This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-11-151 
entitled 'Financial Audit: Federal Housing Finance Agency's Fiscal 
Years 2010 and 2009 Financial Statements' which was released on 
November 15, 2010. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as 
part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. 
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data 
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, 
such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes 
placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, 
are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format 
of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an 
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your 
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or 
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
GAO: 

Report to Congressional Committees: 

November 2010: 

Financial Audit: 

Federal Housing Finance Agency's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2009 Financial 
Statements: 

GAO-11-151: 

GAO Highlights: 

Highlights of GAO-11-151, a report to congressional committees. 

Why GAO Did This Study: 

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) created the 
Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) and gave it responsibility for, 
among other things, the supervision and oversight of the housing-
related government-sponsored enterprises (GSE): Fannie Mae, Freddie 
Mac, and the 12 federal home loan banks. Specifically, FHFA was 
assigned responsibility for ensuring that each of the regulated 
entities operates in a fiscally safe and sound manner, including 
maintenance of adequate capital and internal controls, and carries out 
its housing and community development finance mission. HERA also 
requires FHFA to annually prepare financial statements, and further 
requires GAO to audit these statements. 

Pursuant to HERA’s requirement, GAO audited FHFA’s fiscal years 2010 
and 2009 financial statements to determine whether (1) the financial 
statements were fairly stated, and (2) FHFA management maintained 
effective internal control over financial reporting. GAO also tested 
FHFA’s compliance with selected laws and regulations. 

GAO is not making any recommendations in this report. In commenting on 
a draft of this report, FHFA stated that it was pleased with the 
results of the audit, and it would continue to work to enhance its 
internal controls and ensure the reliability of its financial 
reporting, its operational soundness, and public confidence in its 
mission. 

What GAO Found: 

In GAO’s opinion, FHFA’s fiscal years 2010 and 2009 financial 
statements are fairly presented in all material respects. GAO also 
concluded that FHFA had effective internal control over financial 
reporting as of September 30, 2010. GAO found no reportable instances 
of noncompliance with the laws and regulations it tested.
Because fiscal year 2009 was the first full year of FHFA’s operations, 
fiscal year 2010 is the first year in which FHFA prepared comparative 
financial statements. As discussed in note 10, the fiscal year 2009 
statement of net cost presents costs as one program for fiscal year 
2009. For fiscal year 2010, FHFA tracked resource allocations and 
costs by strategic goal (responsibility segments), consistent with the 
strategic goals identified in its new strategic plan. Consequently, 
the fiscal year 2010 statement of net cost presents FHFA’s costs by 
strategic goal. 

In early September 2008, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed into 
conservatorship by the Director of FHFA, with the stated intent to 
stabilize these entities. The assets, liabilities, and activities of 
the two entities, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are not reflected in FHFA’
s fiscal years 2010 and 2009 financial statements, based on 
determinations by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the 
Department of the Treasury (Treasury) that they do not meet the 
criteria for inclusion in the financial statements of the U.S. 
government or the Treasury under federal accounting concepts. 
Specifically, OMB and Treasury concluded this because the entities are 
not currently reflected in the federal government’s budget and because 
the conservatorship arrangement is considered to be temporary. FHFA 
management concurred with this conclusion. Should circumstances 
change, this conclusion would need to be revisited. 

As of September 30, 2010, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have received 
about $148.2 billion in direct financial support from Treasury in 
exchange for Treasury’s purchase of the entities’ senior preferred 
stock. Over the longer term, Congress and the executive branch face 
difficult decisions on how to restructure the entities and promote 
housing opportunities while limiting the risks to taxpayers and the 
financial markets. 

GAO noted other less significant matters involving FHFA’s internal 
controls and will be reporting separately to FHFA management on these 
matters. 

View [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-151] or key 
components. For more information, contact Steven J. Sebastian at (202) 
512-3406 or sebastians@gao.gov. 

[End of section] 

Contents: 

Letter: 

Auditor's Report: 

Opinion on Financial Statements: 

Opinion on Internal Control: 

Compliance with Laws and Regulations: 

Consistency of Other Information: 

Objectives, Scope, and Methodology: 

Agency Comments and Our Evaluation: 

Management's Discussion and Analysis: 

Financial Statements: 

Appendixes: 

Appendix I: Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial 
Reporting: 

Appendix II: Comments from the Federal Housing Finance Agency: 

Abbreviations: 

FHFA: Federal Housing Finance Agency: 

FHFB: Federal Housing Finance Board: 

FMFIA: Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act of 1982: 

HERA: Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008: 

HUD: Department of Housing and Urban Development: 

OFHEO: Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight: 

OMB: Office of Management and Budget: 

[End of section] 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

November 15, 2010: 

The Honorable Christopher J. Dodd: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Richard C. Shelby: 
Ranking Member: 
Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs: 
United States Senate: 

The Honorable Barney Frank: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Spencer Bachus: 
Ranking Member: 
Committee on Financial Services: 
House of Representatives: 

This report presents the results of our audits of the financial 
statements of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as of, and for 
the fiscal years ending, September 30, 2010 and 2009. These financial 
statements are the responsibility of FHFA. This report contains our 
(1) unqualified opinions on FHFA's financial statements, (2) opinion 
that FHFA's internal control over financial reporting was effective as 
of September 30, 2010, and (3) conclusion that our tests of FHFA's 
compliance with selected laws and regulations disclosed no instances 
of reportable noncompliance during fiscal year 2010. 

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA)[Footnote 1] 
established FHFA as an independent agency empowered with supervisory 
and regulatory oversight of the housing-related, government-sponsored 
enterprises (GSE): Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the 12 Federal Home 
Loan Banks. The act requires FHFA to annually prepare and submit 
financial statements to the Director of the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB), and requires GAO to audit the agency's financial 
statements. We conducted this audit in accordance with U.S. generally 
accepted government auditing standards. 

FHFA continues to be challenged with carrying out its responsibilities 
as conservator of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to ensure that these 
entities continue to meet their mission requirements of providing 
liquidity and stability to the secondary market for residential 
mortgages and serving the needs of certain targeted groups. FHFA 
placed both entities into conservatorship in September 2008 in the 
wake of their deteriorating financial conditions with the objective of 
stabilizing them. These stabilization efforts included direct 
financial support from the U.S. Department of the Treasury (Treasury) 
to each entity of up to the greater of (1) $200 billion; or (2) $200 
billion plus the cumulative net worth deficits experienced during 
2010, 2011, and 2012 less any amount by which the assets of each 
entity exceed its liabilities on December 31, 2012 in exchange for 
Treasury's purchase of the entities' senior preferred stock. As of 
September 30, 2010, the entities have received about $148.2 billion 
through such purchases. FHFA, OMB, and Treasury maintain that the 
conservatorship arrangement is not intended to be permanent. Over the 
longer term, particularly with continuing uncertainty about future 
economic conditions, Congress and the executive branch will face 
difficult decisions on how to restructure Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 
and promote housing opportunities while limiting the risks to 
taxpayers and ensuring the stability of the financial markets. It will 
be necessary for Congress to reevaluate the roles, structures, and 
performance of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and to consider options to 
facilitate mortgage finance while mitigating safety and soundness and 
systemic risk concerns. 

We are sending copies of this report to the Chairman of the Federal 
Housing Finance Oversight Board; the Secretary of the Treasury; the 
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development; the Chairperson of the 
Securities and Exchange Commission; the Director of the Office of 
Management and Budget; and other interested parties. In addition, this 
report will be available at no charge on GAO's Web site at [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov]. 

If you have any questions concerning this report, please contact me at 
(202) 512-3406 or sebastians@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices 
of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last 
page of this report. 

Signed by: 

Steven J. Sebastian: 
Director Financial Management and Assurance: 

[End of section] 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

To the Acting Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency: 

In accordance with the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 
(HERA), we are responsible for conducting audits of the financial 
statements of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). In our audits 
of FHFA's fiscal years 2010 and 2009 financial statements, we found: 

* the financial statements are presented fairly, in all material 
respects, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting 
principles, 

* FHFA maintained, in all material respects, effective internal 
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, and: 

* no reportable noncompliance with laws and regulations we tested. 

The following sections discuss in more detail (1) these conclusions; 
(2) our conclusions on FHFA's Management's Discussion and Analysis; 
(3) our audit objectives, scope, and methodology; and (4) agency 
comments and our evaluation. 

Opinion on Financial Statements: 

FHFA's financial statements, including the accompanying notes, present 
fairly, in all material respects, in conformity with U.S. generally 
accepted accounting principles, its assets, liabilities, and net 
position as of September 30, 2010 and 2009; and its net costs, changes 
in net position, and budgetary resources for the fiscal years then 
ended. 

Because fiscal year 2009 was the first full year of FHFA's operations, 
fiscal year 2010 is the first year in which FHFA prepared comparative 
financial statements. As discussed in note 10, the statement of net 
cost presents costs as one program for fiscal year 2009. For fiscal 
year 2010, consistent with its new strategic plan, FHFA tracked and 
reported resource allocations and costs by strategic goal 
(responsibility segment). Consequently, the fiscal year 2010 statement 
of net cost presents FHFA's costs by strategic goal. 

As discussed in note 1A of the financial statements, FHFA's fiscal 
years 2010 and 2009 financial statements do not include the assets, 
liabilities, and activities associated with Fannie Mae and Freddie 
Mac. In early September 2008, less than 2 months after FHFA's 
establishment, the then-Director of FHFA placed Fannie Mae and Freddie 
Mac into conservatorship under the authority of the Federal Housing 
Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended by 
HERA. FHFA's goal in placing the two entities into conservatorship was 
to stabilize them with the objective of maintaining normal business 
operations and restoring safety and soundness. As of September 30, 
2010, about $148.2 billion in direct financial support from Treasury 
has been provided to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Shortly after Fannie 
Mae and Freddie Mac were placed in conservatorship, OMB and Treasury 
determined that the assets, liabilities, and activities of these 
entities would not be included in the financial statements of the 
federal government or those of the Treasury, although Treasury records 
an asset for its investment in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and a 
liability for future payments to the two entities in its financial 
statements. In making this determination, OMB and Treasury reviewed 
the criteria contained in Statement of Federal Financial Accounting 
Concepts No. 2, Entity and Display. They concluded that because the 
entities were not listed in the section of the federal government's 
budget, entitled "Federal Programs by Agency and Account," and because 
the nature of the conservatorships and the federal government's 
ownership and control of the entities were considered to be temporary, 
the entities did not meet the conclusive or indicative criteria in 
Concept Statement No. 2 for consolidation. OMB and Treasury reaffirmed 
this conclusion with respect to both fiscal years 2009 and 2010. FHFA 
management concurred with this conclusion. Consequently, FHFA did not 
consolidate Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into its fiscal years 2010 and 
2009 financial statements. Should circumstances change, such as the 
inclusion of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the federal budget or a 
determination that the current degree of federal control and ownership 
of the entities is other than temporary, this decision would need to 
be revisited. 

Opinion on Internal Control: 

FHFA maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control 
over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, which provided 
reasonable assurance that misstatements, losses, or noncompliance 
material in relation to the financial statements would be prevented or 
detected and corrected on a timely basis. Our opinion is based on 
criteria established under 31 U.S.C. § 3512 (c), (d), commonly known 
as the Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act of 1982 (FMFIA). 

During our audit of FHFA's fiscal year 2009 financial statements, we 
identified certain deficiencies in FHFA's system of internal control 
that we did not consider to be material weaknesses or significant 
deficiencies.[Footnote 2] These deficiencies involved matters related 
to certain accounting and monitoring procedures, access controls, and 
information security management. FHFA has made progress in addressing 
these deficiencies during fiscal year 2010. However, not all actions 
were completed as of the completion of our fiscal year 2010 audit. 
During our fiscal year 2010 audit, we also identified additional 
deficiencies in accounting procedures. We do not consider the 
deficiencies found during our fiscal year 2009 and 2010 audits, 
individually or in the aggregate, to be material weaknesses or 
significant deficiencies. We have communicated these matters to 
management and, where appropriate, will report on them separately. 

Compliance with Laws and Regulations: 

Our tests of FHFA's compliance with selected provisions of laws and 
regulations for fiscal year 2010 disclosed no instances of 
noncompliance that would be reportable under U.S. generally accepted 
government auditing standards. The objective of our audit was not to 
provide an opinion on overall compliance with laws and regulations. 
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. 

Consistency of Other Information: 

FHFA's Management's Discussion and Analysis and other accompanying 
information contain a wide range of information, some of which is not 
directly related to the financial statements. We did not audit and we 
do not express an opinion on this information. However, we compared 
this information for consistency with the financial statements and 
discussed the methods of measurement and presentation with FHFA 
officials. On the basis of this limited work, we found no material 
inconsistencies with the financial statements, with U.S. generally 
accepted accounting principles, or with OMB Circular No. A-136, 
Financial Reporting Requirements. 

Objectives, Scope, and Methodology: 

FHFA management is responsible for (1) preparing the financial 
statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting 
principles, (2) establishing and maintaining effective internal 
control over financial reporting and evaluating its effectiveness, and 
(3) complying with applicable laws and regulations. FHFA management 
evaluated the effectiveness of FHFA's internal control over financial 
reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on the criteria established 
under FMFIA. FHFA management's assertion based on its evaluation is 
included in appendix I. 

We are responsible for planning and performing the audit to obtain 
reasonable assurance and provide our opinion about whether (1) FHFA's 
financial statements are presented fairly, in all material respects, 
in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and 
(2) FHFA management maintained, in all material respects, effective 
internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010. We 
are also responsible for (1) testing compliance with selected 
provisions of laws and regulations that have a direct and material 
effect on the financial statements, and (2) performing limited 
procedures with respect to certain other information accompanying the 
financial statements. 

In order to fulfill these responsibilities, we: 

* examined, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and 
disclosures in the financial statements; 

* assessed the accounting principles used and significant estimates 
made by management; 

* evaluated the overall presentation of the financial statements; 

* obtained an understanding of the entity and its operations, 
including its internal control over financial reporting; 

* considered FHFA's process for evaluating and reporting on internal 
control over financial reporting that FHFA is required to perform by 
FMFIA; 

* assessed the risk that a material misstatement exists in the 
financial statements and the risk that a material weakness exists in 
internal control over financial reporting; 

* evaluated the design and operating effectiveness of internal control 
over financial reporting based on the assessed risk; 

* tested relevant internal control over financial reporting; 

* tested compliance with selected provisions of the following laws and 
their related regulations: 31 U.S.C. § 3902 (a), (b), (f)--Interest 
penalties under the Prompt Payment Act; 31 U.S.C. § 3904--Limitations 
on Discount Payments Under the Prompt Payment Act; 12 U.S.C. § 4515-- 
Personnel; Federal Employees' Retirement System Act of 1986, as 
amended; Social Security Act of 1935, as amended; Federal Employees 
Health Benefits Act of 1959, as amended; 12 U.S.C. § 4516 (g) (4), 
which makes applicable 31 U.S.C. § 3512 (c), Federal Managers' 
Financial Integrity Act of 1982; and Federal Housing Enterprises 
Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended by the Housing 
and Economic Recovery Act of 2008; and: 

* performed such other procedures as we considered necessary in the 
circumstances. 

An entity's internal control over financial reporting is a process 
affected by those charged with governance, management, and other 
personnel, the objectives of which are to provide reasonable assurance 
that (1) transactions are properly recorded, processed, and summarized 
to permit the preparation of financial statements in conformity with 
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and assets are 
safeguarded against loss from unauthorized acquisition, use, or 
disposition; and (2) transactions are executed in accordance with the 
laws governing the use of budget authority and other laws and 
regulations that could have a direct and material effect on the 
financial statements. 

We did not evaluate all internal controls relevant to operating 
objectives as broadly established under FMFIA, such as those controls 
relevant to preparing statistical reports and ensuring efficient 
operations. We limited our internal control testing to testing 
controls over financial reporting. Our internal control testing was 
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of 
internal control over financial reporting and may not be sufficient 
for other purposes. Consequently, our audit may not identify all 
deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that are 
less severe than a material weakness. Because of inherent limitations, 
internal control may not prevent or detect and correct misstatements 
due to error or fraud, losses, or noncompliance. We also caution that 
projecting any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods is 
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of 
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the 
policies or procedures may deteriorate. 

We did not test compliance with all laws and regulations applicable to 
FHFA. We limited our tests of compliance to selected provisions of 
laws and regulations that have a direct and material effect on the 
financial statements for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010. We 
caution that noncompliance may occur and not be detected by these 
tests and that such testing may not be sufficient for other purposes. 

We performed our audit in accordance with U.S. generally accepted 
government auditing standards. We believe our audit provides a 
reasonable basis for our opinions and other conclusions. 

Agency Comments and Our Evaluation: 

In commenting on a draft of this report, FHFA stated that it was 
pleased that the audit found that its fiscal year 2010 and 2009 
financial statements were presented fairly, that it maintained 
effective internal control over financial reporting, and that there 
had been no instances of reportable noncompliance with laws and 
regulations we tested. FHFA noted that it would continue to work to 
enhance its internal controls and ensure the reliability of its 
financial reporting, its soundness of operations, and public 
confidence in its mission. 

The complete text of FHFA's response is reprinted in appendix II. 

Signed by: 

Steven J. Sebastian: 
Director Financial Management and Assurance: 

November 9, 2010: 

[End of section] 

Management's Discussion and Analysis: 

Managing Through the Housing Crisis, Preparing for the Future: 

FHFA'S Mission:	
Provide effective supervision, regulation, and housing mission 
oversight of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Federal Home Loan Banks 
to promote their safety and soundness, support housing finance and 
affordable housing, and support a stable and liquid mortgage market.
	
FHFA's Values: 

* Accountability: 
We foster responsibility on the part of individual employees and 
divisions through defined delegations of authority. We align our 
actions and resources with our mission and respond promptly and 
proactively to emerging risks. We adhere to a predictable, risk-based 
supervision program. We use agency resources and authorities 
efficiently and effectively to achieve our mission and goals. 

