Homeland Security: Joint Requirements Council Needs Leadership Attention to Improve Effectiveness
Fast Facts
The Department of Homeland Security spends billions annually on IT systems, aircraft, and other major acquisitions programs. Since many programs have overlapping needs, DHS established the Joint Requirements Council to help different parts of the agency find common solutions—or "joint capabilities."
While the council was designed to make recommendations to DHS leadership, we found that agency leaders haven't regularly engaged with the council—limiting the council's potential to help. Also, the council hasn't followed its own guidance when approving "joint capability" projects.
Our recommendations address these issues.
Highlights
What GAO Found
The Joint Requirements Council (JRC) seeks to create efficiencies by identifying opportunities for components within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to develop joint capabilities if they have similar mission needs. Since 2018, the JRC has designated five capabilities as joint. However, the JRC validated four of these as joint capabilities even though the documents that components submitted to assess the capability did not fully meet key criteria required in its guidance. For example, three documents partially met the criterion to quantify the capability gap, which helps determine risk associated with not addressing it. Ensuring these documents fully meet criteria better positions DHS to pursue solutions that are well-defined and will meet mission needs.
The JRC was also established to be a recommending body to DHS leadership but leadership has not regularly engaged with the JRC. For example, it did not participate in the review and validation of the joint capabilities that JRC designated for its attention, and it has not met with the JRC since 2015. This limits DHS's ability to fully realize the JRC's strategic value to identify opportunities for joint solutions and help use resources efficiently.
DHS plans to realign the JRC from reporting to the Office of the Secretary to the Office of the Chief Readiness Support Officer within the Management Directorate. GAO found that this realignment could limit the JRC's ability to independently oversee the requirements development process because it would not be a separate management function. GAO has reported on the importance of the requirements function to be independent.
Organizational Structure of DHS's Management Directorate and the Joint Requirements Council Realignment
Further, GAO found that the Office of the Chief Readiness Officer, which oversees department-wide logistics, had the fewest responsibilities in the Management Directorate that aligned with the JRC's mission. The office is also not well-positioned to assist the JRC with overseeing DHS's requirements development process because it is not a principal member of the Council. As a result, this move could limit the JRC's ability to fully execute its roles and responsibilities.
Why GAO Did This Study
In November 2014, in response to a GAO recommendation, DHS reestablished the JRC to develop and lead a component-driven requirements process to inform investment decisions and to reduce unnecessary duplication, overlap, and redundancy. In 2016, GAO found that the JRC's initial management approach was sound but at the time it had not yet completed a process to identify priorities and inform investment decisions.
GAO was asked to review the effectiveness of the JRC's current operations. This report addresses, among other objectives, the extent to which the JRC (1) has designated and validated joint capabilities and requirements; (2) has engaged with DHS leadership; and (3) is positioned to conduct its mission.
GAO reviewed relevant DHS and JRC policies, guidance, and documentation. GAO also interviewed DHS and JRC officials.
Recommendations
GAO is making six recommendations to DHS, including that it ensures the JRC demonstrates that joint capability documents fully meet key criteria prior to validating them; ensures regular engagement between the JRC and leadership; and reconsiders the placement of the JRC. DHS concurred with all six recommendations, but for two described actions that would not meet their intent as discussed in the report.
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Homeland Security | The Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure that the JRC validates those joint capability and requirements documents that fully meet key criteria. (Recommendation 1) |
In providing comments on this report, DHS concurred with this recommendation and stated that it would review each document carefully and take actions should key criteria not be met, including documenting unmet or partially met criteria as a residual concern to ensure enterprise-awareness and potential mitigating actions. These actions were to be included in a future update to the Joint Requirements Integration and Management System instruction, which was expected to be completed by fall 2024. In February 2024, DHS stated that planned actions were pending approval of a fiscal year 2024 budget. In March 2024, Congress directed DHS to dissolve the existing JRC and identify alternative methods to improve the management and resourcing of joint requirements across the department. We will continue to monitor the actions DHS plans to take and determine whether these actions meet the intent of the recommendation.
