Crop Insurance:

Opportunities Exist to Reduce the Costs of Administering the Program

GAO-09-445: Published: Apr 29, 2009. Publicly Released: Jun 1, 2009.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Anne-Marie Fennell
(202) 512-4146
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) administers the federal crop insurance program with private insurance companies, which, in turn, work with insurance agencies that sell crop insurance. In 2008, according to USDA, the program cost $6.5 billion, including about $2.0 billion in allowances to insurance companies to cover their administrative and operating (A&O) expenses, such as salaries and sales commissions to agencies. GAO was asked to examine (1) the reasons for recent substantial increases in A&O allowances, and the purposes for which insurance companies use these allowances, and (2) insurance agencies' expenses for selling federal crop insurance policies, and questionable practices, if any, that agencies use to compete for business among farmers. GAO analyzed USDA and private insurers' data, among other things.

Between 2000 and 2009, companies' A&O allowances nearly tripled, primarily because USDA's calculation method for A&O allowances considers the value of the crop, rather than the crop insurance industry's actual expenses for selling and servicing policies, which generally remained stable. This increase in the A&O allowances occurred without a proportional increase in the number of policies, acres, or amount of insurance coverage purchased. The higher A&O allowances occurred because of higher crop prices since 2006. Per policy, the allowance rose from a national average of $836 in 2006 to an expected $1,417 in 2009. Companies have used most of the higher allowances to raise commissions, in an effort to compete for insurance agencies' portfolios of crop insurance policies. USDA data show that commissions increased more sharply in states with historically larger insurance underwriting gains, which add to company profits. For example, the average commission paid per policy in 5 Corn Belt states increased by 86 percent from 2006 to 2007, and by 43 percent in the other 45 states. Companies reported to USDA that their expenses to administer the program in 2007 exceeded their allowances. However, GAO determined that these expenses exceeded allowances largely because of the higher commissions paid to insurance agencies. According to GAO's analysis, crop insurance agencies' sales commissions have outpaced their expenses for selling policies. Commissions per policy increased by an average of about 16 percent per year from 2000 to 2009, compared with an increase of about 3 percent per year for insurance agents' wages, which are the largest factor in agencies' expenses. For 2007 through 2009, commissions will exceed wage-adjusted commissions by $2.87 billion. According to USDA officials, higher commissions can create more incentive for rebating, which is the practice of offering something of monetary value to farmers to attract their business. USDA prohibits this practice, as do most states. USDA and state insurance regulators are working to reduce the potential for this practice.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendations for Executive Action

    Recommendation: To better ensure that the A&O allowances provided to the crop insurance industry are sufficient for program delivery, but not excessive, the Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of the Risk Management Agency to develop a new methodology for calculating the A&O allowance so that it is more closely aligned with expenses, in terms of dollars per policy, as was the allowance in place before 2006, when crop prices increased sharply. Standard Reinsurance Agreement (SRA) renegotiations should achieve this goal. Once this alignment is completed, the Administrator should minimize annual fluctuations in A&O allowances that are unrelated to business expenses, while recognizing variations in delivery expenses across regions of the country.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The Risk Management Agency developed a new methodology for calculating the administrative and operating allowance so that it is more closely aligned with expenses. This new methodology was included in the Standard Reinsurance Agreement that USDA completed and implemented in 2010. It placed a maximum for the administrative and operating allowance at $1.3 billion per year with an annual adjustment for inflation.

    Recommendation: To assist in maintaining the relationship between A&O allowances and reasonable business expenses, the Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of the Risk Management Agency to require that companies annually report the commissions they paid to insurance agencies, by policy, to the Risk Management Agency. The agency should also conduct a study of the costs associated with selling and servicing crop insurance policies to establish a standard method for assessing agencies' reasonable costs in selling and servicing policies.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: Although the Risk Management Agency did not require that companies annually report, by policy, the commissions they paid to insurance agencies, the Risk Management Agency is conducting a study of the costs associated with selling and servicing crop insurance policies to assess agencies' reasonable costs in selling and servicing policies. According to a Risk Management Agency document, this study includes interviews of crop insurance companies, a survey of crop insurance agents, a survey of insured farmers, and analysis of financial information that crop insurance companies report to the Risk Management Agency.

    Recommendation: To accurately track the insurance companies' expenses for delivering crop insurance, the Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator of the Risk Management Agency to clarify the current guidance on reporting these expenses and specify what expenses are permitted.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The Risk Management Agency clarified guidance for crop insurance companies on the reporting of crop insurance delivery expenses in the Standard Reinsurance Agreement.

    Mar 26, 2014

    Mar 5, 2014

    Oct 17, 2013

    Sep 4, 2013

    Aug 30, 2013

    Aug 29, 2013

    Jul 29, 2013

    Jun 27, 2013

    Jun 3, 2013

    May 13, 2013

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here