Skip to main content

Transportation Services: Better Dissemination and Oversight of DOT's Guidance Could Lead to Improved Access for Limited English-Proficient Populations

GAO-06-52 Published: Nov 02, 2005. Publicly Released: Nov 02, 2005.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

More than 10 million people in the United States are of limited English proficiency (LEP), in that they do not speak English at all or do not speak English well. These persons tend to rely on public transit more than English speakers. Executive Order 13166 directs federal agencies to develop guidance for their grantees on making their services accessible to LEP persons. The Department of Transportation (DOT) issued its guidance in 2001, with revised guidance pending issuance. This report reviews (1) the language access services transit agencies and metropolitan planning organizations have provided, and the effects and costs of these services; (2) how DOT assists its grantees in providing language access services; and (3) how DOT monitors its grantees' provision of these services.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Transportation To improve awareness and understanding of DOT funding recipients' responsibilities to provide language access services, the Secretary of the Department of Transportation, upon final issuance of DOT's LEP guidance, should ensure that the guidance is distributed to all DOT funding recipients through a policy memorandum or other direct methods and direct regional personnel to make grantees in their areas fully aware of the existence of the guidance, and of grantee responsibilities under the guidance.
Closed – Implemented
The revised guidance, as well as a list of current and planned technical assistance being developed by the FTA Office of Civil Rights, was transmitted to FTA grantees in all regions in June 2006. Furthermore, FTA has been actively working to make FTA regional civil rights officers familiar with the guidance and FTA conducts ongoing workshops to ensure that regional staff understand the guidance.
Department of Transportation To enhance and improve transit agencies' and metropolitan planning organizations' (MPO) language access activities, the Secretary of Transportation, when issuing DOT's revised LEP guidance, should provide additional technical assistance, such as templates or examples, to aid these agencies in developing assessments of the size, location, and needs of the LEP population; plans for implementing language access services; and evaluations of the effectiveness of agencies' language access services.
Closed – Implemented
In April 2007, DOT issued a handbook for transit agencies on implementing the DOT LEP Guidance. This handbook provides templates, examples, guidance, and other information that can assist local agencies (including MPOs) in effectively implementing the DOT LEP guidance. DOT notified grant recipients of this resource as part of a "Dear FTA Grantee" email that notified recipients of the updated Title VI circular, which was published on April 13, 2007.
Department of Transportation To enhance and improve transit agencies' and MPOs' language access activities, the Secretary of Transportation, when issuing DOT's revised LEP guidance, should publicize the availability of existing federal resources on LEP issues, including workshops, http://www.lep.gov, peer-exchange programs, and available training to transit agencies and MPOs, and make these resources easily accessible through an explicit link to LEP Assistance on the Transportation Planning Capacity Building Program's Web site.
Closed – Implemented
DOT has taken several actions to publicize the available resources on LEP issues. These actions included: (1) convening civil rights training that includes the LEP guidance in Texas, Ohio, and Maryland in 2006 and planning to conduct 8-10 additional training sessions in 2007 and 2008; (2) posting the latest guidance and information on the appropriate DOT Web sites, e.g., DOT posted a new publication on engaging LEP populations in transportation decision making on its Planning and Capacity Building Web site and it posted FTA presentations on civil rights training sessions on the department's Civil Rights Web site; and (3)notifying grantees of available resources through periodic e-mail letters, for example, the new handbook for implementing the LEP guidance was publicized to grantees through a "Dear FTA Grantee" email.
Department of Transportation To ensure that transit agencies and MPOs understand their responsibilities to provide language access, and to ensure that they are providing adequate language access to their services and their transportation planning and decision-making processes, the Secretary of Transportation should more fully incorporate the revised LEP guidance into current review processes by including questions on whether agencies have conducted assessments, having language access plans, and having evaluation and monitoring mechanisms in place in Title VI compliance reviews and triennial reviews.
Closed – Implemented
DOT has revised its Title VI circular to incorporate the Limited English-Proficient (LEP) guidance. The circular requests that all recipients and sub-recipients follow the instructions in the LEP guidance and also includes examples of measures that can be used to overcome barriers that may prevent LEP populations from participating in the public involvement process.
Department of Transportation To ensure that transit agencies and MPOs understand their responsibilities to provide language access, and to ensure that they are providing adequate language access to their services and their transportation planning and decision-making processes, the Secretary of Transportation should more fully incorporate the revised LEP guidance into current review processes by including more specific questions regarding language access to the planning process and involvement of LEP communities in planning certification reviews.
Closed – Implemented
FTA and FHWA have prepared two additional questions to add to the Certification Review Handbook: 1. Has the region performed any analysis as to whether there is a group (or groups) that is (are) limited in their comprehension of the English language? If so, how has the region reached out to this group with their limited English proficiency (LEP)? If not, what steps were taken to address the needs of individuals with limited proficiency in the English language? How are these activities documented in the MPO's Participation Plan? 2. On an annual basis, the MPO self-certifies that it complies with all federal laws and regulations, which includes Title VI of the Civil Rights Act and the need to reach-out to segments of the community that are hard to reach and not traditionally involved in transportation planning. Please describe what groups have been contacted and involved in the planning process and how this outreach has been documented.
Department of Transportation To ensure that transit agencies and MPOs understand their responsibilities to provide language access, and to ensure that they are providing adequate language access to their services and their transportation planning and decision-making processes, the Secretary of Transportation should more fully incorporate the revised LEP guidance into current review processes by establishing consistent norms for what constitutes a deficiency in the provision of language access across and within these review processes, ensuring that what constitutes a deficiency could directly lead to lesser service for LEP persons or complaints against the agency.
Closed – Implemented
To improve consistency across reviews with regard to deficiencies, FTA has revised the instructions in the triennial review handbook to indicate that all recipients are required to conduct a Limited English-Proficient (LEP) needs assessment regardless of whether a complaint has been made. These requirements flow out of the revised Title VI circular that was issued on April 13, 2007, which fully incorporates the LEP guidance. DOT has further committed to on-going monitoring of these review processes to ensure that deficiencies are being defined in a consistent manner.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Cost analysisCustomer serviceEvaluation criteriaFederal regulationsForeign language publicationsForeign languagesMass transitMonitoringPerformance measuresPolicy evaluationPopulation statisticsProgram evaluationStrategic planningTransportationBus driversCommercial motor vehicle operatorsNon English speakingTranslating and interpreting