Offshore Seismic Surveys: Additional Guidance Needed to Help Ensure Timely Reviews
Fast Facts
Ships conduct seismic surveys by shooting soundwaves into the ocean floor to collect data, including geology that might indicate oil and gas.
Applicants wishing to conduct oil and gas surveys must first get a permit from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management and, if the survey could harm marine mammals, they must obtain authorization from one or two federal wildlife agencies. Some applicants have questioned the speed of the permit process.
We examined the permit process and time frames in different regions. We recommended that federal wildlife agencies clarify their review processes to ensure the agencies meet statutory review deadlines.
Offshore seismic surveys can help determine where oil drilling platforms like this one should go
Aerial photo of an offshore oil rig
Highlights
What GAO Found
The Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management's (BOEM) process and time frames for reviewing seismic survey applications differ by region along the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). From 2011 through 2016, BOEM reviewed 297 applications and issued 264 seismic survey permits, and the reviews' time frames differed by region (see table). As part of the process, BOEM may require approved “incidental take” authorizations from the Department of Commerce's National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) or Interior's U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), given the possibility such surveys may disturb or injure marine mammals. BOEM does not have statutory review time frame requirements for issuing permits, and officials said the agency starts its formal review once it determines that an application is complete. In some cases, the agency issued a permit on the same day it determined an application was complete.
BOEM's Seismic Survey Permits Issued from 2011 through 2016
|
OCS region |
Permits issued |
How many days review took |
|
Alaska |
8 |
35-200 |
|
Atlantic |
6 |
0-340 |
|
Gulf of Mexico |
250 |
0-287 |
Source: GAO analysis of BOEM data. ׀ GAO-18-60
NMFS and FWS follow a similar general process for reviewing incidental take authorization applications related to seismic survey activities. From 2011 through 2016, NMFS and FWS reviewed 35 and approved 28 such applications across the three OCS regions, including some authorizations related to BOEM permits as well as research seismic surveys not associated with BOEM permits. NMFS was unable to provide accurate data for the dates the agency determines an application is adequate and complete—and FWS does not record this date. For example, based on GAO's review of NMFS data, in at least two cases, the date NMFS recorded the application had been determined adequate and complete was after the date when the proposed authorization was published in the Federal Register . Federal internal control standards call for agencies to use quality information. Without guidance on how to accurately record review dates, agencies and applicants will continue to have uncertainty around review time frames. Further, under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the agencies are to review one type of incidental take authorization application—incidental harassment authorization applications—within 120 days of receiving an application for such authorizations. NMFS and FWS have not conducted an analysis of their review time frames. Not conducting such an analysis is inconsistent with federal internal control standards that call for agency management to design control activities to achieve objectives and respond to risks. Without analyzing the review time frames for incidental harassment authorization applications and comparing them to statutory review time frames, NMFS and FWS are unable to determine whether they are meeting their objectives to complete reviews in the 120-day statutory time frame.
Why GAO Did This Study
Offshore seismic surveys provide federal agencies and other entities with a wide range of data, from research on fault zones to geology that may indicate the presence of oil and gas. Companies seeking to conduct such surveys to find oil and gas resources in the OCS must obtain a permit from BOEM—which oversees offshore oil and gas activities. Man-made sources of ocean noise, such as seismic surveys, may harm marine mammals. Entities whose activities may cause the taking of marine mammals, which includes harassing or injuring an animal, may obtain incidental take authorizations for seismic surveys from NMFS or FWS, depending on the potentially affected species.
GAO was asked to provide information on the seismic permitting process. This report examines (1) BOEM's review process, the number of permit applications reviewed from 2011 through 2016, and its review time frames; and (2) NMFS's and FWS's review process, the number of incidental take authorization applications reviewed from 2011 through 2016, and their review time frames, among other objectives. GAO reviewed laws and regulations and agency documents, analyzed data on applications to BOEM, NMFS, and FWS, and interviewed agency officials.
Recommendations
GAO is recommending that both NMFS and FWS develop guidance clarifying how and when staff should record review dates of incidental take authorization applications and analyze how long the reviews take. NMFS agreed and FWS partially agreed with our recommendations.
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| National Marine Fisheries Service | The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of NMFS should develop guidance that clarifies how and when staff should record the date on which the agency determines the "adequacy and completeness" of an incidental take authorization application. (Recommendation 1). |
In September 2018, NMFS established protocols to provide for the consistent identification and tracking of the review of applications and the adequate and complete designation. The protocols include a standard definition of an adequate and complete application. Further, NMFS will record the adequate and complete date in three ways: (1) the analyst will communicate to the applicant by email that the application is considered adequate and complete; (2) the analyst will record the date in the NMFS database, an internal database in which key project information and milestone dates are input and kept for the purposes of project tracking; and (3) the adequate and complete date will be reflected in Federal Register notices announcing proposed or final incidental take authorizations or, in the case of incidental take regulations, receipt of applications. This guidance has been provided to NMFS analysts that process applications.
|
| United States Fish and Wildlife Service | The Principal Deputy Director of FWS should develop guidance that clarifies how and when to record the date on which the agency determines the "adequacy and completeness" of an incidental take authorization application. (Recommendation 2). |
FWS developed guidance for recording the "adequate and complete" date for processing incidental take authorizations, and transmitted the guidance to affected FWS staff in October 2018. The guidance defines what must be included for an application to be deemed "adequate and complete" and specifies that FWS are to notify the applicant of the date their application was determined to be "adequate and complete" and maintain a record of that date in FWS files.
|
| National Marine Fisheries Service | The Assistant Administrator for Fisheries of NMFS should analyze the agency's time frames for reviewing incidental harassment authorization applications--from the date the agency determines that an application is adequate and complete until the date an application is approved or denied--and compare the agency's review time frames to the statutory review time frame. (Recommendation 3). |
In March 2019, NMFS generated its first annual report indicating the total time frames for processing incidental take authorization applications--from the date the agency determined that the applications were adequate and complete until the date the applications were approved or denied--for the prior year and provided a comparison to the 120-day statutory review time frame.
|
| United States Fish and Wildlife Service | The Principal Deputy Director of FWS should analyze the agency's time frames for reviewing incidental harassment authorization applications--from the date the agency determines that an application is adequate and complete until the date an application is approved or denied--and compare the agency's review time frames to the statutory review time frame. (Recommendation 4). |
In August 2020, the FWS provided GAO with a table template intended to track and analyze the agency's time frames for reviewing incidental harassment authorization applications. The agency noted that it had not issued any incidental harassment authorizations for offshore seismic survey activities since 2014 but that it intends to use the table to report on review time frames if it issues such authorizations in the future.
|