FTA Needs to Better Define and Assess Impact of Certain Policies on New Starts Program
GAO-04-748, Jun 25, 2004
The Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA-21) and subsequent legislation authorized about $8.3 billion in guaranteed funding for the Federal Transit Administration's (FTA) New Starts program, which funds fixed guideway transit projects, such as rail and trolley projects, through FFGAs. GAO assessed the New Starts process for the fiscal year 2005 cycle. GAO identified (1) the number of projects that were evaluated, rated, and proposed for new FFGAs and how recent changes to the process were reflected in ratings; (2) the proposed funding commitments in the administration's budget request and legislative reauthorization proposals; and (3) the extent to which amounts appropriated since 1998 fulfilled FFGAs.
For the fiscal year 2005 cycle, FTA evaluated 38 projects, rated 29 projects, and proposed 7 projects for funding. FTA recommended 5 of the 7 projects for full funding grant agreements (FFGAs). FTA considered the remaining 2 projects to be meritorious and recommended a total of $50 million for these projects in fiscal year 2005. However, FTA does not clearly explain how it decides which projects will be recommended for funding outside of FFGAs or what project sponsors must do to qualify for such a recommendation. Last year, in response to language contained in appropriations committee reports, FTA instituted a policy favoring projects that seek a federal New Starts share of no more than 60 percent of the total project cost--even though the law allows projects to seek up to 80 percent--in its recommendation for FFGAs. According to FTA officials, this policy allows more projects to receive funding and ensures that local governments play a major role in funding such projects. FTA describes the 60 percent policy as a general preference; however, FTA's fiscal year 2005 New Starts report suggests that this policy is absolute in that projects proposing more than a 60 percent federal New Starts share will not be recommended for an FFGA. Therefore, FTA agreed to describe the policy as a general preference in future reporting instructions, thus allowing for the possibility of exceptions. Although most of the projects evaluated during the current cycle proposed a federal New Starts share of less than 60 percent of total project costs, some project sponsors GAO interviewed raised concerns about the difficulties of securing the local funding share. However, the overall impact of this policy on projects is unknown. The administration's fiscal year 2005 budget proposal requests $1.5 billion for the New Starts program, a $225 million increase over the amount appropriated for the fiscal year 2004 cycle. Congress is currently considering legislative reauthorization proposals, which contain a number of provisions and initiatives for the New Starts program including streamlining the New Starts evaluation process for projects requesting less than $75 million in New Starts funds, expanding the definition of eligible projects, changing the ratings categories, and maintaining the maximum federal New Starts share at 80 percent of total project cost. Project sponsors GAO interviewed had varying views on these provisions, but most said that clear definitions would be needed for any proposed changes to the New Starts process. All 26 projects with existing FFGAs have not received funds as scheduled--the amount of funding appropriated was less than the amount authorized and scheduled by the FFGA. According to FTA, all completed projects have received the total amount authorized in the FFGAs, but not necessarily according to the original FFGA schedule. As of March 2004, the 26 projects have received a total of $294 million, or 5 percent, less than the amount scheduled by the projects' FFGAs. The amount and timing of differences varied for each project. Project sponsors GAO interviewed have developed methods to mitigate the impact of receiving less than the scheduled annual amount for their project, but these methods can generate additional costs.
- Closed - implemented
- Closed - not implemented
Recommendations for Executive Action
Recommendation: To ensure that FTA's New Starts evaluation process and policies are objective, transparent, and comply with federal statute, the Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, FTA, to clearly explain the basis on which it decides which projects will be recommended for funding outside of FFGAs, such as projects considered to be meritorious, and what projects must do to qualify for such a recommendation. These explanations should be included in FTA's annual New Starts report and other published New Starts guidance.
Agency Affected: Department of Transportation
Status: Closed - Implemented
Comments: In its Annual Report on New Starts (February 2005), FTA clearly articulated the criteria used to identify projects that are eligible for funding outside of FFGAs. In particular, FTA said eligible projects: 1) are rated "recommended" or higher, 2) do not have a "low" cost-effectiveness rating, and 3) are currently in final design or expect to be in final design in early calendar year 2005.
Recommendation: To ensure that FTA's New Starts evaluation process and policies are objective, transparent, and comply with federal statute, the Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator, FTA, to examine the impact of its preference policy on projects currently in the evaluation process, as well as projects in the early planning stages, and examine whether its policy results in maximizing New Starts funds and local participation.
Agency Affected: Department of Transportation
Status: Closed - Not Implemented
Comments: SAFETEA-LU prohibited FTA from requiring a non-federal match of more than 20 percent. Therefore, FTA discontinued its preference policy. FTA, however, continues to encourage project sponsors to request the lowest New Starts share possible given the overall demand for limited federal funding.