Skip to main content

Government Performance: 2007 Federal Managers Survey on Performance and Management Issues: (GAO-08-1036SP, July 2008), an E-supplement to GAO-08-1026T

GAO-08-1036SP Published: Jul 24, 2008. Publicly Released: Jul 24, 2008.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

This e-publication supplements our testimony GAO-08-1026T by presenting the item by item results of our web-based survey of federal managers which was conducted between October, 2007 and January, 2008. The purpose of the survey was to update information obtained from three previous GAO surveys of federal managers conducted over the last decade. The questionnaire was designed to obtain the observations and perceptions of respondents on various aspects of such results-oriented management topics as the presence and use of performance measures, hindrances to measuring performance and using performance information, and agency climate. In addition, the questionnaire included a section requesting respondents' views on the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) and the priority that should be placed on various potential improvements to it. The questionnaire was administered to a stratified random probability sample of 4,412 persons from a population of approximately 107,326 mid-level and upper-level civilian managers and supervisors working in the 24 executive branch agencies covered by the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (CFO). Survey stratification by agency included an additional breakout of 5 selected agencies that are components of the CFO Act agencies. We received useable questionnaires from about 70 percent of the eligible sample. The response rate across the 29 agencies ranged from 55 percent to 84 percent. This e-publication presents the weighted survey percentages for all respondents, i.e., government-wide, and for each of the 29 agencies. The unweighted number of respondents for each item is also shown. See the report referenced above for a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology as well as a discussion of survey results. Please note that for questions 15 through 19 in the PART section, only respondents who indicated on question 14 at the beginning of the PART section that they had low to extensive knowledge of the PART were instructed to complete the remaining PART items. The "No response" category includes all other respondents who were instructed to skip these questions. Also, for these items, we do not display responses by individual agency due to the low number of respondents at some agencies. We conducted our work in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.

Supplemental Material

Background

This e-publication supplements our testimony GAO-08-1026T by presenting the item by item results of our web-based survey of federal managers which was conducted between October, 2007 and January, 2008.

The purpose of the survey was to update information obtained from three previous GAO surveys of federal managers conducted over the last decade. The questionnaire was designed to obtain the observations and perceptions of respondents on various aspects of such results-oriented management topics as the presence and use of performance measures, hindrances to measuring performance and using performance information, and agency climate. In addition, the questionnaire included a section requesting respondents� views on the Office of Management and Budget�s (OMB) Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART) and the priority that should be placed on various potential improvements to it. The questionnaire was administered to a stratified random probability sample of 4,412 persons from a population of approximately 107,326 mid-level and upper-level civilian managers and supervisors working in the 24 executive branch agencies covered by the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 (CFO). Survey stratification by agency included an additional breakout of 5 selected agencies that are components of the CFO Act agencies.

We received useable questionnaires from about 70 percent of the eligible sample. The response rate across the 29 agencies ranged from 55 percent to 84 percent. This e-publication presents the weighted survey percentages for all respondents, i.e., government-wide, and for each of the 29 agencies. The unweighted number of respondents for each item is also shown. See the report referenced above for a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology as well as a discussion of survey results. Please note that for questions 15 through 19 in the PART section, only respondents who indicated on question 14 at the beginning of the PART section that they had low to extensive knowledge of the PART were instructed to complete the remaining PART items. The �No response� category includes all other respondents who were instructed to skip these questions. Also, for these items, we do not display responses by individual agency due to the low number of respondents at some agencies.

We conducted our work in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtained provides a reasonable basis for our findings and conclusions based on our audit objectives.


 

Instructions for Viewing this Survey

How to View The Surveys

  • Click on the Table of Contents link located in the lower right of this screen. To read to the bottom of the screen, you may need to use your scroll bar on the right side of this screen.
  • The first screen in the survey is an introduction and general information that was sent to and viewed by recipients of the survey. There are no survey results to view on this screen. This screen is for information only and you may by-pass it by clicking on Next located at the bottom of the screen in the lower right.
  • The survey may have links to allow respondents to bypass inapplicable questions (skip patterns). While these were active links during the data collection period, they have now been disabled.
  • When a respondent wrote a narrative response to a question, we sometimes present the percent of respondents making a comment.

How to View the Responses for Each Question

  • To view the responses to each question, click on the question number (Links to survey questions will look like this: 1., etc.).
  • After viewing the responses to each question, click on the "x" in the upper right corner of your screen to close that window and return to the questionnaire.

How to Return to a Page That You Previously Visited

  • To return to the last screen you viewed, click the Previous button on the lower right corner of the screen.
  • Click the Next button to advance to the next screen.

How to Make the Font Larger on Your Screen

  • You can make the font larger by changing your browser setting. For example, on Internet Explorer you can change the font size by going to View and selecting Text Size.
(450697)
Table of Contents
This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. The published product may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. However, because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately.

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

AccountabilityData collectionData integrityDecision makingExecutive agenciesGovernment informationInformation resources managementInternal controlsLessons learnedPerformance appraisalPerformance managementPerformance measuresProgram evaluationProgram managementRegulatory agenciesReporting requirementsStrategic planningSurveysAssessments