Skip to main content

Military Personnel: Collecting Additional Data Could Enhance Pilot Retention Efforts

GAO-18-439 Published: Jun 21, 2018. Publicly Released: Jun 21, 2018.
Jump To:

Fast Facts

Military pilots perform an array of national security operations, such as combat missions and reconnaissance. Consequently, retaining qualified pilots is important—both to fulfill missions and to recoup the substantial investments of time and money needed to train military pilots.

We found that the Air Force, the Navy, and the Marine Corps all had staffing gaps for certain types of pilots during FYs 2013-2017. And these services also lacked information about post-service employment for pilots, such as the number that left the military for commercial airlines. We recommended collecting this data to improve efforts to retain military pilots.

Pilot Loss Rates for Reasons Such as Retirement and Separation, FYs 2013-2017

Bar graph showing pilot loss rates for Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps.

Bar graph showing pilot loss rates for Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps.

Skip to Highlights

Highlights

What GAO Found

The Air Force, the Navy, and the Marine Corps had staffing gaps in some, but not all, fixed-wing pilot communities (or types of pilots) for operational positions from fiscal years 2013 through 2017. Gaps exist when actual staffing levels do not meet service-authorized staffing levels. GAO found that operational position staffing gaps decreased or generally remained the same over this time period, except for in the fighter pilot community. For fighter pilots, the gap increased across all three services over the past 2 to 5 fiscal years (see figure). In April 2018, GAO recommended that all three services reevaluate fighter pilot squadron requirements. The services agreed with these recommendations.

Fighter Pilot Operational Position Staffing Gaps by Percentage from Fiscal Years 2013-2017

 

The three services monitor pilot retention through loss rates, but insufficient data limit a full understanding of the extent to which airline market conditions have influenced military pilot retention. The Department of Defense (DOD) has noted projected increases in airline hiring when justifying increases to aviation retention bonuses. However, DOD does not have data on the number of pilots leaving the military to accept jobs as airline pilots because, according to service officials, the services do not have mechanisms to capture these data. While studies have identified a correlation between airline hiring and military pilot retention, a study conducted on the Air Force’s behalf identified the absence of these data as a limitation. Without developing and implementing mechanisms to capture data about pilots’ post-service employment, including at commercial airlines, DOD lacks key information to support decisions regarding retention incentives.

All three services have developed retention incentives, but the Air Force’s annual business case for aviation retention bonuses—prepared in accordance with a statutory requirement—does not differentiate staffing gaps by officer grade to ensure bonuses are appropriately targeted. To help determine bonus amounts, the Air Force uses a model to weigh various factors, including staffing levels for each pilot community. However, according to an Air Force official, the model only considers overall staffing levels and does not differentiate between senior officer staffing gaps—indicating retention challenges—and junior officer gaps, indicating other challenges. Without analyzing staffing levels by officer grade as part of its annual business case, the Air Force may not know whether it is targeting its bonuses—in the right amounts—to the appropriate pilot communities.

Why GAO Did This Study

Military pilots perform an array of operations, from combat to reconnaissance, that are critical to DOD successfully executing its national security mission. Retaining qualified pilots is important to ensure that requirements can be met, and to recoup the substantial investments—of both time and money—that the services make in training their pilots.

Public Law 115-91 (2017) included a provision for GAO to review the extent to which there is a national pilot shortage and its effects. Among other things, this report assesses for the Air Force, the Navy, and the Marine Corps (1) the extent to which the services had fixed-wing pilot staffing gaps from fiscal years 2013-2017; (2) how the services monitor pilot retention, and the extent to which airline market conditions have influenced retention; and (3) the incentives the services have developed to retain pilots, and the extent to which the Air Force’s annual business case includes information to justify retention bonuses. GAO compared service-authorized pilot staffing levels to actual staffing levels, analyzed economic indicators, conducted a literature review, and interviewed airline association, DOD, and service officials.

