Skip to main content

Ryan White Care Act: First-Year Experiences under the Part D Administrative Expense Cap

GAO-09-140 Published: Dec 19, 2008. Publicly Released: Dec 19, 2008.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

The Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency Act of 1990 (CARE Act) makes federal funds available to assist those infected and affected by HIV/AIDS. Through the CARE Act, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), part of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), awards grants (known as Part D grants) to provide services to women, infants, children, and youth with HIV/AIDS and their families. These grantees incur administrative expenses and indirect costs, such as rent and utilities. The Ryan White HIV/AIDS Treatment and Modernization Act of 2006 (RWTMA), which took effect in fiscal year 2007, capped at 10 percent the amount that Part D grantees could spend on administrative expenses. According to HRSA, there is no cap on indirect costs, but grantees must have an indirect cost rate to use funds for indirect costs. RWTMA directed GAO to examine Part D spending. In this report GAO describes (1) the services that Part D grantees provide and what effect, if any, the administrative expense cap has had on those services and on grantee programs; (2) how Part D grantees report on administrative expenses, indirect costs, and compliance with the cap; and (3) how HRSA implemented the cap and grantees' views on that implementation. GAO surveyed all Part D grantees, interviewed selected grantees, reviewed Part D grant applications and guidance, and interviewed HRSA officials.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AIDSAdministrative costsChild care programsCost analysisExpense claimsFederal fundsFederal grantsFunds managementGrant administrationGrant monitoringHealth care costsHealth care programsHealth care servicesRental ratesReporting requirementsSurveysUtility ratesProgram implementation