Climate Resilience: DOD Coordinates with Communities, but Needs to Assess the Performance of Related Grant Programs
Fast Facts
Military installations rely on nearby communities for commodities and infrastructure, such as electricity, access roads, and telecommunications.
To help protect its installations from the effects of climate change and extreme weather, DOD coordinates with communities to improve infrastructure resilience. Three DOD grant programs help fund studies and improvements. For example, DOD helped fund a study that led one community to elevate a road leading to a base in a flood-prone area.
DOD doesn't currently measure whether its grant programs are achieving their intended objectives. We recommended DOD establish performance measures for the programs.
Damage to a Rail Line at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, Caused by Hurricane Florence in 2018
Highlights
What GAO Found
Department of Defense (DOD) domestic installations report extensive and varied use of community infrastructure and support services—such as roads, bridges, electricity, water, and medical facilities—that are vulnerable to disruptions from climate change and extreme weather. For example, 62 of the 63 installations (98 percent) that responded to GAO's survey report relying on communities for electricity, access roads or bridges, and telecommunications.
DOD installations also report taking a range of actions to coordinate with organizations—including public utilities, county governments, and state agencies—to limit installation exposure to the effects of climate change and extreme weather.
Department of Defense's Climate Change and Extreme Weather Coordination Efforts with Communities
Note: CUP studies result in recommendations that address threats to installation readiness; MIR studies identify risks to infrastructure outside an installation; and DCIP provides construction funds to communities to address, among other things, deficiencies in community infrastructure that support military installation resilience.
DOD administers three grant programs that support community coordination with local installations on climate change and extreme weather—the longstanding Compatible Use Plan (CUP), and the Military Installation Resilience (MIR) and Defense Community Infrastructure Pilot (DCIP) programs established in fiscal year 2020. DOD and community officials emphasized the value of these grant programs as a means of facilitating and funding coordination with surrounding communities, including through joint land use studies and community infrastructure development. In fiscal year 2020, about $67 million was awarded under the three grant programs.
While DOD monitors the status of individual CUP grant expenditures and deliverables—and plans to similarly monitor its MIR and DCIP grants—it is unable to determine the effectiveness of the grant programs. Specifically, DOD has not developed performance measures to benchmark and to track overall program performance. Without establishing performance measures for these grant programs, DOD and Congress are limited in determining whether desired outcomes are being achieved and whether current and future investments in the grant programs are delivering their intended value.
Why GAO Did This Study
DOD manages a domestic real-estate portfolio with an estimated replacement value of nearly $930 billion. DOD has acknowledged climate change and extreme weather as threats to its installations, operations, and readiness; and has noted the importance of coordinating with state and local governments to improve climate change preparedness and resilience.
GAO was asked to review DOD's efforts to coordinate with communities surrounding its installations to limit the exposure to climate change and extreme weather. This report assesses the extent to which DOD (1) reports using the physical infrastructure and support services of communities surrounding domestic installations, and the vulnerabilities to such infrastructure and services from climate change and extreme weather, and (2) coordinates with such communities to limit installation exposure to the effects of climate change and extreme weather, and is able to determine the effectiveness of related community coordination grants. GAO surveyed 65 domestic military installations, reviewed documents related to climate resilience, and interviewed DOD and community officials.
Recommendations
GAO is making three recommendations related to developing performance measures for DOD's community grant programs. DOD concurred with all three recommendations.
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the director of OEA establish performance measures for its Compatible Use Plan grant program. At minimum, the performance measures should be clear, quantifiable, objective, and provide for the baseline measurement of current performance. (Recommendation 1) |
DOD concurred with this recommendation, and in December 2023 fully implemented a mix of quantitative and qualitative performance measures for the grant program. The quantitative performance measures include, for example, the number of activities proposed for a grant and the number of them completed. The quantitative performance measures also had established goals, providing for future baseline measurement. By implementing clear, quantifiable, and objective performance measures and providing a basis for baseline measurement, DOD will have better visibility of whether current and future investments in its Compatible Use Plan grant program are delivering the intended value.
|
| Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the director of OEA establish performance measures for its Military Installation Resilience grant program. At minimum, the performance measures should be clear, quantifiable, objective, and provide for the baseline measurement of current performance. (Recommendation 2) |
DOD concurred with this recommendation, and in December 2023 fully implemented a mix of quantitative and qualitative performance measures for the grant program. The quantitative performance measures include, for example, the number of implementation activities proposed for a grant and the number of them completed. The quantitative performance measures also had established goals, providing for future baseline measurement. By implementing clear, quantifiable, and objective performance measures and providing a basis for baseline measurement, DOD will have better visibility of whether current and future investments in its Military Installation Resilience grant program are delivering the intended value.
|
| Department of Defense | The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the director of OEA establish performance measures for its Defense Community Infrastructure Pilot grant program. At minimum, the performance measures should be clear, quantifiable, objective, and provide for the baseline measurement of current performance. (Recommendation 3) |
DOD concurred with this recommendation, and in December 2023 fully implemented a suite of performance measures and a related implementation plan for the program. The measures include, for example whether the project funded addressed the issues identified in the military letter supporting the awarding of the grant. DOD further set goals for specific measures, providing for the future measurement of baseline performance. By implementing clear, quantifiable, and objective performance measures, and providing a basis for baseline measurement, DOD will have better visibility of whether current and future investments in its Defense Community Infrastructure Pilot grant program are delivering the intended value.
|