Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program:

Enhanced Detection Tools and Reporting Could Improve Efforts to Combat Recipient Fraud

GAO-14-641: Published: Aug 21, 2014. Publicly Released: Aug 21, 2014.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Kay E. Brown
(202) 512-7215
brownke@gao.gov

 

Seto J. Bagdoyan
(202) 512-6722
BagdoyanS@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

What GAO Found

The 11 states GAO reviewed employed a range of detection tools, but experienced mixed success investigating and pursuing cases to combat potential Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipient fraud. States reported using detection tools required or recommended by the Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), such as matching recipient data against prisoner and death files. However, most of selected states reported difficulties in conducting fraud investigations due to either reduced or maintained staff levels while SNAP recipient numbers greatly increased from fiscal year 2009 through 2013. Some state officials suggested changing the financial incentives structure to help support the costs of investigating potential SNAP fraud. For example, investigative agencies are not rewarded for cost-effective, anti-fraud efforts which prevent ineligible people from receiving benefits at all.

GAO found limitations to the effectiveness of recommended replacement card data and website monitoring tools for fraud detection. FNS requires states to monitor SNAP households that request at least four cards per year, but selected states reported limited success detecting fraud this way. GAO's analysis found potential trafficking in 73 percent of households reviewed by focusing on SNAP households requesting cards in at least four monthly benefit periods. Benefits are allotted monthly, and a recipient selling their benefits and then requesting a new card would generally have one opportunity per month to do so. As a result, additional card requests in the same benefit period may not indicate increased risk of trafficking. Additionally, GAO found the FNS recommended e-commerce website monitoring tool to be less effective than manual searches in detecting posts indicative of SNAP trafficking. GAO found the recommended tool for monitoring social media to be impractical due to the volume of irrelevant data.

Figure 1: Using Replacement Cards to Target Trafficking in Michigan, Fiscal Year 2012

Figure 1: Using Replacement Cards to Target Trafficking in Michigan, Fiscal Year 2012

FNS has increased its oversight of state anti-fraud activity in recent years by issuing new regulations and guidance, conducting state audits, and commissioning studies on recipient fraud since fiscal year 2011. Despite these efforts, FNS does not have consistent and reliable data on states' anti-fraud activities because its reporting guidance lacks specificity. For example, the guidance from FNS did not define the kinds of activities that should be counted as investigations, resulting in data that were not comparable across states. Additional oversight efforts, such as providing guidance to states for reporting consistent data, could improve FNS's ability to monitor states and obtain information about more efficient and effective ways to combat recipient fraud.

Why GAO Did This Study

In fiscal year 2013, SNAP, the nation's largest nutrition support program, provided about 47 million people with $76 billion in benefits. Fraud, including trafficking—the misuse of program benefits to obtain non-food items—has been a long-standing concern, and technology has provided additional opportunities to commit and combat such activities. State agencies are responsible for addressing SNAP recipient fraud under the guidance and monitoring of FNS. GAO was asked to review state and federal efforts to combat SNAP recipient fraud.

GAO reviewed: (1) how selected state agencies combat SNAP recipient fraud; (2) the effectiveness of certain state fraud detection tools; and (3) how FNS oversees state anti-fraud efforts. GAO reviewed relevant federal laws, regulations, guidance, and documents; interviewed officials in 11 states; interviewed federal officials; tested fraud detection tools using fiscal year 2012 program data; and monitored websites for potential trafficking online. Although results are not generalizable to all states, the 11 states, selected based on various criteria including the size of their SNAP recipient household population and their payment error rates, served about a third of SNAP recipient households.

What GAO Recommends

GAO recommends, among other things, that FNS reassess current financial incentives and detection tools and issue guidance to help states better detect fraud and report on their anti-fraud efforts. Agency officials agreed with our recommendations.

For more information, contact Kay E. Brown at (202) 512-7215 or brownke@gao.gov, or Seto J. Bagdoyan at (202) 512-6722 or bagdoyans@gao.gov.

Recommendations for Executive Action

  1. Status: Open

    Comments: FNS officials reported that, in 2014, the agency published a Request for Information in the Federal Register to solicit state and other stakeholder input on how they can more effectively incentivize states to improve overall performance, including in the area of program integrity. Specifically, the request asked for input on how new bonus award categories that recognize strong program integrity efforts could be implemented as well as what should be the minimize level of performance across all program areas. FNS officials reported that, ideally, future program policies will help ensure that states perform well in all areas, including program integrity, to be eligible for bonus awards. Additionally, in September 2014, FNS officials granted over $5 millions to 8 states through its SNAP Recipient Trafficking Prevention Grants to support improvements to their recipient trafficking prevention, detection and prosecution efforts. GAO will monitor how the information collected from the Request for Information is used to develop policies for the new bonus awards, especially as the awards related to anti-fraud and program integrity efforts.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of FNS to explore ways that federal financial incentives can better support costeffective state anti-fraud activities.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

  2. Status: Open

    Comments: FNS officials reported that, in September 2013, they awarded a contract to provide expert business consultation and technical assistance in the area of recipient fraud prevention and detection to 7 states. The purpose of the contract was to improve how effectively recipients suspected of trafficking SNAP benefits were identified and investigated, including the use of predictive analytics involving transaction and replacement card data to uncover potential recipient trafficking. FNS officials reported that, by the end of fiscal year 2015, they and the contractor plan to provide technical assistance to the states to help implement the results of the initial consultation and assistance efforts. GAO will monitor these efforts and await information, including related technical assistance materials and documentation, on how the information from the contractor is used to guide states' efforts to used transaction and replacement card data to better focus on high-risk households for potential investigation.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of FNS to establish additional guidance to help states analyze SNAP transaction data to better identify SNAP recipient households receiving replacement cards that are potentially engaging in trafficking, and assess whether the use of replacement card benefit periods may better focus this analysis on high-risk households potentially engaged in trafficking.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

  3. Status: Open

    Comments: FNS officials reported that, in September 2013, they commissioned a study to independently evaluate the guidance they provided to states for monitoring social media and e-commerce websites. The study results should include recommendations for improving how FNS helps states to conduct this monitoring. GAO will monitor this recommendation to see whether FNS received the study results and how they were used to change the guidance.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of FNS to reassess the effectiveness of the current guidance and tools recommended to states for monitoring e-commerce and social media websites, and use this information to enhance the effectiveness of the current guidance and tools.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

  4. Status: Open

    Comments: FNS official reported that, based on recommendations from a national working group and input provided through a Request for Information in the Federal Register, they plan to redesign the form used to collect recipient integrity performance information and submit it to the Office of Management and Budget by the end of fiscal year 2015. After the form is approved, FNS officials reported that they plan to provide training to state officials to help ensure the form is understood and that reporting is consistent. We will close this recommendation when documentation that these efforts have been completed becomes available.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of FNS to take steps, such as guidance and training, to enhance the consistency of what states report on their anti-fraud activities.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Jun 15, 2015

Jun 3, 2015

May 21, 2015

Apr 30, 2015

Feb 25, 2015

Jan 5, 2015

Dec 19, 2014

Aug 21, 2014

Jul 16, 2014

May 29, 2014

Looking for more? Browse all our products here