Medicare:

Improvements Needed to Address Improper Payments for Medical Equipment and Supplies

GAO-07-59: Published: Jan 31, 2007. Publicly Released: Mar 6, 2007.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Leslie G. Aronovitz
(312) 220-7767
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)--the agency that administers Medicare--estimated that the program made about $700 million in improper payments for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS) from April 1, 2005, through March 31, 2006. To protect Medicare from improper DMEPOS payments, CMS relies on three Program Safeguard Contractors (PSC), and four contractors that process Medicare claims, to conduct critical program integrity activities. GAO was requested to examine CMS's and CMS's contractors' activities to prevent and minimize improper payments for DMEPOS, and describe CMS's oversight of PSC program integrity activities. To do this, GAO analyzed DMEPOS claims data by supplier and item to identify atypical, or large, increases in billing; reviewed CMS documents; and conducted interviews with CMS and contractor officials. GAO focused its work on contractors' automated prepayment controls and described related claims analysis functions.

To prevent and minimize improper DMEPOS payments, CMS's contractors conduct program integrity activities, which include performing medical reviews of certain claims before they are paid to determine whether the items meet criteria for Medicare coverage. As part of their efforts, CMS's contractors responsible for medical review use automated prepayment controls to deny claims that should not be paid or identify claims that should be reviewed. However, GAO found three shortfalls in these automated prepayment controls that make the Medicare program vulnerable to improper payments. (1) Contractors responsible for medical review did not have automated prepayment controls in place to identify questionable claims that are part of an atypically rapid increase in billing. (2) In some instances, these contractors did not have automated prepayment controls in place to identify claims for items unlikely to be prescribed in the course of routine quality medical care. CMS has recently begun an initiative to add controls of this kind for some DMEPOS items. (3) CMS does not require these contractors to share information on the most effective automated prepayment controls of the other contractors or consider adopting them. For example, Medicare might have saved almost $71 million in less than 2 years if one effective automated prepayment control designed to prevent Medicare from paying for more than one home-use hospital bed per month for a beneficiary, which was used by one of these contractors, had been used by the others. CMS oversees the PSCs' program integrity activities by providing written manuals and contracts to guide their work. As part of its oversight, CMS is implementing an annual contractor performance evaluation process, based on three evaluation tools, to assess each PSC's performance. CMS officials said that the agency will use the results of these evaluations to determine two things: whether to renew a PSC's contract, and whether a PSC may earn award fees--a monetary reward for good performance--in addition to the regular payments it receives under its contract.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendations for Executive Action

    Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should require the PSCs to develop thresholds for unexplained increases in billing--and use them to develop automated prepayment controls as one component of their manual medical review strategies.

    Agency Affected: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

    Status: Closed - Not Implemented

    Comments: Although the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) agreed with this recommendation in its comments on the report, until recently it had not taken action that directly addressed the recommendation. The agency is currently streaming every Medicare fee-for-service claim prior to payment through its predictive modeling technology, known as the Fraud Prevention System (FPS). The FPS uses a series of algorithms to identify potentially fraudulent claims and prioritize the most egregious situations. As each claim streams through the predictive modeling system, the system builds profiles of providers, networks, and billing patterns. Using these profiles, CMS estimates a claim's likelihood of being fraudulent. However, CMS has not addressed this specific recommendation through use of the FPS.

    Recommendation: The Administrator of CMS should require the Durable Medical Equipment Medicare Administrative Contractors, Durable Medical Equipment Regional Carrier, and PSCs to exchange information on their automated prepayment controls, and have each of these contractors consider whether the automated prepayment controls developed by the others could reduce their incidence of improper payments.

    Agency Affected: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) agreed with this recommendation in its comments on the report and responded that the contractors' Joint Operating Agreements (JOA) provide a means through which information could be shared. CMS currently requires these contractors to have Joint Operating Agreements attached to each of their contracts to outline specifically the contact people and coordination points for sharing information across contractors. In 2007, CMS reviewed the JOAs and confirmed that contractors are required to exchange information and coordinate on program edits including auto-deny and other prepayment edits. These opportunities for communication include meetings between the DME PSCs, DME MACs and other relevant contractor groups. The DME PSCs develop and share the information to determine if actions, including automated prepayment edits, would be appropriate for their jurisdiction and to refer such actions to the appropriate DME MAC. CMS also implemented a workgroup that will enhance the sharing of edits across DME MACs and DME PSCs to further address the GAO's recommendation. In addition, on October 6, 2008, CMS implemented a fraud module that allowed the DME MACs to share edits that were developed locally, but could be shared nationally.

    Aug 22, 2014

    Aug 13, 2014

    Aug 11, 2014

    Jul 30, 2014

    Jul 29, 2014

    Jul 23, 2014

    Jul 16, 2014

    Jul 15, 2014

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here