This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-04-930R 
entitled 'FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction 
Program' which was released on July 09, 2004.

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately.

July 9, 2004:

The Honorable John Warner:
Chairman:
The Honorable Carl Levin:
Ranking Minority Member:
Committee on Armed Services:
United States Senate:

The Honorable Duncan Hunter:
Chairman:
The Honorable Ike Skelton:
Ranking Minority Member:
Committee on Armed Services:
House of Representatives:

Subject: FY 2005 Annual Report on the Cooperative Threat Reduction 
Program:

Under section 1308 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2001 (P.L. 106-398), the Department of Defense (DOD) is to submit 
an annual report to Congress on its Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) 
program no later than the first Monday in February of each year. The 
report should include a 5-year plan that discusses the amount and 
purpose of funding needed over the term of the plan and a description 
of efforts conducted by the United States to ensure that CTR assistance 
is fully accounted for and used for its intended purposes. The act 
requires the Comptroller General to assess this 5-year plan and the 
description of efforts to account for CTR assistance within 90 days of 
the report's submission to Congress. The Department submitted its CTR 
annual report for fiscal year 2005 to Congress in early February 2004, 
and we briefed your staff on April 29, 2004.[Footnote 1]

We analyzed the 2005 report to determine whether (1) the 5-year plan 
addresses legislative requirements and presents accurate information, 
(2) the accountability section addresses legislative requirements and 
presents accurate information, and (3) past GAO recommendations have 
been adopted. Enclosed is information provided to your staff presenting 
our assessment of the CTR annual report submitted for fiscal year 2005 
(see enclosure).

We found that the 5-year plan addressed the legislative requirements by 
setting forth funding information for the term of the plan and the 
purpose of those funds. We also confirmed with project managers that, 
for the eight projects we reviewed in detail, the information provided 
in the report was generally accurate. In addition, we examined the 
source documents that supported the data in the published report and 
found that the published data were generally well supported.

We found that the accountability section addressed all legislative 
requirements. It described the condition and location of CTR-furnished 
equipment, discussed the status of contracts and services and the 
methods used to ensure that CTR aid is used for the purposes intended, 
determined whether the assistance provided has been used effectively 
and efficiently, and described the audits and examinations planned for 
the next year. We found that the information was generally accurate and 
complete and included the concerns raised in project trip reports and 
audit and examinations.

We found that DOD has taken action on 13 of 14 GAO recommendations 
regarding the reporting of CTR program information over the last 9 
years. For example, in our review of DOD's fiscal year 2004 annual 
report, we recommended that the Secretary of Defense integrate the 5-
year plan and accountability sections of the report.[Footnote 2] DOD 
modified the fiscal year 2005 annual report to comply with our 
recommendation. The report now integrates the information that was 
found separately in the 5-year plan and the accountability section. 
This presentation provides relevant project information in one 
location, making it easier to understand the progress and problems of 
each project.

DOD has not implemented our recommendation that the annual report 
incorporate key federal strategic planning elements. In July 2003, we 
found that DOD's fiscal year 2004 annual report lacked a discussion of 
key strategic planning elements that could help congressional decision 
makers in their annual CTR budget deliberations. Specifically, the 
report did not include annual performance goals linked to long-term 
goals, information on external factors that could affect the 
achievement of these goals, and plans for revising program goals, all 
of which had been developed by CTR program managers. However, in its 
response to our July 2003 report, DOD stated that the legislation does 
not require reporting on these elements in its annual CTR report. 
During our audit work for this report, DOD officials stated that the 
Department would not implement our recommendation without specific 
congressional direction to do so.

Since 1994, DOD has implemented all but one of GAO's recommendations 
regarding the reporting of CTR program information and in so doing has 
significantly improved the quality of its annual reporting to Congress 
on the CTR program. Based on the quality and timeliness of the fiscal 
year 2005 annual report, Congress may wish to rescind the requirement 
that GAO review the CTR report annually, provided that the fiscal year 
2006 annual report is delivered on time and is reviewed favorably.

We performed our work in Washington, D.C., from February 2004 through 
May 2004 in accordance with generally accepted government auditing 
standards.

DOD did not comment on a draft of this report that we provided.

We are sending copies of this report to the Honorable Donald Rumsfeld, 
Secretary of Defense, and to interested congressional committees. We 
also will make copies available to others upon request. This report 
will also be available at no charge on the GAO Web site at http://
www.gao.gov.

If you or your staff have any questions regarding this report, please 
contact me at (202) 512-8979 or christoffj@gao.gov. David Maurer, 
Claude Adrien, Hynek Kalkus, Beth Hoffman León, and Josie Sigl also 
made key contributions to this report.

Signed by: 

Joseph A. Christoff:

Director, International Affairs and Trade:

Enclosure:

[See PDF for image]

[End of slide presentation]

(320281):

FOOTNOTES

[1] We refer to the section of the CTR annual report for fiscal year 
2004 titled "Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program implementation 
plan for FY 2004" as the 5-year plan. We refer to the section titled 
"accounting for Cooperative Threat Reduction (CTR) program assistance 
to states of the former Soviet Union (FSU) conducted during FY 2002" as 
the accountability section. These sections were consolidated in the FY 
2005 report at GAO's recommendation.

[2] See U.S. General Accounting Office, FY 2004 Annual Report on the 
Cooperative Threat Reduction Program, GAO-03-1008R (Washington, D.C.: 
July 18, 2003).