Skip to main content

Telecommunications: Survey of State Regulatory Commissions (GAO-08-662SP, June 2008), an E-supplement to GAO-08-633

GAO-08-662SP Published: Jun 13, 2008. Publicly Released: Jul 10, 2008.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, state regulatory commissions were given primary responsibility for determining whether a telecommunications carrier is eligible to participate in and receive support from the federal Universal Service Fund's High-Cost Program. We conducted an Internet-based survey of state regulatory commissions in the 50 states and the District of Columbia to better understand the similarities and differences in states' roles in the high-cost program, including questions about the state's process to determine carrier eligibility to participate in the program and annually certify carriers use of program funds, the state's internal control procedures for ensuring funds are being used appropriately, and the state's universal service fund, if any. This document presents the results of GAO's survey of the staff of state regulatory commissions that oversee telecommunications carriers. The responses are presented in aggregate, and do not represent specific state responses. To help ensure that the survey questions were clear and understandable to respondents, and that we gathered the information that we desired, we conducted pre-tests with relevant officials in five states. The survey was available online to officials in the 50 states and the District of Columbia on a secure Web site. We received complete responses from 50 of the 51 commissions we surveyed, for an overall response rate of 98 percent. A more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology is contained in our report: "Telecommunications: FCC Needs to Improve Performance Management and Strengthen Oversight of the High-Cost Program" GAO-08-633. We conducted our survey work from December 12, 2007, to February 8, 2008, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.

Supplemental Material

Background

Under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, state regulatory commissions were given primary responsibility for determining whether a telecommunications carrier is eligible to participate in and receive support from the federal Universal Service Fund�s High-Cost Program. We conducted an Internet-based survey of state regulatory commissions in the 50 states and the District of Columbia to better understand the similarities and differences in states� roles in the high-cost program, including questions about the state�s process to determine carrier eligibility to participate in the program and annually certify carriers use of program funds, the state�s internal control procedures for ensuring funds are being used appropriately, and the state�s universal service fund, if any. This document presents the results of GAO�s survey of the staff of state regulatory commissions that oversee telecommunications carriers. The responses are presented in aggregate, and do not represent specific state responses.

To help ensure that the survey questions were clear and understandable to respondents, and that we gathered the information that we desired, we conducted pre-tests with relevant officials in five states. The survey was available online to officials in the 50 states and the District of Columbia on a secure Web site. We received complete responses from 50 of the 51 commissions we surveyed, for an overall response rate of 98 percent.

A more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology is contained in our report: �Telecommunications: FCC Needs to Improve Performance Management and Strengthen Oversight of the High-Cost Program� GAO-08-633. We conducted our survey work from December 12, 2007, to February 8, 2008, in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
 


Instructions for Viewing this Survey

How to View The Surveys

  • Click on the Table of Contents link located in the lower right of this screen. To read to the bottom of the screen, you may need to use your scroll bar on the right side of this screen.
  • The first screen in the survey is an introduction and general information that was sent to and viewed by recipients of the survey. There are no survey results to view on this screen. This screen is for information only and you may by-pass it by clicking on Next located at the bottom of the screen in the lower right.
  • The survey may have links to allow respondents to bypass inapplicable questions (skip patterns). While these were active links during the data collection period, they have now been disabled.
  • When a respondent wrote a narrative response to a question, we sometimes present the percent of respondents making a comment.

How to View the Responses for Each Question

  • To view the responses to each question, click on the question number (Links to survey questions will look like this: 1., etc.).
  • After viewing the responses to each question, click on the "x" in the upper right corner of your screen to close that window and return to the questionnaire.

How to Return to a Page That You Previously Visited

  • To return to the last screen you viewed, click the Previous button on the lower right corner of the screen.
  • Click the Next button to advance to the next screen.

How to Make the Font Larger on Your Screen

  • You can make the font larger by changing your browser setting. For example, on Internet Explorer you can change the font size by going to View and selecting Text Size.
(543208)
Table of Contents
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately.

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

BroadbandCompetitionCost analysisCost controlFederal aid to localitiesFederal regulationsInternal controlsNoncompliancePerformance measuresPolicy evaluationProgram managementRisk assessmentTelecommunication policyTelecommunicationsTelecommunications industryTelephonesUniversal serviceProgram costsProgram goals or objectives