Missile Defense: Better Oversight and Coordination Needed for Counter-Hypersonic Development
Fast Facts
The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) is developing systems to counter hypersonic missiles. These weapons are capable of flight at speeds 5 times the speed of sound, and can maneuver mid-flight—which makes tracking them difficult.
MDA's Glide Phase Interceptor is a missile designed to shoot down a hypersonic weapon in the middle (or glide phase) of its flight. However, we found that MDA doesn't have plans to get early independent assessments of the program's cost or performance risks, which could be significant.
We recommended that MDA get independent cost and technology assessments for this interceptor.
Comparison of Ballistic and Hypersonic Flight Trajectories
Highlights
What GAO Found
The Missile Defense Agency (MDA) continues to build components of the Missile Defense System (MDS), test its capabilities, and plan for countering evolving threats. In fiscal year 2021, MDA made progress, but continued to fall short of its goals for asset deliveries and testing. For example, MDA successfully delivered many of the planned interceptors and conducted developmental and operational cybersecurity testing for MDS elements; however, MDA did not conduct any planned system-level cybersecurity tests—leaving MDA without knowledge of its systems' vulnerabilities and contributing to programmatic delays. The shortfalls to planned system-level tests were partially attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic.
MDA's efforts to address hypersonic threats include the Glide Phase Interceptor (GPI) and Hypersonic and Ballistic Tracking Space Sensor (HBTSS). These efforts represent technologies that have considerable risks, but MDA has not taken necessary steps to reduce risks and ensure appropriate oversight from the Department of Defense (DOD) or stakeholder involvement.
Missile Defense Agency's Hypersonic Efforts in a Notional Scenario
- GPI is a missile designed to shoot down a hypersonic weapon in the middle (or glide phase) of its flight. Contrary to a DOD directive with which MDA has aligned its effort, at the time of our review, MDA did not plan to obtain an independent technological risk assessment to determine the maturity of the technologies before proceeding with development. In addition, MDA did not plan to obtain an independent cost estimate.
- HBTSS is a concept of space-based sensors to track the unique flight path of a hypersonic weapon. However, MDA has not adequately coordinated the HBTSS effort with DOD's Space Development Agency and Space Force.
Increased DOD oversight and involvement would reduce risk. In addition, more clearly delineated roles and responsibilities would help avoid duplication, overlap, or fragmented capabilities among MDA and other DOD space agencies.
Why GAO Did This Study
Since MDA was established in 2002, the Department of Defense has spent over $174 billion to equip operational commanders with a network of sensors, interceptors and command and control capabilities collectively called the Missile Defense System. Since 2017, MDA's mission has broadened to include hypersonic weapons, which are difficult to track and defeat because they are capable of maneuvering during flight.
Congress included provisions in legislation for GAO to annually assess MDA's progress toward meeting its acquisition goals. This report—the 19th to date—assesses (1) MDA's progress achieving its delivery and testing goals for fiscal year 2021, and (2) MDA's efforts to defend against hypersonic weapons. To conduct this work, GAO reviewed MDA's baseline reports, test plans, and the agency's responses to detailed question sets. GAO also interviewed officials within MDA and DOD.
Recommendations
GAO recommends that the Undersecretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment ensure that MDA obtains an independent technical risk assessment and cost estimate for the GPI effort.
GAO also recommends that, for the HBTSS effort, the Secretary of Defense ensures the responsibilities for satellite development and operation in the missile defense and missile warning domains are properly delineated.
DOD concurred with GAO's recommendations.
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment to ensure that the GPI effort obtains an Independent Cost Estimate developed by the Director of Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation prior to entering the Product Development Phase as defined by DTM 20-002. (Recommendation 1) |
MDA concurred with this recommendation, however this Independent Cost Estimate is not due until before the program enters the Product Development Phase, which is not planned for several years. As of August 2, 2023, according to CAPE officials, the GPI ICE is not completed and is not expected until the President's Budget 2025 budget is finalized. When we confirm whether the agency has taken actions, we will update the status of this recommendation.
|
| Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment to ensure that the GPI effort obtains an Independent Technical Risk Assessment conducted by the Under Secretary of Defense for Research and Engineering prior to entering the Product Development Phase as defined by DTM 20-002. (Recommendation 2) |
MDA concurred with this recommendation and provided the Independent Technical Risk Assessment to GAO in August 2023. However, we are not closing the recommendation until we ensure the assessment includes all the elements required by DOD for a complete ITRA, Through the course of our annual mandate review (GAO-23-106835) we will be able to assess the robustness and completeness of the assessment and will update this recommendation at that time.
|
| Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should ensure the Missile Defense Agency, Space Development Agency, Space Force, and any other relevant agencies establish a memorandum of understanding that delineates roles and responsibilities for satellite development and operation in the missile defense and missile warning domains. This memorandum should establish which agencies will develop operational satellites (including prototypes) and articulate a process by which duplication and overlap will be avoided. (Recommendation 3) |
DOD concurred with this recommendation. In August 2022, the Commander of Space Force's Space Systems Command (SSC) and the Directors of the Space Development Agency (SDA) and Missile Defense Agency (MDA) signed a memorandum of agreement. This memorandum documented responsibilities within a new, combined program office that was created to coordinate efforts on the delivery of space-based missile warning, missile tracking, and missile defense capabilities. Under this memorandum, SDA will develop and deliver low-earth orbit missile warning, missile tracking, and missile defense capabilities and associated ground support systems. MDA will develop missile defense fire control requirements, demonstrate fire control prototypes, and develop fire control ground systems capable of accepting data from SDA and SSC's sensors. We believe this memorandum of agreement meets the intent of our recommendation to delineate roles and responsibilities and avoid duplication and overlap.
|