Skip to main content

B-161091, APR. 24, 1967

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

M.D.: FURTHER REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF MARCH 7. YOU WERE REASSIGNED FROM HEADQUARTERS 98TH GENERAL HOSPITAL. YOU SAY THAT WHILE YOUR FAMILY SITUATION (THE PREGNANCY OF YOUR WIFE) WAS THE PRIMARY REASON YOUR DEPENDENTS TRAVELED IN JUNE RATHER THAN AUGUST. YOU WERE VERBALLY ADVISED IN MAY 1966 THAT TRAVEL ORDERS WOULD BE CUT IN JULY. THAT IN THE ABSENCE OF SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS AND THE FACT THAT THE THEN COMMANDING OFFICER AND PERSONNEL OFFICER ARE NO LONGER ASSIGNED TO THAT HOSPITAL. IT CAN BE ASSUMED THAT YOU WERE VERBALLY INFORMED OF YOUR ROTATION DATE PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF WRITTEN ORDERS. HE ALSO SAYS THAT YOUR ORDERS DID NOT PROVIDE FOR TRAVEL OF DEPENDENTS FOR THE REASON THAT YOUR DEPENDENTS WERE NOT COMMAND SPONSORED.

View Decision

GAO Contacts

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries