Skip to main content

B-124759, OCTOBER 4, 1955, 35 COMP. GEN. 187

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

1955: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTER OF JULY 19. IT IS STATED THAT. YOUR DEPARTMENT RECEIVES CLAIMS FOR PAYMENT OF INDEMNITY FOR LOSS OR DESTRUCTION OF INSURED MATTER WHERE THE FEE PAID WOULD HAVE BEEN SUFFICIENT TO OBTAIN THE AMOUNT OF INSURANCE COVERAGE DESIRED BY THE SHIPPER HAD THE PREVIOUS FEE SCHEDULE REMAINED IN EFFECT. THERE IS CLEAR AND CONVINCING EVIDENCE SHOWING THE INTENT OF THE SHIPPER TO PURCHASE A CERTAIN STATED AMOUNT OF INSURANCE. LIKEWISE THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT SUCH INTENT WAS FRUSTRATED BY THE ERROR OF A POSTAL EMPLOYEE IN COLLECTING A FEE LESS THAN THE FEE REQUIRED BY THE REVISED SCHEDULE FOR THE AMOUNT OF INSURANCE SOUGHT BY THE SHIPPER. IT IS EXPLAINED THAT THE POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT FEELS THAT IN SUCH CASES THE PAYMENT TO THE INSURED OF A LESSER INDEMNITY THAN THAT WHICH THE INSURED SOUGHT WORKS AN INJUSTICE AND HARDSHIP UPON THE INSURED.

View Decision

GAO Contacts

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries