Government Sponsored Enterprises: Freddie Mac's and Fannie Mae's Accounting for Costs of Foreclosed Property
AIMD-94-75
Published: May 27, 1994. Publicly Released: May 27, 1994.
Skip to Highlights
Highlights
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the foreclosed property accounting changes made by two government-sponsored enterprises (GSE), focusing on: (1) whether the accounting changes are in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); and (2) how the changes will affect GSE loan loss reserves and GSE compliance with federal housing legislation minimum capital requirements.
Recommendations
Recommendations for Executive Action
| Agency Affected | Recommendation | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Other | To improve the consistency in accounting for selling costs related to foreclosed assets and to clarify ambiguities in current accounting literature that may lead to results that differ from standards setters' intentions, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) should revise paragraph A-12 of the Statement of Position (SOP) 92-3 by eliminating language which implies that selling costs cannot be recognized as part of loan loss reserves. Additionally, guidance for applying this revision of SOP 92-3 should specifically address the appropriate accounting treatment for entities that originally made accounting changes to adopt SOP 92-3 based on paragraph A-12 that resulted in delaying selling cost recognition until after foreclosure. |
A Technical Practice Aid was published by AICPA that specifies that SOP 92-3 was not intended to address the accounting for loan loss allowances or to prohibit the recognition of selling costs in a loan loss allowance. The draft reiterates that Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 114 requires that selling costs be recognized in the loan loss allowance under specific circumstances. This document was published in November 1994.
|
| Financial Accounting Standards Board | To improve the consistency in accounting for selling costs related to foreclosed assets and to clarify ambiguities in current accounting literature that may lead to results that differ from standards setters' intentions, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and AICPA should work together to establish consistent guidance for recognizing selling costs for loan types not included in the scope of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 114. |
FASB included the issue of extending SFAS 114 guidance on selling costs to all loans in its 1994 FASAC survey of potential projects to be added to the Board's agenda. Based on the results of the survey, this issue was not added to the FASB agenda. However, FASB and AICPA have formal mechanisms to work together on a continuous basis to address accounting issues, and AICPA issued a Technical Practice Aid that resolved the issue.
|
| Other | To improve the consistency in accounting for selling costs related to foreclosed assets and to clarify ambiguities in current accounting literature that may lead to results that differ from standards setters' intentions, the Financial Accounting Standards Board and AICPA should work together to establish consistent guidance for recognizing selling costs for loan types not included in the scope of the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 114. |
AICPA indicated in its letter dated August 31, 1994, that FASB was addressing this recommendation but that AICPA would be willing to work with FASB if asked. In its letter dated July 12, 1994, FASB did not indicate its intention to involve AICPA in responding to this recommendation.
|
Full Report
Office of Public Affairs
Topics
Accounting proceduresCost accountingFederal corporationsForeclosuresGovernment sponsored enterprisesInternal controlsLoan accounting systemsLossesMortgage programsRisk management