation and directives on agency processes, program cost and schedule baselines, and design and technology issues. GAO assessed performance in these areas using criteria in NNSA directives, as well as criteria from GAO's Technology Readiness Assessment Guide. GAO also visited NNSA sites and interviewed agency officials and contractors about challenges.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that NNSA document, in a formal and comprehensive manner, the process its nuclear weapon acquisition programs must follow to identify which technologies are critical technologies. NNSA agreed with GAO's recommendation.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
National Nuclear Security Administration The NNSA Administrator should ensure that the Office of Defense Programs documents, in a formal and comprehensive manner, the process that its nuclear weapon acquisition programs must follow to identify which of their technologies are critical technologies. (Recommendation 1)
Open
When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Allison Bawden
Director
Natural Resources and Environment

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Acquisition programsCost and scheduleCritical technologiesDefense programsNuclear weaponsOperational testingPlutoniumProgram evaluationMilitary readinessNuclear security