Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2006
GAO-06-836R: Jun 13, 2006
- Full Report:
GAO reviewed the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's (NRC) new rule on fee recovery for fiscal year 2006. GAO found that (1) the rule amends the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to NRC's applicants and licensees and requires that the NRC recover approximately 90 percent of its budget authority in fiscal year 2006, less the amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund; and (2) NRC complied with applicable requirements in promulgating the rule.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2006, GAO-06-836R, June 13, 2006
Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), entitled Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2006 (RIN: 3150-AH83). We received the rule on
The final rule amends the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to NRC's applicants and licensees. The final rule is necessary to implement the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended, which requires that the NRC recover approximately 90 percent of its budget authority in fiscal year 2006, less the amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste Fund. The amount to be recovered for FY 2006 is approximately $624 million, which is increased by approximately $0.9 million to account for billing adjustments, resulting in a total of approximately $625 million.
Enclosed is our assessment of the NRC's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that NRC complied with the applicable requirements.
If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Robert Robinson, Managing Director, Natural Resources and Environment. Mr. Robinson can be reached at (202) 512-3841.
Kathleen E. Wannisky
Managing Associate General Counsel
(i) Cost-benefit analysis
The NRC was not required to, nor did it prepare, a cost-benefit analysis of the final rule. However, the preamble to the final rule contains an explanation of how the amount of the fees was computed to permit the NRC to recover the necessary costs required by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. For fiscal year 2006, the fee recovery amount is approximately $625 million.
(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 603-605, 607 and 609
The entire Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is contained in Appendix A of the final rule. The analysis describes the reason for the rule and the legal basis for it; describes and estimates the number of small entities affected by the rule; discusses the recordkeeping, reporting, and other compliance requirements; and the steps taken to minimize the burden on small entities, including a maximum fee level.
(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. sections 1532-1535
The final rule, promulgated by an independent regulatory agency, is not subject to title II of the Unfunded Mandates Act of 1995.
(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. sections 551 et seq.
The final rule was issued using the notice and comment procedures contained in 5 U.S.C. 553. On
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. sections 3501-3520
The NRC states that the final rule does not contain any information collections that are subject to review under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Statutory authorization for the rule
The final rule was promulgated under the authority of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508), as amended by the FY 2001 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 106-377) and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.
Executive Order No. 12866
The final rule, promulgated by an independent regulatory agency, is not subject to the review requirements of the order.