Skip to main content

Defense Satellite Communications: DOD Needs Additional Information to Improve Procurements

GAO-15-459 Published: Jul 17, 2015. Publicly Released: Jul 17, 2015.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The Department of Defense's (DOD) procurement of commercial satellite communications (SATCOM), or bandwidth, is fragmented and inefficient. Historically, commercial SATCOM was used to augment military capability, but DOD has become increasingly reliant on commercial SATCOM to support ongoing U.S. military operations. DOD policy requires all of its components to procure commercial SATCOM through the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA), but GAO found that some components are independently procuring SATCOM to meet their individual needs. DOD's most recent SATCOM usage report estimates that over 30 percent of commercial SATCOM is bought independently by DOD components, even though DOD found the average cost of commercial SATCOM bought through DISA is about 16 percent lower than independently bought commercial SATCOM. Fragmentation limits opportunities for DOD to bundle purchases, share services, and streamline its procurement of commercial SATCOM.

DOD recently completed two studies aimed at identifying the appropriate future mix of military and commercial SATCOM and predicting future SATCOM needs, however, the reports are partially based on incomplete data. First, the 2014 Satellite Communications Strategy Report did not identify the appropriate future mix of military and commercial SATCOM; rather, it outlined a plan that, if successful, may allow DOD to do so at a later time. Second, the 2014 Mix of Media Report based its predictions of future SATCOM requirements and demand on DOD's SATCOM Database, which DOD officials acknowledge lacks comprehensive usage and demand data.

DOD is taking steps to improve its SATCOM procurement and address challenges through “pathfinder” efforts aimed at identifying short- and long-term options. For example, DOD intends to study the potential benefits of using innovative contracting approaches as it procures military and commercial SATCOM, and refine its understanding of DOD's global SATCOM requirements. However, it may be several years before DOD is able to evaluate the results of its pathfinder efforts. For example, all of the 10 pathfinders planned or already underway are expected to be completed in or beyond fiscal year 2017. DOD's efforts to improve its procurement of military and commercial SATCOM will also be hampered by two long-standing challenges—lack of knowledge of what DOD is spending on commercial SATCOM and resistance to centralized management of SATCOM procurement—both of which GAO reported on and made recommendations to improve in 2003—regarding commercial SATCOM. Specifically, GAO recommended that DOD strengthen its capacity to provide accurate and complete analyses of commercial bandwidth spending and implement a strategic management framework for improving the acquisition of commercial bandwidth. DOD generally concurred with GAO's 2003 recommendations and developed a plan to address them, but none of DOD's corrective actions was carried out as intended. These challenges are commonly faced by organizations seeking to strategically source procurements of services, but they can be overcome by employing best practices, which include conducting detailed spend analyses and centralized management of service procurements to identify procurement inefficiencies and opportunities.

Why GAO Did This Study

DOD depends on commercial SATCOM to support a variety of critical mission needs, from unmanned aerial vehicles and intelligence to voice and data for military personnel. In fiscal year 2011, the most recent information available, DOD spent over $1 billion leasing commercial SATCOM. In prior work, GAO found that some major DOD users of commercial satellite bandwidth were dissatisfied with DISA's acquisition process seeing it as too costly and lengthy. These users also indicated that the contracts used were too inflexible.

The Senate Armed Services Committee's report accompanying the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 included a provision for DOD to report on the future mix of military and commercial SATCOM and for GAO to review DOD's report, issued in August 2014. This report (1) assesses the extent to which DOD efficiently procures bandwidth, (2) analyzes the extent to which DOD has identified its future SATCOM requirements using DOD and commercial satellite services, as well as how those requirements will be met, and (3) identifies the steps DOD is taking to improve its procurements of commercial SATCOM.

