Skip to main content

Employment and Training Administration: Increased Authority and Accountability Could Improve Research Program

GAO-10-243 Published: Jan 29, 2010. Publicly Released: Jan 29, 2010.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

With current rising unemployment rates and the need for a more skilled workforce, it is important for the Department of Labor's (Labor) Employment and Training Administration (ETA) to invest in sound research that identifies the most effective and efficient ways to train and employ workers for 21st century jobs. While ETA traditionally has played an important role in providing job training, employment assistance, and labor market information for the nation's workers, the current unemployment crisis has made this role more critical. The Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that jobless rates have increased over the past year in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. In particular, several states have reported unemployment rates well over 10 percent. As ETA's new leadership works to help the nation meet these economic challenges, it must have solid information that is supported by sound research to guide decision-making. Since 2002, GAO and others have criticized ETA for not focusing sufficient attention on its research program, particularly with regard to complying with congressional mandates, conducting policy-relevant research, and disseminating key research findings in a timely way. In this context, we have examined the structure and processes of ETA's research and evaluation center in terms of the elements that leading national research organizations cite as essential to a sound program; that is, research independence, transparency and accountability, and policy relevance. Based on these elements, we addressed the following questions: (1) How does ETA's organizational structure provide for research independence? (2) What steps has ETA taken to promote transparency and accountability in its research program? (3) How does ETA ensure that its research is relevant to workforce development policy and practice?

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Labor Concerning the structure and processes of ETA's research and evaluation center, the Secretary of Labor should take steps to ensure that ETA clarifies its organizational structure and OPDR reports directly to ETA's Assistant Secretary.
Closed – Implemented
In 2010, the Department of Labor (DOL) established the Chief Evaluation Office (CEO) to oversee the department's research and evaluation efforts. CEO responsibilities include maintaining a comprehensive inventory of all past, ongoing, and planned evaluation activities within DOL; and ensuring evaluation program and findings are transparent, credible, and accessible to the public. Since that time, the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) has formally incorporated the CEO in its formal research process. While ETA has not changed its organizational structure, we believe the creation and involvement of this office helps to improve the transparency and accountability of ETA's research program.
Department of Labor Concerning the structure and processes of ETA's research and evaluation center, the Secretary of Labor should provide sufficient decision-making authority to ETA's research and evaluation center regarding its research.
Closed – Implemented
ETA's Research and Evaluation Division reported in FY 2014 that it submits an annual operating plan to the Secretary of Labor, which identifies milestones and outputs for the coming year, as well as performance levels. Some of their strategies include: (1) using an annual consultation process with all ETA program offices to develop and implement a 5-year research agenda; and (2) ensuring completion of internal research and analysis and procurement and management of grants and contractors for pilots, demonstrations, research and evaluations. With increased involvement of outside stakeholders, DOL's Chief Evaluation Officer (CEO) and others, ETA's research and evaluation center should have sufficient decision-making authority to ensure transparency and the dissemination of research.
Department of Labor Concerning the structure and processes of ETA's research and evaluation center, the Secretary of Labor should direct ETA's research and evaluation center to establish more specific processes, including time frames for dissemination of research.
Closed – Implemented
The Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration (ETA) has developed dissemination procedures for reviewing and finalizing reports. The agency also added specific timeframes for dissemination to the performance standards for federal project officers who oversee the research.
Department of Labor Concerning the structure and processes of ETA's research and evaluation center, the Secretary of Labor should create an information system to track research projects.
Closed – Implemented
The Department of Labor's Employment and Training Administration (ETA), in collaboration with the DOL's Chief Evaluation office (CEO), has been working with a contractor to develop a more robust system with enhanced reporting functions that tracks planning, procurement, and project management throughout the project lifecycle. A demonstration and presentation of the software was made to ETA and CEO in April and May 2014. Final changes are being completed in September 2014. ETA anticipates staff training in October 2014.
Department of Labor Concerning the structure and processes of ETA's research and evaluation center, the Secretary of Labor should instruct ETA's research and evaluation center to develop processes to involve outside experts in setting its research agenda.
Closed – Implemented
In preparing its new research agenda, the Employment and Training Administration (ETA) hosted a series of consultations with external stakeholders and has informally engaged in dialogues with outside research and program experts. In FY12, ETA reported that it had taken steps to engage outside experts more fully in setting its research agenda (plan). Specifically, the agency: 1) included outside experts in the development of its 5-year research plan; 2) formed advisory and peer review groups for major evaluations; 3) developed, with the Coalition for Evidence-Based Policy, the capability to conduct peer reviews on an ad hoc basis; and 4) had DOL's CEO, who is independent of ETA, review reports. And ETA now requires the identification of experts as members of a technical working group to provide assistance at key points in the research process for large scale contracts. In addition, ETA is collecting and synthesizing feedback from a variety of sources for developing its 5-year research plan including input received from experts and workforce system practitioners at ETA's conferences, and feedback solicited from stakeholders in the workforce community. ETA also plans to analyze public comments that it will solicit when the draft plan is announced in the Federal Register and posted on the ETA web site. ETA also reported that it strengthened its collaboration with other federal agency experts at the Departments of Education and Health and Human Services in planning and carrying out research and evaluation studies. Also see related recommendations in GAO-11-285.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AccountabilityEmployee trainingEmployment assistance programsEvaluation methodsInformation managementProduct evaluationProgram evaluationProgram managementReporting requirementsResearch and developmentResearch program managementResearch programsStrategic planningTraining utilizationOrganizational changePolicies and procedures