Responding to Infectious Diseases
Excerpted from GAO-12-55
Lessons from an Outbreak: 2009 H1N1 Flu Pandemic The 2009 H1N1 influenza pandemic was the first human pandemic in over 4 decades with as many as 89 million U.S. cases. Over $6 billion was made available for the response, most of which was spent on vaccines, and grants to states and selected local jurisdictions. The remaining $1.98 billion was meant for longer-term pandemic preparation efforts, such as speeding up vaccine development. We identified several lessons from the government's response to the H1N1 pandemic:- prior pandemic planning efforts and federal funding paid off. For example, funding before the pandemic prepared vaccine manufacturers to produce more vaccines when they were needed.
- when fewer vaccines were available than expected, federal, state, and local government’s credibility was diminished.
- using a central distributor to get vaccines to state and local health providers and organizations was generally cited as an effective practice.
- CDC's communication efforts were successful; however, they fell short in meeting the needs of some non-English-speaking populations.
- deployment of the Strategic National Stockpile—a supply of medicines and medical supplies for a national emergency—met its goals; however, there were gaps in planning, including the need for long-term storage plans for stockpiled materials.
- timely detection and situational awareness is essential to confronting biological threats;
- multiple federal agencies have responsibility for different aspects of biosurveillance;
- federal efforts generally rely on resources that are owned by nonfederal entities—such as those in the state, local, tribal, and private sectors; and
- the systems and programs that make up the national biosurveillance capability were largely developed separately and are relatively uncoordinated.
- disposable equipment, such as disposable plastic bag systems for growing cell cultures instead of stainless steel tanks that require more time to clean and sterilize before re-use;
- modular sterile rooms, which allow manufacturing of multiple products simultaneously in a single facility; and
- cell-based or recombinant technologies to make vaccines, rather than the traditional egg-based technology.
- Questions about the content of this post? Contact Chris Mihm at mihmj@gao.gov, Chris Currie at curriec@gao.gov, or Marcia Crosse at crossem@gao.gov.
- Comments on the GAO WatchBlog? Contact blog@gao.gov.
GAO's mission is to provide Congress with fact-based, nonpartisan information that can help improve federal government performance and ensure accountability for the benefit of the American people. GAO launched its WatchBlog in January, 2014, as part of its continuing effort to reach its audiences—Congress and the American people—where they are currently looking for information.
The blog format allows GAO to provide a little more context about its work than it can offer on its other social media platforms. Posts will tie GAO work to current events and the news; show how GAO’s work is affecting agencies or legislation; highlight reports, testimonies, and issue areas where GAO does work; and provide information about GAO itself, among other things.
Please send any feedback on GAO's WatchBlog to blog@gao.gov.