Skip to main content

B-163549, SEP. 2, 1969

B-163549 Sep 02, 1969
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

PATRICK BYRNE: REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTERS OF APRIL 30 AND MAY 23. SINCE YOU FURNISHED NO POSITIVE OR SPECIFIC INFORMATION UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION COULD BE MADE YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED. SUBSEQUENTLY YOU SUBMITTED INFORMATION AS TO VARIOUS DATES ON WHICH YOU BELIEVED YOU WERE DUE OVERTIME COMPENSATION. WE HAVE AGAIN REVIEWED THE RECORD IN YOUR CASE. OUR DECISIONS ARE FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE UPON THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT BUT THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE A CLAIMANT FROM PURSUING HIS CLAIM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OR THE COURT OF CLAIMS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1346 (A) (2) AND 1491.

View Decision

B-163549, SEP. 2, 1969

TO MR. PATRICK BYRNE:

REFERENCE IS MADE TO YOUR LETTERS OF APRIL 30 AND MAY 23, 1969, REQUESTING REVIEW OF OUR DECISION OF APRIL 22, 1969, B-163549.

THE RECORD INDICATES THAT YOU SUBMITTED A GENERAL CLAIM FOR OVERTIME ON SEPTEMBER 22, 1967. SINCE YOU FURNISHED NO POSITIVE OR SPECIFIC INFORMATION UPON WHICH A DETERMINATION COULD BE MADE YOUR CLAIM WAS DISALLOWED. SUBSEQUENTLY YOU SUBMITTED INFORMATION AS TO VARIOUS DATES ON WHICH YOU BELIEVED YOU WERE DUE OVERTIME COMPENSATION. ON THE BASIS OF SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION SUPPLIED BY YOU AND THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AND AN EXAMINATION OF THE PERTINENT STATUTES, WE DISALLOWED YOUR CLAIM IN DECISIONS B-163549 DATED SEPTEMBER 6, 1968, MARCH 6, 1969, AND APRIL 22, 1969.

WE HAVE AGAIN REVIEWED THE RECORD IN YOUR CASE. HOWEVER, WE FIND NO BASIS UPON WHICH TO ALLOW ANY PART OF YOUR CLAIM.

AS INDICATED IN OUR DECISION OF MARCH 6, 1969, OUR DECISIONS ARE FINAL AND CONCLUSIVE UPON THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT BUT THEY DO NOT PRECLUDE A CLAIMANT FROM PURSUING HIS CLAIM IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OR THE COURT OF CLAIMS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 1346 (A) (2) AND 1491, RESPECTIVELY.

CONGRESSMAN RICHARD D. MCCARTHY WHO CONTACTED US ON YOUR BEHALF HAS BEEN ADVISED IN THIS MATTER.

GAO Contacts

Office of Public Affairs