Skip to main content

Defense Inventory: DOD Needs Additional Information for Managing War Reserve Levels of Meals Ready to Eat

GAO-15-474 Published: May 07, 2015. Publicly Released: May 07, 2015.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The military services determine their war reserve materiel (WRM) requirements for Defense Logistics Agency (DLA)-managed items based on operational plans that support warfighting scenarios and other inputs such as deployment schedules and equipment-usage data. WRM can include repair parts, construction equipment and supplies, and chemical protection suits, among other items. Service officials stated that changes to troop end strength, force posture, and force structure could over time be reflected in operational plans, but these factors are more long-term influences than the primary drivers of service WRM requirements for DLA-managed items. DLA compares service WRM requirements against its assets to identify the level of available inventory, including any potential inventory shortfalls, and communicates this information to the military services, which use it to inform their procurement decisions.

DLA monitors various types of data to manage Meals Ready to Eat (MRE), but it lacks other analysis and information that could be useful for managing this category of WRM. DLA monitors data such as purchases from industry and sales to the military services and currently has a yearly purchase objective of 2.5 million MRE cases. Service officials have expressed concerns that in light of changing needs resulting from budgetary effects and reduced end strengths, it may be difficult for the services to consume MREs in the future at a rate that will prevent disposals due to expiring shelf life. However, DLA has not conducted an analysis of the MRE industry to determine the level of purchases needed annually to sustain the industrial base while retaining the ability to meet a surge in requirements. Without conducting an analysis that provides more information on industry capabilities, DLA does not have reasonable assurance that it is balancing readiness and budget priorities with the need to sustain the industrial base in the most efficient way. DLA acknowledges in its strategic plan for MRE inventory that sharing information about the military services' usage patterns among DLA and the services will be vital to making purchase decisions. While the military services provide DLA with their estimated future demand for MREs, DLA does not obtain information from the services, as part of existing coordination efforts, about potential changes to MRE consumption and disposals that could affect future demand. Without obtaining this information from the military services, DLA may be limited in its ability to optimize the supply chain across the department.

DLA uses various supply-chain strategies to balance cost with readiness in meeting the need for items identified as WRM and needed for surges associated with new contingencies or crises. For instance, DLA continues to stock certain types of items, such as those that are military-unique or of limited availability, but seeks to contract for fast access to those items that are readily available on the commercial market, such as medical supplies. Further, for many years DLA has sought to facilitate and improve access to certain items through its Warstopper Program, which addresses weaknesses in certain supply chains, such as MREs, by making targeted investments in industry that guarantee DLA access to materiel and enable industry to increase production when needed.

Why GAO Did This Study

The Department of Defense (DOD) maintains WRM to reduce reaction time and sustain forces in future military operations. WRM is managed by DLA and the military services. WRM is intended to meet short-term needs until supply pipelines are established. Cost-effective management of WRM that maintains war-fighting capabilities is important as the department faces budget constraints and changes in force structure.

Senate Report 113-176, accompanying S. 2410, a proposed bill for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2015, included a provision for GAO to review the management of DOD's WRM. This report examines (1) how DOD determines WRM requirements for DLA-managed items, (2) the extent to which DLA has the information needed for MRE inventory decision making, and (3) any strategies DLA pursues to balance cost with readiness in supplying WRM. GAO obtained information from the services on their processes for identifying WRM requirements, reviewed DLA's inventory-management processes and related guidance, and interviewed DLA and military service officials.

Recommendations

To assist with DOD's decision making regarding MRE inventory levels, GAO recommends that DLA conduct analysis to obtain information on MRE industry capabilities and request information on MRE consumption and disposals is shared among DLA and the services as part of existing coordination with the services. DOD concurred with GAO's recommendations.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Logistics and Materiel Readiness To obtain information useful to DLA's decision making regarding MRE inventory levels, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness should direct the Director, DLA, to conduct an analytical study of the MRE industry's capabilities that provides information on the level of MRE purchases needed to sustain the industrial base, including the ability to respond to a surge requirement. Specifically, the analysis should assess the validity of the current annual purchase objective of 2.5 million cases.
Closed – Not Implemented
DLA had no plans for implementing this recommendation as of September 2017. In a June 2015 report to Congress, DLA stated that it had approached the MRE industry to conduct an analytical study. In subsequent follow-up documentation provided by DLA in October 2015, the agency stated that the industry was not amenable to a minimum sustaining rate study, that the study would be costly, and that demand for MREs continued to be higher than anticipated, thus negating the need for such as study. We understand that demand was projected to be higher than anticipated through fiscal year 2016. However, as discussed in our report, we continue to believe that more detailed analysis, specifically about the level of purchases needed to sustain the base and meet surge needs, would provide important information if demand patterns were to change beyond fiscal year 2016. However, DOD officials confirmed in September 2017 that industry was still not amenable to a study and there were no plans to conduct such a study.
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Logistics and Materiel Readiness To obtain information useful to DLA's decision making regarding MRE inventory levels, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics and Materiel Readiness should direct the Director, DLA, to request that the military services, as part of existing coordination efforts, share information on potential changes to MRE consumption and disposals that could affect future demand.
Closed – Implemented
DOD concurred with our recommendation and stated that the military services will share potential changes in usage of MREs in the existing quarterly reviews with DLA. In a June 2015 report to Congress, DLA stated that the agency and the services were sharing information on MRE demand and usage patterns. DOD officials stated in August 2016 that DLA requested more detailed information regarding MRE consumption and disposal data from the services for fiscal year 2016. In June 2018, DLA provided documentation that showed that information sharing on consumption and disposal data now occurs. DLA officials stated that MRE demand and usage levels have continued to be shared at monthly Joint Subsistence Policy Board meetings, and documentation provided by DLA shows that additional information on MRE consumption and disposal is also shared by the military services as part of these meetings. DLA officials stated this sharing of information is now required as part of the meeting agenda.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Johana Ayers
Managing Director
Forensic Audits and Investigative Service

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Combat readinessData collectionDecision makingDefense budgetsDefense capabilitiesDefense industryDefense procurementFood industryFood supplyInventory controlMilitary forcesMilitary inventoriesMilitary materielMilitary operationsStrategic planningSupply chain managementInformation sharing