Actions Needed to Increase Competition
GAO-13-325: Published: Mar 28, 2013. Publicly Released: Mar 28, 2013.
What GAO Found
The Department of Defenses (DOD) competition rate for all contract obligations declined over the past five fiscal years, from 62.6 percent in fiscal year 2008 to 57.1 percent in fiscal year 2012. GAO also found that the competition rate in fiscal year 2012 varied by specific DOD component with the Air Force having the lowest at 37.1 percent and the Defense Logistics Agency the highest at 83.3 percent. The majority of the noncompetitive awards cited the availability of only one responsible source to meet the governments needs as the reason for using noncompetitive procedures.
A number of factors affect DODs competition rate, but these factors are not always considered when setting DODs annual competition goals. For example, reliance on an original equipment manufacturer throughout the life cycle of a program has been a long-standing challenge for DOD competition, and budget uncertainty can also hinder DODs ability to compete. Noncompetitive purchases that DOD makes on behalf of foreign governments can also affect DODs competition rate. DOD does not systematically consider these and other factors when setting its annual competition goals. For example, it sets competition goals for individual DOD components by simply adding two percentage points to the rate achieved in the previous year. Without identifying and tracking the specific factors affecting competition DOD cannot set meaningful goals for improving competition or accurately gauge its progress toward achieving them.
Many of the noncompetitive justifications GAO reviewed included the required elements as defined by the Federal Acquisition Regulation; however, the level of insight into the reasons for noncompetitive awards varied. For example, some justifications included clear descriptions of market environments where only one source was available to meet the governments needs or described planned actions that could help improve competition in the future. However, other justifications provided limited insight into the reasons for the noncompetitive award or did not fully describe actions that the agency could take to increase future competition. Without this information, DOD may be missing opportunities to gain a fuller understanding of why past acquisitions were not competitive and may be unable to apply those lessons to effectively facilitate competition for future acquisitions.
In 2010, DOD introduced a new requirement that applies to competitive awards that elicit only one offer (one-offer awards); however, the impact of the requirement is unknown because of unreliable data. To address the risk associated with one-offer awards, the requirement established rules that were intended to help ensure adequate solicitation time, ensure that contract requirements are not unnecessarily restrictive, and verify that offers received are fair and reasonable. However, GAOs analysis of 35 one-offer awards determined that contracting officers had incorrectly coded 10 of these awards in the procurement database that DOD relies on to measure the impact of its new requirement. Six of the 10 awards were noncompetitive awards and the remaining 4 had received multiple offers. As a result, GAO determined that DODs data cannot be used to accurately calculate the amount obligated on one-offer awards during fiscal year 2012. Without reliable data, DOD cannot accurately measure the impact of its new requirement.
Why GAO Did This Study
Competition is the cornerstone of a sound acquisition process and a critical tool for achieving the best return on investment for taxpayers. In fiscal year 2012, DOD obligated $359 billion through contracts and task orders, of which 57 percent was competed. DOD also obligates billions of dollars annually on contracts that are awarded competitively, but for which the government received only one offer. DOD implemented the Better Buying Power initiative in 2010, in an effort to increase competition.
The conference report for the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012 directed GAO to report on DODs non-competitive and one-offer contracts. GAO examined (1) trends in DODs use of noncompetitive awards; (2) factors influencing DODs competition rate; (3) the extent to which justifications provided insight into the reasons for noncompetitive awards; and (4) the impact of DODs new requirement for competitive solicitations that only elicit one offer. GAO analyzed federal procurement data for fiscal years 2008 through 2012, reviewed DOD policy and competition reports, examined nongeneralizable samples of awards, and interviewed DOD officials.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that DOD identify, track, and consider the specific factors that affect competition when setting competition goals; develop guidance to apply lessons learned from past procurements to help achieve competition in the future; and collect reliable data on one-offer awards. DOD concurred with these recommendations.
For more information, contact Michael J. Courts at (202) 512-4841 or email@example.com.
Recommendations for Executive Action
Comments: DOD concurred with our recommendation and commented that it will consider specific factors affecting competition in setting annual competition goals. As of February 2014, DOD had conducted analysis of the impact of certain factors, including weapons systems, international agreements, and purchases authorized by statute, on its competition rate. However, it is not clear how DOD has considered this analysis in setting annual competition goals for each DOD component.
Recommendation: To better inform DOD's efforts to enhance competition, the Secretary of Defense should identify and track the specific factors that affect the competition rate, such as foreign military sales, and consider this information when setting annual competition goals for each DOD component.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: DOD concurred with our recommendation. In response, in August 2014, DOD issued a memorandum amending DOD's procedures for completing noncompetitive justification documents. Specifically, the new procedures will require follow-on acquisitions of the same supply or service to include the previous justification as part of the approval package. In addition, if the planned actions to increase competition in the previous justification were not completed, the follow-on justification must get higher-level approval.
Recommendation: To better inform DOD's efforts to enhance competition, the Secretary of Defense should develop guidance that could enable DOD components to apply lessons learned from past procurements to increase competition for the same good and services in the future.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense
Comments: DOD concurred with our recommendation and commented that it will take two actions. First, it plans to review existing training and procedures for reporting of contract actions in FPDS-NG. Second, it plans to update guidance on the reporting of competitive procurements in which only one offer is received to increase the reliability of the data and better understand the impact of the new requirement on one-offer contracts. The department also plans to discuss this information at future Competition Advocates meetings. However, DOD has not yet taken agency-wide action. The Air Force has established mandatory training on data coding for all contracting personnel responsible for entering this information.
Recommendation: To better inform DOD's efforts to enhance competition, the Secretary of Defense should develop an action plan for DOD components to collect reliable data on competitive procurements for which only one offer is received, so that the department can determine the effect of its new requirement on one-offer contracts.
Agency Affected: Department of Defense