World Health Organization:
Reform Agenda Developed, but U.S. Actions to Monitor Progress Could be Enhanced
GAO-12-722, Jul 23, 2012
What GAO Found
In May 2012, 194 member states approved components of the World Health Organizations (WHO) reform agenda, encompassing three broad areaspriority-setting, governance, and management reformsthat generally address the challenges identified by stakeholders. According to WHO officials, member state representatives, and other stakeholders, some of the challenges facing WHO include its (1) lack of clear organizational priorities; (2) lack of predictable and flexible financing; and (3) highly decentralized organizational structure. In developing its reform agenda, WHO consulted with member states, employees, and other parties to gather their views and feedback. In addition, WHO has commissioned three ongoing evaluations to provide input into the reform process. The first stage of one of the planned evaluations was conducted by WHOs External Auditor, which concluded in March 2012 that WHOs reform proposals are comprehensive in addressing challenges faced by the organization. WHO continues to consult with member states on priority-setting and governance proposals, which generally require extensive deliberation and consensus from member states. In November 2011, the WHO Executive Board approved WHOs management reform proposals in several areas, and requested further development of proposals in other areas. In May 2012, WHO developed a high-level implementation and monitoring framework that includes reform objectives, selected activities, 1-year and 3-year milestones, and intended impacts. Certain factors could impede WHOs ability to successfully implement its reform proposals, including the availability of sufficient financial and technical resources and the level of sustained support from internal and external stakeholders.
The United States has provided input into WHOs reform agenda, particularly in the areas of transparency and accountability, but the Department of States (State) tool for assessing progress in the area of management reform could be enhanced. On priority-setting, the United States has advocated for WHO to maintain its focus on certain functions such as setting regulations and standards for international health. In consultations on governance, the U.S. delegation to WHO has commented on a range of proposals WHO has put forth, including those on engagement with other global health stakeholders. On management reforms, the United States has supported an agenda for greater transparency and accountability. The U.S. delegation has advocated for a number of reforms to improve WHOs internal and external oversight mechanisms and supported reforms in budgeting, planning, and human resources. Additionally, State has established an assessment tool to measure progress on transparency and accountability mechanisms, which is a useful tool for guiding U.S. priorities and engagement with WHO, and could be helpful for monitoring WHOs progress in implementing certain management reforms. However, we found weaknesses in States assessment tool, including an unclear basis for States determinations on certain elements in its assessment of WHO, as well as a lack of clarity in the definitions used in the assessment. According to State officials, State provides guidance to officials completing these assessments but acknowledged that the process does not fully mitigate risks to data reliability.
Why GAO Did This Study
WHO is the directing and coordinating authority for global health within the United Nations (UN) system. In 2012, member states approved a reform agenda addressing three areas: (1) priority-setting, to refocus its efforts and establish a process to determine priorities; (2) governance, to improve the effectiveness of its governing bodies and strengthen engagement with other stakeholders; and (3) management, including human resources, results-based planning, and accountability. The United States is a key participant in WHOs governing bodies and the largest donor, contributing about $219 million, or 22 percent, to WHOs assessed budget for 2010 and 2011, and more than $475 million, or about 16 percent, to WHOs voluntary budget. As the largest financial contributor to the UN, the United States has advocated for comprehensive management reform throughout the UN system, including WHO. This report examines (1) the steps WHO has taken to develop and implement a reform agenda that aligns with the challenges identified by stakeholders and (2) the input the United States has provided to WHO reforms. GAO analyzed WHO and U.S. government documents and interviewed officials and stakeholders in Washington, D.C., and Geneva, Switzerland.
What GAO Recommends
GAO recommends that the Secretary of State enhance States guidance on completing its assessment tool for monitoring WHOs progress in implementing transparency and accountability reforms. State generally concurred with GAO's recommendation.
For more information, contact Thomas Melito at (202) 512-9601 or email@example.com.
- Review Pending
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Recommendation for Executive Action
Recommendation: To improve U.S. assessment of WHO reform, the Secretary of State should enhance its guidance on completing States assessment tool for monitoring WHOs progress in implementing transparency and accountability reforms by including, for example, a requirement to collect and submit supporting documentation with completed assessments.
Agency Affected: Department of State
Status: Review Pending
Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.