Financial Management:

Comparison of the Arthur Andersen Study and the Ernst and Young Financial Audit of the National Institutes of Health

AIMD-99-9R: Published: Oct 2, 1998. Publicly Released: Oct 2, 1998.

Additional Materials:


Gloria L. Jarmon
(202) 512-4476


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a legislative requirement, GAO compared the results of the Arthur Andersen (AA) study of the National Institutes of Health's (NIH) operations and the Ernst and Young (E&Y) audit of NIH's fiscal year 1997 financial statements to determine if they contained any conflicting information.

GAO noted that: (1) it compared the two reports and found no conflicting information; (2) rather, the reports were complementary, discussing the need to improve management controls and making recommendations that, if properly implemented, could improve overall financial management of NIH's operations; (3) although the reports did not have the same focus, some of the issues they discussed were similar; (4) the AA study, which was much broader in scope, focused on 17 administrative functions of NIH and their respective costs; (5) these functions included information technology, finance, procurement, property management, intramural and extramural research management, personnel, and budget; (6) for each function, AA discussed in detail related issues, identified best practices, and made recommendations; (7) the E&Y audit focused more on internal controls, compliance with laws and regulations, and issues that may impact NIH's financial statements; and (8) these issues included property, plant, and equipment, grant accrual, the decentralized accounting environment, physical access controls to systems, and grant monitoring.

Oct 6, 2016

Aug 19, 2016

Aug 12, 2016

Jul 29, 2016

Jul 28, 2016

Jul 13, 2016

Jul 11, 2016

Jun 13, 2016

Jun 6, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here