Recommendations

GAO recommends that the Air Force, the Navy, and the Marine Corps develop and implement mechanisms to capture information about pilots’ post-service employment; and that the Air Force analyze staffing levels by officer grade as part of its annual business case for aviation retention bonuses. DOD concurred with the recommendations, but noted concerns, which GAO addressed in the report.

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Defense The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Secretary of the Air Force develops and implements mechanisms to consistently capture information on pilots' post-service employment, including the number of those going to the commercial airlines, such as through revising existing exit surveys, or working in coordination with the National Pilot Sourcing Forum specifically to monitor commercial airline hiring to supplement the information DOD collects. (Recommendation 1)
Closed – Implemented
DOD concurred with this recommendation. In fiscal year 2020, the Air Force modified its exit survey to include additional questions on the degree to which pilots are seeking or plan to seek employment in the civilian aviation industry in either pilot or non-pilot positions. In addition, according to DOD officials, the Air Force uses a number of other sources to inform its staffing outlook, such as the airlines, online forums, and Federal Aviation Administration data to assess current and predicted civilian airline hiring. These actions meet the intent of our recommendation.
Department of Defense The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Secretary of the Navy develops and implements mechanisms to consistently capture information on pilots' post-service employment, including the number of those going to the commercial airlines, such as through revising existing exit surveys, or working in coordination with the National Pilot Sourcing Forum specifically to monitor commercial airline hiring to supplement the information DOD collects. (Recommendation 2)
Closed – Implemented
DOD concurred with this recommendation. In fiscal year 2020, the Navy modified its Aviation Department Head Screen Board "Decliner" survey to better capture post-service employment intentions. Specifically, the survey now asks aviators to select between five options following separation from the Navy, including the airlines. The survey also asks whether the increased airline hiring rate and airline job opportunities influenced an aviator's decision. According to DOD officials, the Navy is using this survey data in conjunction with open source airline hiring data to monitor and track pilot retention trends across all type, model, and series platforms. These actions meet the intent of our recommendation.
Department of Defense The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Commandant of the Marine Corps develops and implements mechanisms to consistently capture information on pilots' post-service employment, including the number of those going to the commercial airlines, such as through revising existing exit surveys, or working in coordination with the National Pilot Sourcing Forum specifically to monitor commercial airline hiring to supplement the information DOD collects. (Recommendation 3)
Closed – Implemented
DOD concurred with this recommendation. In fiscal year 2022, the Marine Corps provided a copy of its exit and milestone longitudinal survey, which a DOD official stated is sent to all Marines at specific times throughout their careers. The survey asks a number of questions regarding why Marines choose to stay or separate from the Marine Corps. There is also a comment box for Marines to communicate their post-service career plans. According to a DOD official, the Marine Corps can separate out responses by occupation and specifically review aviator responses. This official further stated that the Marine Corps has done this and compared the responses to non-aviators for aviator talent management initiatives. As of January 2022, these actions meet the intent of our recommendation.
Department of Defense The Secretary of Defense should ensure that the Secretary of the Air Force analyzes staffing levels by officer grade for each pilot community as part of its annual business case for aviation retention bonus payments to help ensure that aviation retention bonuses are targeted to the appropriate pilot communities. (Recommendation 4)
Closed – Implemented
DOD concurred with this recommendation. As part of its business case for aviation retention bonuses for fiscal years 2024 and 2025, the Air Force incorporated a Rated Career Field Health Chart. The chart includes an analysis of staffing levels for both junior and senior officers, including authorizations, sustainment, and core inventory. The business case notes that the Air Force continues to evaluate the balance and retention of aviators in both the junior and senior officer grades. This action meets the intent of the recommendation.

Full Report

GAO Contacts

Topics

Aircraft pilotsAirlinesData collectionEmployee retentionHuman capital managementMilitary aviationMilitary forcesMilitary personnelMilitary personnel retentionMilitary pilotsNaval aviationRetention bonusesRetention incentivesRetention strategiesStaffing levels