To conduct this work, GAO reviewed DOD's reports, DOD SATCOM procurement guidance, prior GAO reports, and interviewed DOD officials.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that DOD (1) enforce current policy requiring DISA to acquire all commercial SATCOM; (2) conduct a spend analysis identifying procurement inefficiencies and opportunities; and (3) assess whether further centralization of commercial SATCOM procurement could be beneficial. DOD concurred.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Defense In order to improve DOD's procurement of SATCOM, to address DOD's fragmented procurement of commercial SATCOM, to better position DOD to identify needs, manage and acquire commercial SATCOM, and to address the incomplete data on commercial SATCOM spending and demand, the Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Joint Chiefs, U.S. Strategic Command, combatant commands, military services, and DISA, should enforce current policy requiring DISA to acquire all commercial SATCOM for DOD.
Closed – Implemented
DOD concurred with this recommendation. GAO analysis of data contained in the DOD Chief Information Officer's Fiscal Year 2017 Commercial Satellite Communications Expenditures and Usage report indicates a 10% drop in procurements outside DOD's policy to use a central procurement office from the previous year. This means that from fiscal year 2016 to fiscal year 2017, DOD procurement of fixed satellite services (FSS) in compliance with DOD policy increased by ten percent, from 65% to 75% of FSS procurements occurring as DOD policy prescribes. Additionally, the National Defense Authorization Act (Act) for Fiscal Year 2018 directed Air Force Space Command to assume sole procurement authority for commercial satellite communications services for DOD, in consultation with the DOD Chief Information Officer. On December 12, 2018, Air Force Space Command assumed responsibility for DOD commercial SATCOM procurement. We believe the improvement in FSS procurement from fiscal years 2016 to 2017, and the codification of a central authority to procure commercial satellite services for DOD, indicate DOD is more closely adhering to its policy that all SATCOM be procured through a central office.
Department of Defense In order to improve DOD's procurement of SATCOM, to better leverage DOD's buying power and help DOD understand its military and commercial SATCOM spending, and enable DOD to reform its commercial SATCOM acquisition and management processes, the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Air Force and DISA, should complement the pathfinder efforts by conducting a spend analysis that identifies procurement inefficiencies and opportunities to consolidate purchases. Specifically, the analysis should identify how much is being spent for which services, who the buyers are, who the suppliers are, duplicative contracts and opportunities to aggregate demand, and where the opportunities are for leveraged buying and other tactics to save money and improve performance.
Closed – Implemented
U.S. Strategic Command issued its Fiscal Year 2014 Commercial Satellite Communications Usage report in October 2016 which contains a spend analysis that identifies opportunities for consolidation and improvement of commercial satellite communications procurement. Specifically, the report identifies expenditures and usage by satellite communications services (both fixed and mobile), vendor, owner, mission, contract type and satellite operator, among others. The report recommends several areas for improved procurement, including increased use of global managed services and higher throughput satellites.
Department of Defense In order to improve DOD's procurement of SATCOM, to better leverage DOD's buying power and help DOD understand its military and commercial SATCOM spending, and enable DOD to reform its commercial SATCOM acquisition and management processes, the Secretary of Defense, in conjunction with the Air Force and DISA, should complement the pathfinder efforts by conducting an assessment of whether further centralization of military and commercial SATCOM procurement, such as the identification of a single focal point within DOD to decide how to meet the overall demand or a central procurement knowledge focal point, could further save money and improve performance.
Closed – Not Implemented
DOD concurred with our recommendation, and originally planned to include the recommended assessment as part of its Wideband Communication Services Analysis of Alternatives, which DOD completed earlier this year. However, the National Defense Authorization Act (Act) for Fiscal Year 2018 directed Air Force Space Command to assume sole procurement authority for commercial satellite communications services for DOD, in consultation with the DOD Chief Information Officer. On December 12, 2018, Air Force Space Command assumed responsibility for DOD commercial SATCOM procurement. Given this change in procurement authority, according to the study lead for the Analysis of Alternatives, DOD did not analyze the benefit of further centralization because it became a lesser priority than other analyses in the study.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Cristina T. Chaplain
Director
Contracting and National Security Acquisitions

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Topics

BandwidthBest practicesCommunication satellitesCost analysisDefense capabilitiesDefense procurementMilitary communicationMilitary forcesMilitary satellitesProcurement planningStrategic planningUnmanned aerial systems