Sunbelt Design & Development, Inc., B-291490; B-291490.2, January 2, 2003 * REDACTED DECISION
B-291490,B-291490.2, Jan 2, 2003
DIGEST Protest of the agency's evaluation of the protester's and the awardee's past performance is denied. Where the protester does not demonstrate that the agency's evaluation was unreasonable or inconsistent with the solicitation evaluation criteria. Sunbelt contends that the evaluation of past performance was inconsistent with the terms of the solicitation and otherwise unreasonable. Offerors were advised that the agency would conduct a performance/price trade-off to make an integrated assessment for a "best value" award decision. Each offeror was required to provide information for itself and each proposed "critical" subcontractor: for each active or completed contract (with preferably at least one year of performance history) in the past three (3) years.