|
| Department of Homeland Security | The Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure that the JRC, in coordination with stakeholders, (1) implements an assessment process that prioritizes emerging capability gaps and existing requirements annually, and (2) submits these priorities to leadership for consideration in investment decisions. (Recommendation 2) |
In providing comments on this report, DHS concurred with this recommendation and stated that it would continue to enhance and mature its existing assessment process through enterprise-wide collaboration in future iterations, including providing the results and proposed actions for leadership consideration, as appropriate. In February 2024, DHS stated that planned actions were pending approval of a fiscal year 2024 budget. In March 2024, Congress directed DHS to dissolve the existing JRC and identify alternative methods to improve the management and resourcing of joint requirements across the department. We will continue to monitor the actions DHS plans to take and determine whether these actions meet the intent of the recommendation.
|
| Department of Homeland Security | The Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure that the Deputy's Management Action Group (DMAG) establishes a process to regularly engage with the JRC to review the JRC's recommendations, approve and/or direct related follow-on activities, and provide direction and guidance to the JRC. (Recommendation 3) |
In providing comments on this report, DHS concurred with this recommendation and stated that it plans to align the JRC within the DHS Management Directorate, after which the JRC will provide recommendations to the DMAG through the Under Secretary for Management, as appropriate. In February 2024, DHS stated that planned actions were pending approval of a fiscal year 2024 budget. In March 2024, Congress directed DHS to dissolve the existing JRC and identify alternative methods to improve the management and resourcing of joint requirements across the department. We will continue to monitor the actions DHS plans to take and determine whether these actions meet the intent of the recommendation.
|
| Department of Homeland Security | The Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure that the Deputy's Management Action Group (DMAG), in coordination with the JRC participates in the Joint Requirements Integration and Management System process, by reviewing and validating all designated documents determined to be DMAG Interest by the JRC. (Recommendation 4) |
In providing comments on this report, DHS concurred with this recommendation and stated that it plans to align the JRC within the DHS Management Directorate in fiscal year 2024, after which the JRC interactions with the DMAG would be more focused on informing prioritized investment decision-making. DHS also said it planned to review the current Joint Requirements Integration and Management System lexicon and update related guidance in fall 2024 to better differentiate between documents warranting department-wide review and those special circumstances when DMAG involvement is necessary. In February 2024, DHS stated that planned actions were pending approval of a fiscal year 2024 budget. In March 2024, Congress directed DHS to dissolve the existing JRC and identify alternative methods to improve the management and resourcing of joint requirements across the department. We will continue to monitor the actions DHS plans to take and determine whether these actions meet the intent of the recommendation.
|
| Department of Homeland Security | The Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure that the Deputy Secretary, prior to finalizing the realignment of the JRC, reconsiders the placement of the JRC within the Management Directorate to ensure it fully aligns with the JRC's mission and maintains the JRC's independence. (Recommendation 5) |
In providing comments on this report, DHS concurred with this recommendation and stated that it would assess the JRC's roles and responsibilities to determine the most effective organizational alignment and for DHS leadership to take action as appropriate after transitioning the JRC to the Management Directorate in fiscal year 2024. In February 2024, DHS stated that planned actions were pending approval of a fiscal year 2024 budget. In March 2024, Congress directed DHS to dissolve the existing JRC and identify alternative methods to improve the management and resourcing of joint requirements across the department. We will continue to monitor the actions DHS plans to take and determine whether these actions meet the intent of the recommendation.
|
| Department of Homeland Security | The Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure that the Deputy Secretary, prior to the realignment of the JRC, assesses the JRC's workforce to ascertain the extent to which it has the appropriate number and mix of staff with the necessary skills to fulfill its responsibilities. (Recommendation 6) |
In providing comments on this report, DHS concurred with this recommendation and stated that it would revalidate and prioritize the JRC's roles and responsibilities once it was transitioned to the Management Directorate during fiscal year 2024 to ensure the JRC has the resources needed to fulfill its mission. In February 2024, DHS stated that planned actions were pending approval of a fiscal year 2024 budget. In March 2024, Congress directed DHS to dissolve the existing JRC and identify alternative methods to improve the management and resourcing of joint requirements across the department. We will continue to monitor the actions DHS plans to take and determine whether these actions meet the intent of the recommendation.
|