Department of the Army |
The Secretary of the Army should ensure the Army Judge Advocate General issues guidance that addresses the risk that the perishability of litigation skills poses to the use of skill levels for Army litigators, such as specifying the maximum time a recipient may serve in a non-litigation role before the skill level must be reviewed. (Recommendation 7) |
|
Department of the Air Force |
The Secretary of the Air Force should ensure the Air Force Judge Advocate General issues guidance that addresses the risk that the perishability of litigation skills poses to the use of skill levels for Air Force litigators, such as specifying the maximum time a recipient may serve in a non-litigation role before the skill level must be reviewed. (Recommendation 8) |
|
Department of the Army |
The Secretary of the Army should issue guidance requiring specified experience requirements for specific positions which litigators must meet for assignment unless the Judge Advocate General documents a waiver for a given situation. (Recommendation 9) |
|
Department of the Army |
The Secretary of the Army should ensure that the Army Judge Advocate General formally evaluates Army policies and procedures governing the use of litigators to help ensure their efficient and effective use. (Recommendation 10) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Navy Judge Advocate General formally evaluates Navy policies and procedures governing the use of litigators to help ensure their efficient and effective use. (Recommendation 11) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Commandant of the Marine Corps formally evaluates Marine Corps policies and procedures governing the use of litigators to help ensure their efficient and effective use. (Recommendation 12) |
|
Department of the Air Force |
The Secretary of the Air Force should ensure that the Air Force Judge Advocate General formally evaluates Air Force policies and procedures governing the use of litigators to help ensure their efficient and effective use. (Recommendation 13) |
|
Department of the Army |
The Secretary of the Army should ensure that the Army Judge Advocate General issues guidance requiring a periodic evaluation of professional experience standards for Army military justice litigation positions. (Recommendation 14) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Navy Judge Advocate General issues guidance requiring periodic evaluation of professional experience standards for Navy military justice litigation positions. (Recommendation 15) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps issues guidance requiring a periodic evaluation of professional experience standards for Marine Corps military justice litigation positions. (Recommendation 16) |
|
Department of the Air Force |
The Secretary of the Air Force should ensure that the Air Force Judge Advocate General issues guidance requiring a periodic evaluation of professional experience standards for Air Force military justice litigation positions. (Recommendation 17) |
|
Department of the Army |
The Secretary of the Army should ensure that the Army Judge Advocate General assesses the need for experience standards tailored to the responsibilities of individual Army military justice litigation positions, such as supervisory litigation positions and defense counsel, and implements any recommendations from the assessment. (Recommendation 18) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Navy Judge Advocate General assesses the need for experience standards tailored to the responsibilities of individual Navy military justice litigation positions, such as supervisory litigation positions and defense counsel, and implements any recommendations from the assessment. (Recommendation 19) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Staff Judge Advocate to the Commandant of the Marine Corps assesses the need for experience standards tailored to the responsibilities of individual Marine Corps military justice litigation positions, such as supervisory litigation positions and defense counsel, and implements any recommendations from the assessment. (Recommendation 20) |
|
Department of the Air Force |
The Secretary of the Air Force should ensure that the Air Force Judge Advocate General assesses the need for experience standards tailored to the responsibilities of individual Air Force military justice litigation positions, such as supervisory litigation positions and defense counsel, and implements any recommendations from the assessment. (Recommendation 21) |
|
Department of the Army |
The Secretary of the Army should ensure that the Army Judge Advocate General collects information on retention rates of participants in the Army's military justice career path and considers including such information in the Army's annual Article 146a judge advocate workforce report to Congress. (Recommendation 22) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Navy Judge Advocate General collects information on retention rates of participants in the Navy's military justice career path and considers including such information in the Navy's annual Article 146a judge advocate workforce report to Congress. (Recommendation 23) |
|
Department of the Navy |
The Secretary of the Navy should ensure that the Deputy Commandant, Manpower and Reserve Affairs collects information on retention rates of participants in the Marine Corps' military justice career path and considers including such information in the Marine Corps' annual Article 146a judge advocate workforce report to Congress. (Recommendation 24) |
|
Department of the Air Force |
The Secretary of the Air Force should ensure that the Air Force Judge Advocate General collects information on retention rates of participants in the Air Force's military justice career path and considers including such information in the Air Force's annual Article 146a judge advocate workforce report to Congress. (Recommendation 25) |
|
Department of the Army |
The Secretary of the Army should ensure that the Army Judge Advocate General develops a process to systematically collect information on the reasons Army military justice litigators separate from service, such as by adapting its existing judge advocate exit survey process to include a mechanism for identifying litigators, and considers including such information in the Army's annual Article 146a judge advocate workforce report to Congress. (Recommendation 26) |
|