Skip to main content

Medigap Loss Ratios, First 2 Years

HEHS-94-131R Published: Apr 04, 1994. Publicly Released: Apr 04, 1994.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO reviewed Medigap policies' loss ratios, focusing on the: (1) appropriate loss ratio percentages if the refund and credit provision is extended for the first 2 years a policy is in effect; and (2) National Association of Insurance Commissioners' (NAIC) methodology for calculating refunds or credits. GAO noted that: (1) NAIC uses a cumulative loss ratio methodology for determining refunds and credits which makes use of loss data from a policy's first 2 years' experience, but does not provide for credits or refunds during that time; (2) the NAIC methodology is designed to ensure a specified cumulative loss ratio for individual policies over a 15-year period; (3) the NAIC methodology is compatible with premium pricing methods to meet required loss ratios either on a year-to-year basis or over the life of the policy; (4) under the NAIC methodology, a policy's failure to meet the standard loss ratio for a particular year may not trigger a refund or credit; (5) an alternative methodology would base credits and refunds after the first 2 years on the actual loss ratio for each year, which would ensure refunds or credits each year a policy fails to meet the standard, but it could lead to more volatility in premiums; (6) if the refund or credit provision is extended to a policy's first 2 years, refunds or credits for those years would be based on lower loss ratios; and (7) the extension is not necessary, since safeguards in the law and market forces tend to eliminate nonconforming policies.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Credit insuranceElderly personsHealth insuranceHealth insurance cost controlInsurance companiesInsurance premiumsInsurance regulationLoss ratioStatistical methodsStatutory lawMedicare