Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Employer Payment for Personal Protective Equipment
GAO-08-303R: Nov 30, 2007
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Department of Labor, Occupational Health and Safety Administration's (OSHA) new rule on employer payment for personal protective equipment (PPE). GAO found that (1) the final rule requires employers to pay for the personal protective equipment, but does not require employers to provide PPE where none was required before, and sets forth limited exceptions to the general requirement; and (2) OSHA complied with the applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration: Employer Payment for Personal Protective Equipment, GAO-08-303R, November 30, 2007
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), entitled Employer Payment for Personal Protective Equipment (RIN: 1218-AB77). We received the rule on
This final rule requires employers to pay for the personal protective equipment (PPE) for their employees. Examples of PPE include hard hats, gloves, goggles, safety shoes, and other items. This final rule does not require employers to provide PPE where none was required before; this rule only requires that, in most cases, the employer must pay for the PPE. This rule also sets forth some limited exceptions to this general requirement.
Enclosed is our assessment of OSHA's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that OSHA complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact Michael R. Volpe, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8236.
Robert J. Cramer
Associate General Counsel
REPORT UNDER 5 U.S.C. sect. 801(a)(2)(A) ON A MAJOR RULE
ISSUED BY THE
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ADMINISTRATION
"EMPLOYER PAYMENT FOR PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT"
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) prepared a Final Economic Analysis to determine the costs and benefits of this final rule. OSHA's analysis indicated that the final rule will avert approximately 21,798 injuries annually. OSHA estimated the total benefits of the final rule to be $349 million under a willingness-to-pay methodology and $228.3 million under a direct-cost methodology. OSHA estimated total compliance costs to be $85.7 million for all establishments.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607, and 609
OSHA concluded that this final rule will not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
OSHA reviewed this rule in accordance with the Act and determined that the rule will not impose unfunded mandates within the meaning of the Act. OSHA estimates that compliance with this final rule will cost affected employers $85.7 million per year. OSHA standards do not apply to state or local governments.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
OSHA promulgated this rule under the notice-and-comment procedures found in the Administrative Procedures Act. 5 U.S.C. sect. 553. OSHA published a proposed rulemaking on
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
According to OSHA, this final rule does not contain information collection requirements requiring the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Act.
Statutory authorization for the rule
OSHA promulgated this rule under sections 4, 6, and 8 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. sections 653, 655, 657) and section 41 of the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. sect. 941).
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), 42 U.S.C. sections 4321–4370f
OSHA reviewed this rule under NEPA and determined that this final rule will have no significant impact on the external environment.
Executive Order No. 12,866
OSHA prepared a Final Economic Analysis to determine the costs and benefits of this final rule to meet the requirements of the Order.
Executive Order No. 13,132 (Federalism)
OSHA determined that this final rule complied with the Order. According to OSHA, the Order provides for preemption of state law when there is clear congressional intent to do so. OSHA has determined that Congress expressed such intent in the case of OSHA's occupational safety and health standards. 29 U.S.C. sections 651–78.