Skip to main content

Defense Management: The Department of Defense's Fiscal Year 2012 Corrosion Prevention and Control Budget Request

GAO-11-490R Published: Apr 13, 2011. Publicly Released: Apr 13, 2011.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

In 2010, the Department of Defense (DOD) estimated that corrosion costs the DOD over $22.9 billion annually. Corrosion negatively affects all military assets, including both equipment and infrastructure, and is defined as the unintended destruction or deterioration of a material due to its interaction with the environment. Corrosion also affects military readiness, taking critical systems out of action and creating safety hazards. Congress has enacted several legislative requirements to address the high cost of corrosion on military equipment and infrastructure, including legislation that created the Office of Corrosion Policy and Oversight (Corrosion Office) within the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics. The Corrosion Office is responsible for the prevention and mitigation of corrosion of military equipment and infrastructure and, according to officials, manages funding for DOD-wide corrosion prevention and control (CPC) activities and CPC projects proposed by the Military Departments. Section 2228(e) of Title 10 of the United States Code requires DOD to annually report on CPC funding to Congress. Additionally, the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2009 required each Military Department's corrosion control and prevention executive to submit an annual report with recommendations pertaining to his or her Department's CPC program, including corrosion-related funding levels to carry out all of the duties of the executive. In fiscal year (FY) 2011, Congress expanded the requirement for DOD to report on its CPC efforts by adding to or revising existing elements. Section 2228(e), as recently amended, requires DOD to annually submit a report to Congress on corrosion funding as part of its annual budget submission. In the report, DOD is to address funding requirements for its long-term corrosion reduction strategy, the return on investment (ROI) that would be achieved by implementing the strategy, the current and previous fiscal year funds requested in the budget compared to funding requirements, an explanation if funding requirements are not fully funded in the budget, and the current and previous fiscal year amount of funds requested in the budget for each project or activity described in its long-term strategy compared to the funding requirements for the project or activity. This letter provides our mandated analysis of DOD's CPC budget request and the Corrosion Office's accompanying report for FY 2012. Accordingly, our objectives were to: (1) determine the extent to which DOD's corrosion report addressed the mandated requirements, (2) assess the extent to which the CPC budget request met total estimated CPC funding requirements for activities and preliminary project proposals as stated in the FY 2012 DOD corrosion report, and (3) calculate the potential cost avoidance for DOD's CPC budget request and reported budget shortfall identified in the FY 2012 DOD corrosion report.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Defense To help ensure that the Corrosion Office and Military Department annual reports provide information on all of the mandated elements, and, specifically, to ensure that Congress has all of the information it needs to exercise its oversight responsibilities, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics to include all required elements in DOD's future corrosion reports.
Closed – Not Implemented
DOD did not include all of the required elements in its Fiscal Year 2014, Fiscal Year 2015, or Fiscal Year 2016 corrosion budget reports. Although DOD concurred with this recommendation and as of March 2019, the DOD's/theCorrosion Office's annual corrosion budget reports to Congress from fiscal years 2012 through 2020 have not included, for the current and previous fiscal year, the amount of funds requested in the budget compared to the funding requirements for each project or activity supporting the long-term corrosion strategy. According to Corrosion Office officials, the aggregate budget request and actual budgeted amounts address this required reporting element. Further, the Corrosion Office officials stated that the budget request reflects the minimum amount of funding necessary to meet the Office's requirements. If additional funds are made available, increased investments to increase readiness and reduce costs related to corrosion can be made.
Department of Defense To help ensure that the Corrosion Office and Military Department annual reports provide information on all of the mandated elements, and, specifically, to ensure that Congress has all of the information it needs to exercise its oversight responsibilities, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of each Military Department to provide the required information on funding levels necessary to carry out all duties of the corrosion control and prevention executive. As the Military Departments develop the elements needed to provide the full funding levels, they should include the information on these elements in their annual reports.
Closed – Implemented
In their respective corrosion reports for fiscal year 2013, the Army, Air Force, and Navy each identified funding requests to carry out the duties of the Corrosion Control and Prevention Executive established in Public Law 110-417, section 903. Each report provided some breakdown of the elements and activities that the funding will go to support. In its Annual Report on Corrosion for Fiscal Year 2013, the Navy identified a request of $1.132 million to carry out the duties of the Corrosion Control and Prevention Executive per P.L. 110-417, section 903. The Air Force, in its Annual Corrosion Prevention and Control Report for Fiscal Year 2013, identified the cost of carrying out the duties of the Corrosion Control and Prevention Executive as laid out in P.L. 110-417, section 903, as $1.31 million. It also identified the need for an additional $1.5 million to fund Air Force technology demonstration projects. The Army, in its Fiscal Year 2013 Annual Report on Corrosion Prevention and Control, identified the cost of resourcing the Corrosion Control and Prevention Executive office, per P.L. 110-417, as well as funding the Army Corrosion Integrated Product Team, as $2.096 million. Each of the reports cited the law and the CCPE duties as the basis for the funding, and identified some breakdown of the elements that the funding will go to support.

Full Report

Topics

Budget obligationsBudget outlaysCorrosionCost analysisDefense budgetsDefense economic analysisEquipment maintenanceInvestment planningInvestmentsReporting requirementsBudget requestsCost estimates