* Responsiveness: 
We cooperate, collaborate, and communicate within FHFA, with other 
government agencies, Congress, and the public. We respond promptly to 
external requests and regularly disseminate information about the 
housing industry and markets. We promptly address and clearly 
communicate issues, decisions, and conclusions to the regulated 
entities. 

* Independence: 
We are the independent regulator of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the 
Federal Home Loan Banks. Our evaluations of the regulated entities are 
unbiased and remain free from external influence. 

* Integrity: 
We adhere to the highest ethical and professional standards. We treat 
the regulated entities, the public, policy makers and other 
stakeholders fairly with impartiality and respect. We apply consistent 
treatment to and among the housing regulated entities and base our 
decisions on the merits of their current actions and conditions. 

* Professionalism: 
We maintain a highly skilled, dedicated, and diverse workforce. We 
promote equal opportunity and advancement on the basis of merit. We 
recognize employees who demonstrate competence and effectiveness in 
their decisions and actions and whose results serve the agency's 
mission and the public interest. We judge the regulated entities against
defined industry standards through a disciplined examination approach. 

Description of FHFA: 

The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA) established FHFA 
by merging the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, the 
Federal Housing Finance Board, and certain Department of Housing and 
Urban Development's (HUD) staff; to oversee the financial safety and 
soundness and the housing mission compliance of the housing-related 
government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs or regulated entities). These 
include Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the FHLB System, comprised of 12 
Federal Home Loan Banks. 

FHFA is an independent government agency with a workforce that 
includes highly skilled economists, analysts, examiners, subject 
matter experts, technology specialists, accountants, and attorneys. 
FHFA had a staff of 453 employees at the end of FY 2010. In FY 2011, 
the agency plans to add 103 employees, in addition to staff in the 
Office of Inspector General following the appointment in September 
2010, of the agency's first Inspector General. FHFAs Director sets the 
direction for the agency to achieve its mission. FHFA divisions and 
offices have specific responsibilities and work together to ensure 
effective execution of the agency's mission. 

The Division of Federal Home Loan Bank Regulation is responsible for 
the supervision and examination of the FHLBanks and the Office of 
Finance. The division conducts annual on-site examinations, periodic 
visitations, and off-site monitoring. Other division responsibilities 
include supervisory policy and program development, regulatory 
analysis and developments, and economic research and analysis in 
support of FHLBank regulation. 

The Division of Enterprise Regulation is responsible for the 
supervision and examination of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The 
division conducts on-site continuous supervision, targeted 
examinations, and off-site monitoring. The division provides oversight 
and ensures coordination among all FHFA mission-critical supervisory 
functions, including programs for capital adequacy, compliance, 
examination, financial analysis, and quality assurance in support of 
the Enterprises. 

[Figure: photograph: FHFA staff assembled for Town Hall Meeting at the 
National Press Club, April 19, 2010] 

The Division of Housing Mission and Goals is composed of the following 
three offices, each with responsibilities that span all of the 
regulated entities: 

* The Office of Housing and Community Investment is responsible for 
regulatory policy relating to community investment, affordable 
Managing Through the Housing Crisis, Preparing for the Future
housing, certain new business activities, and housing goals of the 
Enterprises and FHLBanks. 

* The Office of the Chief Accountant develops safety and soundness 
guidance and policies related to accounting, auditing, and financial 
reporting and disclosure at the regulated entities. The office 
monitors the compliance of the regulated entities with such policies 
and also promotes the application of consistent accounting policies 
across the regulated entities. 

* The Office of Policy Analysis and Research conducts research and 
policy analysis to assess the short- and long-term effect of trends 
and issues in the activities of the regulated entities, housing 
finance, and financial regulation on the regulatory and supervisory 
functions of FHFA. The office also prepares data series and 
publications that inform the public about the housing finance system, 
changes in housing prices, and helps support development of FHFA 
regulatory policies. 

The Office of Conservatorship Operations assists the FHFA Director, as 
conservator, in preserving and conserving Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's 
assets and property. The office ensures the Enterprises appropriately 
focus on their mission, including the stability, liquidity, and 
affordability of the housing market. 

The Office of the General Counsel advises and supports the Director 
and all FHFA staff on legal matters related to the functions, 
activities, and operations of FHFA and the regulated entities, 
specifically providing support for supervision functions, promulgation 
of regulations, and enforcement actions. The Office also manages the 
Freedom of Information and Privacy Act programs. In addition, the 
agency ethics official provides advice, counseling and training to 
FHFA employees concerning ethical standards and conflicts of interest, 
and manages the agency's financial disclosure program.
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducts independent and 
objective audits, evaluations, and investigations to assist FHFA in 
meeting its mission; keeps the FHFA Director, Congress, and the 
American public up to date and fully informed of problems and 
deficiencies relating to FHFA programs and operations; and works 
collaboratively with FHFA staff and program participants to ensure 
success of the agency's program goals. This office came into being 
upon the confirmation of Steve A. Linick by the U.S. Senate on 
September 29, 2010. 

Figure 1. Organization Chart for FHFA: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Top level: 
Office of the Director: 
Office of the Inspector General. 

Second level, reporting to Office of the Director: 
* Office of the Deputy Chief Operating Officer: 
- Office of Human Resources Management; 
- Office of Budget & Financial Management; 
* Division of Enterprise Regulation; 
* Division of FHLBank Regulation; 
* Office of Conservatorship; 
* Office of the General Counsel; 
* Office of Congressional Affairs & Communications; 
* Office of Technology & Information Management; 
* Division of Housing Mission and Goals: 
- Office of Housing & Community Investment; 
- Office of the Chief Accountant; 
- Office of Policy Analysis & Research; 

[End of figure] 

The Office of Internal Audit through FY 2010, until the appointment of 
the FHFA Inspector General, reported directly to the FHFA Director and 
carried out a variety of audit functions for FHFA as delegated by the 
Director. 

The Office of Congressional Affairs and Communications is responsible 
for the public affairs and congressional relations functions at FHFA 
and is the primary point of contact for the external and internal 
communications of the agency. OCAC prepares and disseminates pertinent 
public information and responds to inquiries from Congress, the media, 
industry, and the public at large. 

The Office of the Deputy Chief Operating Officer provides operational 
support and services to the agency in the areas of human resources, 
budget and financial management, performance management, emergency 
preparedness, and facilities. 

The Office of Technology and Information Management is responsible for 
ensuring the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of FHFAs 
information systems and assets. The office maintains the agency's 
information technology (IT) infrastructure; oversees the IT security 
program; develops and maintains custom applications and data 
repositories; manages technology resources, investments, and assets; 
establishes IT strategic plans, policies and procedures; supports 
business partners; and manages the agency's records and information 
management program. 

The Enterprises: 

In the primary mortgage market, financial institutions make mortgage 
loans directly to homebuyers. This process begins when a potential 
homeowner or borrower applies for a mortgage loan from a lender. For 
example, the lender may be a savings bank, credit union, mortgage 
banking company, commercial bank, savings and loan, or state or local 
housing finance agency. Once the loan is originated, the lender either 
holds the loan in its own portfolio or sells the loan. The secondary 
mortgage market is the market in which mortgages or mortgage-backed 
securities are traded. The Enterprises acquire mortgages and issue 
mortgage-backed securities in the secondary mortgage market (See 
Figure 2). 

Congress established the Enterprises to provide liquidity, stability, 
and affordability to the secondary mortgage market. In the secondary 
mortgage market, the Enterprises make funds readily accessible to 
banks, savings and loans, and mortgage companies that make loans in 
the primary mortgage market to finance housing. Fannie Mae and Freddie 
Mac are the largest buyers of mortgages in the secondary market. They 
hold the mortgages they purchase in their portfolios or package the 
loans into mortgage-backed securities (MBS). The Enterprises also have 
the authority to buy other agency and private-label MBS for their own 
portfolios. Lenders may use the cash raised by selling mortgages to 
the Enterprises to lend to other home-buyers and real estate 
investors. Roughly half of the mortgages purchased by Fannie Mae and 
Freddie Mac finance dwelling units that are affordable to households 
with income at or below 80 percent of the area median income. More 
than one-fourth of the mortgages are located in geographic areas 
designated as underserved. 

MBS are traded in the secondary mortgage market. Because Fannie Mae 
and Freddie Mac package mortgages as MBS and guarantee timely payment 
of principal and interest on the underlying mortgages, investors who 
might not otherwise invest in mortgages enter the secondary mortgage 
market, which expands the pool of funds available for housing. Such 
capital makes the secondary mortgage market more liquid and helps 
lower the interest rates paid by homeowners and other mortgage 
borrowers. 

Figure 2. FHFA's Oversight Role — Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Primary Mortgage Market: 
Market in which financial institutions provide mortgage loans to 
homebuyers. 

Borrower: Applies for Mortgage; 
Lender: Provides Loan. 

Secondary Mortgage Market: 
Market in which existing mortgages and mortgage-backed securities 
(MBS) are traded. 

Lender: Sells Loans that Meet Underwriting and Product Standards; 
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Buys mortgages. 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: 
Credit guarantee business; 
Portfolio investment business; 
FHFA: Ensures Financial Safety and Soundness of Fannie Mae and Freddie 
Mac. 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: Issues MBS; Issues debt; 
Wall Street: Buys MVS; Buys debt. 

Wall Street: Sells MBS and Debt; 
Investors (individual, institutional, foreign): Buys MBS and Debt. 

[End of figure] 

The Federal Home Loan Banks: 
The FHLBanks provide a readily available, low-cost source of funds to 
support housing finance and member liquidity. The FHLBanks are member-
owned cooperatives. Only members own the capital stock in each 
FHLBank, and only members can borrow from an FHLBank. Membership is 
limited to regulated depository institutions (banks, thrifts, and 
credit unions), insurance companies, and community development 
financial institutions (CDFIs) engaged in residential housing finance 
(See Figure 3). The regions comprise combinations of whole states.
Each FHLBank conducts the majority of its credit and mortgage program 
businesses exclusively with its members or eligible housing associates. 

Figure 3. Federal Home Loan Bank Districts: 

[Refer to PDF for image: U.S. map] 

Atlanta: 
Alabama, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, North 
Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia. 

Boston: 
Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont
Chicago	Illinois, Wisconsin. 

Cincinnati: 
Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee. 

Dallas: 
Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Texas. 

Des Moines: 
Iowa, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, South Dakota. 

Indianapolis: 
Indiana, Michigan. 

New York: 
New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands. 

Pittsburgh: 
Delaware, Pennsylvania, West Virginia. 

San Francisco: 
Arizona, California, Nevada. 

Seattle: 
Alaska, Guam, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, Utah, Washington, 
Wyoming. 

Topeka: Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma. 

[End of figure] 

The FHLBanks offer credit and credit-related products, including loans 
(advances), letters of credit, and lines of credit to their members 
and eligible housing associates. All advances must be fully 
collateralized by mortgages and other eligible collateral pledged by 
the borrowing member or housing associates. Advances are the largest 
category of FHLBank assets. By providing advances and other credit-
related products to their members, FHLBanks increase the availability 
of credit for residential mortgages. 

In addition, some FHLBanks have an Acquired Member Assets (AMA) 
program to purchase mortgages from their members. Under these 
programs, members may sell qualifying mortgages to, or fund them 
through, an FHLBank. Members also may borrow from an FHLBank to fund 
low-income housing, helping members satisfy their regulatory 
requirements under the Community Reinvestment Act. 

Finally, some FHLBanks offer their members a variety of services, such 
as correspondent banking, which includes security safekeeping, wire 
transfers and settlements, cash management, letters of credit, and 
derivative intermediation. 

The FHLBanks fund their operations principally through the sale of 
debt instruments known as consolidated obligations, which are joint 
and severable obligations of the 12 FHLBanks, These debt instruments 
are sold to the public through the Office of Finance. Consolidated 
obligations are not obligations of the United States, and the U.S. 
Government does not guarantee them (Figure 4). 

Figure 4. FHFA's Oversight Role — FHLBanks: 

[Refer to PDF for image: illustration] 

Note: 
The collateral pledged may include assets other than mortgages. Also, 
the collateral pledged may be loans originated well in the past. 

Borrower: Applies for Loan. Receives Loan from Lender. 

Lender: Pledges Collateral to FHLBank; receives cash. 

FHLBank: 
FHFA: Ensures Financial Safety and Soundness. 
All debt is issues through the Office of Finance. 

Office of Finance: Issues Debt to Underwriters; Receives Cash from 
Underwriters. 

Wall Street: 
Sells Bonds to Investors; 
Investors Purchase Bonds from Underwriters. 

Investors: Institutional; Foreign. 

[End of figure] 

Performance Highlights: 

Changes in the Housing and Mortgage Markets During FY 2010
Housing prices declined at a slower rate in 2010 than in 2009. For the 
12 months ending in August 2010, housing prices fell 2.4 percent, 
based on FHFAs monthly House Price Index. At the end of August 2010, 
the index was 13.6 percent below its peak, which occurred in April 
2007. 

Mortgage rates generally declined during FY 2010. In September 2010, 
the average interest rate on conventional 30-year, fixed rate mortgage 
loans of $417,000 or less was 4.58 percent, compared to 5.23 percent
in September 2009. Recovery in the housing and mortgage markets has 
generally been slowed by several economic factors, including 
unemployment, but there are signs of progress. 

[Photograph: Stephen Cross, Acting Chief Operating Officer, addresses 
FHFA staff at an FHFA Town Hall meeting on April 19, 2010] 

In July 2010, Congress passed and President Obama signed the Dodd-
Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act 
or the Act), designed to correct problems that led to the financial 
crisis. Among other things, the Dodd-Frank Act, provides that 
taxpayers will not be called upon to bail out failing financial 
companies or cover the cost of their liquidation. The Act also 
strengthens regulatory oversight and enhances regulators' authority to 
pursue financial fraud. The Act does not address the future of the 
Enterprises, the secondary mortgage market or of the housing finance 
system. 

During FY 2010, FHFA carried out its mission against this backdrop of 
financial regulatory reform and changing conditions in the housing 
market. The agency accomplished a number of important goals as both 
conservator of the Enterprises and safety and soundness regulator of 
the 14 housing GSEs. 

Preserving and Conserving the Assets of the Enterprises: 

Since September 2008, when both Enterprises were placed into 
conservatorship, FHFA has worked to preserve and conserve their 
assets. As conservator, FHFA assumed the powers of each Enterprise's 
management, board, and shareholders. FHFA provides approvals and 
guidance for the Enterprises as they conduct their business activities 
and day-to-day operations. 

During FY 2010, FHFA prohibited the Enterprises from developing and 
offering new products to eliminate the operational challenges and 
risks inherent in such offerings. This restriction, standard for 
troubled financial institutions, directs focus of the Enterprises on 
existing core businesses while minimizing credit losses and 
remediating internal control weaknesses. 

During FY 2010, FHFA also directed the Enterprises and the FHLBanks to 
undertake prudential actions to address significant safety and 
soundness concerns presented by energy retrofit lending programs 
denominated as Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE). PACE loans 
foster lending for retrofits of residential or commercial properties 
through a county or city's tax assessment. In some states, such loans 
have a priority lien over existing mortgages, which could result in an 
alteration of lien priorities, thereby posing credit risk to lenders 
and secondary market entities. The actions required by FHFA were 
designed to mitigate risks posed by those PACE programs that altered 
lien priorities and failed to operate with sound underwriting 
guidelines and consumer protections. 

In July 2010, exercising broad authority granted under HERA, FHFA 
issued 64 subpoenas to various entities seeking documents related to 
private-label MBS in which the Enterprises had invested. Information 
obtained from the subpoenas will aid FHFA in determining whether 
private-label MBS issuers and others are liable to the Enterprises for 
losses sustained on these securities, and enable the Enterprises to 
assess any claims arising from the failure of the loans or their 
servicing to meet required standards. Before FHFA issued the 
subpoenas, the Enterprises had been unsuccessful in their attempts to 
obtain such information. 

FHLBank Corporate Governance: 

In April 2010, FHFA sent to the Federal Register a final rule that 
restructures the board of directors of the FHLBank System's Office of 
Finance and enhances the responsibility of the Office of Finance board 
of directors audit committee for the System's combined financial 
reports. The Office of Finance is responsible for issuing consolidated 
obligations on behalf of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks, serves as 
their fiscal agent, and prepares disclosure materials associated with 
the marketing and sale of that debt, including the System's quarterly 
and annual combined financial reports. 

Under the new rule, the Office of Finance board of directors expanded 
from three to 17 members. The new board of directors is composed of 
the president of each of the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks and five 
independent directors, each of whom must be a U.S. citizen with no 
material financial relationship to the System. The rule also provides 
that the five independent directors serve as the audit committee for 
the Office of Finance, and gives the audit committee increased 
authority over the form and content of the information that the 
FHLBanks provide to the Office of Finance for use in the System's 
combined financial reports. 

The FHLBanks' Resolution Funding Corporation Obligations: 

Recent trends indicate that the FHLBanks will, within the next two 
fiscal years, fulfill their obligation to pay their portion of the 
interest on bonds issued by the Resolution Funding Corporation 
(REFCORP) as part of the savings and loan cleanup of 1989.
Currently, each FHLBank's REFCORP obligation is 20 percent of its net 
earnings. When the REFCORP obligation is satisfied, FHFA will expect 
the FHLBanks to allocate a commensurate sum each quarter to retained 
earnings. By increasing retained earnings, the FHLBanks will be in a 
better position to support par value repurchases and redemptions of
member capital stock and will otherwise enhance their safety and 
soundness. 

Responding to the Administration, Congress, and the Public: 

Addressing the financial crisis required a collaborative effort among 
the Administration, Congress, regulators, the public, and other 
industry stakeholders. FHFA responded promptly to inquiries, published 
reports and data pertaining to the secondary mortgage market, and met 
regularly with industry stakeholders. FHFA also gave a series of 
presentations regarding affordable housing and community investment 
activities for participants of the NeighborWorks Training Institutes. 

