Kathpal Technologies, Inc., B-291637.2, April 10, 2003 * REDACTED DECISION
B-291637.2, Apr 10, 2003
Evaluation of protester's past performance at level below highest possible ratings under the applicable criteria was unobjectionable where record establishes that agency followed stated evaluation criteria and rating had a reasonable basis. Proposals were to be evaluated under three factors. Was to be rated as outstanding. Or marginal. /2/ Proposed costs were to be evaluated for reasonableness and realism. Non-cost factors were considered significantly more important than cost and awards were to be made to the offerors whose proposals were evaluated as providing the best value to the government. Were received and were evaluated by a technical evaluation panel. Were as follows: . The agency took corrective action in the form of identifying which task orders were associated with the challenged comments and provided KTI the opportunity to submit additional information.