Skip to main content

Small Business Research Programs: Many Agencies Took Longer to Issue Small Business Awards than Recommended

GAO-19-620 Published: Sep 26, 2019. Publicly Released: Sep 26, 2019.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

Since 1982, federal agencies have given $46 billion to small businesses to help them develop and market new technologies (such as robotic vacuum cleaners and personal genetic testing kits). Businesses apply for these awards, and agencies generally aim to make awards within 180 days after the application deadline.

We reviewed 15,453 awards made over 3 years: 76% were made on time. However, the 28 agencies that made the awards varied widely on timeliness—some made 100% on time and some made 0%.

Agencies cited factors that slowed the process, such as heavy workloads for reviewers and slow responses to requests for more information.

Calculator, paper with numbers in columns, and hands holding a magnifying glass and a pen

Calculator, paper with numbers in columns, and hands holding a magnifying glass and a pen

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

In fiscal years 2016 through 2018, agencies issued 11,710 of the 15,453 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) awards we reviewed (76 percent) within the recommended time period. However, component agencies varied in the percentage of awards that they issued within the recommended time (see figure).

Perecent of Small Business Awards Issued withing the Recommended Time for Fiscal Years 2016 through 2018

High_5_v7_Issuance_103341

Note: The policy directive for the Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs recommends agencies issue awards within 180 days, except for the the National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation, which should issue awards within 15 months.

Agency officials described a number of factors that can affect award issuance timelines, including:

  • Some agencies use cost reimbursement contracts, which require additional agency review under federal acquisition regulations.
  • Some contracting officers have limited expertise in issuing SBIR and STTR awards and their overall workloads can be heavy.
  • Small businesses may be slow to respond to agency requests for information, such as requests for information needed to meet government contracting requirements.

Why GAO Did This Study

Since the SBIR and STTR programs began in 1982 and 1992, respectively, federal agencies have awarded at least 162,000 contracts and grants totaling around $46 billion to help small businesses develop and commercialize new technologies. Eleven agencies participate in the SBIR program and five of them also participate in the STTR program. Each agency issues a solicitation requesting proposals at least once a year. Agencies then review proposal submissions and issue awards using grants or contracts. The SBIR and STTR policy directive recommends that most agencies issue awards no more than 180 calendar days from solicitation close.

The John S. McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019 included a provision for GAO to report on the timeliness of agencies' SBIR and STTR proposal review and award issuance. This report examines the time agencies spend issuing SBIR and STTR awards and the factors that affect the time spent, among other things. Within the 11 agencies, GAO reviewed 28 component agencies that participate in these programs. GAO analyzed agency-provided award data from fiscal years 2016 to 2018 for 15,453 awards and interviewed officials from the Small Business Administration and 26 of the component agencies.

For more information, contact John Neumann at (202) 512-6888 or neumannj@gao.gov.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

John Neumann
Managing Director
Science, Technology Assessment, and Analytics

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AwardsContracting officersCost reimbursement contractsResearch and developmentResearch programsSmall businessSmall business innovationTechnology transferHealth careMilitary forces