This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-11-358T 
entitled 'Airport And Airway Trust Fund: Declining Balance Raises 
Concerns over Ability to Meet Future Demands' which was released on 
February 3, 2011. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as 
part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. 
Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data 
integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, 
such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes 
placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, 
are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format 
of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an 
exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your 
feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or 
accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
GAO: 

Testimony: 

Before the Committee on Finance, U.S. Senate: 

For Release on Delivery: 
Expected at 10:00 a.m. EST:
Thursday, February 3, 2011: 

Airport And Airway Trust Fund: 

Declining Balance Raises Concerns over Ability to Meet Future Demands: 

Statement of Gerald Dillingham, Director: 
Physical Infrastructure: 

GAO-11-358T: 

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee: 

We appreciate the opportunity to participate in today's hearing on the 
status of the Airport and Airway Trust Fund (Trust Fund). Established 
in 1970, the Trust Fund helps finance the Federal Aviation 
Administration's (FAA) investments in the airport and airway system, 
such as construction and safety improvements at airports and 
technological upgrades to the air traffic control system, as well as 
FAA operations, such as providing air traffic control and conducting 
safety inspections.[Footnote 1] FAA, the Trust Fund, and the excise 
taxes that support the Trust Fund (which are discussed later in this 
statement) must all be periodically reauthorized. The most recent 
reauthorization expired at the end of fiscal year 2007.[Footnote 2] 
Proposed reauthorization legislation was considered but not enacted in 
the 110th and 111th Congresses, although several short-term measures 
were passed to extend the authorization of aviation programs, funding, 
and Trust Fund revenue collections. The latest of these extensions--
the Airport and Airway Extension Act of 2010, Part IV--was enacted on 
December 22, 2010, extending FAA programs, expenditure authority, and 
aviation trust fund revenue collections through March 31, 2011. 
[Footnote 3] The financial health of the Trust Fund is important to 
ensure sustainable funding for a safe and efficient aviation system 
without increasing demands on general revenues. 

My statement today provides an update on the status of the Airport and 
Airway Trust Fund, including the current financial condition of the 
Trust Fund, anticipated Trust Fund expenditures for planning and 
implementing improvements in the nation's air traffic management 
system that are expected to enhance the safety and capacity of the air 
transport system, and options for ensuring a sustainable Trust Fund. 
This statement draws on our body of work on these issues, supplemented 
with updated information on the Trust Fund from FAA and the 
Congressional Budget Office.[Footnote 4] All dollars reported in this 
statement are nominal, unless otherwise noted. 

Background: 

Sources of Trust Fund Revenues: 

The Trust Fund provides the primary source of funding for FAA and 
receives revenues principally from a variety of excise taxes paid by 
users of the national airspace system. The excise taxes are imposed on 
airline ticket purchases and aviation fuel, as well as the shipment of 
cargo. Revenues deposited in the Trust Fund are subject to 
congressional appropriations. In addition to Trust Fund revenues, in 
most years, General Fund revenues have been used to help fund FAA 
operations. 

Table 1: Trust Fund Excise Tax Revenue Sources: 

Source: Domestic passenger ticket tax; 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: 7.5 percent. 

Source: Domestic flight segment tax; 
(excluding flights to or from rural airports); 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: $3.70 per passenger per segment; 
indexed to the Consumer Price Index. 

Source: Tax on flights between the continental United States and 
Alaska or Hawaii (or between Alaska and Hawaii); 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: $8.20 per passenger; indexed to 
the Consumer Price Index. 

Source: Tax on international arrivals and departures; 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: $16.30 per person; indexed to 
the Consumer Price Index. 

Source: Tax on mileage awards (frequent flyer awards tax); 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: 7.5 percent of value of miles. 

Source: Domestic commercial fuel tax; 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: $0.043 per gallon. 

Source: Domestic general aviation gasoline tax; 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: $0.193 per gallon. 

Source: Domestic general aviation jet fuel tax; 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: $0.218 per gallon. 

Source: Tax on domestic cargo or mail; 
Rates effective as of January 1, 2011: 6.25 percent on the price paid 
for transportation of domestic cargo or mail. 

Source: GAO presentation of FAA and IRS data. 

Note: The Trust Fund also earns interest on its cash balance along 
with refunds or credits, such as refunds of taxes on aviation fuel 
other than gas (noncommercial) and refunds of taxes on aviation 
gasoline (noncommercial). 

[End of table] 

As figure 1 shows, Trust Fund revenues have fluctuated since fiscal 
year 2000.[Footnote 5] A number of factors, such as external events 
and general economic conditions, contributed to this fluctuation in 
revenues because they affect the number of tickets purchased, the 
fares paid by passengers, the amount of fuel purchased, and the value 
of air cargo shipped. For example, revenues declined early in the 
decade because of a series of largely unforeseen events, including the 
September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, that reduced the demand for air 
travel, resulting in a steep decline in airline industry revenue. 
Similarly, during the recent recession, Trust Fund revenues declined 
from $12.4 billion in fiscal year 2008 to $10.9 billion in fiscal year 
2009, in part because of the 7 percent decline in domestic passenger 
traffic during that period. 

Figure 1: Trust Fund Receipts, Fiscal Years 2000 through 2010: 

[Refer to PDF for image: line graph] 

Fiscal year: 2000; 
Trust Fund receipts: $10.6 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2001; 
Trust Fund receipts: $10.1 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2002; 
Trust Fund receipts: $9.8 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2003; 
Trust Fund receipts: $9.3 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2004; 
Trust Fund receipts: $9.6 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2005; 
Trust Fund receipts: $10.8 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2006; 
Trust Fund receipts: $10.9 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2007; 
Trust Fund receipts: $11.9 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2008; 
Trust Fund receipts: $12.4 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2009; 
Trust Fund receipts: $10.9 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2010; 
Trust Fund receipts: $10.8 billion. 

Source: GAO analysis of FAA data. 

Note: Taxes related to passenger tickets, including the ticket tax, 
made up about 65 percent to 69 percent of the revenues going into the 
Trust Fund in fiscal years 2000 through 2010. 

[End of figure] 

Uses of Airport and Airway Trust Fund Revenues: 

The Trust Fund is the primary source of funding for FAA's capital 
programs and also provides funds for FAA's Operations account. The 
capital accounts include (1) the Facilities and Equipment (F&E) 
account, which funds technological improvements to the air traffic 
control system, including the modernization of the air traffic control 
system, called the Next Generation Air Transportation System 
(NextGen); (2) the Research, Engineering, and Development (RE&D) 
account, which funds research on issues related to aviation safety, 
mobility, and NextGen technologies; and (3) the Airport Improvement 
Program (AIP), which provides grants for airport planning and 
development. In addition, the Trust Fund has provided all or some 
portion of the funding for FAA's Operations account, which funds the 
operation of the air traffic control system and safety inspections, 
among other activities. Finally, the Trust Fund is used to pay for the 
Essential Air Service (EAS) program.[Footnote 6] In fiscal year 2010, 
FAA's expenditures totaled about $15.5 billion, with Trust Fund 
revenues covering about $10.2 billion, or 66 percent, of those 
expenditures. As figure 2 shows, while total FAA expenditures grew 
about 60 percent from fiscal year 2000 through fiscal year 2010, the 
Trust Fund's revenue contribution only increased 12 percent, while the 
contribution of general revenues from the U.S. Treasury has increased 
to cover a larger share of FAA's operations expenditures. We discuss 
this change in more detail in the next section of this statement. 

Figure 2: Trust Fund Expenditures, Fiscal Years 2000 through 2010: 

[Refer to PDF for image: stacked vertical bar graph] 

Fiscal year: 2000; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $9.04 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $0.52 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2001; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $9.52 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $1.29 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2002; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $11.73 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $1.47 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2003; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $9.52 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $3.27 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2004; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $10.37 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $2.7 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2005; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $11.12 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $2.85 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2006; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $12.04 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $2.49 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2007; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $12.01 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $2.46 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2008; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $12.82 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $2.12 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2009; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $11.8 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $3.76 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2010; 
Total expenditures from the Trust Fund: $10.17 billion; 
Total expenditures from the General Fund: $5.29 billion. 

Source: GAO analysis of FAA data. 

Note: These expenditures exclude the general revenues provided under 
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, 
123 Stat. 115 (2009). 

[End of figure] 

The Financial Condition of the Trust Fund Has Deteriorated over the 
Last Decade: 

Since the Trust Fund's creation in 1970, revenues have in the 
aggregate generally exceeded spending commitments from FAA's 
appropriations, resulting in a surplus.[Footnote 7] This surplus is 
referred to as the Trust Fund's uncommitted balance--the balance in 
the Trust Fund that remains after funds have been appropriated from 
the Trust Fund and contract authority has been authorized. As of the 
end of fiscal year 2010, the Trust Fund's uncommitted balance was 
about $770 million (see figure 3).[Footnote 8] 

Figure 3: Trust Fund End-of-Year Uncommitted Balance, Fiscal Years 
2000 through 2010: 

[Refer to PDF for image: line graph] 

Fiscal year: 2000; 
Uncommitted balance: $7.07 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2001; 
Uncommitted balance: $7.35 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2002; 
Uncommitted balance: $4.82 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2003; 
Uncommitted balance: $3.9 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2004; 
Uncommitted balance: $2.45 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2005; 
Uncommitted balance: $1.94 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2006; 
Uncommitted balance: $1.77 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2007; 
Uncommitted balance: $1.53 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2008; 
Uncommitted balance: $1.44 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2009; 
Uncommitted balance: $0.3 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2010; 
Uncommitted balance: $0.77 billion. 

Source: FAA. 

[End of figure] 

As figure 3 shows, the Trust Fund's uncommitted balance has declined 
since reaching $7.35 billion in fiscal year 2001. This decline is 
largely a result of how Congress determines the amount of 
appropriations that should be made from the Trust Fund. Starting with 
the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act of the 21st 
Century (AIR-21)[Footnote 9] in 2000 and continuing with Vision 
100,[Footnote 10] Congress has based FAA's fiscal year appropriation 
from the Trust Fund on the forecasted level of Trust Fund revenues, 
including interest on Trust Fund balances, as set forth in the 
President's baseline budget projection for the coming fiscal year. 
Each year's forecast, and accordingly FAA's appropriation, is based on 
information available in the first quarter of the preceding fiscal 
year. For example, the revenue forecast for fiscal year 2011 is 
prepared in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. These revenue 
forecasts can be uncertain because it is difficult to anticipate, a 
year in advance, events that may significantly affect the demand for 
air travel or fuel usage, the fares that passengers pay, and other 
variables that affect Trust Fund revenues. In fact, as figure 4 shows, 
FAA's forecasts of Trust Fund revenues (including both tax revenues 
and interest earned by the Trust Fund's cash balance) have exceeded 
actual Trust Fund revenues (including interest) in 9 of 11 years, and 
in aggregate, these forecasted revenues have exceeded actual tax 
revenues by over $9 billion over that period.[Footnote 11] 
Accordingly, appropriations from the Trust Fund, which are based on 
these revenue forecasts, have also exceeded actual revenues, thus 
drawing the uncommitted balance lower over the course of the last 
decade. 

Figure 4: Forecast Trust Fund Revenues and Actual Trust Fund Revenues 
Received, Fiscal Years 2000 through 2010: 

[Refer to PDF for image: vertical bar graph] 

Fiscal year: 2000; 
Forecast total revenue: $10.06 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $10.54 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2001; 
Forecast total revenue: $10.46 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $10.02 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2002; 
Forecast total revenue: $12.18 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $9.89 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2003; 
Forecast total revenue: $10.30 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $9.28 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2004; 
Forecast total revenue: $10.93 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $9.65 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2005; 
Forecast total revenue: $11.09 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $10.74 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2006; 
Forecast total revenue: $11.77 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $10.92 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2007; 
Forecast total revenue: $11.79 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $11.94 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2008; 
Forecast total revenue: $12.57 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $12.43 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2009; 
Forecast total revenue: $13.04 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $10.88 billion. 

Fiscal year: 2010; 
Forecast total revenue: $11.95 billion; 
Actual total revenue: $10.81 billion. 

Source: FAA. 

[End of figure] 

Until recently, FAA generated a forecast for the President's budget 
using models based on historical relationships between key economic 
variables, such as the growth rate of the economy, and aviation 
measures, such as passenger traffic levels and passenger fares, that 
affect Trust Fund revenues. The responsibility for forecasting Trust 
Fund revenues shifted from FAA to the U.S. Department of the Treasury 
(Treasury), which already had responsibility for other federal excise 
tax revenue forecasts, in fiscal year 2010. We have recently been 
asked by the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee to 
examine the Trust Fund revenue forecasting process and how it might be 
improved; we expect to begin our review this year. 

The Trust Fund's uncommitted balance, which exceeded $7.3 billion at 
the end of fiscal year 2001, dropped to $299 million at the end of 
fiscal year 2009--the lowest balance over the past decade. One of the 
greatest declines in the uncommitted balance occurred in 2002 
following the sudden drop-off in aviation activity after the terrorist 
attacks of September 11. In addition, the declines in passenger 
traffic and aircraft operations and reduced fuel consumption in 2009 
resulted in actual revenues to the Trust Fund that fell significantly 
below forecasted levels in fiscal year 2009 and an uncommitted Trust 
Fund balance that approached zero.[Footnote 12] In response, the 
fiscal year 2009 omnibus appropriation increased the general revenue 
contributions to FAA's operations and decreased FAA's appropriation 
from the Trust Fund by approximately $1 billion compared with what was 
originally outlined in the President's fiscal year 2009 proposed 
budget for FAA.[Footnote 13] These additional general revenues kept 
the Trust Fund's uncommitted balance from going negative, thereby 
avoiding budgetary challenges for FAA. As a result, general revenues 
accounted for 24 percent of FAA's expenditures in fiscal year 2009 and 
reached 34 percent in fiscal year 2010 (see figure 2).[Footnote 14] 

If the uncommitted balance is nearly depleted and actual Trust Fund 
revenues continue to fall below forecasted levels, there is a risk of 
overcommitting available resources from the Trust Fund--meaning 
revenues could be insufficient to cover all of the obligations that 
FAA has the authority to incur.[Footnote 15] A low uncommitted balance 
signals to FAA that limited revenues are available to incur new 
obligations while still covering expenditures on existing obligations 
and increases FAA's challenge in moving forward with planned projects 
and programs. FAA officials have noted that they closely monitor the 
Trust Fund's available cash and FAA's obligations to ensure that 
enough cash and budget authority are available to cover FAA's 
expenditures and obligations. In the short term, if there were a risk 
of overcommitting Trust Fund resources, FAA officials noted that they 
might delay obligations for capital programs if the Trust Fund did not 
have adequate revenues to cover those obligations without additional 
funding authorized and appropriated from the General Fund. According 
to FAA officials, they would first defer some capital program 
obligations so they could continue to fund operations, such as air 
traffic control and safety inspections. These actions would ensure 
that the agency did not incur obligations or expenditures in excess of 
the Trust Fund's cash balance, which could potentially lead to a 
violation of the Antideficiency Act.[Footnote 16] Later this month, in 
the President's budget, the administration will release its newest 
estimate of the Trust Fund's fiscal year 2011 year-end uncommitted 
balance. 

Anticipated Future Expenditures for NextGen: 

Congress may choose to increase FAA's authorized funding level in the 
near term to allow FAA to further develop NextGen, the new satellite- 
based air traffic management system that is designed to replace the 
current radar-based system. NextGen improvements include new 
integrated systems, procedures, aircraft performance capabilities, and 
supporting infrastructure needed for a performance-based air 
transportation system that uses satellite-based surveillance and 
navigation and network-centric operations. These improvements are 
intended to improve the efficiency and capacity of the air 
transportation system while maintaining its safety so that it can 
accommodate anticipated future growth. FAA has generally identified 
the NextGen capabilities that it plans to implement in the near term 
to midterm, through 2018. FAA's capital investment is expected to be 
$11 billion to $12 billion through 2018. This cost does not include 
research, the airport and associated airfield improvements, or the 
aircraft equipage that is necessary to realize all benefits. In 
addition to FAA's capital investment costs, FAA estimates that the 
equipage necessary to realize significant capabilities implemented 
through 2018 will cost in the range of $5 billion to $7 billion. 
Decisions about the long-term direction for NextGen (beyond 2018) have 
yet to be made, and two key planning documents--the NextGen Integrated 
Work Plan and Enterprise Architecture--contain a wide variety of 
possible ideas and approaches. Therefore, the costs of the system over 
the long term are uncertain, but have been estimated to be in the $40 
billion range (combined public and private investment in ground 
infrastructure and avionics). FAA's proposed budget for NextGen 
activities is $1.14 billion in fiscal year 2011, up from the $700 
million spent in fiscal year 2009 and the $868 million spent in fiscal 
year 2010. In addition, as we have previously reported, NextGen's 
ability to enhance capacity will partly depend on how well airports 
can handle greater capacity.[Footnote 17] FAA's plans call for 
building or expanding runways at the nation's 35 busiest airports to 
help meet the expected increases. However, even with these planned 
runway improvements and the additional capacity gained through NextGen 
technologies and procedures, FAA analyses indicate that 14 more 
airports will still need additional capacity, which could require 
additional Trust Fund resources. 

Additionally, the Future of Aviation Advisory Committee[Footnote 18] 
recently proposed to the Secretary of Transportation that the federal 
government undertake a significant financial investment to accelerate 
efforts to equip aircraft and train staff to use key NextGen 
technologies and operational capabilities, including performance-based 
navigation (PBN), automatic dependent surveillance--broadcast (ADS-B), 
ground-based augmentation system (GBAS) and data communications. The 
amount of investment required will depend on how any financial 
incentives are structured. Financial assistance can come in a variety 
of forms, including grants, cost-sharing arrangements, loans, loan 
guarantees, tax incentives, and other innovative financing 
arrangements. One financing option proposed by the NextGen Midterm 
Implementation Task Force[Footnote 19] to encourage the purchase of 
aircraft equipment is the use of equipage banks, which would provide 
federal loans to operators to equip their aircraft. Another financing 
option, proposed in various forms by a variety of stakeholders, would 
involve setting up an equipage fund using private equity backed by 
federal loan guarantees. While the details of different proposals 
vary, they would all allow operators who purchase equipment through 
the fund to defer payments on the equipment until FAA makes 
improvements required for the operators to benefit from the equipment. 
As we have previously reported, prudent use of taxpayer dollars is 
always important; therefore, any financial incentives should be 
applied carefully and in accordance with key principles.[Footnote 20] 
For example, mechanisms for financial assistance should be designed so 
as to effectively target parts of the fleet and geographical locations 
where benefits are deemed to be greatest, avoid unnecessarily 
equipping aircraft (e.g., those that are about to be retired), and not 
displace private investment that would otherwise occur. Furthermore, 
it is preferable that the mechanism used for federal financial 
assistance result in minimizing the use of government resources (e.g., 
some mechanisms may cost the government more to implement or may place 
the government at greater risk than others). 

Options for Ensuring a Sustainable Trust Fund: 

Given the uncertainty inherent in forecasting revenues and the decline 
in the uncommitted balance of the Trust Fund, we have suggested that 
Congress should work with FAA to develop alternative ways to reduce 
the risk of overcommitting budgetary resources from the Trust Fund. 
[Footnote 21] Better matching of actual revenues to the appropriation 
from the Trust Fund would help to ensure that Trust Fund revenues are 
sufficient to cover all the obligations that FAA has the authority to 
incur, thereby reducing the risk of disruptions in funding for 
aviation projects and programs. One approach would be to appropriate 
less than 100 percent of the forecasted revenues, especially until a 
sufficient surplus is established to protect against potential 
disruptions in revenue collection. This change would reduce the 
likelihood that FAA would incur obligations in excess of the cash 
needed to liquidate these obligations and thus reduce the risk of 
delaying or terminating projects. The House of Representatives' FAA 
reauthorization bill proposed in the 111th Congress includes a 
provision that would limit the budgetary resources initially made 
available each fiscal year from the Trust Fund to 90 percent, rather 
than 100 percent, of forecasted revenues for that year; then 2 fiscal 
years later, when actual revenues would be known, any amount that 
exceeded 90 percent of forecasted revenues in the second previous year 
would be appropriated from the Trust Fund to FAA.[Footnote 22] 
Congress would need to provide additional general revenues in the 
first 2 years to make up the difference. Another approach would be to 
target a minimum level for the Trust Fund's uncommitted balance and 
base appropriations on the goal of maintaining that target level. This 
change would make it more likely that uncommitted resources would be 
available to FAA in the event that actual revenues fell short of 
forecasted revenues in a future year. Either approach would result in 
fewer Trust Fund resources available for FAA for some period of time, 
requiring additional general revenues to make up the difference, 
unless FAA's overall resources are reduced. 

In the longer term, future Trust Fund revenues under the current tax 
structure may be lower than previously anticipated. For example, in 
January 2011, the Congressional Budget Office forecast about $25 
billion less in Trust Fund revenues over the next 6 years (through 
fiscal year 2017) than it forecast in 2007 for that same time period. 
Given the decline in expected future revenues, appropriations from the 
Trust Fund under current law will be lower in future years than 
previously projected unless new revenue sources are found. To maintain 
appropriations consistent with what earlier revenue forecasts would 
have afforded, Congress could take action such as increasing general 
revenue contributions or increasing Trust Fund revenues. For example, 
we suggested that if Congress determines that the benefit of added 
revenue to the Trust Fund warrants taxation of optional airline 
service fees, such as baggage fees, then it should consider amending 
the Internal Revenue Code to make mandatory the taxation of certain or 
all airline-imposed fees and require that the revenue be deposited in 
the Trust Fund.[Footnote 23] 

The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee also recommended that the 
Secretary of Transportation commission an independent study of the 
federal aviation tax burden on passengers, airlines, and general 
aviation to determine if existing levels of taxes and fees 
sufficiently balance the Department's statutory mandates to "encourage 
efficient and well-managed air carriers to earn adequate profits and 
attract capital...;" "promote, encourage, and develop civil 
aeronautics and a viable, privately-owned United States air transport 
industry;" and "ensure that consumers in all regions of the United 
States, including those in small communities and rural remote areas, 
have access to affordable, regularly scheduled air service."[Footnote 
24] The committee recommended that the study address the following 
questions: 

* How do the federal taxes imposed on the U.S. aviation industry 
compare to those imposed on other modes of transportation? 

* Is the existing level of aviation taxes and fees levied efficiently 
and effectively for the services provided by the federal government? 

* Are there more efficient ways to collect and administer existing 
aviation taxes and fees that would save taxpayer and aviation industry 
dollars? 

* Would regular consultation between those departments and agencies 
that administer aviation taxes and fees prior to implementing any 
changes to tax rates and policies result in (1) a more efficient and 
rational aviation tax system and (2) the desired industry and social 
outcome? 

* What is the appropriate balance between General Fund financing and 
Trust Fund financing of capital and operating costs of the national 
aviation system, recognizing the significant role commercial and 
general aviation play in fostering economic growth and development? 

Based on the results of the study, the committee recommends that the 
Secretary pursue appropriate legislative and regulatory actions that 
may be needed to ensure that existing and any new aviation taxes and 
fees applied to passengers, airlines, and general aviation are 
effective and collected efficiently, appropriately recognizing the 
role commercial and general aviation play in fostering economic growth 
and development.[Footnote 25] 

Thank you, Mr. Chairman, that concludes my statement. I will be 
pleased to answer any questions that you or other Members of the 
Committee might have. 

Contacts and Staff Acknowledgments: 

For future questions about this statement, please contact me at (202) 
512-2834 or dillinghamg@gao.gov. Individuals making key contributions 
to this report were Paul Aussendorf, Assistant Director; Amy 
Abramowitz; Jessica Bryant-Bertail; Lauren Calhoun; Carol Henn; Bess 
Eisenstadt; Heather Krause; Hannah Laufe; Maureen Luna-Long; and 
Andrew Von Ah. 

[End of section] 

Footnotes: 

[1] Airport and Airway Revenue Act of 1970, Pub. L. No. 91-258, 84 
Stat. 236 (1970). 

[2] Vision 100--Century of Aviation Reauthorization Act (Vision 100), 
Pub. L. No. 108-176, 117 Stat. 2490 (2003). 

[3] Pub. L. No. 111-329, 124 Stat. 3566 (2010). While the majority of 
the extensions expire March 31, 2011, certain authorities were 
extended until April 1, 2011, or June 30, 2011. 

[4] Commercial Aviation: Consumers Could Benefit from Better 
Information about Airline-Imposed Fees and Refundability of Government-
Imposed Taxes and Fees, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-785] (Washington, D.C.: July 14, 
2010); Next Generation Air Transportation System: FAA Faces Challenges 
Responding to Task Force Recommendations, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-188T] (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 28, 
2009); Commercial Aviation: Airline Industry Contraction Due to 
Volatile Fuel Prices and Falling Demand Affects Airports, Passengers, 
and Federal Government Revenues, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-393] (Washington, D.C.: Apr. 21, 
2009); Next Generation Air Transportation System: Status of Systems 
Acquisition and the Transition to the Next Generation Air 
Transportation System, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-1078] (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 11, 
2008); Aviation Finance: Observations on Potential FAA Funding 
Options, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-06-973] 
(Washington, D.C.: September 29, 2006); and Airport and Airway Trust 
Fund: Preliminary Observations on Past, Present, and Future, 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-657T], (Washington, 
D.C.: May 4, 2005). 

[5] Although figure 1 shows Trust Fund receipts fluctuating, these 
receipts are in nominal dollars; if the numbers were adjusted for 
inflation, the value of receipts in fiscal year 2010 would be 
considerably lower than the value of the receipts in fiscal year 2000. 

[6] EAS was established when the airline industry was deregulated in 
1978. Airline Deregulation Act of 1978, Pub. L. No. 95-504, § 33(a), 
92 Stat. 1705, 1732-39 (1978) (codified as amended at 49 U.S.C. §§ 
41731--41748). Since then, the program has subsidized air service to 
eligible communities that would otherwise not have scheduled service. 

[7] FAA considers the committed balance to include appropriations from 
the Trust Fund and authorized contract authority, whether or not 
obligated. 

[8] GAO annually audits the excise tax contributions to the Trust 
Fund, and the most recent audit was published in November 2010. See 
GAO, Applying Agreed-Upon Procedures: Fiscal Year 2010 Airport and 
Airway Trust Fund Excise Taxes, [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-120R] (Washington, D.C.: Nov. 4, 
2010). 

[9] Pub. L. No. 106-181, 114 Stat. 61 (2000). 

[10] Pub. L. No. 108-176, 117 Stat. 2490 (2003). 

[11] As previously noted, the Trust Fund also earns interest on its 
cash balances. 

[12] Some of the decline in Trust Fund revenues could also be 
attributed to a decline in tax revenues from cargo and general 
aviation. 

[13] Omnibus Appropriations Act 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-8, div. I, title 
I, 123 Stat. 524, 918-19 (2009). 

[14] FAA's general revenue contribution can also be presented in 
relation to FAA's appropriation. Although the numbers for general 
revenue contributions in relation to expenditures and in relation to 
appropriations are not necessarily the same, these numbers are very 
similar. 

[15] An obligation is an action that creates a legal liability or 
definite commitment on the part of the government to make a 
disbursement at some later date. FAA's fiscal year appropriations and 
authorization provide the legal authority for FAA to incur obligations 
and make payments out of the Trust Fund (through the Treasury). 

[16] The Antideficiency Act prohibits an officer or employee of the 
federal government from incurring an obligation, or making an 
expenditure, in advance or in excess of an appropriation or fund. 31 
U.S.C. § 1341(a)(1). However, FAA's aviation programs are partly 
funded with contract authority, which is an exemption to the 
Antideficiency Act and authorizes FAA to incur obligations in advance 
or in excess of an appropriation. This authority permits FAA to incur 
obligations in excess of the revenue in the Trust Fund. However, FAA 
must receive an appropriation from the Trust Fund in order to 
liquidate these obligations. If there is not adequate revenue in the 
Trust Fund, the obligation cannot be liquidated. Because of the 
uncertainty in forecasting, the addition of revenues into the Trust 
Fund throughout the fiscal year, and the mix of FAA programs funded 
through contract authority and through regular appropriations, it may 
be difficult for FAA to determine at what point it would violate the 
Antideficiency Act. Accordingly, FAA must carefully manage its 
obligations and expenditures so that it can take action before it 
reaches the point where it could potentially incur an Antideficiency 
Act violation. 

[17] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-08-1078]. 

[18] On March 24, 2010, the Secretary of Transportation authorized the 
establishment of a Federal Advisory Committee to address aviation 
issues. The Future of Aviation Advisory Committee (FAAC) was set up to 
develop information, advice, and recommendations to the Secretary of 
Transportation on ensuring the competitiveness of the U.S. aviation 
industry and its capability to address the evolving transportation 
needs, challenges, and opportunities of the global economy. On 
December 15, 2010, the committee presented its recommendations to the 
Secretary of Transportation. 

[19] Recognizing the importance of near-term and midterm solutions, 
FAA requested that RTCA, Inc.--a private, not-for-profit corporation 
that develops consensus-based recommendations on communications, 
navigation, surveillance, and air traffic management system issues-- 
create a NextGen Midterm Implementation Task Force to reach consensus 
within the aviation community on the operational improvements that can 
be implemented between now and 2018. The Task Force issued its 
recommendations in September 2009. 

[20] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-188T]. 

[21] [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-09-393]. 

[22] This provision is contained in H.R. 915, 111th Cong. (2009), 
introduced on February 9, 2009, but was amended from 95 percent to 90 
percent on March 5, 2009. H.R. 2881, 110TH Cong. (2007), which was 
introduced two sessions ago, passed in the House on September 20, 
2007, and included a provision to limit FAA's budget authority to 95 
percent. 

[23] As we reported in [hyperlink, 
http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-10-785], while fares have decreased, 
airlines have imposed fees for a variety of passenger services, most 
notably for a first or second checked bag, for which separate charges 
did not previously exist. Fees have also been imposed for early 
boarding, seat selection, and meals, among other services. Under 
governing Treasury regulations and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) 
guidance, charges for services beyond those mandatory charges 
necessary to transport passengers, such as checked baggage, are not 
subject to the 7.5 percent excise tax, and consequently, those 
revenues are not deposited into the Trust Fund. See Rev. Rul. 73-508, 
1973-2, C.B. 366. See also Rev. Rul. 80-31, 1980-1, C.B. 251; Priv. 
Ltr. Rul. 118216-09 (Sept. 28, 2009); 26 C.F.R. §§ 49.4261-7, 49.4261-
8. To the extent that airlines continue to rely on revenues from 
optional services, such as baggage fees, the Trust Fund will not 
benefit because many of these additional fees, in accordance with 
Treasury regulations and IRS guidance, are not included in the tax 
base. If baggage fees alone had been subject to the 7.5 percent excise 
tax in fiscal year 2010, the Trust Fund would have received 
approximately an additional $248 million in revenues. This amount is 
expected to grow in future years if airlines continue to shift toward 
more fee revenue relative to fare revenue. 

[24] 49 U.S.C. § 40101(a). 

[25] The committee's recommendations are currently under consideration 
by the Secretary of Transportation. 

[End of section] 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each 
weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly 
posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] 
and select "E-mail Updates." 

Order by Phone: 

The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO’s actual cost of
production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the
publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and
white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO’s Web site, 
[hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm]. 

Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or
TDD (202) 512-2537. 

Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card,
MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional 
information. 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]: 
E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov: 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Congressional Relations: 

Ralph Dawn, Managing Director, dawnr@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4400: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7125: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

Public Affairs: 

Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov: 
(202) 512-4800: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street NW, Room 7149: 
Washington, D.C. 20548: