DSC Cleaning, Inc., B-292125, June 25, 2003
B-292125, Jun 25, 2003
DIGEST Protester's proposal was properly excluded from the competitive range where. It was not among most highly-rated proposals. Protester fails to show that evaluation was unreasonable. The three factors were approximately equal in importance and. Offerors were to complete and submit with their proposals attachment 9. That are of services similar to this requirement. The evaluation under past performance was to include. The evaluation of work experience was to include current and recent projects and/or the years of experience of the firm. DSC's proposal was rated pink/marginal under the technical capability factor. DSC's proposal was rated red/high risk under the work experience subfactor based on the Army's finding that DSC provided no references to indicate that it had any experience in dining facility attendant services.