In FY 2010, FHFAs Acting Director testified before Congressional 
committees on five occasions. Throughout 2010, FHFA responded promptly 
to numerous Congressional inquiries. FHFA received 253 Congressional 
inquiries and responded to 88 percent of them within 15 business days. 
FHFA participated in the President's Working Group on Financial 
Markets to help coordinate regulatory activities. FHFA also held 
meetings with representatives from U.S. Department of the Treasury 
(Treasury), HUD, the Council of Economic Advisers, the National
Economic Council, and the Enterprises to discuss ways to improve the 
performance of the Enterprises and increase the stability of the 
secondary mortgage market. 

FHFA provided information on the regulated entities and other housing-
related topics through the FHFA website and several published papers 
and reports. In FY 2010, FHFA published two working papers: Estimating 
Median House Prices and Automatic Recapitalization Alternatives. FHFA 
also published five new research papers: Revisions to FHFA's House 
Price Index in the Recent National House Price Boom and Bust; Housing 
and Mortgage Markets and the Housing Government-Sponsored Enterprises 
in 2008; Market Estimation Model for the 2010 and 2011 Enterprise 
Single-Family Housing Goals; Data on the Characteristics and 
Performance of Single-Family Mortgages Originated in 2001-2008 and 
Financed in the Secondary Market; and An Approach for Calculating 
Reliable State and National House Price Statistics. A mortgage market 
note was titled The Housing Goals of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the 
Context of the Mortgage Market: 1996-2009. In addition to this 
mortgage market note, FHFA published two mortgage market note updates. 
In August 2010, FHFA released its first Conservator's Report on the 
Enterprises' Financial Condition, which provided an overview of 
various aspects of the financial condition of the Enterprises during 
conservatorship. FHFA also published a monthly Federal Property 
Managers Report, described further in the next section. 

Foreclosure Alternatives and Loss Mitigation: 

The Enterprises have long had programs to mitigate losses. These 
programs typically consisted of repayment plans and modest changes to 
loan terms, rather than any substantial modification to reduce the 
borrowers monthly payments to an affordable level. 

As the housing crisis persisted, it was dear that a more aggressive 
and broader approach to loss mitigation—one that included mortgages 
securitized in private-label securities, mortgages held as whole loans
in bank portfolios, and mortgages owned or guaranteed by the 
Enterprises—was needed. This recognition led to the Enterprises 
participation in the Administration's Making Home Affordable (MHA) 
program, including the Home Affordable Modification Program (HAMP) and 
the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP). MHA is a plan developed 
by the Administration to stabilize the housing market and help 
struggling homeowners get relief and avoid foreclosure. HAMP provides 
mortgage servicers a single, consistent program to modify mortgage 
payments for borrowers with delinquent mortgages or in imminent
default to make them more affordable. FHFA oversees Fannie Mae and 
Freddie Mac's participation as financial agents for HAMP, as well as 
their efforts to carry out these and other loss mitigation strategies. 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have played key roles in the development 
and implementation of HAMP. A well-designed loan modification is often 
a lower cost resolution to a delinquent mortgage than foreclosure, and 
these alternatives to foreclosure lower Enterprise costs and save 
taxpayers money. Loan modification programs also can offer benefits 
beyond reducing losses directly on the Enterprises' resolutions of 
their delinquent mortgages, by improving stability in housing markets 
and reducing credit exposure. 

During FY 2010, FHFA published a monthly Foreclosure Prevention and 
Refinance Report to publicize the progress of MHA, promote 
transparency in the Enterprises foreclosure prevention activities, and 
provide data on the Enterprises' mortgage refinance and loan 
modification activities. In addition, FHFA published a monthly Federal 
Property Managers Report, which detailed the number and types of loan 
modifications and the number of foreclosures during the reporting 
period. 

Housing Mission Compliance: 

On September 2, 2010, FHFA sent a final rule to the Federal Register, 
establishing new housing goals for the Enterprises for calendar years 
2010 and 2011. The final rule establishes three, single-family, owner-
occupied home purchase mortgage goals for low-income families, very 
low-income families, and families living in geographical areas with 
lower-income populations, areas with high concentrations of minority 
residents, and federally-declared disaster areas. The latter goal also 
includes a specialized subgoal to ensure that the Enterprises address 
housing needs in lower-income and minority areas. The final rule also 
contains a goal for single-family, owner-occupied refinance mortgages 
for low-income families. 

While the Enterprises are in conservatorships, FHFA expects them to 
continue to fulfill their core statutory purposes, which includes 
their support for affordable housing. One set of measures of the 
Enterprises support for affordable housing comes through the housing 
goals, which Congress revised significantly in HERA. 

FHFA does not intend for the Enterprises to undertake imprudent or 
high-risk activities in support of the goals, nor does it intend 
conservatorship to be a justification for withdrawing support from 
these market segments. Under the conservatorships, the Enterprises 
have tightened their underwriting standards to avoid poor quality 
mortgages, such as those that contributed so much to their losses. 
Through FHFA oversight, the Enterprises will be expected to maintain 
this type of sound underwriting discipline going forward. 

As before enactment of HERA, the FHLBanks will continue to support 
affordable housing for low- and moderate-income households principally 
through the Affordable Housing Program (AHP). Beginning in 2011, HERA 
also requires FHFA to establish affordable housing goals for the 
FHLBanks. The affordable housing goals for the FHLBanks must be 
consistent with those for the Enterprises and take into consideration 
the unique mission and ownership structure of the FHLBanks. 

On May 27, 2010, FHFA published in the Federal Register a proposed 
rule to establish a framework for affordable housing goals for the 
FHLBanks. Under the proposed rule, an FHLBank would be subject to the 
proposed housing goals if its AMA-approved mortgage purchases in a 
given year exceed a volume threshold of $2.5 billion. FHFA received 
public comments on the establishment of three purchase money mortgage 
goals and one refinancing mortgage goal applicable to the FHLBanks' 
purchases of mortgages on owner-occupied single-family housing under 
their AMA programs. 

Under the AMA programs, the FHLBanks purchase only single-family, 
fixed-rate mortgages below the conforming loan limit. While at one 
time, all FHLBanks offered AMA programs, several no longer offer the 
program, and mortgage loan balances are stable or declining at most of 
the FHLBanks. As of September 30, 2010, the combined value of the AMA 
mortgage loans in the FHLBanks' portfolios was $64 billion. 

Executive Compensation: 

During FY 2010, FHFA established a new executive compensation program 
for the Enterprises as part of its oversight responsibilities as 
conservator. FHFA designed the new compensation structure in 
consultation with the Special Master for Troubled Asset Relief Program 
(TARP) Executive Compensation. 

In addition, FHFA also lowered executive officer pay at the 
Enterprises by an average of 40 percent from pre-conservatorship 
levels. The significant salary structure changes implemented during FY 
2010 include the following: 

* No executive officers will receive perquisites exceeding $25,000 
without FHFA approval in consultation with the U.S. Department of the 
Treasury. 

* No retirement plans for executives may use more generous formulas 
than plans for lower-ranking employees. 

* No expense reimbursements to executives will include"tax gross-ups," 
which are reimbursements to an employee for taxes owed on relocation 
expense payments. 

* Deferred salary and incentive pay for all executive officers will be 
subject to "claw backs" by the Enterprises in the event of gross 
misconduct, gross negligence, conviction of a felony, or erroneous 
performance metrics. Claw backs allow FHFA to reclaim previously given 
monies or benefits, if it is later determined that management fell 
short through either adverse action or inaction. 

The agency also issued the final rule, FHLBank Board of Directors 
Eligibility, Elections, Compensation, and Expenses. HERA repealed the 
statutory caps on the annual compensation an FHLBank may pay its 
directors. The final rule allows each FHLBank to pay its directors 
reasonable compensation and expenses, subject to the authority of the 
FHFA Director to prohibit compensation determined to be unreasonable. 
This is consistent with the authority the FHFA Director has used to 
reform compensation practices at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. 

FHLBank Membership: 

On January 5, 2010, FHFA published a final rule that authorizes CDFIs, 
that have been certified by the CDFI Fund of the U.S. Department of 
the Treasury, to become members of the FHLBanks. Congress provided for 
such membership in the FHLBanks to enable CDFIs with increased access 
to long-term funding to increase their capacity to promote economic 
growth and stability in low- and moderate-income communities. 

Figure 5. Regulations Published in FY 2010: 

[Refer to PDF for image: table] 

Proposed: 

Minority and Women Inclusion: 
(75 FR 1289, January 11, 2010, 12 CFR Part 1207). 
	
Minimum Capital Temporary Increase: 
(75 FR 6151, February 8, 2010, 12 CFR 1225). 

Use of Community Development Loans by Community Financial Institutions 
to Secure Advances, Secured Lending by Federal Home Loan Banks to 
Members and their Affiliates; Transfer of Advances and New Business 
Activity Regulations: 
(75 FR 7990, February 23, 2010, 12 CFR 1266, 1272). 
	
Equal Access to Justice Act Implementation: 
(75 FR 17622, April 7, 2010, 12 CFR 1203). 
	
Federal Home Loan Bank Investments: 
(75 FR 23631, May 4, 2010, 12 CFR 1267). 

Federal Home Loan Bank Housing Goals: 
(75 FR 29947, May 28, 2010, 12 CFR 1281). 

Enterprise Duty to Serve Underserved Markets: 
(75 FR 32099, June 7, 2010, 12 CFR 1282). 

Conservatorship and Receivership: 
(75 FR 39462, July 9, 2010, 12 CFR 1237). 

Office of Ombudsman: 
(75 FR 47495, August 6, 2010, 12 CFR 1213). 

Rules on Practice and Procedure: 
(75 FR 49313, August 12, 2010, 12 CFR Parts 1209). 

Private Transfer Fee Covenants: 
(74 FR 49932, August 16, 2010). 

Information Sharing among Federal Home Loan Banks: 
(75 FR 60347, September 30, 2010, 12 CFR Part 1260). 

Final: 

Post-Employment Restriction for Senior Examiners: 
(74 FR 51073, October 5, 2009, 12 CFR 1212). 

Federal Home Loan Bank Membership for Community Development Financial 
Institutions: 
(75 FR 677, January 5, 2010, 12 CFR Parts 1263, 1290). 

Reporting of Fraudulent Financial Instruments: 
(75 FR 4255, January 27, 2010, 12 CFR 1233). 

Federal Home Loan Bank Housing Associates, Core Mission Activities and 
Standby Letters of Credit: 
(75 FR 8239, February 24, 2010, 12 CFR 1264, 1265, 1269). 

Federal Home Loan Bank Director's Eligibility, Elections, Compensation 
and Expenses: 
(75 FR 17037, April 5, 2010, 12 CFR 1261). 

Board of Directors of Federal Home Loan Bank System Office of Finance: 
(75 FR 23152, May 3, 2010, 12 CFR Parts 1273, 1274). 

Affordable Housing Program Amendments: Federal Home Loan Bank Mortgage 
Refinancing Authority: 
(75 FR 29877, May 28, 2010, 12 CFR 1291). 

Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Federal 
Housing Finance Agency: 
(75 FR 52607, August 27, 2010, 5 CFR 9001). 

2010 - 2011 Enterprise Affordable Housing Goals; Enterprise Book-entry 
Procedures: 
(75 FR 55892, September 14, 2010, 12 CFR Parts 1249, 1282). 

[End of figure] 

[Photograph: An FHFA meeting wherein FHFA operating as conservator of 
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is carrying out the assumed powers of the 
Board and management of the two Enterprises] 

The final rule sets forth eligibility and procedural requirements for 
CDFIs to become members of the FHLBanks. The eligible CDFIs include 
community development loan funds, certain venture capital funds, and 
state-chartered credit unions without federal insurance. 

Providing Regulatory Guidance: 

In addition to the rulemaking described above, FHFA issued an array of 
other rules, some to implement new authorities provided in HERA and 
some to update or change regulations previously issued by one of FHFAs 
predecessor agencies. Figure 5 lists the proposed and final 
regulations issued by FHFA during FY 2010. Importantly, FHFA finalized 
a rule on post-employment restrictions for senior examiners, which 
restricts senior examiners from taking a job with a regulated entity 
for one year after leaving FHFA. 

Management Challenges: 

FHFA as Conservator: 

Conservatorship cannot be a permanent state for the Enterprises. As 
debate continues over the future design of the housing finance system, 
FHFA remains focused on the fundamental purposes of the 
conservatorships: conserving the Enterprises assets and maintaining 
their activities in the secondary mortgage market. 

The statutory role of FHFA as conservator also requires the agency to 
take actions to preserve the assets of the Enterprises and restore 
them to a financially safe and sound condition. In the conservator 
role, FHFA has consistently emphasized that the Enterprises will 
continue to be responsible for normal business activities and day-to-
day operations, seeking conservator approval and guidance as needed; 
in FY 2010, the companies focused on these principles. Pursuant to 
FHFAs mandate, the Enterprises, while they are in conservatorship, are 
not permitted to engage in new lines of business. 

Managing and Reporting on the Conservatorship: 

During 2009, Treasury and the Federal Reserve provided unprecedented 
support to the mortgage markets via the Enterprises. Treasury 
established three support mechanisms: the GSE Credit Facility, the GSE 
Mortgage-Backed Securities (GSE MBS) Purchase Facility, and the Senior 
Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements. As required by law, the GSE 
Credit Facility and GSE MBS Purchase Facility terminated at the end of 
2009. The GSE Credit Facility was never used. However, Treasury used 
the GSE MBS Purchase Facility to buy $221 billion of Fannie Mae and 
Freddie Mac MBS from September 2008 through December 2009. In 
addition, the Federal Reserve completed its commitment to purchase 
$1.25 trillion of Enterprise and the Government National Mortgage 
Association (Ginnie Mae) MBS as of March 31, 2010. 

Treasury reaffirmed its commitment to the stability and liquidity of 
the mortgage market through the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase 
Agreements with two modifications in 2009 to the original agreements. 
First, Treasury announced an increase in the financial commitment to 
each company from $100 billion to $200 billion in February 2009, a 
move that emphasized the importance of the agreements in maintaining 
market confidence in the Enterprises. Legal authority to commit 
additional funds was set to expire at year-end, so Treasury reaffirmed 
its commitment on December 24, 2009, by amending the agreements to 
provide funding for each Enterprise up to the greater of: (1) $200 
billion; or (2) $200 billion plus the cumulative total of draws for 
each calendar quarter in 2010, 2011 and 2012, minus any amount by 
which the assets of the Enterprise exceed its liabilities on December 
31, 2012. This funding is to ensure that each Enterprise maintains a 
non-negative net worth, thereby avoiding a statutory requirement that 
an Enterprise be put in receivership following an extended period of 
negative net worth. 

The December 2009 amendment was designed to quell market uncertainty 
by assuring investors of the soundness of Enterprise securities. That 
December amendment allows the Enterprises to be able to serve
as a stable source of funds for new home purchases and refinancing of 
existing mortgages. This amendment also assures capital market 
investors that Enterprise securities are sound investments. 

Although the Enterprises substantial market presence has been a key 
step to restoring market stability, neither company would be capable 
of serving the mortgage market today without the ongoing financial 
support provided by Treasury. Losses at the Enterprises have totaled 
$226 billion since year-end 2007. At the end of FY 2010, Fannie Mae 
had drawn $85.1 billion and Freddie Mac $63.1 billion in Treasury 
support from the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements, nearly 
$148.2 billion in total. To provide the public with dear information 
about the Enterprises, FHFA began posting on its website in August 
2010, quarterly data on the Enterprises financial performance in 
conservatorship. 

FHFA previously determined that capital classifications would be 
suspended during conservatorship. Both Enterprises have depleted all 
of their shareholders equity, with the negative balances of those 
accounts offset by Treasury's investments under the Senior Preferred 
Stock Purchase Agreements. Consequently, levels of capital and capital 
adequacy, key measures of safety and soundness, cannot be measured for 
the Enterprises while operating under conservatorship with financial 
support from Treasury. Reliance on the U.S. Department of Treasury's 
backing will continue until legislation produces a final resolution of 
the Enterprises' future. 

Each Enterprise continues to realize credit losses from mortgages 
originated in the years prior to conservatorship. Between 2004 and 
2007, the Enterprises increased the amount of their exposure in 
nontraditional and high-risk mortgages, including Alt-A and interest 
only loans, which resulted in substantial losses. For example, during 
the first quarter of calendar year 2010, Alt-A loans accounted for 37 
percent of Fannie Mae's losses for the quarter and 42 percent of 
Freddie Mac's. Figure 6 shows the characteristics of the Enterprises 
single-family mortgage acquisitions since 2006. 

Past business decisions cannot be undone; however, with the oversight 
and guidance of FHFA as conservator and regulator, the Enterprises are 
actively seeking ways to minimize these credit losses and ensure that 
new business generated during conservatorship is profitable. During 
the first quarter of 2010, less than 2 percent of Fannie Mae's 
purchases were interest only loans. Freddie Mac did not purchase any 
interest only loans. Alt-A loans were less than 1 percent of 
acquisitions for both Enterprises during the first quarter of 2010. 

Operational challenges remain a critical concern at each Enterprise. 
In conservatorship, the Enterprises can continue their existing core 
business activities and take actions necessary to advance the goals of 
the conservatorship. They cannot commence new products or lines of 
business. 

FHFA will work with the Administration and Congress on a complete 
review of, and legislative action on, the future of the housing 
finance system and of the Enterprises beyond conservatorship. Also, 
FHFA is looking at possible changes in the way the Enterprises do 
business that may be desirable in the interim period, as Congress 
contemplates and debates statutory options. 

For example, this year FHFA directed the two Enterprises to work 
collectively to expand and enhance the data submitted by loan sellers. 
The goal of this initiative is to raise the quality and consistency of 
key mortgage and property information, which in turn should improve 
the Enterprises risk management capabilities. The changes should also 
improve the functioning of the mortgage market and be beneficial 
regardless of what course the larger-scale restructuring of the 
housing finance system takes. 

