Restitution, Fines, and Forfeiture:

Issues for Further Review and Oversight

T-GGD-94-178: Published: Jun 28, 1994. Publicly Released: Jun 28, 1994.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the federal government's criminal debt collection efforts. GAO noted that: (1) criminal monetary penalties serve punitive and remedial purposes in the criminal justice system; (2) most criminal fine payments are deposited into the Crime Victims Fund and are used to support victim assistance programs; (3) restitution orders are designed to compensate identifiable victims of particular crimes; (4) by 1993, the outstanding criminal debt increased to $3.6 billion; (5) the increase in criminal debt is largely due to penalties imposed in financial institution fraud cases; (6) data limitations prevent federal agencies from accurately assessing the effectiveness of their debt collection efforts or the amount of outstanding debt; (7) although criminal debt collection efforts could be enhanced by making the National Fine Center (NFC) fully operational, its implementation has been delayed; (8) the NFC purpose is to centralize criminal debt collection efforts and develop a comprehensive criminal debt payments database; (9) NFC expects its centralized system to be fully operational by 1996; (10) asset forfeiture procedures deprive criminals of the proceeds of their crimes and permit federal agencies to seize assets without a criminal conviction; (11) most asset forfeiture proceeds are used to fund law enforcement activities; and (12) although the Justice Department plans to make greater use of asset forfeiture procedures, concerns over their over aggressive use and potential negative impact on victim restitution remain.

May 23, 2016

May 17, 2016

May 9, 2016

Apr 26, 2016

Apr 5, 2016

Feb 22, 2016

Feb 11, 2016

Feb 1, 2016

Dec 16, 2015

Dec 2, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here