This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-05-1050T
entitled 'Army Corps of Engineers: Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity 
Hurricane Protection Project' which was released on September 28, 2005. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

Testimony: 

Before the Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development, Committee on 
Appropriations, House of Representatives: 

United States Government Accountability Office: 

GAO: 

For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT: 

September 28, 2005: 

Army Corps of Engineers: 

Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Hurricane Protection Project: 

Statement of Anu Mittal, Director, Natural Resources and Environment: 

GAO-05-1050T: 

GAO Highlights: 

Highlights of GAO-05-1050T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on 
Energy and Water Development, Committee on Appropriations, House of 
Representatives: 

Why GAO Did This Study: 

The greatest natural threat posed to the New Orleans area is from 
hurricane-induced storm surges, waves, and rainfalls. A hurricane surge 
that can inundate coastal lowlands is the most destructive 
characteristic of hurricanes and accounts for most of the lives lost 
from hurricanes. Hurricane surge heights along the Gulf and Atlantic 
coasts can exceed 20 feet. The effects of Hurricane Katrina flooded a 
large part of New Orleans and breeched the levees that are part of the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity, 
Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project. This project, first authorized 
in 1965, was designed to protect the lowlands in the Lake Pontchartrain 
tidal basin from flooding by hurricane-induced sea surges and rainfall. 
GAO was asked to provide information on (1) the purpose and history of 
the Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection 
Project and (2) funding of the project. 

GAO is not making any recommendations in this testimony. 

What GAO Found: 

Congress first authorized the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, 
Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project in the Flood Control Act of 
1965. The project was to construct a series of control structures, 
concrete floodwalls, and levees to provide hurricane protection to 
areas around Lake Pontchartrain. The project, when designed, was 
expected to take about 13 years to complete and cost about $85 million. 
Although federally authorized, it was a joint federal, state, and local 
effort. 

The original project designs were developed based on the equivalent of 
what is now called a fast-moving Category 3 hurricane that might strike 
the coastal Louisiana region once in 200-300 years. As GAO reported in 
1976 and 1982, since the beginning of the project, the Corps has 
encountered project delays and cost increases due to design changes 
caused by technical issues, environmental concerns, legal challenges, 
and local opposition to portions of the project. As a result, in 1982, 
project costs had grown to $757 million and the expected completion 
date had slipped to 2008. None of the changes made to the project, 
however, are believed to have had any role in the levee breaches 
recently experienced as the alternative design selected was expected to 
provide the same level of protection. In fact, Corps officials believe 
that flooding would have been worse if the original proposed design had 
been built. When Hurricane Katrina struck, the project, including about 
125 miles of levees, was estimated to be from 60-90 percent complete in 
different areas with an estimated completion date for the whole project 
of 2015. The floodwalls along the drainage canals that were breached 
were complete when the hurricane hit. 

The current estimated cost of construction for the completed project is 
$738 million with the federal share being $528 million and the local 
share $210 million. Federal allocations for the project were $458 
million as of the enactment of the fiscal year 2005 federal 
appropriation. This represents 87 percent of the federal government’s 
responsibility of $528 million with about $70 million remaining to 
complete the project. Over the last 10 fiscal years (1996-2005), 
federal appropriations have totaled about $128.6 million and Corps 
reprogramming actions resulted in another $13 million being made 
available to the project. During that time, appropriations have 
generally declined from about $15-20 million annually in the earlier 
years to about $5-7 million in the last three fiscal years. While this 
may not be unusual given the state of completion of the project, the 
Corps’ project fact sheet from May 2005 noted that the President’s 
budget request for fiscal years 2005 and 2006, and the appropriated 
amount for fiscal year 2005 were insufficient to fund new construction 
contracts. The Corps had also stated that it could spend $20 million in 
fiscal year 2006 on the project if the funds were available. The Corps 
noted that several levees had settled and needed to be raised to 
provide the level of protection intended by the design. 

www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-1050T. 

To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on 
the link above. For more information, contact Anu Mittal at
(202) 512-3841 or mittala@gao.gov. 

[End of section] 

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: 

We are pleased to be here today to discuss the U.S. Army Corps of 
Engineers (Corps) Lake Pontchartrain, and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane 
Protection Project. This project, first authorized in 1965, was 
designed to protect the lowlands in the Lake Pontchartrain tidal basin 
within the greater New Orleans metropolitan area from flooding by 
hurricane-induced sea surges and rainfall. As you know, the effects of 
Hurricane Katrina breeched the levees that are part of this project and 
flooded a large part of New Orleans. 

In my testimony, I will discuss (1) the purpose and history of the 
project and (2) funding of the project. To conduct this work, we 
reviewed GAO's past reports on the Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, 
Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project and on the Corps' flood control 
efforts in general.[Footnote 1] We interviewed Corps personnel 
responsible for the Lake Pontchartrain project to obtain information on 
the Corps funding of the project and its current status. We did the 
work reflected in this statement during September 2005 in accordance 
with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

In summary, the Lake Pontchartrain hurricane project was designed to 
protect areas around the lake from flooding caused by a storm surge or 
rainfall associated with a standard project hurricane, which is roughly 
the same as what is now classified as a fast moving Category 3 
hurricane. The project, when designed in the mid-1960s, was expected to 
take about 13 years to complete and cost about $85 million. Over the 
years, the project has undergone some significant design changes as a 
result of a successful court challenge, local opposition to certain 
aspects of the proposed design, and changed Corps thinking about the 
most cost-effective approach. None of these changes, however, are 
believed to have had any role in the levee breaches recently 
experienced as the alternative design selected was expected to provide 
the same level of protection. In fact, Corps staff believes that 
flooding would have been worse if the original proposed design had been 
built. As of early 2005, the project was not expected to be completed 
until 2015--nearly 50 years after it was first authorized--and cost 
about $738 million, much of the cost increase is due to inflation over 
the years and changes to the scope and design of the project. In recent 
years, questions have been raised about the ability of the project to 
protect the New Orleans area from hurricanes greater than Category 3. 
This issue was only beginning to be studied by the Corps when Hurricane 
Katrina hit the area in August 2005. 

Background: 

Since its founding in 1718, the city of New Orleans and its surrounding 
areas have been subject to numerous floods from the Mississippi River 
and hurricanes. The greater New Orleans metropolitan area, composed of 
Orleans, Jefferson, St. Charles, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany parishes, 
sits in the tidal lowlands of Lake Pontchartrain and is bordered 
generally on its southern side by the Mississippi River. Lake 
Pontchartrain is a tidal basin about 640 square miles in area that 
connects with the Gulf of Mexico through Lake Borgne and the 
Mississippi Sound. 

While the area has historically experienced many river floods, a series 
of levees and other flood control structures built over the years were 
expected to greatly reduce that threat. The greatest natural threat 
posed to the New Orleans area continues to be from hurricane-induced 
storm surges, waves, and rainfalls. Several hurricanes have struck the 
area over the years including Hurricane Betsy in 1965, Hurricane 
Camille in 1969, and Hurricane Lili in 2002. The hurricane surge that 
can inundate coastal lowlands is the most destructive characteristic of 
hurricanes and accounts for most of the lives lost from hurricanes. 
Hurricane surge heights along the Gulf and Atlantic coasts can range up 
to 20 feet or more and there is growing concern that continuing losses 
of coastal wetlands and settlement of land in New Orleans has made the 
area more vulnerable to such storms. Because of such threats, a series 
of control structures, concrete floodwalls, and levees, was proposed 
for the area along Lake Pontchartrain in the 1960s. 

Purpose and History of Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity Flood Control 
Project: 

Congress first authorized construction of the Lake Pontchartrain and 
Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project in the Flood Control 
Act of 1965[Footnote 2] to provide hurricane protection to areas around 
the lake in the parishes of Orleans, Jefferson, St. Bernard, and St. 
Charles. Although federally authorized, it was a joint federal, state, 
and local effort with the federal government paying 70 percent of the 
costs and the state and local interests paying 30 percent. The Corps 
was responsible for project design and construction and local interests 
were responsible for maintenance of levees and flood controls. The 
original project design, known as the barrier plan, included a series 
of levees along the lakefront, concrete floodwalls along the Inner 
Harbor Navigation Canal, and control structures, including barriers and 
flood control gates located at the Rigolets and Chef Menteur Pass 
areas. These structures were intended to prevent storm surges from 
entering Lake Pontchartrain and overflowing the levees along the 
lakefront. The original lakefront levees were planned to be from 9.3 
feet to 13.5 feet high depending on the topography of the area directly 
in front of the levees. 

This project plan was selected over another alternative, known as the 
high-level plan, which excluded the barriers and flood control gates at 
the Rigolets and Chef Menteur Pass complexes and instead employed 
higher levees ranging from 16 feet to 18.5 feet high along the 
lakefront to prevent storm surges from inundating the protected areas. 
In the 1960s, the barrier plan was favored because it was believed to 
be less expensive and quicker to construct. As explained later in my 
statement, this decision was reversed in the mid-1980s. The cost 
estimate for the original project was $85 million (in 1961 dollars) and 
the estimated completion date was 1978. 

Figure 1: Flood Protection Control Levees In and Around New Orleans, 
LA. 

[See PDF for image]

[End of figure]

The original project designs were developed to combat a hurricane that 
might strike the coastal Louisiana region once in 200-300 years. The 
basis for this was the standard project hurricane developed by the 
Corps with the assistance of the United States Weather Bureau (now the 
National Weather Service). The model was intended to represent the most 
severe meteorological conditions considered reasonably characteristic 
for that region. The model projected a storm roughly equivalent to a 
fast-moving Category 3 hurricane. A Category 3 hurricane has winds of 
111-130 miles per hour and can be expected to cause some structural 
damage from winds and flooding near the coast from the storm surge and 
inland from rains. 

Even before construction began on the project, it became evident that 
some changes to the project plan were needed. Based on updated Weather 
Bureau data on the severity of hurricanes, the Corps determined that 
the levees along the three main drainage canals, that drain water from 
New Orleans into Lake Pontchartrain, would need to be raised to protect 
against storm surges from the lake. The need for this additional work 
became apparent when Hurricane Betsy flooded portions of the city in 
September 1965. 

During the first 17 years of construction on the barrier plan, the 
Corps continued to face project delays and cost increases due to design 
changes caused by technical issues, environmental concerns, legal 
challenges, and local opposition to various aspects of the project. For 
example, foundation problems were encountered during construction of 
levees and floodwalls which increased construction time; delays were 
also encountered in obtaining rights-of-ways from local interests who 
did not agree with all portions of the plan. By 1981, cost estimates 
had grown to $757 million for the barrier plan, not including the cost 
of any needed work along the drainage canals, and project completion 
had slipped to 2008. At that time, about $171 million had been made 
available to the project and the project was considered about 50 
percent complete, mostly for the lakefront levees which were at least 
partially constructed in all areas and capable of providing some flood 
protection although from a smaller hurricane than that envisioned in 
the plan. 

More importantly, during the 1970s, some features of the barrier plan 
were facing significant opposition from environmentalists and local 
groups who were concerned about environmental damages to the lake as 
well as inadequate protection from some aspects of the project. The 
threat of litigation by environmentalists delayed the project and local 
opposition to building the control complexes at Rigolets and Chef 
Menteur had the potential to seriously reduce the overall protection 
provided by the project. This opposition culminated in a December 1977 
court decision[Footnote 3] that enjoined the Corps from constructing 
the barrier complexes, and certain other parts of the project until a 
revised environmental impact statement was prepared and accepted. After 
the court order, the Corps decided to change course and completed a 
project reevaluation report and prepared a draft revised Environmental 
Impact Statement in the mid-1980s that recommended abandoning the 
barrier plan and shifting to the high-level plan originally considered 
in the early 1960s. Local sponsors executed new agreements to assure 
their share of the non-federal contribution to the revised project. 
These changes are not believed to have had any role in the levee 
breaches recently experienced as the high-level design selected was 
expected to provide the same level of protection as the original 
barrier design. In fact, Corps staff believe that flooding would have 
been worse if the original proposed design had been built because the 
storm surge would likely have gone over the top of the barrier and 
floodgates, flooded Lake Pontchartain, and gone over the original lower 
levees planned for the lakefront area as part of the barrier 
plan.[Footnote 4] As of 2005, the project as constructed or being 
constructed included about 125 miles of levees and the following major 
features: 

* New levee north of Highway U.S. 61 from the Bonnet Carré Spillway 
East Guide Levee to the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary: 

* Floodwall along the Jefferson-St. Charles Parish boundary: 

* Enlarged levee along the Jefferson Parish lakefront: 

* Enlarged levee along the Orleans Parish lakefront: 

* Levees, floodwalls, and flood proofed bridges along the 17th Street, 
Orleans Avenue and London Avenue drainage canals: 

* Levees from the New Orleans lakefront to the Gulf Intracoastal 
Waterway: 

* Enlarged levees along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway and the 
Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet: 

* New levee around the Chalmette area. 

The project also includes a mitigation dike on the west shore of Lake 
Pontchartrain. 

The current estimated cost of construction for the completed project is 
$738 million with the federal share being $528 million and the local 
share $210 million. The estimated completion date as of May 2005 for 
the whole project was 2015. The project was estimated to be from 60-90 
percent complete in different areas. The work in Orleans Parish was 
estimated to be 90 percent complete with some work remaining for bridge 
replacement along the Orleans Avenue and London Avenue drainage canals. 
The floodwalls along the canals, where the recent breaches occurred, 
were complete. Jefferson Parish work was estimated to be 70 percent 
complete with work continuing on flood proofing the Hammond Highway 
bridge over 17th Street and two lakefront levee enlargements. Estimated 
completion for that work was 2010. In the Chalmette area work was 
estimated to be 90 percent complete with some levee enlargement work 
and floodwall work remaining. In St. Charles Parish work was 60 percent 
complete with some gaps still remaining in the levees. Closure of these 
gaps was scheduled by September 2005. 

Recent Funding History for the Project: 

Federal allocations for the project totaled $458 million as of the 
enactment of the fiscal year 2005 federal appropriation. This 
represents 87 percent of the Federal government's responsibility of 
$528 million with about $70 million remaining to complete the project 
in 2015. Over the last 10 fiscal years (1996-2005), federal 
appropriations have totaled about $128.6 million and Corps 
reprogramming actions resulted in another $13 million being made 
available to the project. During that time, appropriations have 
generally declined from about $15-20 million annually in the earlier 
years to about $5-7 million in the last three fiscal years. While this 
may not be unusual given the state of completion of the project, the 
Corps' project fact sheet from May 2005 noted that the President's 
Budget request for fiscal years 2005 and 2006 and the appropriated 
amount for fiscal year 2005 were insufficient to fund new construction 
contracts. Among the construction efforts that could not be funded, 
according to the Corps, were the following: 

* Levee enlargements in all four parishes: 

* Pumping station flood protection in Orleans Parish: 

* Floodgates and a floodwall in St. Charles Parish: 

* Bridge replacement in Orleans Parish. 

The Corps had also stated that it could spend $20 million in fiscal 
year 2006 on the project if the funds were available. The Corps noted 
that several levees had settled and needed to be raised to provide the 
design-level of protection. For the last few years, the project 
generally received the amount of funds appropriated to it and was not 
adversely affected by any Corps reprogramming actions. 

In recent years, questions have been raised about the ability of the 
project to withstand larger hurricanes than it was designed for, such 
as a Category 4 or 5, or even a slow-moving Category 3 hurricane that 
lingered over the area and produced higher levels of rainfall. Along 
this line, the Corps completed in 2002 a reconnaissance or pre-
feasibility study on whether to strengthen hurricane protection along 
the Louisiana coast. A full feasibility study was estimated to take at 
least five years to complete and cost about $8 million. In March 2005, 
the Corps reported that it was allocating $79,000 to complete a 
management plan for the feasibility study and a cost-share agreement 
with local sponsors. The President's fiscal year 2006 budget request 
did not include any funds for the feasibility project. 

In closing, the Lake Pontchartrain hurricane project has been under 
construction for nearly 40 years, much longer than originally 
envisioned and at much greater cost, although much of that can be 
attributed to inflation over these years, and the project is still not 
complete. Whether the state of completion of the project played a role 
in the flooding of New Orleans in the wake of Hurricane Katrina in 
August 2005 is still to be determined as are issues related to whether 
a project designed to protect against Category 4 or 5 hurricanes would 
or could have prevented this catastrophe. 

Mr. Chairman, this concludes my prepared testimony. We would be happy 
to respond to any questions that you or Members of the Subcommittee may 
have. 

GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments: 

For further information on this testimony, please contact Anu Mittal at 
(202) 512-3841 or mittala@gao.gov. Individuals making contributions to 
this testimony included Ed Zadjura, Ken Lightner, Omari Norman, John 
Delicath, and Patrick Castellano: 

FOOTNOTES

[1] GAO, Cost, Schedule, And Performance Problems Of The Lake 
Pontchartrain And Vicinity, Louisiana, Hurricane Protection Project, 
GAO/PSAD-76-161 (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 31, 1976) and GAO, Improved 
Planning Needed By The Corps Of Engineers To Resolve Environmental, 
Technical, And Financial Issues On The Lake Pontchartrain Hurricane 
Protection Project, GAO/MASAD-82-39 (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 17, 1982). 

[2] Pub. L. No. 89-298, § 204, 79 Stat. 1073, 1077. 

[3] Save Our Wetlands v. Rush, Civ. A. No. 75-3710 (E.D. La. Dec. 30, 
1977). 

[4] The lakefront levees in the original barrier plan were 9.5 feet to 
13.5 feet high compared to the 16 feet to 18.5 feet high levees built 
along the lakefront as part of the high-level plan.