FHFA as Regulator: 

FHFA has the statutory responsibility of conducting an annual 
examination program for the Enterprises, the FHLBanks, and the Office 
of Finance. FHFAs annual examination program assesses the regulated 
entities financial safety and soundness and overall risk management 
practices. 

FHFA examiners use a risk-based approach to supervision. Through 
examinations, data analysis, and risk monitoring activities, FHFA 
identifies matters requiring corrective action by the regulated 
entities and monitors their efforts to correct deficiencies. 

Setting Expectations for the FHLBank System: 

The FHLBanks face challenges. In FY 2010, the FHLBanks incurred 
aggregate credit-related impairment charges of more than $900 million 
on their holdings of private-label MBS. However, all but one of the 12 
FHLBanks was adequately capitalized at the end of FY 2010, and the 
12th FHLBank met regulatory minimum capital requirements but FHFA used 
its discretionary authority to deem it undercapitalized" because of 
losses associated with its holdings of private-label MBS. 

Four FHLBanks have negative accumulated other comprehensive income 
(AOCI) in excess of retained earnings. The negative AOCI principally 
reflects non-credit impairment in private-label MBS for which OTTI has 
been taken. The excess of negative AOCI over retained earnings is 
large at two FHLBanks, both with significant exposure to private-label 
MBS backed by non-traditional mortgages originated in 2005-08. 

During FY 2010, the FHLBanks worked collectively to improve the rigor 
and consistency of their analytical framework for valuing their 
holding of private-label MBS. FHFA conducted two reviews of the 
"commonplatform" for FHLBank OTTI analyses and separately evaluated 
their OTTI modeling. FHFA offered recommendations for improvement, but 
concluded that the FHLBanks' methodology was generally sound. 

A key objective of FHFA is to return the focus of FHLBank operations 
to providing advances to member institutions and to establish 
stability at each FHLBank to permit repurchases and redemptions of 
member stock at par. FHFA expects advances to represent an increasing 
share of total FHLBank assets over time. FHFA also expects Banks to 
achieve and maintain a market value of equity equal to or greater than 
the par value of their capital stock. 

In recent years, FHLBank investment portfolios had grown beyond levels 
needed for liquidity and mission achievement at some FHLBanks. In some 
cases, interest rate exposures and credit risk rose significantly. 
Several FHLBanks experienced sharp declines in net asset values, which 
in turn led to restrictions on dividend payments, stock repurchases, 
and stock redemptions. Some of those restrictions have been voluntary, 
while others have stemmed directly from supervisory action. But, in 
either case, the restrictions disrupt the normal operations of the 
FHLBanks and affect the value proposition of membership. 

Against this backdrop, FHFA expects all the FHLBanks to review, 
rethink and reformulate their business strategies with an increased 
emphasis on mission achievement and a focus on the traditional 
business of making advances to member institutions, while de-
emphasizing investment portfolios not needed to support core 
activities. 

Source of Losses: 

Enterprises: 

In its annual Report of Examinations for each Enterprise, FHFA rated 
both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac as critical supervisory concerns, 
mainly due to credit-related expenses and forecasted credit losses
yet to be recognized on purchases and guarantees of mortgages 
originated in 2006 and 2007. FHFA expects the high delinquency rates 
to continue for these vintage mortgages because of uncertainty about 
the overall economy, housing prices, and unemployment rates. 

Both Enterprises also face a high degree of operational risk and 
limitations in their operational capacity. Constraints on operational 
capacity are also a concern for mortgage servicers, many of whom 
received incentives to keep costs low during the housing boom and 
subsequently have been strained by record mortgage defaults. 

Both Enterprises have been working to develop alternative servicing 
solutions for high-risk mortgage portfolios because of rapidly rising 
inventories of real estate owned. Not only do large volumes of 
foreclosed houses present operational challenges, but these properties 
must be liquidated in a manner that does not needlessly exacerbate 
weaknesses in housing markets. 

Each Enterprise funds more than $700 billion in mortgage-related 
assets through the issuance of debt securities. The interest rate risk 
of mortgage portfolios of this size is inherently large, but the 
challenges of managing this portfolio have become even larger because 
of the difficulty of estimating prepayments. 

The need to carefully manage the interest rate risk of these 
portfolios is heightened by the fact that many of the new mortgages in 
the Enterprises portfolios were originated at historically low rates. 
In an environment of rising interest rates, the average duration of 
these investments would significantly extend. If interest rate risk is 
not properly managed in the present, such a situation could lead to 
significant future funding challenges. Furthermore, the retained 
portfolio mix is changing with a much larger concentration of 
distressed assets that have cash flows that are difficult to model and 
may not be as sensitive to changes in rates. Finally, the asset mix 
within the retained portfolios is becoming less liquid. 

Figure 6. Characteristics of the Enterprises' Single-Family Mortgage 
Acquisitions: 

[Refer to PDF for image: table] 

Percent of new single-family business (categories overlap and are not 
additive): 

Alt-A: 
Fannie Mae, 2006: 22%. 
Fannie Mae, 2007: 17%. 
Fannie Mae, 2008: 3%. 
Fannie Mae, 2009: 0%. 
YDT, June 2010: 0%. 
Freddie Mac, 2006: 18%. 
Freddie Mac, 2007: 22%. 
Freddie Mac, 2008: 7%. 
Freddie Mac, 2009: 0%. 
YDT, June 2010: 1%. 

Interest-only: 
Fannie Mae, 2006: 15%. 
Fannie Mae, 2007: 15%. 
Fannie Mae, 2008: 6%. 
Fannie Mae, 2009: 1%. 
YDT, June 2010: 2%. 
Freddie Mac, 2006: 17%. 
Freddie Mac, 2007: 21%. 
Freddie Mac, 2008: 6%. 
Freddie Mac, 2009: 0%. 
YDT, June 2010: 0%. 

Credit Score less than 620: 
Fannie Mae, 2006: 6%. 
Fannie Mae, 2007: 6%. 
Fannie Mae, 2008: 3%. 
Fannie Mae, 2009: 0%. 
YDT, June 2010: 1%. 
Freddie Mac, 2006: 5%. 
Freddie Mac, 2007: 6%. 
Freddie Mac, 2008: 3%. 
Freddie Mac, 2009: 1%. 
YDT, June 2010: 1%. 

LTV greater than 90 percent: 
Fannie Mae, 2006: 10%. 
Fannie Mae, 2007: 16%. 
Fannie Mae, 2008: 10%. 
Fannie Mae, 2009: 4%. 
YDT, June 2010: 8%. 
Freddie Mac, 2006: 6%. 
Freddie Mac, 2007: 11%. 
Freddie Mac, 2008: 9%. 
Freddie Mac, 2009: 4%. 
YDT, June 2010: 9%. 

Average LTV: 
Fannie Mae, 2006: 73%. 
Fannie Mae, 2007: 75%. 
Fannie Mae, 2008: 72%. 
Fannie Mae, 2009: 67%. 
YDT, June 2010: 69%. 
Freddie Mac, 2006: 73%. 
Freddie Mac, 2007: 74%. 
Freddie Mac, 2008: 71%. 
Freddie Mac, 2009: 67%. 
YDT, June 2010: 70%. 

Average Credit Score: 
Fannie Mae, 2006: 716; 
Fannie Mae, 2007: 716; 
Fannie Mae, 2008: 738; 
Fannie Mae, 2009: 761; 
YDT, June 2010: 758; 
Freddie Mac, 2006: 720
Freddie Mac, 2007: 718
Freddie Mac, 2008: 734; 
Freddie Mac, 2009: 756; 
YDT, June 2010: 750. 

Notes:									
	
1. New business is defined as issuance of MBS plus purchases of whole 
loans and does not include purchases of mortgage-related securities. 
	
2. For Fannie Mae, Alt-A generally refers to a mortgage loan that may 
be underwritten with reduced or alternative documentation than that 
required for a full documentation mortgage loan but may also include 
other alternative product features. In reporting Alt-A exposure, 
Fannie Mae classified mortgage loans as Alt-A if the lenders that 
delivered the mortgage loans to them classified the loans as Alt-A 
based on documentation or other product features. Fannie Mae 
classified private-label mortgage related securities held in its 
investment portfolio as Alt-A if the securities were labeled as such 
when issued. 
	
3. In determining Alt-A exposure on loans underlying its single-family 
credit guarantee portfolio, Freddie Mac classified mortgage loans as 
Alt-A if the lender that delivered the mortgage loans classified the 
loans as Alt-A, or if the loans had reduced documentation 
requirements, as well as a combination of certain credit 
characteristics	and expected performance characteristics at 
acquisition which, when compared to full documentation loans in 
Freddie Mac's portfolio, indicate that the loan should be classified 
as Alt-A. Freddie Mac's year-to-date figures include Alt-A purchases 
of $1.5 billion due to a long-term standby commitment termination and 
a subsequent participation certificate issuance. There was no change 
to the Alt-A exposure on these mortgages as a result of these 
transactions. 								
		
4. The years in the heading of this table are calendar years. 

Sources: Enterprises' Forms 10-K, credit supplements to SEC 
disclosures, and management reports. 

[End of figure] 

Federal Home Loan Banks: 

sent at some individual FHLBanks. Also, FHLBanks with substantial 
investments in private-label MBS have seen a decline in their market 
value of equity compared to the par value of capital stock, which has 
resulted in a reduction or suspension of dividends and limits on their 
ability to repurchase or redeem stock. 

By the end of FY 2010, FHLBank advances had declined to the lowest 
level for the System since the third quarter of 2004. Advances 
accounted for less than 60 percent of total assets for the first time 
since the first quarter of 1998. The decline in advances reflects 
continuing deposit growth and members tepid loan demand, which reduces 
their need for wholesale funding. In addition, ongoing consolidation 
in the financial services industry has resulted in some large 
borrowers being acquired by firms with a lower historical use of 
advances. 

The FHLBanks' AHP continues to be a source of funding for national and 
local affordable housing initiatives supported by member institutions. 
However, the decline in FHLBank income has reduced program 
contributions from $331 million in 2007 to $258 million in 2009. 

Participating in Regulatory Reform: 

The Dodd-Frank Act requires new rules for mortgages and mortgage 
securitizations. Among other things, the Act requires FHFA to work 
with other federal regulators and agencies to define low-risk, 
"qualified residential mortgage." Such mortgages will be exempt from 
certain risk-retention requirements related to their securitization. 

In addition, the Act establishes the Consumer Financial Protection 
Bureau, which will be responsible for regulations governing certain 
disclosures and mortgage lending practices. FHFA expects to work with 
the Bureau on mortgage-related consumer protection matters. 

Future of the Housing Finance System: 

Numerous ideas about the future of the housing finance system have 
been proposed in the past two years. Large-scale restructuring of the 
housing finance system that would provide an explicit federal guarantee 
of any kind, assign the functions of the Enterprises to a federal 
agency or corporation, or establish more than two federally chartered 
secondary market firms would require new legislation. 

The Administration, Congressional Budget Office, U.S. Government 
Accountability Office (GAO), trade associations, academics, and others 
have identified a variety of approaches related to the future 
structure and functions of the Enterprises or their successors. FHFA 
is participating in internal and multiagency efforts to review and 
evaluate the strengths, weaknesses, and risks of the various options. 
FHFAs experience with, and understanding of, secondary mortgage 
markets and institutions will be valuable to the Administration and 
Congress as they consider restructuring housing finance and financial 
regulation and address the secondary mortgage market and the role of 
the Enterprises. 

Though much of the debate will focus on the Enterprises or their 
successors in the secondary mortgage market, FHFA expects the 
discussion to include the future of the FHLBanks. The FHLBanks have 
played a critical role in providing financing to large and small 
member financial institutions through advances, but their residential 
mortgage portfolios are small compared to those of the Enterprises. To 
prepare for future policy decisions, FHFA is closely monitoring 
markets and holding discussions with various stakeholders. 

Challenges for the Housing GSEs and FHFA as the Policy Debate 
Commences: 

The upcoming national debate on the future of the country's housing 
finance system will pose unique challenges for the housing GSEs and 
FHFA. As the debate progresses, the Enterprises will be expected to 
continue providing an active, stable secondary mortgage market so that 
mortgage lending may continue uninterrupted and unimpeded by policy 
debates. Yet the management and staff at each Enterprise will be 
sensitive to the terms and course of the debate, as it will include 
discussions of whether and how the Enterprises may exist in the 
future. The ongoing policy debate poses challenges for Enterprise 
management as well as for FHFA in ensuring the continued staffing and 
efficient operations at each Enterprise. 

As the FHLBanks are an important part of the country's housing finance 
system, the policy debate may soon include consideration of possible 
new or changing roles and responsibilities for the FHLBanks. As with 
the Enterprises, the FHLBanks will be challenged with maintaining 
ongoing operations as policy discussions about the FHLBank System take 
place. 

For FHFA, the broad Administration and congressional review of the 
country's housing finance system also poses challenges and 
opportunities. Since its creation two years ago, FHFA has worked to 
realize HERAs purpose in having a single housing finance regulator 
capable of a broad view of wholesale mortgage financing and of the 
liquidity of the nations mortgage market. Internally, FHFA continues 
to make strides in how it organizes and manages its responsibilities 
so as to realize the benefits of being a single, unified housing GSE 
regulator. In FY 2011, FHFA will continue to develop its internal 
management structure to more fully realize the benefits of combining 
its three predecessor agencies. It will also be active in supporting 
the policy debate on the future of housing finance, while remaining 
focused on the difficult challenges facing the country's housing 
finance system and its institutions today. 

FY 2010 Performance Summary: 

FHFA's Strategic Planning: 

FHFA sets long-term and annual goals and monitors progress throughout 
the year to produce results using strategic and performance planning. 
The second section of this report describes FHFAs results and their 
relation to the agency's FY 2010 performance goals. 

FHFAs FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan was developed and released in 
January 2010, and includes a total of 26 performance measures: 20 
annual performance goals in support of three strategic goals and 
objectives; and six annual performance goals in support of FHFAs 
resource management strategy. This section describes the agency's 
performance against its FY 2010 Annual Performance Plan, which 
outlined the means and strategies to achieve the annual performance 
goals and related measures for the past year. 

FHFA plans to refine and update the agency's strategic plan in time 
for the FY 2012 budget development, in response to OMB's directive. 
Consistent with OMB guidance and sound strategic planning practices, 
FHFA will update its FY 2011 targets and set FY 2012 performance 
targets in advance of preparing its FY 2012 budget. 

In FY 2010, FHFA began tracking resource allocations and program costs 
by strategic goals that are outlined in the agency's strategic plan. 

FHFA's Strategic Goals: 

To achieve FHFAs mission, the agency established three strategic goals: 

1. The housing GSEs operate in a safe and sound manner and comply with 
legal requirements. 

2. The housing GSEs support a stable, liquid, and efficient mortgage 
market, including sustainable homeownership and affordable housing. 

3. FHFA preserves and conserves the assets and property of the 
Enterprises, ensures focus on their housing mission, and facilitates 
their financial stability and emergence from conservatorship. 

FHFA also has set a resource management strategy which states that 
FHFA has the personnel, resources, and infrastructure to effectively 
and efficiently achieve its mission and goals. 

FHFA FY 2010 Performance: 

The performance section describes the agency's performance goals for 
each strategic goal and FHFAs accomplishments related to each 
performance goal and its associated performance measures. Performance 
goals are counted as met when targets for all performance measures 
have been achieved. FHFA reported on 26 performance measures in its FY 
2010 Annual Performance Plan. The agency met or exceeded 12 of
the performance measures in the plan. It failed to meet 14 of the 
performance measures. 

The agency is not satisfied with that performance record. However, in 
a number of cases in which a goal was not fully satisfied, the agency 
did achieve a substantial degree of progress toward the goal. For 
example, one measure relating to the safety and soundness would 
require an improvement in at least one component examination rating 
for each of the two Enterprises. The objective was satisfied in one 
Enterprise, but not the other. In the other, progress was made in a 
number of component areas, but not enough progress to warrant a higher 
component rating. As such, the performance measure was not achieved, 
but the agency and the Enterprises made clear progress toward the 
measure's satisfaction. 

Another example relates to the FHLBanks achieving a composite 
examination rating of "2" or better or operating under an approved 
remediation plan. Of the three FHLBanks that were not operating under 
an approved remediation plan within 90 days of the downgrade,
one subsequently adopted a plan acceptable to FHFA during FY 2010. The 
other two FHLBanks adopted plans acceptable to FHFA during the first 
quarter of FY 2011. 

In another case, a new examination documentation and retrieval tool 
was tested during the fiscal year, but the tool's specifications were 
not yet final. Certain key decisions had been made, but a final 
decision will be made in FY 2011, rather than in FY 2010. Similarly, 
the agency's housing goals and duty to serve rules for the Enterprises 
were delayed, but ultimately published for comment during the fiscal 
year. The associated performance measures were not met because the 
rulemakings did not meet their target dates. 

Therefore, in preparing the agency's FY 2011 Annual Performance Plan, 
FHFA will look to refine its performance measures in light of progress 
made to date. Also, the FY 2011 performance measures will more clearly 
tie to measurable progress in the supervision of the Enterprises and 
the FHLBanks and enhancements to internal controls at FHFA. 

Further, FHFA identified six of the 26 performance measures for FY 
2010 as key performance indicators critical to its achievement of its 
strategic goals and objectives. Those key performance indicators
represent each of the agency's three strategic goals and its resource 
management strategy, and represent the highest priority measures for 
the agency. See Figure 7 above for a summary of FHFAs achievement of 
those six key performance indicators. 

The data for FHFAs performance measures are complete and reliable. 
Data for FHFAs performance measures are created internally, reported 
in the agency's performance tracking system, and reviewed by senior 
management quarterly. Data related to supervision activities are 
collected through FHFAs supervision process and reviewed by FHFA 
quality assurance staff and agency management. 

Program Evaluation: 

Because FHFAs Inspector General was not confirmed until the end of FY 
2010, no program evaluations were conducted at FHFA during the fiscal 
year. 

Figure 7. Key FHFA Performance Indicators for FY 2010: 

[Refer to PDF for image: table] 

Strategic Goal 1: 
The housing GSEs operate in a safe and sound manner and comply with 
legal requirements. 

Key Performance Indicators: 

Performance Goal 1.1: 
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (the Enterprises) comply with legal 
requirements and operate in a safe and sound manner with adequate 
capital and access to funds and capital. 

Performance Measure 1.1.1: 
Each Enterprise improves in one or more component ratings. 

Target: September 30, 2010. 
Not Met: 
Freddie Mac's market risk rating improved from critical concerns to 
significant concerns at the end of the second quarter. Fannie Mae did 
not improve in any component ratings during the fiscal year. Although 
most of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac's component ratings did not 
improve, improvements were made in several areas, increasing the 
likelihood that some component ratings will improve in the next fiscal 
year. 

Performance Goal 1.2: 
The FHLBanks and the Office of Finance comply with legal requirements 
and operate in a safe and sound manner with adequate capital and 
access to funds and capital. 

Performance Measure 1.2.1: 
Each FHLBank is rated 2 or better or operates under a performance 
improvement plan acceptable to FHFA within 90 calendar days of a 
downgrade below a rating of 2. 

Target: Quarterly, beginning June 30, 2010	
Not Met: 
In FY 2010, 7 FHLBanks were assigned a rating below "2", and 3 of 
those were not operating under an acceptable performance improvement 
plan within 90 days. 

Strategic Goal 2: 
The housing GSEs support a stable, liquid, and efficient mortgage 
market including sustainable homeownership and affordable housing. 

Performance Goal 2.1: 
FHFA ensures the housing GSEs support a stable, liquid, and efficient 
mortgage market. 

Performance Measure 2.1.2: 
Absent a revival of the private market in FY 2010, each Enterprise's 
share of single-family mortgage purchases and originations does not 
decline by more than 10 percent of the share obtained in FY 2009.
Target: Annually; 
Met: 
For Fannie Mae, the share of single-family mortgage purchases and 
originations decreased from 40.04 percent in FY 2009 to 36.26 percent 
in FY 2010. For Freddie Mac, the share of single-family mortgage 
purchases and originations decreased from 25.61 percent in FY 2009
to 23.75 percent in FY 2010. 

Performance Goal 2.2: 
FHFA ensures the housing GSEs provide leadership in housing finance 
and affordable housing by operating these programs in an effective and 
efficient manner, developing products, establishing partnerships, and 
financing homes For very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. 

Performance Measure 2.1.2: 
The FHLBanks' Affordable Housing Program (AHP) funds are awarded in 
compliance with laws and regulations.
Target: Annually; 
Met; 
FHFA conducted AHP examinations at all 12 FHLBanks. No substantive 
issues were found regarding compliance with laws and regulations. 

Strategic Goal 3: 
FHFA preserves and conserves the assets and property of the 
Enterprises, ensures Focus on their housing mission, and Facilitates 
their financial stability and emergence From conservatorship. 

Performance Goal 3.2: 
Delegate appropriate authorities to each Enterprise's management to 
continue with or improve upon the Enterprises' mission and their 
business operations. 

Performance Measure 3.2.1: 
FHFA provides approvals and guidance to the Enterprises	on 
conservatorship-related issues within 30 business days.	
Target: 80 percent per quarter; 
Not Met; 
FHFA provided approvals and guidance to the Enterprises on 
conservatorship-related issues within 30 business days for 54 percent 
of the time in the fourth quarter, reflecting both improved ability to 
track performance and improved performance over prior period results. 
Early data problems with this measure are described later in this 
report.	
	
Resource Management Strategy: 
FHFA has the personnel, resources, and infrastructure to manage 
effectively and efficiently to achieve its mission and goals. 

Performance Goal 4.4: 
FHFA has the information technology and physical infrastructure needed 
to achieve its mission and goals. 

Performance Measure 4.4.2: 
FHFA completes its internal review of Examiner Workstation and 
finalizes a new strategic plan for Examiner Workstation. 
Target: September 30, 2010; 
Not Met; 
Although the target deadline was missed, substantial development of 
the Proof of Concept was achieved. Feedback from ongoing testing was 
positive and will result in a more robust strategic plan. 

[End of figure] 

FY 2010 Financial Summary: 

For FY 2009 and FY 2010, its first and second year as a new agency, 
FHFA achieved an unqualified (clean) opinion from the GAO on its 
annual financial statements. GAO noted no material weaknesses or 
significant deficiencies in FHFAs internal controls and cited no 
instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations. In accordance 
with the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Circular No. A-123, 
Management's Responsibility for Internal Control, FHFA continued to 
assess the effectiveness of its internal controls annually. FHFA 
received, for the second consecutive year, the Certificate of 
Excellence in Accountability Reporting (CEAR) award for its
FY 2009 Performance and Accountability Report (PAR) from the 
Association of Government Accountants (AGA). The CEAR is awarded to 
agencies that have demonstrated excellence in integrating performance 
and accountability reporting. FHFA also received a CEAR Best-In-Class 
award for providing the most comprehensive and candid presentation of 
forward-looking information in its FY 2009 PAR. 

Source of Funds: 

HERA authorizes FHFA to collect annual assessments from its regulated 
entities to pay its costs and expenses and maintain a working capital 
fund. Under HERA, annual assessments are levied against the 
Enterprises and the FHLBanks to cover the cost and expenses of the 
agency's operations for supervision of the regulated entities. 

[Photograph: FHFA received, for the second consecutive year, the 
Certificate of Excellence in Accountability Reporting award for its FY 
2009 Performance and Accountability Report from the Association of 
Government Accountants] 

FHFA calculates the assessments for each Enterprise by determining the 
proportion of each Enterprise's assets and off-balance sheet 
obligations to the total for both Enterprises and then applying each 
of the Enterprise's proportion (expressed as a percentage) to the 
total budgeted costs for regulating the Enterprises. FHFA calculates 
the assessments for each of the 12 FHLBanks by determining each 
FHLBank's share of minimum required regulatory capital as a percentage 
of the total minimum capital of all the FHLBanks and applying this 
percentage to the total budgeted costs for regulating the banks. 
Assessments are paid semiannually on October 1 and April 1. FHFA 
collected assessments of $143 million during FY 2010, which included a 
$10.4 million special assessment on the Enterprises related to 
conservatorship activities. 

Analysis of Financial Statements: 

The principal financial statements present FHFAs financial position, 
net cost of operations, changes in net position, and budgetary 
resources for fiscal years 2010 and 2009. Financial statements and 
notes for fiscal years 2010 and 2009 appear on pages 70-86. Highlights 
of the financial information presented in the principal financial 
statements are shown below. 

Balance Sheet: 

The Balance Sheet presents, as of the end of the fiscal year, the 
recorded value of assets and liabilities retained or managed by FHFA. 
The difference between the assets and liabilities represents FHFAs net 
position. The Balance Sheet reflects total assets of $55.5 million, a 
21-percent decrease over FY 2009. The decrease is primarily due to FY 
2010 assessment payments received during FY 2009 and increased cash 
outlays during FY 2010. FHFAs total liabilities decreased by $34 
million, a 66-percent decrease over FY 2009. The decrease is primarily 
due to the decrease in deferred revenue. FHFA deferred revenue to 
reflect FY 2010 assessments that were received at the end of FY 2009. 
As a result, FHFAs net position as of September 30, 2010 was $37.9 
million, a $19.5 million increase over the $18.4 million net position 
as of September 30, 2009. 

Figure 8. Assets and Liabilities (Dollars in Thousands): 

[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph] 

Date: September 2009; 
Assets: $70,024; 
Liabilities: $51,613. 

Date: September 2010; 
Assets: $55,461; 
Liabilities: $17,605. 

[End of figure] 

Statement of Net Cost: 

The Statement of Net Cost presents the components of FHFAs net cost, 
which is the gross cost incurred less any revenues earned. FHFAs total 
program net costs, as reflected on the Statement of Net Cost, were -
$14.6 million (or net revenue) as compared to the $7.1 million net 
cost in FY 2009. This change reflects the increase in gross costs and 
earned revenue needed to carry out its mission as reflected in its FY 
2010 operating budget. The operating budget increase between fiscal 
years is the result of increased mission costs and a special 
assessment levied on the Enterprises related to conservatorship 
activities. However, during the course of the year, FHFA was unable to 
fully expend its FY 2010 earned revenue, thereby resulting in an 
excess of revenue over cost. FHFAs costs for FY 2010 were less than 
expected and budgeted for, resulting in a surplus. FHFA issues a 
credit for unobligated funds as of September 30, 2010 against next 
year's assessment. 

Consistent with the Government Performance and Results Act of 1993, 
the Statement of Net Cost is reported by FHFAs strategic goals. FHFAs 
program costs were reflected as one program for FY 2009, as defined by 
HERA Section 1311(b)(1). Beginning in FY 2010, FHFA tracked resource 
allocations and program costs to the strategic goals (responsibility 
segments) developed for FHFAs new strategic plan, which became 
effective for FY 2010. Strategic Goals, 1 — Safety and Soundness; 2 — 
Affordable Housing; and 3 — Conservatorship, guide program offices to 
carry out FHFAs vision and mission. FHFA has a Resource Management 
Strategy, which is distributed proportionately to Strategic Goals 1-3 
based on the percentage of direct costs of each goal to the total 
direct costs for FHFA. Strategic Goal 1, Safety and Soundness,
comprises the major portion of the total program costs. 

Figure 9. Total Net Cost of Operations (Dollars in Thousands): 

[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph] 

Date: September 2009; 
Unallocated: $7,107; 
Strategic Goal 1 - Safety and Soundness: $6,598. 

Date: September 2010; 
Strategic Goal 2 - Affordable Housing: -$10,488; 
Strategic Goal 3 - Conservatorship: -$10,788. 

[End of figure] 

Statement of Changes in Net Position: 

The Statement of Changes in Net Position presents those accounting 
items that caused the net position section of the Balance Sheet to 
change from the beginning to the end of the reporting period. 
Financing sources increase net position. FHFAs financing source is 
imputed financing from costs absorbed on FHFAs behalf by other Federal 
agencies. Net cost of/income from operations impacts net position. 

FHFAs cumulative results of operations for the period ending September 
30, 2010 increased $19.5 million, due primarily to a combination of a 
decrease in net costs of $21.7 million and an increase in beginning 
balances of $8.9 million. Total financing sources decreased $11.2 
million as a result of having no appropriation in FY 2010. 

Figure 10. Statement of Changes in Net Position (Dollars in Thousands): 

[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph] 

Cumulative Results of Operations: 
September 2009: $18,411; 
September 2010: $37,856. 

Net Cost of Operations: 
September 2009: $7,107; 
September 2010: -$14,638. 

Total Financing Sources: 
September 2009: $15,974; 
September 2010: $4,807. 

Beginning Balances: 
September 2009: $9,544; 
September 2010: $18,411. 

[End of figure] 

Statement of Budgetary Resources: 

This statement provides information about the provision of budgetary 
resources and their status as of the end of the reporting period. The 
statement shows that FHFA had $155.6 million in total budgetary 
resources for the 12 months ended September 30, 2010. These budgetary 
resources were composed of $143 million in assessments, $9.7 million 
in unobligated balance brought forward from FY 2009, and $2.7 million 
in recoveries of prior year unpaid obligations. Obligations incurred 
increased $16.6 million to $132.8 million in FY 2010. Gross outlays 
increased $5.5 million to $122.9 million in FY 2010. 

Figure 11. Statement of Budgetary Resources Comparisons (Dollars in 
Thousands): 

This figure illustrated values for September 2009 and September 2010 
for the following: 
Budgetary Resources; 
Obligations incurred; 
Gross Outlays. 

[End of figure] 

Limitations of the Financial Statements: 

FHFA management has prepared its fiscal years 2010 and 2009 financial 
statements from the books and records of the agency in accordance with 
the requirements of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular 
A-136, Financial Reporting Requirements, as amended. The financial 
statements represent the financial position and results of operations 
of the agency pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 31 of the U.S. 
Code section 3515 (b). While these statements have been prepared from 
the agency's books in accordance with the formats prescribed
by the OMB, the statements are in addition to the financial reports 
used to monitor and control budgetary resources, which are prepared 
from the same books and records. These statements should be read with 
the understanding that they are for a component of the U.S. 
government, a sovereign entity. 

Management Assurances: 

During FY 2010, FHFA adhered to the internal control requirements of 
the Federal Managers Financial Integrity Act of 1982 (FMFIA) and the 
guidance provided by OMB Circular A-123. FHFAs Executive Committee on 
Internal Controls met quarterly to oversee internal controls and 
provide recommendations to the Acting Director on the effectiveness of 
FHFAs internal controls. 

In 2010, the executive committee members were the Senior Deputy 
Director/Chief Operating Officer who served as the Chairman, the Chief 
Administrative Officer who served as the Vice-Chairman, the Chief 
Information Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, the Deputy Director 
for Enterprise Regulation, the Deputy Director for FHLBank Regulation, 
the General Counsel, and the Associate Director, Office of Supervision 
Infrastructure. The Chairman and Vice Chairman invited other FHFA 
executives when appropriate. The executive committee also established 
senior assessment teams to review specific areas when needed.
During FY 2010, pursuant to its obligations under OMB Circular A-123, 
FHFA monitored and assessed the following three areas: 

* Reliability over Financial Reporting FHFAs Office of Budget and 
Financial Management assessed the agency's financial reporting 
controls according to the requirements outlined in OMB Circular A-123, 
Appendix A. 

* Compliance with Laws and Regulations Assessment teams from FHFA 
divisions and offices identified the significant laws and regulations 
that relate to the operations for their respective offices. Assessment 
teams documented the actions that demonstrated compliance, and the 
agency's Office of General Counsel reviewed all submissions. 

* Effectiveness and Efficiency of Operations Assessment teams from 
FHFA divisions and offices reviewed controls over operations using the 
criteria outlined in the GAO Internal Control Management and 
Evaluation Tool. Division and office managers and the Office of Budget 
and Financial Management reviewed the reports of the assessment teams.
The Executive Committee on Internal Controls reviewed documentation 
from all three areas. In compliance with the FMFIA requirements, the 
Acting Director, on the basis of a recommendation from the executive 
committee, provided reasonable assurance that internal controls over 
financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, were operating 
effectively and no material weaknesses were found in the design or 
operation of the internal controls over financial reporting. This 
assurance can be found in the"Management's Discussion and Analysis" of 
this report and meets the FMFIA reporting requirement for internal 
controls. 

Federal Management System and Strategy: 

Section 1106(g)(3) of HERA requires FHFA to implement and maintain 
financial management systems that comply substantially with federal 
financial management systems requirements, applicable federal 
accounting standards, and the U.S. Government Standard General Ledger 
at the transaction level. FHFA uses the Bureau of the Public Debt for
its accounting services and that agency's financial management system 
(FMS) which includes (1) a core accounting system—Oracle Federal 
Financials; (2) three feeder systems—PRISM (procurement), GovTrip 
(travel), and Citidirect (charge card); (3) a reporting system—
Discoverer; and (4) an inventory tracking system. FHFA is responsible 
for overseeing the Bureau of the Public Debt's performance of
accounting services for the agency. A financial oversight document 
outlines the assignment of activities between FHFA and the Bureau of 
the Public Debt. FMS includes manual and automatic procedures and 
processes from the point at which a transaction is initiated to 
issuance of financial reports. FMS meets the requirements of HERA 
Section 1106(g)(3). FHFA also uses the National Finance Center, a 
service provider within the Department of Agriculture, for its payroll 
and personnel processing. FHFA has streamlined accounting processes by 
electronically interfacing data from charge cards, investment 
activities, the GovTrip travel system, the PRISM procurement system, 
and the National Finance Center payroll system to FMS. 

Federal Information Security Management Act: 

Title III of the Electronic Government Act of 2002, titled the Federal 
Information Security Management Act (FISMA), requires all federal 
agencies to develop and implement an agency-wide information security 
program. The program provides the framework to protect the agency's 
information, operations, and assets. During FY 2010, OMB issued 
guidance requiring federal agencies to continuously monitor the 
security posture of information systems to enable timely decision 
making regarding identified vulnerabilities and threats. To accomplish 
this, agencies must automate security-related activities and acquire 
tools that correlate and analyze security-related information. 

FHFA annually reviews the agency's information security program 
through its internal audit function and reports the results to OMB as 
required by FISMA. FHFAs information security program activities 
during FY 2010 reflect efforts in bringing the agency into compliance 
with the government-wide continuous monitoring requirement. Such 
compliance requires FHFA to proactively monitor the security posture 
of its information technology infrastructure through the 
implementation of automated security tools and supplemental resources 
for monitoring activities. The tools and activities include system log 
review and configuration management tools, and periodic vulnerability 
scans. 

Other FY 2010 information security program activities included 
implementing an updated information security policy, comprehensive 
security procedures, and performing annual security control 
assessments. FHFA maintained security certification and accreditation
on 100 percent of all major systems in production and provided 
security awareness training through an automated program to all FHFA 
employees and contractors. FHFA also addressed security-related 
weaknesses for systems noted in the prior year FISMA review. 

The FY 2010 FISMA review concluded that FHFA had an effective 
information security program. The review disclosed weaknesses 
pertaining to monitoring of contractor systems, control and disposal 
of storage media for peripheral equipment such as copiers, 
noncompliance of the organizational structure of FHFAs information 
security program with FISMA, lack of completion of updates to the FHFA 
information security policy and related information security 
procedures, and vulnerabilities identified by network scans. All of 
the findings have been addressed and remediation efforts are underway. 
None of the weaknesses were classified as significant deficiencies. 

Erroneous Payments: 

The Improper Payments Information Act of 2002 requires that agencies 
(1) review activities susceptible to significant erroneous payments; 
(2) estimate the amount of annual erroneous payments; (3) implement a 
plan to reduce erroneous payments; and (4) report the estimated amount 
of erroneous payments and the progress to reduce them. The Act defines 
significant erroneous payments as the greater of 2.5 percent of 
program activities or $10 million. 

FHFA has implemented and maintains internal control procedures that 
ensure disbursement of federal funds for valid obligations. FHFA made 
no erroneous payments in FY 2010 that met the Act's thresholds. 

Prompt Pay: 

The Prompt Payment Act requires federal agencies to make timely 
payments to vendors and improve the cash management practices of the 
government by encouraging the use of discounts when they are 
justified. This also means that FHFA must pay its bills within a 
narrow window of time. In FY 2010, the dollar amount subject to prompt 
payment was $28.7 million. The amount of interest penalty paid in FY 
2010 was $126 or 0.00044 percent of the total dollars disbursed. 

[End of section] 

Financial Statements: 

Message from the Chief Financial Officer: 

[Photograph: Mark Kinsey, Chief Financial Officer, Federal Housing 
Finance Agency] 

I am pleased to report that, in its second full year of operations, 
the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) once again received an 
unqualified 'clean' audit opinion on its financial statements from the 
Government Accountability Office (GAO). In its financial audit report, 
GAO concluded that 1) FHFA's FY 2010 financial statements are fairly 
presented in all material respects; 2) FHFA had effective internal 
control over financial reporting; and 3) there were no reportable 
instances of noncompliance with the laws and regulations it tested. 

In addition to its clean financial audits, FHFA received the 
Certificate for Excellence in Accountability Reporting (CEAR) award 
for FY 2009 from the Association of Government Accountants. This is 
the second straight year FHFA received this prestigious award. The 
CEAR award is given to government agencies that received unqualified 
audit opinions on their financial statements and produced Performance 
and Accountability Reports (PARs) that achieved the highest standards 
in communicating results and demonstrating accountability. 

These impressive accomplishments could not have been achieved with out 
the commitment from management and staff to maintain effective 
programs of internal control over important agency activities. FHFA's 
Executive Committee on Internal Controls works to establish a strong 
control environment for the agency and meets at least quarterly to 
monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the agency's internal 
control programs. 

As always, I am very proud to work with a highly dedicated group of 
professionals whose efforts contributed significantly to these 
accomplishments. 

Sincerely, 

Signed by: 

Mark Kinsey: 
Chief Financial 0fficer: 
November 10, 2010: 

[End of letter] 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
1625 Eye Street, N.W., 
Washington, D.C. 20006-4065: 
Telephone: (202) 408-2500: 
Facsimile: (202) 408-1435: 
[hyperlink, http://www.fhfa.gov] 
	
Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act: 
Statement of Assurance: 
Fiscal Year 2010: 

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) management is responsible 
for establishing and maintaining effective internal control and 
financial management systems that meet the objectives of the Federal 
Managers' Financial Integrity Act (FMFIA). 

FHFA conducted its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control 
over the effectiveness and efficiency of operations and compliance 
with applicable laws and regulations in accordance with OMB Circular A-
123, Management's Responsibility for Internal Control. Based on the 
results of this evaluation, FHFA can provide reasonable assurance that 
its internal control over the effectiveness and efficiency of 
operations and compliance with applicable laws and regulations as of 
September 30, 2010 was operating effectively and that no material 
weaknesses were found in the design or operation of the internal 
controls. 

In addition, FHFA conducted its assessment of the effectiveness of 
internal controls over financial reporting, which includes 
safeguarding of assets and compliance with applicable laws and 
regulations, in accordance with the requirements of Appendix A of OMB 
Circular A-123. Based on the results of this evaluation, FHFA can 
provide reasonable assurance that its internal controls over financial 
reporting as of September 30, 2010 were operating effectively and no 
material weaknesses were found in the design or operation of the 
internal controls over financial reporting. 

In accordance with the requirements of FMFIA, FHFA's financial 
management systems are substantially in compliance with the 
requirements for federal financial management systems as presented in 
A-127, Financial Management Systems as of September 30, 2010. 

Signed by: 

Edward J. DeMarco: 
Acting Director: 

Date: October 10, 2010: 

[End of letter] 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
Balance Sheet: 
As of September 30, 2010 and 2009 (In Thousands): 

Assets: 2009: 

Intragovernmental: Fund Balance With Treasury (Note 2):	$29,076; 
Intragovernmental: Investments (Note 3): $37,668; 
Intragovernmental: Accounts Receivable (Note 4): $3. 

Total Intragovemmental: $66,747. 

Accounts Receivable (Note 4): $3; 
General Property and Equipment, Net (Note 5): $3,273; 
Prepaid Expenses: $1; 

Total Assets: $70,024. 

Liabilities: 

Intragovernmental: Accounts Payable: $758; 
Intragovernmental: Payroll Taxes Payable (Note 7): $652; 
Total Intragovemmental: $1,410. 

Accounts Payable: $4,268; 

Deferred Revenue (Note 6): $35,122; 
Other (Note 7): $10,813; 
Total Liabilities: $51,613. 

Net Position: 	
Cumulative Results of Operations: $18,411. 

Total Net Position: $18,411. 

Total Liabilities and Net Position: $70,024. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial 
statements. 

[End of table] 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
Statement of Net Cost: 
for the Year Ended September 30, 2009 (in Thousands): 

Program Costs: (Note 10): 2009: 
	
Gross Costs: $122,816; 
Less: Earned Revenue: $115,709; 

Net Program Costs: $7,107. 

Net Cost of Operations: $7,107. 

The accompanying notes am an integral part of these financial 
statements. 

[End of table] 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
Balance Sheet: 
for the Year Ended September 30, 2009 (in Thousands): 

Assets: 

Intragovernmental: Fund Balance With Treasury (Note 2):	
2010: $1,000; 
2009: $29,076. 

Intragovernmental: Investments (Note 3): 
2010: $50,878; 
2009: $37,668. 

Intragovernmental: Accounts Receivable (Note 4): 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $3. 

Total Intragovemmental: 
2010: $52,185; 
2009: $66,747. 

Accounts Receivable (Note 4): 
2010: $6; 
2009: $3. 

General Property and Equipment, Net (Note 5): 
2010: $2,397; 
2009: $3,273. 

Prepaid Expenses: 
2010: $873; 
2009: $1. 

Total Assets: 
2010: $55,461; 
2009: $70,024. 

Liabilities: 

Intragovernmental: Accounts Payable: 
2010: $430; 
2009: $758. 

Intragovernmental: Payroll Taxes Payable (Note 7): 
2010: $799; 
2009: $652. 

Total Intragovemmental: 
2010: $1,229; 
2009: $1,410. 

Accounts Payable: 
2010: $4,358; 
2009: $4,268. 

Deferred Revenue (Note 6): 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $35,122. 

Other (Note 7): 
2010: $12,018; 
2009: $10,813. 

Total Liabilities: 
2010: $17,605; 
2009: $51,613. 

Net Position: 

Cumulative Results of Operations: 
2010: $37,856; 
2009: $18,411. 

Total Net Position: 
2010: $37,856; 
2009: $18,411. 

Total Liabilities and Net Position: 
2010: $55,461; 
2009: $70,024. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial 
statements. 

[End of table] 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
Statement of Net Cost: 
For the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (In Thousands): 

Program Costs by Strategic Goal: (Note l0): 

Safety and Soundness: 

Gross Costs: 
2010: $95,870	
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Earned Revenue: 
2010: $(89,272); 
2009: [Empty]. 

Net Safety and Soundness Costs/(Income): 

Affordable Housing: 
Gross Costs	
2010: $16,031; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Earned Revenue: 
2010: ($26,819); 
2009: [Empty]. 

Net Affordable Housing Costs/(Income): 

Conservatorship: 

Gross Costs: 
2010: $16,663; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Earned Revenue: 
2010: ($27,111); 
2009: [Empty]. 

Net Conservatorship Costs/(Income): 

Total Gross Program Costs: 
2010: $128,564; 
2009: $122,816. 

Less: Total Earned Revenue: 
2010: ($143,202); 
2009: ($115,709). 
	
Net (Income from)/Cost of Operations: 
2010: ($14,638); 
2009: $7,107. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial 
statements. 

[End of table] 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
Statement of Changes in Net Position: 
For the Year Ended September 30, 2009 (in Thousands): 

Cumulative Results of Operations: Beginning Balances: 
2010: $18,411; 
2009: $9,544. 

Budgetary Financing Sources: Appropriations Used: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $12,896. 

Other Financing Sources (Non-Exchange): Imputed Financing Sources: 	
2010: $4,807; 
2009: $3,078. 

Total Financing Sources: 
2010: $4,807; 
2009: $15,974. 

Net Income from/(Cost of) Operations: 
2010: $14,638
2009: ($7,107). 

Net Change: 
2010: $19,455
2009: $8,867. 

Cumulative Results of Operations: 
2010: $37,856
2009: $18,411. 

Unexpended Appropriations: Beginning Balances: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $12,896. 

Budgetary Financing Sources: Appropriations Used: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $12,896. 

Total Budgetary Financing Sources: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $12,896. 

Total Unexpended Appropriations: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Net Position: 
2010: $37,856; 
2009: $18,411. 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial 
statements. 

[End of table] 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
Statement of Budgetary Resources: 
For the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (In Thousands): 

Budgetary Resources: 

Unobligated Balance: Unobligated Balance Brought Forward, October 1: 
2010: $9,657; 
2009: $5,132. 

Recoveries of Prior Year Unpaid Obligations: 
2010: $2,693; 
2009: $6,002; 

Budget Authority: Appropriation - Assessments: 
2010: $143,028; 
2009: $115,669; 

Budget Authority: Appropriation - Investment Interest: 
2010: $72; 
2009: $30; 

Spending Authority From Offsetting Collections, Earned: Collected: 
2010: $104; 
2009: $4,572; 

Spending Authority From Offsetting Collections, Earned: Change In 
Receivables From Federal Sources: 
2010: ($3); 
2009: ($1,459); 

Spending Authority From Offsetting Collections: Change In Unfilled 
Customer Orders: Without Advance From Federal Sources: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: ($4,038); 

Subtotal: 
2010: $143,201; 
2009: $114,774. 

Total Budgetary Resources: 
2010: $155,551; 
2009: $125,908. 

Status of Budgetary Resources: 

Obligations Incurred: Direct: 
2010: $132,707; 
2009: $111,682; 

Obligations Incurred: Reimbursable: 
2010: $101; 
2009: $4,569; 

Obligations Incurred: Subtotal: 
2010: $132,808; 
2009: $116,251. 

Unobligated Balance: Exempt From Apportionment: 
2010: $22,743; 
2009: $9,657. 

Total Status of Budgetary Resources: 
2010: $155,551; 
2009: $125,908. 

Change In Obligated Balance: Obligated Balance, Net
Unpaid Obligations, Brought Forward, October 1: 
2010: $21,968; 
2009: $29,146; 

Less: Uncollected Customer Payment From Federal Sources, Brought 
Forward, October 1: 
2010: ($3); 
2009: ($5,500); 

Total Unpaid Obligated Balance, Net: 
2010: $21,965; 
2009: $23,646. 

Obligations Incurred Net: 
2010: $132,808; 
2009: $116,251; 

Less: Gross Outlays: 
2010: ($122,948); 
2009: ($117,427); 

Less: Recoveries of Prior Year Unpaid Obligations, Actual: 
2010: ($2,693); 
2009: ($6,002); 

Change In Uncollected Customer Payments From Federal Sources: 
2010: $3; 
2009: $5,497; 

Obligated Balance, Net, End of Period: Unpaid obligations: 
2010: $29,135;
2009: $21,968; 

Less: Uncollected Customer Payment From Federal Sources: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $3; 

Total, Unpaid Obligated Balance, Net, End of Period: 
2010: $29,135; 
2009: $21,965. 

Net Outlays: 

Gross Outlays: 
2010: $122,948; 
2009: $117,427; 

Less: Offsetting Collections: 
2010: ($104); 
2009: ($4,572); 

Less: Distributed Offsetting Receipts: 
2010: ($143,100); 
2009: ($115,699); 

Net Outlays: 
2010: ($20,256); 
2009: ($2,844). 

The accompanying not are an integral part of these financial 
statements. 

[End of table] 

Notes to the Financial Statements: 
for the Years Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009: 

Note 1. Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies: 

A. Reporting Entity: 

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) was established on July 30, 
2008, when the President signed into law the Housing and Economic 
Recovery Act of 2008 (HERA). FHFA is an independent agency in the 
Executive branch empowered with supervisory and regulatory oversight 
of the twelve Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks), Federal National 
Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae), and Federal Home Loan Mortgage 
Corporation (Freddie Mac), all of which are referred to as regulated 
entities within this document. FHFA is responsible for ensuring that 
each regulated entity operates in a safe and sound manner, including 
maintenance of adequate capital and internal controls, and carries out 
their housing and community development finance missions. 

HERA abolished the Federal Housing Finance Board (FHFB) and Office of 
Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO) effective at the end of 
the 1-year period beginning on July 30, 2008. FHFB and OFHEO existed 
until then solely for the purpose of winding up their affairs. During 
fiscal year 2009, in accordance with HERA, the transfer of personnel, 
property, and program activities of FHFB, OFHEO, and certain employees 
and activities of the Department of Housing and Urban Development 
related to the regulation of the mission of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 
were made to FHFA. 

Under the authority of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial 
Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended by HERA, FHFA placed 
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac under conservatorship on September 6,2008, 
to stabilize the two entities with the objective of maintaining normal 
business operations and restoring safety and soundness. FHFA, as 
conservator, assumed the power of stockholders, boards, and 
management. FHFA delegated to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac certain 
business and operational authority. FHFA personnel monitor the 
operations of the enterprises. 

In September 2008, after Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were placed in 
conservatorship under the FHFA, the Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) determined that the assets, liabilities and activities of the 
companies would not be included in the financial statements of the 
federal government. For fiscal year 2008, OMB and the Department of 
the Treasury (Treasury) concluded that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac did 
not meet the conclusive or indicative criteria for a federal entity 
contained in OMB Circular A-136 and Statement of Federal Financial 
Accounting Concepts No. 2, Entity and Display because they are not 
listed in the section of the federal government's budget 
entitled"Federal Programs by Agency and Account," and because the 
nature of FHFAs conservatorships over Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and 
the federal government's ownership and control of the entities is 
considered to be temporary. Treasury reaffirmed this position for 
fiscal year 2009, with which FHFA concurs. OMB continued to hold this 
view in the President's fiscal year 2010 and fiscal year 2011 budget 
submissions to Congress. Consequently, the assets, liabilities, and 
activities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have not been consolidated 
into FHFAs financial statements. However, Treasury records the value 
of the federal government's investments in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 
in its financial statements as a General Fund asset. 

Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as represented by FHFA as their 
Conservator, entered into separate agreements with Treasury known as 
the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements (Agreements) on 
September 7,2008. These two Agreements are identical and have since 
been amended three times, on September 26, 2008, May 6, 2009 and 
December 24,2009. The Agreements commit Treasury to provide funding 
for each Enterprise up to the greater of: (1) $200 billion; or (2) 
$200 billion plus the cumulative total of draws for each calendar 
quarter in 2010,2011 and 2012 minus any amount by which the assets of 
the Enterprise exceed its liabilities on December 31, 2012. This 
funding is to ensure that each Enterprise maintains a non-negative net 
worth, thereby avoiding a statutory requirement that an Enterprise be 
put in receivership following an extended period of negative net 
worth. Under the Agreements, each Enterprise submits a request for any 
needed draw amount once their financials (to be published in their 10-
K or 10-1) are finalized. The Enterprise also submits a statement 
certifying compliance with Agreement covenants, which include limits 
on portfolio size and indebtedness. FHFA, in its role as Conservator, 
reviews any request for a draw and certifies that the request is 
available for funding under the agreement. FHFA then sends a letter to 
Treasury requesting the draw amount prior to the end of the current 
quarter. FHFA as Conservator also issues an order to the Enterprises 
each quarter requiring each Enterprise to pay dividends to Treasury as 
required by the Agreements. Additionally, the Agreements require each 
Enterprise to obtain Treasury approval for the disposition of assets, 
except under certain circumstances. FHFA as Conservator reviews these 
requests. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac draws on their Agreements with 
Treasury are summarized below. Such draws are reported in Treasury's 
financial statements. 

Enterprise Draws on Treasury Agreements (Dollars in Billions): 

Draw date: September 30, 2008; 
Fannie Mae: [Empty]; 
Freddie Mac: $13.8. 

Draw date: December 31, 2008; 
Fannie Mae: $15.2; 
Freddie Mac: $30.8. 

Draw date: March 31, 2009; 
Fannie Mae: $19.0; 
Freddie Mac: $6.1. 

Draw date: June 30, 2009; 
Fannie Mae: $10.7; 
Freddie Mac: [Empty]. 

Draw date: September 30, 2009; 
Fannie Mae: $15.0; 
Freddie Mac: [Empty]. 

Draw date: December 31, 2009; 
Fannie Mae: $15.3; 
Freddie Mac: [Empty]. 

Draw date: March 31, 2010; 
Fannie Mae: $8.4; 
Freddie Mac: $10.6. 

Draw date: June 30, 2010; 
Fannie Mae: $1.5; 
Freddie Mac: $1.8. 

Draw date: Cumulative Draws; 
Fannie Mae: $85.1; 
Freddie Mac: $63.1. 

B. Basis of Presentation: 

FHFA’s principal statements were prepared from its official financial 
records and general ledger in conformity with accounting principles 
generally accepted in the United States and follow the presentation 
guidance established by OMB Circular A-136 “Financial Reporting 
Requirements,” revised September 29, 2010. The statements are a
requirement of the Government Management Reform Act of 1994, the 
Accountability of Tax Dollars Act of 2002, and HERA. These financial 
statements are in addition to the financial reports prepared by FHFA, 
pursuant to OMB directives, which are used to monitor and control 
budgetary resources. As required by HERA, the financial statements of 
FHFA are audited by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). 
The financial statements have been prepared to report the financial 
position, net cost of operations, changes in net position, and the 
status and availability of budgetary resources of FHFA. Unless 
specified otherwise, all amounts are presented in thousands. 

C. Basis of Accounting: 

Transactions are recorded on both an accrual accounting basis, and a 
budgetary basis. Under the accrual basis of accounting, revenues are 
recognized when earned, and expenses are recognized when a liability 
is incurred, without regard to receipt or payment of cash. Budgetary 
accounting facilitates compliance with legal requirements and controls 
over the use of federal funds. FHFA conforms to accounting principles 
generally accepted in the United States for federal entities as 
prescribed by the standards set forth by the Federal Accounting
Standards Advisory Board (FASAB). FASAB is recognized by the American 
Institute of Certified Public Accountants as the body designated to 
establish generally accepted accounting principles for federal entities.
Certain assets, liabilities, earned revenues, and costs have been 
classified as intragovernmental throughout the financial statements 
and notes. Intragovernmental is defined as exchange transactions made 
between two reporting entities within the federal government. 

D. Revenues, Imputed & Other Financing Sources: 

Operating revenues of FHFA are obtained through assessments of the 
regulated entities. The agency's acting Director, in September 2009, 
approved the annual budget. By law, FHFA is required to charge semi-
annual assessments to the entities. Assessments collected shall not 
exceed the amount sufficient to provide for the reasonable costs 
associated with overseeing the entities, plus amounts determined by 
the acting Director to be necessary for maintaining a working capital 
fund. 

FHFA develops its annual budget using a 'bottom up' approach. Each 
office within the agency is asked to bifurcate their budget request 
between the amount of resources needed for the regulation of Fannie 
Mae and Freddie Mac and the resources needed for the regulation of the 
twelve FHLBanks. The office requests are then aggregated (with 
overhead costs distributed proportionately) to determine the total 
expected costs associated with regulating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac 
and the total expected costs associated with regulating the FHLBanks. 
These two totals, along with any expected collection for the working 
capital fund, comprise the fiscal year budget for the agency. 
Additionally, FHFA levied a special assessment for conservatorship 
activities on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during fiscal year 2010. 

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pay a pro rata share of their portion of 
the total assessment based on the combined assets and off-balance 
sheet obligations of each enterprise. Each FHLBank's share of their 
portion of the total assessment is based on the dollar value of its 
capital stock relative to the combined dollar value of all FHLBanks' 
capital stock. Assessment letters are sent to the entities 30 days 
prior to the assessment due dates of October 1st and April 1st. 
Assessments received prior to due dates are available for investment 
but are unavailable for obligation. These assessments are recorded as 
deferred revenue. 

Federal government entities often receive goods and services from 
other federal government entities without reimbursing the providing 
entity for all the related costs. In addition, federal government 
entities also incur costs that are paid in total or in part by other 
entities. An imputed financing source is recognized by the receiving 
entity for costs that are paid by other entities. FHFA recognized 
imputed costs and financing sources in fiscal years 2010 and 2009 as 
prescribed by accounting standards. FHFA recognizes as an imputed 
financing source the amount of pension and post-retirement benefit 
expenses for current employees accrued on FHFAs behalf by the Office 
of Personnel Management (OPM). 

E. Use of Estimates: 

The preparation of the accompanying financial statements in accordance 
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management 
to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported 
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses. Actual results 
could differ from those estimates. 

F. Earmarked Funds: 

FASAB's Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) 
No. 27 "Identifying and Reporting Earmarked Funds" established certain 
disclosure requirements for funds defined as "earmarked." SFFAS No. 27 
states that"earmarked funds are financed by specifically identified 
revenues, often supplemented by other financing sources, which remain 
available over time. These specifically identified revenues and other 
financing sources are required by statute to be used for designated 
activities, benefits or purposes and must be accounted for separately 
from the Government's general revenues." The standard also presents 
three required criteria for an earmarked fund. Based on the standard's 
criteria, FHFA determined that it has no earmarked funds. 

G. Fund Balance with Treasury: 

The U.S. Treasury (Treasury) processes cash receipts and disbursements 
on FHFAs behalf. Funds held at the Treasury are available to pay 
agency liabilities and finance authorized purchase obligations. FHFA 
does not maintain cash in commercial bank accounts or foreign currency 
balances. 

During the year, increases to FHFAs Fund Balance with Treasury are 
comprised of semi-annual assessments, investment interest, collections 
on reimbursable agreements, civil penalty monies, and Freedom of 
Information Act (FOIA) request fees. FHFA is not authorized to retain 
civil penalty monies or FOIA fees, and as such, records these as 
custodial liabilities (See Note 15. Incidental Custodial Collections). 

HERA provides authority for FHFA to maintain a working capital fund. 
The working capital fund is defined in FHFAs Assessment Regulation as 
an account for amounts collected from the regulated entities to 
establish an operating reserve that is intended to provide for the 
payment of large or multiyear capital and operating expenditures, as 
well as unanticipated expenses. The balance in the working capital 
fund will be evaluated annually. 

H. Investments: 

FHFA has the authority to invest in U.S. Treasury securities with 
maturities suitable to FHFAs needs. FHFA invests solely in U.S. 
Treasury securities, which are normally held to maturity and carried 
at cost. Investments are adjusted for unamortized premiums or 
discounts. Premiums and discounts are amortized and interest is 
accrued using the level-yield, scientific method of effective interest 
amortization over the term of the respective issues. 

I. Accounts Receivable: 

Accounts receivable consists of amounts owed to FHFA by other federal 
agencies and the public. Amounts due from federal agencies are 
considered fully collectible and consist of interagency agreements. 
Accounts receivable from the public include reimbursements from 
employees, civil penalty assessments and FOIA request fees. An 
allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable from the public is 
established when either (1) management determines that collection is 
unlikely to occur after a review of outstanding accounts and the 
failure of all collection efforts, or (2) an account for which no 
allowance has been established is submitted to the Department of the 
Treasury for collection, which takes place when it becomes 180 days 
delinquent. Historical experience has indicated that the majority of 
the receivables are collectible. 

J. Property, Equipment, and Software, Net: 

Property, Equipment, and Software is recorded at historical cost. It 
consists of tangible assets and software. Under FHFAs property 
management policy, equipment acquisitions of $25 thousand or more are 
capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over the 
estimated useful life of the asset. Additionally, for bulk purchases 
of similar items, which individually do not meet the test for 
capitalization, the acquisition is capitalized and depreciated if the 
depreciated basis of the bulk purchase is $250 thousand or more. 
Applicable standard governmental guidelines regulate the disposal and 
convertibility of agency property and equipment. The useful life 
classifications for capitalized assets are as follows: 

Description: Furniture, Fixtures, and Equipment; 
UseFul Life (years): 3. 

Description: Automated Filing Storage Systems; 
UseFul Life (years): 15. 

Description: Internal Use Software; 
UseFul Life (years): 3. 

A leasehold improvement's useful life is equal to the remaining lease 
term or the estimated useful life of the improvement, whichever is 
shorter. FHFA has no real property holdings or stewardship or heritage 
assets. Other property items, normal repairs and maintenance are 
charged to expense as incurred. 

K. Advances and Prepaid Charges: 

Advance payments are generally prohibited by law. There are some 
exceptions, such as reimbursable agreements, subscriptions and 
payments to contractors and employees. Payments made in advance of the 
receipt of goods and services are recorded as advances or prepaid 
charges at the time of prepayment and recognized as expenses when the 
related goods and services are received. 

L. Liabilities: 

Liabilities represent the amount of funds that are likely to be paid 
by FHFA as the result of a transaction or event that has already 
occurred. 

FHFA reports its liabilities under two categories, Intragovernmental 
and With the Public. Intragovernmental liabilities represent funds 
owed to another government agency. Liabilities With the Public 
represent funds owed to any entity or person that is not a federal 
agency, including private sector firms and federal employees. Each of 
these categories may include liabilities that are covered by budgetary 
resources and liabilities not covered by budgetary resources. 

Liabilities covered by budgetary resources are liabilities funded by a 
current appropriation or other funding source. These consist of 
accounts payable and accrued payroll and benefits. Accounts payable 
represent amounts owed to another entity for goods ordered and 
received and for services rendered except for employees. Accrued 
payroll and benefits represent payroll costs earned by employees 
during the fiscal year which are not paid until the next fiscal year. 

Liabilities not covered by budgetary resources are liabilities that 
are not funded by any current appropriation or other funding source. 
These liabilities consist of accrued annual leave, deferred rent, and 
the amounts due to Treasury for collection and accounts receivable of 
civil penalties and FOIA request fees. Annual leave is earned 
throughout the fiscal year and is paid when leave is taken by the 
employee; the accrued liability for annual leave represents the 
balance earned but not yet taken. The Department of Labor (DOL) is the 
central paying agent for all workman compensation claims filed under 
the Federal Employees Compensation Act (FECA). Accrued FECA
represents the amount FHFA is to reimburse DOL for claims paid to FHFA 
employees. No liability is recorded for future workman compensation as 
of September 30, 2010 and 2009, as FHFAs methodology for estimating the
future workman compensation as prescribed by DOL determined that the 
liability would be negligible. Deferred rent is the difference at year-
end between the sum of monthly cash disbursements paid to date for 
rent and the sum of the average monthly rent calculated based on the 
term of the lease. This determination and recording of deferred
rent is applicable only to the lease agreement on the property at 1750 
Pennsylvania Avenue that commenced in 2005 (See Note 8. Leases). 

M. Employee Leave and Benefits: 

FHFA employees are entitled to accrue annual leave and sick leave at a 
rate based on years of federal service. For most employees, annual 
leave may be accrued up to 240 hours each year. The FHFA executive 
employees equivalent to the Senior Executive Service (SES) employees 
may accrue annual leave consistent with the rules for SES level 
employees. Accrued annual leave is treated as an unfunded expense with 
an offsetting liability when earned. The accrued liability is reduced 
when the annual leave is taken. Any unused annual leave balance is 
paid to the employee upon leaving federal service, based on the 
employee's earnings per hour. There is no maximum limit on the amount 
of sick leave that may be accrued. Upon separation, any unused sick 
leave of Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) plan employees is 
creditable as additional time in service for the purpose of 
calculating an employee's retirement annuity. Credit is given for sick 
leave balances in the computation of annuities upon the retirement of 
Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS)-covered employees effective 
at 50% beginning in fiscal year 2010 and 100% beginning in fiscal year 
2014. 

Health Benefits and Life Insurance: FHFA, through programs established 
for all agencies by the federal government, offers its employees 
health and life insurance coverage through the Federal Employees 
Health Benefits Program and Federal Employees Group Life Insurance 
Program. The cost of each is shared by FHFA and its employees. In 
addition, all employees have 1.45% of gross earnings withheld to pay 
for future Medicare coverage. 

N. Retirement Plans: 

FHFA employees participate in the retirement plans offered by OPM, 
which consist of CSRS, CSRS — Othet, or FERS. The employees who 
participate in CSRS are beneficiaries of FHFAs contribution, equal to 
7% of pay, distributed to the employee's annuity account in the Civil 
Service Retirement and Disability Fund. Prior to December 31, 1983, 
all employees were covered under the CSRS program. From January 1, 
1984 through December 31, 1986, employees had the option of remaining 
under CSRS or joining FERS and Social Security. Employees hired as of 
January 1, 1987 are automatically covered by the FERS program. Both 
CSRS and FERS employees may participate in the federal Thrift Savings 
Plan (TSP). FERS employees receive an automatic Agency contribution 
equal to 1% of pay and FHFA matches any employee contribution up to an 
additional 4% of pay. For FERS participants, FHFA also contributes the 
employer's matching share of Social Security. 

FERS employees and CSRS — Othet employees are eligible to participate 
in the Social Security program after retirement. In these instances, 
FHFA remits the employer's share of the required contribution, which 
is 11.2% for FERS and 7% for CSRS. 

FHFA expenses its contributions to the retirement plans of covered 
employees as the expenses are incurred. FHFA reports imputed 
(unfunded) costs with respect to retirement plans, health benefits and 
life insurance pursuant to guidance received from OPM. These costs are 
paid by OPM and not by FHFA. Disclosure is intended to provide 
information regarding the full cost of FHFAs program in conformity 
with generally accepted accounting principles. 

FHFA does not report on its financial statements information 
pertaining to the retirement plans covering its employees. Reporting 
amounts such as plan assets, accumulated plan benefits, and related 
unfunded liabilities, if any, is the responsibility of OPM as the 
administrator. 

In addition to the TSP, FHFA offers a supplemental 401(K) plan that is 
administered by T. Rowe Price. All CSRS employees are eligible to 
contribute to the 401(K). Only FERS employees contributing at least 3% 
to the TSP are eligible to participate in the 401(K). All eligible 
employees that participate may contribute up to 10% of their biweekly 
salary on a pre-tax basis while FHFA will match contributions up to 3% 
of the employee's salary. Qualified employees may participate in the 
TSP and/or FHFAs 401(K) Savings Plan, up to the Internal Revenue Code 
limitations established for salary deferral and annual additions. 

O. Contingencies: 

Liabilities are deemed contingent when the existence or amount of the 
liability cannot be determined with certainty pending the outcome of 
future events. FHFA recognizes contingent liabilities, in the 
accompanying balance sheet and statement of net cost, when they are 
both probable and can be reasonably estimated. FHFA discloses 
contingent liabilities in the notes to the financial statements when a 
loss from the outcome of future events is more than remote but less 
than probable or when the liability is probable but cannot be 
reasonably estimated. 

Note 2. Fund Balance With Treasury: 

Fund Balance with Treasury consists of an Operating Fund and a Working 
Capital Fund. FHFA did not use the funds in the Working Capital Fund 
during fiscal years 2010 or 2009. In fiscal year 2010, the funds in 
the Working Capital Fund were fully invested. Fund Balance with 
Treasury (FBWT) account balances as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 
were as follows: 

(Dollars in Thousands): 

Fund Balances:	 

Operating Fund: 
2010: $1,000; 
2009: $26,076. 	 

Working Capital Fund: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $3,000. 

Total: 
2010: $1,000; 
2009: $29,076. 

Status of Fund Balance with Treasury: 

Unobligated Balance: 

Available: 
2010: $22,743; 
2009: $9,657. 

Unavailable (See Note 6: Deferred Revenue): 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: $35,122. 

Total Unobligated Balance: 
2010: $22,743; 
2009: $44,779. 

Obligated Balance Not Yet Disbursed: 
2010: $29,135; 
2009: $21,968. 

Investments: 
2010: ($50,878); 
2009: ($37,668). 

Uncollected Customer Payment Earned: 
2010: [Empty]; 
2009: ($3). 

Total: 
2010: $1,000; 
2009: $29,076. 

(See Note 12 Legal Arrangements Affecting Use of Unobligated Balances) 

[End of table] 

Note 3. Investments: 

Investments as of September 30, 2010 consist of the following: 

(Dollars in Thousands): 

Intragovernmental Securities: 
Non-Marketable Market Based: 	
Cost: $50,878; 
Amortized (Premium) Discount: [Empty]; 
Interest Receivable: [Empty]; 
Investments, Net: $50,878; 
Market Value Disclosure: $50,878. 

Investments as of September 30, 2009 consist of the following: 

(Dollars in Thousands): 

Intragovernmental Securities: 
Non-Marketable Market Based: 	
Cost: $37,668; 
Amortized (Premium) Discount: [Empty]; 
Interest Receivable: [Empty]; 
Investments, Net: $37,668; 
Market Value Disclosure: $37,668. 

[End of table] 

Non-marketable, market-based securities are Treasury notes and bills 
issued to governmental accounts that are not traded on any securities 
exchange, but mirror the prices of marketable securities with similar 
terms. FHFA is currently investing in one-day certificates issued by 
the U.S. Treasury. There were no amortized premiums/discounts
or interest receivable on investments as of September 30, 2010 or 
2009. Interest earned on investments was $72 thousand and $30 thousand 
for fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively. 

Note 4. Accounts Receivable: 

Accounts Receivable balances as of September 30, 2010 and 2009 were as 
follows: 

(Dollars in Thousands): 

Intragovernmental: Accounts Receivable: 
2010: $0; 
2009: $3. 

With the Public: Accounts Receivable: 
2010: $6; 
2009: $3. 

Total Accounts Receivable: 
2010: $6; 
2009: $3. 

There are no amounts that are deemed uncollectible as of September 30, 
2010 and 2009. 

Note 5. Property, Equipment, And Software, Net: 

Schedule of Property, Equipment, and Software as of September 30, 2010 
(Dollars in Thousands): 

Schedule of Property and Equipment as of September 30, 2009 (In 
Thousands): 
			
Description: Equipment; 
Acquisition Cost: $10,844; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $9,975; 
Book Value: $869. 

Description: Leasehold Improvements; 
Acquisition Cost: $6,940; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $6,674; 
Book Value: $266. 

Description: Capital Lease; 
Acquisition Cost: $22; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $22; 
Book Value: [Empty]. 

Description: Internal-Use Software; 
Acquisition Cost: $29,267; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $28,521; 
Book Value: $746. 

Description: Internal-Use Software In Development; 
Acquisition Cost: $370; 
Accumulated Depreciation: [Empty]; 
Book Value: $370. 

Description: Construction in Progress; 
Acquisition Cost: $146; 
Accumulated Depreciation: [Empty]; 
Book Value: $146. 

Description: Total; 
Acquisition Cost: $47,589; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $45,192; 
Book Value: $2,397. 

Schedule of Property and Equipment as of September 30, 2009 (In 
Thousands): 
			
Description: Equipment; 
Acquisition Cost: $10,303; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $9,526; 
Book Value: $777. 

Description: Leasehold Improvements; 
Acquisition Cost: $6,881; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $6,270; 
Book Value: $611. 

Description: Capital Lease; 
Acquisition Cost: $22; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $22; 
Book Value: [Empty]. 

Description: Internal-Use Software; 
Acquisition Cost: $29,093; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $27,280; 
Book Value: $1,813. 

Description: Internal-Use Software In Development; 
Acquisition Cost: $61; 
Accumulated Depreciation: [Empty]; 
Book Value: $61. 

Description: Construction in Progress; 
Acquisition Cost: $11; 
Accumulated Depreciation: [Empty]; 
Book Value: $11. 

Description: Total; 
Acquisition Cost: $46,371; 
Accumulated Depreciation: $43,098; 
Book Value: $3,273. 

[End of table] 

Note 6. Deferred Revenue: 

Deferred revenue for fiscal 2009 consists of $35.1 million and is 
classified as with the public for assessments received from the 
regulated entities prior to the due date of October 1st. These 
assessments are available for investment but unavailable for 
obligation. (See Note 2. Fund Balance With Treasury) 

Note 7. Other Liabilities: 

The other liabilities for FHFA are comprised of payroll accruals, 
deferred lease liability and unfunded leave. Payroll accruals 
represent payroll expenses that were incurred prior to year-end but 
were not paid. Other liabilities not covered by budgetary resources 
consist of unfunded annual leave, compensatory time, and deferred 
lease liability. 

(Dollars in Thousands): 

Intragovernmental: 

Payroll Taxes Payable: 
2010: $799; 
2009: $652. 

Total Intragovemmental: 
2010: $799; 
2009: $652. 

With the Public: 

Accrued Payroll: 
2010: $4,124; 
2009: $3,417. 

Unfunded Leave: 
2010: $7,837; 
2009: $7,256. 

Deferred Lease Liabilities: 
2010: $57; 
2009: $140. 

Total Public Liabilities: 
2010: $12,018; 
2009: $10,813. 

[End of table] 

Note 8. Leases: 

Operating Leases: 

1700 G Street NW: 

FHFA has an occupancy lease with the Office of Thrift Supervision 
(OTS) at 1700 G Street NW, Washington, DC, that covers office space 
and building services, including utilities, security guards, 
janitorial services, mail delivery, use of the loading dock, garage 
parking and building operation and maintenance. The initial term of the 
lease was for five years beginning in 1993, with the option to renew 
for three 5-year terms with OFHEO. This lease was transferred to FHFA 
with its creation. FHFA has exercised the third of the three option 
terms. 

FHFA may terminate the lease agreement with OTS in whole or in part. 
In the event of termination at FHFAs discretion, FHFA would be 
required to pay two months' rent. If either party ceases to exist or 
merges with another entity by operation of law, either party may 
terminate the rental agreement. In the event of termination under this 
provision, neither party is liable for further costs, fees, damages or 
other monies due to the termination, except for payments through the 
date of the termination. Because of this termination clause, no 
deferred rent is established for this lease, nor is disclosure of 
minimum future lease payments required under Financial Accounting 
Standard Board Statement No. 13. 

1750 Pennsylvania Avenue NW and 1625 Eye Street NW: 

FHFA leases office space in Washington, DC at 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW and 1625 Eye Street NW. The lease terms of 1750 Pennsylvania Avenue 
NW expire on March 30, 2011. The lease terms of 1625 Eye Street NW 
expire on June 30, 2015. Contingency space at an undisclosed location 
is also leased, with the lease expiring on March 31, 2011. Total 
rental payments for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 
were $4.91 million and $4.78 million, respectively. The minimum future 
payments for these leases are as follows: 

Fiscal year: 2011; 
Amount (Dollars in Thousands): $4,123. 

Fiscal year: 2012; 
Amount (Dollars in Thousands): $3,674. 

Fiscal year: 2013; 
Amount (Dollars in Thousands): $3,748. 

Fiscal year: 2014; 
Amount (Dollars in Thousands): $3,823. 

Fiscal year: 2015; 
Amount (Dollars in Thousands): $2,910. 

Fiscal year: Thereafter; 
Amount (Dollars in Thousands): [Empty]; 

Total future payments: 
Amount (Dollars in Thousands): $18,278. 

Note 9. Commitments And Contingencies: 

FHFA did not have any material commitments or contingencies that met 
disclosure requirements as of September 30, 2010 and 2009. 

Note 10. Program Costs: 

Pursuant to HERA, FHFA was established to supervise and regulate the 
fourteen regulated entities. The regulated entities include Freddie 
Mac, Fannie Mae and the twelve FHLBanks. FHFAs Program Costs were 
reflected as one program for fiscal year 2009 as defined by HERA 
Section 1311(b)(1). For fiscal year 2010, FHFA tracked resource 
allocations and program costs to the strategic goals (responsibility 
segments) developed for FHFAs new strategic plan, which was published 
in the last quarter of fiscal year 2009. The table below reflects the 
reporting change from fiscal year 2009 to 2010. 

Program costs are broken out into two categories-—"Intragovernmental" 
and "With the Public". Intragovernmental costs are costs FHFA incurs 
through contracting with other federal agencies for goods and/or 
services, such as rent paid to OTS, payroll processing services 
received from the Department of Agriculture and imputed financing 
costs for post-retirement benefits with OPM. With the Public costs are 
costs FHFA incurs through contracting with the private sector for 
goods or services, payments for employee salaries, depreciation, 
annual leave and deferred rent expenses. Revenue is comprised of 
assessments, investment interest, and miscellaneous revenue. 
Intragovernmental expenses relate to the source of goods and services 
purchased by the agency and not to the classification of related 
revenue. Such costs and revenue are summarized as follows: 

(Dollars in Thousands): 

Safety and Soundness	 

Intragovernmental Costs: 	
2010: $21,703; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Public Costs: 
2010: $74,167; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Total Costs: 
2010: $95,870; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Intragovernmental Earned Revenue: 
2010: $108; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Public Earned Revenue: 
2010: $89,164; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Net Safety and Soundness Costs: 
2010: $6,598; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Affordable Housing: 

Intragovernmental Costs: 
2010: $3,759; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Public Costs: 
2010: $12,272; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Total Costs: 
2010: $16,031; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Intragovernmental Earned Revenue: 
2010: $33; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Public Earned Revenue: 
2010: $26,786; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Net Affordable Housing (Income)/Costs: 
2010: ($10,788); 
2009: [Empty]. 

Conservatorship: 

Intragovernmental Costs: 
2010: $1,926; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Public Costs: 
2010: $14,737; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Total Costs: 
2010: $16,663; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Intragovernmental Earned Revenue: 
2010: $33; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Less: Public Earned Revenue: 
2010: $27,078; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Net Conservatorship (Income)/Costs: 
2010: $($10,448); 
2009: [Empty]. 

Total Intragovernmental costs: 
2010: $27,388; 
2009: $24,048. 

Total Public costs: 
2010: $101,176; 
2009: $98,768. 

Total Program Costs: 
2010: $128,564; 
2009: $122,816. 

Less: Total Intragovemmental Earned Revenue: 
2010: $174; 
2009: $33. 

Less: Total Public Earned Revenue: 
2010: $143,028; 
2009: $115,676. 

Total Program Net (Income)/Costs: 
2010: ($14,638); 
2009: $7,107. 

Note 11. Apportionment Categories Of Obligations Incurred: 

All obligations incurred are characterized as Category C, Exempt from 
apportionment (i.e. not apportioned), on the Statement of Budgetary 
Resources. Obligations incurred and reported in the Statement of 
Budgetary Resources in fiscal years 2010 and 2009 consisted of the 
following: 

(Dollars in Thousands): 

Direct Obligations, Category C: 
2010: $132,707; 
2009: $111,682. 

Reimbursable Obligations, Category C: 
2010: $101; 
2009: $4,569. 

Note 12. Legal Arrangements Affecting Use Of Unobligated Balances: 

HERA requires that any balance that remains unobligated at the end of 
the fiscal year, except for amounts assessed for contribution to 
FHFA's working capital fund, must be credited against the next year's 
assessment to the regulated entities. As of September 30, 2010 and 
2009, the unobligated balance was $22.7 million and $44.8 million,
of which $35.1 million of the balance at September 30, 2009 was 
deferred revenue, which was unavailable. The portion of the fiscal 
year 2010 unobligated available balance that will be credited against 
the regulated entities April assessments is $16.7 million with the 
remaining $6.0 million retained in the working capital fund. (See Note 
2. Fund Balance With Treasury) 

Note 13. Budgetary Resource Comparisons To The Budget Of The United 
States Government: 

Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards No. 7, Accounting 
for Revenue and Other Financing Sources and Concepts for Reconciling 
Budgetary and Financial Accounting; calls for explanations of material 
differences between amounts reported in the Statement of Budgetary 
Resources and the actual balances published in the Budget of the 
United States Government (President's Budget). The President's Budget 
that will include fiscal year 2010 actual budgetary execution 
information has not yet been published. The President's Budget is 
scheduled for publication in February 2012 and can be found at the OMB 
Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/]. The 2011 Budget 
of the United States Government, with the "Actual" column completed 
for 2009, has been reconciled to the Statement of Budgetary Resources 
and there were no material differences. 

Note 14. Undelivered Orders At The End Of The Period: 

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, undelivered 
orders amounted to $20.60 million and $12.87 million, respectively. 

Note 15. Incidental Custodial Collections: 

FHFAs custodial collections primarily consist of Freedom of 
Information Act requests and civil penalties assessed. Custodial 
collections will be reflected in the Fund Balance with Treasury amount 
on the Balance Sheet. While these collections are considered 
custodial, they are neither primary to the mission of the agency nor 
material to the overall financial statements. FHFA also collects civil 
penalties assessed against the regulated entities. FHFAs custodial 
collections are $288 for the year ended September 30, 2010. Custodial 
collections totaled $500 thousand for the year ended September 30, 
2009 which resulted from a penalty collected from a former executive 
of Freddie Mac. There were no civil penalties assessed or collected in 
fiscal year 2010. Custodial collections are transferred to the 
Treasury General Fund on September 30 and are not reflected in the 
financial statements of the Agency. 

Note 16. Reconciliation Of Net Cost Of Operations To Budget: 

FHFA has reconciled its budgetary obligations and non-budgetary 
resources available to its net cost of operations. 

Resources Used to Finance Activities: 

Budgetary Resources Obligated: 

Obligations Incurred: 
2010: $132,808; 
2009: $116,251; 

Less: Spending Authority From Offsetting Collections and Recoveries: 
2010: $2,794; 
2009: $5,077; 

Obligations Net of Offsetting Collections and Recoveries: 
2010: $130,014; 
2009: $111,174; 

Less: Offsetting Receipts: 
2010: $143,100; 
2009: $115,699; 

Net Obligations: 
2010: ($13,086); 
2009: ($4,525). 

Other Resources: 
Imputed Financing From Costs Absorbed by Others: 
2010: $4,807; 
2009: $3,078; 

Total Resources Used to Finance Activities: 
2010: ($8,279); 
2009: ($1,447). 

Resources Used to Finance Items Not Part of the Net Cost of Operations: 

Change in Budgetary Resources Obligated for Goods, Services and Benefits
Ordered But Not Yet Provided: 
2010: $7,729; 
2009: ($2,524); 

Resources That Fund Expenses Recognized In Prior Periods: 
2010: $84; 
2009: $46; 

Resources That Finance the Acquisition of Assets: 
2010: $975; 
2009: $974; 

Total Resources Used to Finance Items Not Part of the Net Cost of 
Operations: 
2010: $8,788; 
2009: ($1,504); 

Total Resources Used to Finance the Net Cost of Operations: 
2010: ($17,067); 
2009: $57. 

Components of Net Cost of Operations That Will Not Require or Generate 
Resources in the Current Period: 

Components Requiring or Generating Resources In Future Periods Increase 
In Annual Leave Liability: 
2010: $581; 
2009: $3,349. 

Components Requiring or Generating Resources In Future Periods Other: 
2010: $1; 
2009: [Empty]. 

Total Components of Net Cost of Operations That Will Require or 
Generate Resources In Future Periods: 
2010: $528; 
2009: $3,349; 

Components Not Requiring or Generating Resources: Depreciation and 
Amortization: 
2010: $2,200; 
2009: $3,697; 

Components Not Requiring or Generating Resources: Revaluation of Assets 
and Liabilities: 
2010: ($353); 
2009: $4; 

Total Components of Net Cost of Operations That Will Not Require or 
Generate Resources: 
2010: $1,847; 
2009: $3,701; 

Total Components of Net Cost of Operations That Will Not Require or 
Generate Resources in the Current Period: 
2010: $2,429; 
2009: $7,050. 
	
Net Cost of Operations: 
2010: ($14,638); 
2009: $7,107. 

[End of table] 

Note 17. Subsequent Event: 

Subsequent events have been evaluated through November 15, 2010, the 
date the financial statements are available to be issued. 

On October 25, 2010, the FHLBank of Seattle's Board of Directors 
agreed to a set of stipulations made by FHFA and consented to an FHFA 
order that set forth a comprehensive set of actions and requirements 
for the Bank. This was in response to investment decisions made in 
2006 and 2007 and a series of supervisory determinations beginning in 
November 2009, when FHFA used its Prompt Corrective Action authority 
to make the discretionary determination that the FHLBank of Seattle 
was undercapitalized based on depreciation in the value of the Bank's 
investments in private-label MBS. The decline in value of private-
label MBS investments and related shortcomings in its retained 
earnings made it inadvisable for the FHLBank of Seattle to honor 
pending requests for stock redemptions by member institutions. In 
response to the FHFA determination that the Seattle Bank was 
undercapitalized, the Bank submitted to FHFA a capital restoration 
plan in December 2009. In April 2010, FHFA directed the Bank to 
provide a business plan supplement to its capital restoration plan to 
address how the Bank would move toward more normal FHLBank 
functioning, including a greater balance sheet focus on advances and a 
return of capital at par to members. The Bank submitted the business 
plan supplement to FHFA on August 16, 2010, which was deemed complete 
upon a meeting at FHFA offices on August 31, 2010. FHFA responded to 
the Bank's capital restoration plan and business supplement in a 
meeting with the Bank's Board of Directors on October 22, 2010. The 
consent order and associated agreement with the Board constitute the 
Bank's approved capital restoration plan. The Bank also announced on 
October 25, 2010, that its President was stepping down and the current 
Chief Operating Officer would serve as the Bank's Acting President and 
Chief Executive Officer. 

[End of section] 

Appendix I: Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial 
Reporting: 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
1625 Eye Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20006-4065: 
Telephone: (202) 408-2500: 
Facsimile: (202) 408-1435: 
[hyperlink, http://www.fhfa.gov] 

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Federal Housing Finance Agency's (FHFA) internal control over 
financial reporting is a process effected by those charged with 
governance, management, and other personnel, the objectives of which 
are to provide reasonable assurance that (1) transactions are properly 
recorded, processed and summarized to permit the preparation of 
financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted 
accounting principles and assets are safeguarded against loss from 
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition; and (2) transactions 
are executed in accordance with the laws governing the use of budget 
authority and other laws and regulations that could have a direct and 
material effect on the financial statements. 

FHFA management is responsible for establishing and maintaining 
effective internal control over financial reporting. FHFA management 
evaluated the effectiveness of the agency's internal control over 
financial reporting as of September 30, 2010, based on the criteria 
established under 31 U.S.C. sec. 3512 (c), (d) (commonly known as the 
Federal Managers' Financial Integrity Act). 

Based on that evaluation, we conclude that, as of September 30, 2010, 
FHFA's internal control over financial reporting was effective. 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 

Signed by: 

Edward J. DeMarco: 
Acting Director: 

Signed by: 

Mark A. Kinsey: 
Chief Financial Officer: 

November 5, 2010: 

[End of section] 

Appendix II: Comments from the Federal Housing Finance Agency: 

Federal Housing Finance Agency: 
Office of the Director: 
1700 G Street, N.W. 
Washington, D.C. 20552-0003: 
202-414-3800: 
202-414-3823 (fax): 

November 8, 2010: 

Mr. Steven J. Sebastian: 
Director, Financial Management and Assurance: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street, NW: 
Washington, DC 20548: 

Dear Mr. Sebastian: 

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the Government 
Accountability Office's (GAO) draft audit report titled, Financial 
Audit: Federal Housing Finance Agency's Fiscal Years 2010 and 2009 
Financial Statements, GAO-11-151. This report presents GAO's opinion 
on the fiscal years 2010 and 2009 financial statements of the Federal 
Housing Finance Agency (FHFA). The report also presents GAO's opinion 
on the effectiveness of FHFA's internal controls as of September 30, 
2010 and GAO's evaluation of FHFA's compliance with laws and 
regulations. 

I am pleased to accept GAO's unqualified opinion on the FHFA financial 
statements and to note that there were no materials weaknesses or 
significant deficiencies identified during the fiscal year 2010 audit. 
The GAO reported that: the statements and notes were presented fairly, 
in all material respects; FHFA had effective internal controls over 
financial reporting; and there were no reportable instances of 
noncompliance with laws and regulations tested by GAO. 

FHFA will continue to work to enhance our internal controls and ensure 
the reliability of our financial reporting, soundness of operations, 
and public confidence in the agency's mission. We appreciate your 
support of these efforts. In addition, we would like to acknowledge 
the dedicated GAO staff that worked with FHFA to meet the reporting 
deadline for our audited financial statements and notes. 

If you have any questions relating to our response, please contact 
Mark Kinsey, Chief Financial Officer, at (202) 414-3811. 

Sincerely, 

Signed by: 

Edward J. DeMarco: 
Acting, Director: 

[End of section] 

Footnotes: 

[1] Public Law 110-289, 122 Stat. 2654, signed into law on July 30, 
2008. 

[2] A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of 
deficiencies, in internal control such that there is a reasonable 
possibility that a material misstatement of the entity's financial 
statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely 
basis. A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of 
deficiencies, in internal control that is less severe than a material 
weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those charged 
with governance. A deficiency in internal control exists when the 
design or operation of a control does not allow management or 
employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned 
functions, to prevent or detect and correct misstatements on a timely 
basis. 

[End of section] 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each 
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly 
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] 
and select "E-mail Updates." 

Order by Phone: 

The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO’s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO’s Web site, 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm]. 

Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537. 

Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional 
information. 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]: 
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov: 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Congressional Relations: 

Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4400: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7125: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

Public Affairs: 

Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4800: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7149: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: