Coverage of Public Employees and Implications for Reform
GAO-05-786T: Published: Jun 9, 2005. Publicly Released: Jun 9, 2005.
Social Security covers about 96 percent of all U.S. workers; the vast majority of the rest are state, local, and federal government employees. While these noncovered workers do not pay Social Security taxes on their government earnings, they may still be eligible for Social Security benefits. This poses difficult issues of fairness, and Social Security has provisions that attempt to address those issues, but critics contend these provisions are themselves often unfair. The Subcommittee asked GAO to discuss Social Security's effects on public employees as well as the implications of reform proposals.
Social Security's provisions regarding public employees are rooted in the fact that about one-fourth of them do not pay Social Security taxes on the earnings from their government jobs, for various historical reasons. Even though noncovered employees may have many years of earnings on which they do not pay Social Security taxes, they can still be eligible for Social Security benefits based on their spouses' or their own earnings in covered employment. To address the issues that arise with noncovered public employees, Social Security has two provisions--the Government Pension Offset (GPO), which affects spouse and survivor benefits, and the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP), which affects retired worker benefits. Both provisions reduce Social Security benefits for those who receive noncovered pension benefits. Both provisions also depend on having complete and accurate information on receipt of such noncovered pension benefits. However, such information is not available for many state and local pension plans, even though it is for federal pension benefits. As a result, the GPO and the WEP are not applied consistently for all noncovered pension recipients. In addition to the administrative challenges, these provisions are viewed by some as confusing and unfair. In recent years, various Social Security reform proposals that would affect public employees have been offered. Some proposals specifically address the GPO and the WEP and would either revise or eliminate them. Such actions, while they may reduce confusion among affected workers, would increase the long-range Social Security trust fund deficit and could create fairness issues for workers who have contributed to Social Security throughout their working lifetimes. Other proposals would make coverage mandatory for all state and local government employees. According to Social Security actuaries, mandatory coverage would reduce the 75-year actuarial deficit by 11 percent. It could also enhance inflation protection, pension portability, and dependent benefits for the affected beneficiaries, in many cases. However, to maintain the same level of spending for retirement, mandating coverage would increase costs for the state and local governments that sponsor the plans, and would likely reduce some pension benefits. Moreover, the GPO and the WEP would still be needed for many years to come even though they would become obsolete in the long run.
Matter for Congressional Consideration
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: As a result of GAO's matter for congressional consideration, Congress considered giving the IRS the authority to collect this information. Specifically, Congress included a provision in the Social Security Protection Act of 2004 to help identify persons receiving state and local pensions based on non-covered work. This provision, which was reported by Senate Finance, required state and local government pension-paying entities to indicate on their Form 1099R report whether the pension is based on earnings not covered by Social Security. The provision allowed IRS to share this information with SSA for the purpose of equitably administering the Government Pension Offset and Windfall Elimination Provision. Although the final legislation did not include this provision, a similar measure ("Enforce Windfall Elimination Provision/Government Pension Offset") appears in the President's 2008 Budget.
Matter: To facilitate complete and accurate reporting of government pension income, the Congress may wish to consider giving IRS the authority to collect this information, which could perhaps be accomplished through a simple modification to a single form.