Employment Disputes:

Recommendations to Better Ensure That Securities Arbitrators Are Qualified

GAO-03-790: Published: Aug 29, 2003. Publicly Released: Sep 24, 2003.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Robert E. Robertson
(202) 512-9889
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Employees in the securities industry must submit to binding arbitration in most employment disputes. The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is responsible for overseeing these arbitration programs--the largest being run by NASD and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Congress asked GAO to examine (1) the circumstances under which NASD and NYSE will arbitrate employment and employment discrimination disputes, and their procedures for selecting and evaluating their arbitrators; (2) the characteristics and outcomes of arbitrated employment and employment discrimination disputes at NASD and NYSE over the last 10 years; and (3) how SEC oversees the arbitration programs at NASD and NYSE and the results of these oversight activities.

Arbitration is generally required for most employment disputes, except those dealing with discrimination claims. NYSE will only arbitrate discrimination cases when parties involved agree to arbitrate after the dispute occurs. NASD will arbitrate employment discrimination cases based on agreements entered into between employees and firms before or after a dispute occurs. NASD has instituted additional requirements, however, for these cases, such as requiring that arbitrators not be affiliated with the securities industry. In addition, those chairing hearings for employment discrimination cases must hold a law degree, have 10 years of legal experience, have substantial familiarity with employment laws, and must not have primarily represented employers or employees in the last 5 years. To qualify to hear cases, NASD and NYSE require that arbitrators have at least 5 years of work experience, supply two letters of recommendation, and complete training in basic arbitration procedures. Arbitrators must also provide information on their complete employment history, including any affiliation with the securities industry, as well as information on whether they have any regulatory or criminal history. Neither organization independently verifies the qualifications for applicants not associated with the securities industry. In addition NASD and NYSE have standard procedures for ensuring that arbitrators selected to hear cases do not have conflicts and for evaluating arbitrator performance. However, evaluations of arbitrators by staff, parties in disputes and other arbitrators on cases are not always completed. Officials at NASD and NYSE noted that if they receive no information about an arbitrator's performance on a case, they assume that the arbitrator's performance was adequate. Over the last 10 years, 261 (17 percent) of the 1,546 employment disputes arbitrated at NASD or NYSE included a discrimination claim. Discrimination cases differed from cases with disputes that did not involve discrimination in the following ways: (1) discrimination cases required more hearing sessions; (2) employees won discrimination cases less often than cases not involving discrimination claims; and (3) in cases that employees won, the monetary award in discrimination cases was generally larger than in cases not involving discrimination. SEC periodically inspects NASD and NYSE arbitration programs. On the basis of its inspections, SEC has recommended improvements. In its most recent inspections of NASD and NYSE, SEC made various recommendations concerning procedures for ensuring that arbitrators are qualified. In addition, SEC recommended that one or both improve procedures for recording information on arbitrator performance in a central database and for disqualifying arbitrators who are poor performers.

Recommendations for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: On September 25, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved an NASD rule change imposing a fee on all new arbitrator applicants to cover the cost of background verification (68 FR 56661, Oct. 1, 2003). With the SEC approval of this NASD rule, all new applicants for the NASD arbitrator roster will have their basic background information verified.

    Recommendation: To help ensure that all NASD arbitrators possess the qualifications required by their SRO, the Chairman of SEC should direct NASD to verify basic background information of all new applicants for their arbitrator rosters.

    Agency Affected: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

  2. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: SEC believes the NYSE arbitration department should explore steps to ensure parties have sufficient information to make informed decisions regarding arbitrator disclosure. In addition, SEC suggested that the NYSE might want to contact NASD to learn about how they are verifying the background of all new arbitrator applicants and determine if they should adopt a similar process. Since a number of NYSE arbitrators also serve as NASD arbitrators, SEC suggested the NYSE explore the feasibility of implementing a formal arrangement to exchange information involving judicial, regulatory or professional licensing actions, to the extent such information is publicly available, that have been initiated against persons who serve as arbitrators in both arbitration forums. In response to SEC's suggestion, NYSE is in the process of developing a rule that will verify background information submitted by its arbitrators.

    Recommendation: To help ensure that all NYSE arbitrators possess the qualifications required by their SRO, the Chairman of SEC should direct NYSE to verify basic background information of all new applicants for their arbitrator rosters.

    Agency Affected: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

  3. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The Securities and Exchange Commission reported that it will continue to review the adequacy of the procedures NASD (formerly National Association of Securities Dealers) and New York Stock Exchange use for evaluation arbitrator performance.

    Recommendation: SEC should continue to review the adequacy of procedures for evaluating arbitrator performance in their next inspections at NASD and NYSE.

    Agency Affected: United States Securities and Exchange Commission

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Nov 13, 2014

Jul 23, 2014

May 15, 2014

Apr 9, 2014

Mar 5, 2014

Jan 23, 2014

Dec 20, 2013

Dec 6, 2013

Dec 2, 2013

Nov 4, 2013

Looking for more? Browse all our products here