Military Sealift Command:
Weak Controls and Management of Contractor-Operated Ships
NSIAD-96-41, Dec 12, 1995
Contact:
(202) 512-4126
contact@gao.gov
Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Military Sealift Command's (MSC) management of its contractor-operated ships, focusing on whether MSC has: (1) adequate management controls to oversee contractors and prevent abuses; and (2) sufficient oversight to ensure that contractual requirements are being met.
GAO found that MSC: (1) does not require contractors to adequately document minor repairs, crew time, or subcontracted work; (2) does not adequately verify crew-performed repairs, review subcontractor invoices, or supervise overhaul work; (3) lacks sufficient internal controls to adequately manage its ship operation contracts; (4) has no guidelines for systematically establishing personnel requirements; (5) does not ensure that contractors comply with requirements for trustworthiness evaluations and security clearances; (6) has no formal system to identify and implement best practices that could improve contractor performance and reduce costs; and (7) has acknowledged its organizational problems and plans to designate program managers and establish formal lines of accountability.
Status Legend:
- Review Pending
- Open
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Recommendations for Executive Action
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to, as part of MSC upcoming reorganization, direct program managers to clarify accountability by: (1) assigning a specific individual responsibility for each contract requirement; and (2) periodically checking that contract provisions, such as those dealing with trustworthiness and security clearances, are correctly administered and met.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to develop and require the use of standardized procedures by program managers and their staffs whenever possible to establish personnel requirements in their contracts.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to consider expanding the responsibilities of MSC Comptroller or creating a new position for a financial management expert to oversee the implementation of the above recommendations. If a new position is created, this person should report directly to the Commander, MSC. In addition to the existing duties of the Comptroller, this person would be responsible for setting minimal internal controls for all aspects of financial management throughout MSC and overseeing the implementation of these controls. The responsibilities of this person would be similar to those of a Chief Financial Officer established pursuant to the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to provide written guidance defining the roles, responsibilities, and authority of MSC representatives in protecting the government's interests during overhauls and other major repair work.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to, when practical, require an MSC representative to verify, based upon physical observation, the satisfactory completion of work performed at various stages of overhauls of MSC contractor-operated ships.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to, when practical, require that MSC representatives verify, through spotchecks, that repairs and industrial assistance paid for by MSC have actually been done and recommend deductions if necessary. These spotchecks could be done by MSC personnel as part of their normal inspections.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to institute MSC-wide procedures to ensure that contractors are: (1) accurately reporting how they meet contract-defined thresholds for crew-performed minor repairs; (2) submitting adequate documentation with invoices for MSC to determine that prices are fair and reasonable; and (3) obtaining prior MSC approval for subcontracted work above thresholds required by the contracts.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Recommendation: The Secretary of Defense should direct the Commander, MSC, to instruct program managers and contracting personnel to meet to discuss and evaluate ways to identify and implement best practices into their contractor-operated ship programs.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
Jun 13, 2013
Transportation Infrastructure
Jun 12, 2013
Federal-Aid Highways
Jun 4, 2013
May 9, 2013
Apr 16, 2013
Aviation Safety
Apr 8, 2013
NextGen Air Transportation System
Mar 28, 2013
National Airspace System
Mar 14, 2013
Department of Transportation
Mar 7, 2013
Feb 14, 2013
Looking for more? Browse all our products here







