Skip to main content

B-114827, MAY 20, 1966, 45 COMP. GEN. 713

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

WHICH ARE SET FORTH BELOW. ARE EXPENSES (NOT TO EXCEED $500. THE BOARD BELIEVES THAT THIS IS A PERTINENT FACTOR FOR CONSIDERATION IN THE INTERPRETATION OF THE STUDY PROVISION. IF OUR ANSWER TO THE ABOVE QUESTION IS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. IS APPLICABLE WITH RESPECT TO THIS STUDY PROVISION. IF WE CONCLUDE THAT THIS DOLLAR LIMITATION IS APPLICABLE TO THE STUDY PROVISION. YOU ASK WHETHER IT IS APPLICABLE TO OBLIGATIONS INCURRED AFTER (AS WELL AS BEFORE) THE CLOSE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 1966. YOU STATE THAT UNLESS WE ADVISE THAT THE STUDY PROVISION IS AVAILABLE FOR OBLIGATION AFTER THE CLOSE OF THE FISCAL YEAR 1966. 000 LIMITATION AFORESAID IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SAID PROVISION OR THAT IT IS AVAILABLE FOR ALL OBLIGATIONS INCURRED UNDER THE STUDY PROVISION.

 

View Decision

GAO Contacts

Shirley A. Jones
Managing Associate General Counsel
Office of the General Counsel

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries