Dismas Charities, Inc., B-289575.2; B-289575.3, February 20, 2004 * REDACTED DECISION
B-289575.2,B-289575.3, Feb 20, 2004
Is denied where record shows that agency did give past performance greater weight than other factors. Proposals were equal under all technical factors combined. Agency was not required to perform price realism analysis where solicitation contemplated award of a fixed-price. Past performance was identified as the most important factor. The non-price factors combined were significantly more important than price. Were received. The agency determined that the two offerors' non-price proposals were technically equal. We have considered each issue and find them all to be without merit. As evidenced by the agency's determining that Dismas's and Bannum's proposals were technically equal despite the fact that Bannum's proposal score was lower than Dismas's for past performance and for all non-cost factors combined.