Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2003, GAO-03-934R, B-292452, June 30, 2003

B-292452: Jun 30, 2003

Contact:

Edda Emmanuelli Perez
(202) 512-2853
EmmanuelliPerezE@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

This is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). It was published in the Federal Register as a final rule on June 18. The final rule is necessary to implement the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. The amount to be recovered for FY 2003 is approximately $526.3 million. Enclosed is our assessment of the NRC's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. If you have any questions about this report. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Robert Robinson. FEE RECOVERY FOR FY 2003" (RIN: 3150-AH14) (i) Cost-benefit analysis The NRC was not required to.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission: Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2003, GAO-03-934R, B-292452, June 30, 2003

The Honorable James M. Inhofe Chairman The Honorable James M. Jeffords Ranking Minority Member Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate

The Honorable W.J. "Billy" Tauzin Chairman The Honorable John D. Dingell Ranking Minority Member Committee on Energy and Commerce House of Representatives

Pursuant to section 801(a)(2)(A) of title 5, United States Code, this is our report on a major rule promulgated by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), entitled "Revision of Fee Schedules; Fee Recovery for FY 2003" (RIN: 3150-AH14). We received the rule on June 13, 2003. It was published in the Federal Register as a final rule on June 18, 2003. 68 Fed. Reg. 36714.

The final rule amends the licensing, inspection, and annual fees charged to NRC's applicants and licensees. The final rule is necessary to implement the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990, as amended, which requires that the NRC recover approximately 94 percent of its budget authority in fiscal year 2003, less the amounts appropriated from the Nuclear Waste and General Fund. The amount to be recovered for FY 2003 is approximately $526.3 million.

Enclosed is our assessment of the NRC's compliance with the procedural steps required by section 801(a)(1)(B)(i) through (iv) of title 5 with respect to the rule. Our review indicates that the NRC complied with the applicable requirements.

If you have any questions about this report, please contact James W. Vickers, Assistant General Counsel, at (202) 512-8210. The official responsible for GAO evaluation work relating to the subject matter of the rule is Robert Robinson, Managing Director, Natural Resources and Environment. Mr. Robinson can be reached at (202) 512-3841.

signed
Kathleen E. Wannisky
Managing Associate General Counsel

Enclosure

cc: Dennis K. Rathbun
Director, Office of Congressional Affairs
Nuclear Regulatory Commission

ENCLOSURE

ANALYSIS UNDER 5 U.S.C. Sec. 801(a)(1)(B)(i)-(iv) OF A MAJOR RULE ISSUED BY THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ENTITLED "REVISION OF FEE SCHEDULES; FEE RECOVERY FOR FY 2003" (RIN: 3150-AH14)

(i) Cost-benefit analysis

The NRC was not required to, nor did it prepare, a cost-benefit analysis of the final rule. However, the preamble to the final rule contains an explanation of how the amount of the fees were computed to permit the NRC to recover the necessary costs required by the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. For fiscal year 2003, the fee recovery amount is approximately $526.3 million.

(ii) Agency actions relevant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. Secs. 603-605, 607, and 609

The entire Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is contained in Appendix A of the final rule. The analysis describes the reason for the rule and the legal basis for it; describes and estimates the number of small entities affected by the rule; discusses the recordkeeping, reporting, and other compliance requirements; and the steps taken to minimize the burden on small entities, including a maximum fee level.

(iii) Agency actions relevant to sections 202-205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. Secs. 1532-1535

The final rule, promulgated by an independent regulatory agency, is not subject to title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.

(iv) Other relevant information or requirements under acts and executive orders

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. Secs. 551 et seq.

The final rule was issued using the notice and comment procedures contained in 5 U.S.C. 553. On April 3, 2003, the NRC published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register. 68 Fed. Reg. 16374. NRC received 32 comments in response to the proposed rule and responds to those comments in the preamble to the final rule.

Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. Secs. 3501-3520

The NRC states that the final rule does not contain any information collections that are subject to review under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Statutory authorization for the rule

The final rule was promulgated under the authority of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101-508), as amended by the FY 2001 Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act (Pub. L. 106-377) and the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended.

Executive Order No. 12866

The final rule, promulgated by an independent regulatory agency, is not subject to the review requirements of the order.

Jul 25, 2014

Jul 24, 2014

Jul 18, 2014

Jul 17, 2014

Looking for more? Browse all our products here