This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-07-947 
entitled 'Defense Health Care: Under TRICARE Children's Hospitals Paid 
More Than Other Hospitals After Accounting for Patient Complexity' 
which was released on July 31, 2007. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

Report to Congressional Committees: 

United States Government Accountability Office: 

GAO: 

July 2007: 

Defense Health Care: 

Under TRICARE, Children's Hospitals Paid More Than Other Hospitals 
After Accounting for Patient Complexity: 

GAO-07-947: 

GAO Highlights: 

Highlights of GAO-07-947, a report to congressional committees 

Why GAO Did This Study: 

Under the Department of Defense’s (DOD) TRICARE health program, 
hospitals that treat primarily children—designated by DOD as children’s 
hospitals—are paid differently from other types of civilian hospitals 
through a children’s hospital differential payment. Representatives of 
children’s hospitals state that payments for children’s hospital 
services do not fully recognize the higher complexity of children’s 
hospital patients. Acknowledging concerns over payments for children’s 
hospital services, the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal 
Year 2006 directed GAO to study DOD’s current system of payments to 
children’s hospitals. This report examines (1) the effect of the 
differential on TRICARE’s base payments to children’s hospitals, (2) 
differences in diagnosis and complexity between TRICARE pediatric 
patients at children’s hospitals and those at other hospitals, (3) the 
extent to which TRICARE payment differences across hospitals reflect 
differences in patient complexity, and (4) recent trends in TRICARE 
pediatric patients’ use of children’s hospital services. To do this, 
GAO analyzed pertinent TRICARE claims data for fiscal years 2003 
through 2006 and interviewed relevant DOD officials and representatives 
of children’s hospitals. 

What GAO Found: 

In fiscal year 2007, TRICARE’s base payments, a key component of the 
program’s hospital payment formula, were 61 percent higher for 
facilities that TRICARE defines as children’s hospitals than for other 
hospital types. Base payments to children’s hospitals have been 
substantially higher than base payments to other hospitals since 1989. 
However, the relative difference in base payments has decreased over 
time, and will continue to decrease, as the children’s hospital 
differential is not adjusted for inflation. 

From fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006, excluding newborns, the 
types of diagnoses for TRICARE pediatric patients at children’s 
hospitals were similar to those treated at medical centers, hospitals 
that also provide specialized pediatric services. TRICARE pediatric 
patients at children’s hospitals had a similar level of complexity to 
those at medical centers and were substantially more complex than those 
at community hospitals, facilities that focus on more routine 
children’s care. GAO measured the complexity of patients using a tool 
that classifies hospital stays into a more refined set of groups than 
TRICARE’s system. Indirect measures of complexity, such as the length 
of a hospital stay, also showed similarities between TRICARE pediatric 
patients at children’s hospitals and those at medical centers. 

GAO found that after adjusting for differences in patient complexity, 
TRICARE payments to children’s hospitals were substantially greater per 
admission than TRICARE payments to medical centers and community 
hospitals. Specifically, holding patient complexity constant, 
children’s hospitals were paid 22 percent more than medical centers and 
53 percent more than community hospitals. 

The number of TRICARE pediatric admissions at children’s hospitals 
increased from 5,027 in fiscal year 2003 to 7,083 in fiscal year 2006. 
The percentage of TRICARE pediatric admissions in civilian hospitals 
that occurred at children’s hospitals also increased during this time 
period. The increase in the use of children’s hospital services is 
consistent with statements from representatives of children’s 
hospitals, who said that their hospitals are committed to accepting and 
caring for TRICARE patients. 

GAO’s findings show TRICARE’s hospital payment system functioning 
largely as DOD expected, as the difference in base payments to 
children’s hospitals and other hospitals was designed to endure but 
diminish over time. GAO has no data on other factors that might support 
payment differences, however, GAO’s findings suggest that further 
increasing payments to children’s hospitals is not supported on the 
basis of patient complexity. In commenting on a draft of this report, 
DOD agreed with GAO’s findings and concluding observations. 

[Hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-07-947]. 

To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on 
the link above. For more information, contact Laurie Ekstrand at (202) 
512-7114 or ekstrandl@gao.gov. 

[End of section] 

Contents: 

Letter: 

Results in Brief: 

Background: 

TRICARE's Base Payments to Children's Hospitals Substantially Higher 
Than Base Payments to Other Hospitals, Though Relative Difference in 
Payments Decreases over Time: 

TRICARE Pediatric Patients at Children's Hospitals Similar to Those at 
Medical Centers in Terms of Diagnoses and Complexity: 

After Adjusting for Patient Complexity, Children's Hospitals Were Paid 
More per TRICARE Pediatric Admission Than Other Hospitals: 

Rising Number of TRICARE Admissions at Children's Hospitals Suggests No 
Decline in Access: 

Concluding Observations: 

Agency and Professional Association Comments and Our Evaluation: 

Appendix I: Scope and Methodology: 

Appendix II: Comments from the Department of Defense: 

Appendix III: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments: 

Tables: 

Table 1: Average TRICARE Patient Complexity by Hospital Type, Fiscal 
Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Table 2: Indirect Measures of TRICARE Pediatric Patient Complexity by 
Hospital Type, Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Table 3: Average TRICARE Payment per Pediatric Admission, Patient 
Complexity, and Payment Adjusted for Complexity, by Hospital Type, 
Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Table 4: Average Complexity per TRICARE Pediatric Admission by Hospital 
Type, Using Both TRICARE DRGs and APR-DRGs, Fiscal Year 2003 through 
Fiscal Year 2006: 

Table 5: Change in TRICARE Base Payments to Children's Hospitals 
Compared to the Change in Hospital Inflation, Fiscal Year 1992 through 
Fiscal Year 2006: 

Figures: 

Figure 1: Civilian Hospital Types Treating TRICARE Pediatric Patients 
in Fiscal Year 2006, by Number of Admissions and Number of Hospitals: 

Figure 2: Location of Children's Hospitals That Admitted TRICARE 
Pediatric Patients in Fiscal Year 2006: 

Figure 3: TRICARE Base Payments to Children's Hospitals Compared to 
TRICARE Base Payments to Other Hospitals, Fiscal Year 1989 through 
Fiscal Year 2007: 

Figure 4: Relative Difference between TRICARE's Base Payment to 
Children's Hospitals and Other Hospitals, in Percentages, Fiscal Year 
1989 through Fiscal Year 2007: 

Figure 5: Most Common TRICARE Children's Hospital Admissions by Major 
Diagnostic Category (MDC) and Hospital Type, Excluding Newborns, Fiscal 
Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Figure 6: TRICARE Pediatric Admissions to Children's Hospitals, Fiscal 
Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Figure 7: Percentage of TRICARE Pediatric Civilian Hospital Admissions 
Occurring in Children's Hospitals, Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 
2006: 

Abbreviations: 

APR-DRG: All Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Group: 
ASA: adjusted standardized amount: 
CMS: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services: 
DOD: Department of Defense: 
DRG: diagnosis-related group: 
MCSC: managed care support contractor: 
MDC: major diagnostic category: 
MTF: military treatment facility: 
NACH: National Association of Children's Hospitals: 
TMA: TRICARE Management Activity: 

United States Government Accountability Office: 
Washington, DC 20548: 

July 31, 2007: 

Congressional Committees: 

Of the more than 9 million individuals who were eligible for TRICARE-- 
the health program that is managed by the Department of Defense (DOD)-
-at the end of fiscal year 2006, about 2 million were children. Under 
TRICARE, beneficiaries can receive care from military treatment 
facilities (MTF), which are owned and operated by DOD, or from civilian 
providers. Of the $10 billion that TRICARE paid for civilian health 
care services in fiscal year 2006, TRICARE spent a small fraction-- 
approximately $430 million--on inpatient hospital services for 
children. Of this amount, about $114 million--26 percent--went to 
children's hospitals, defined by TRICARE as hospitals in which the 
majority of patients are under the age of 18.[Footnote 1] Children's 
hospitals accounted for 7.8 percent of TRICARE's pediatric 
admissions.[Footnote 2] 

Inpatient care for children admitted as TRICARE patients can be 
provided in a variety of civilian hospital settings. Since children's 
hospitals treat primarily children, they are generally freestanding, 
meaning that they are not part of a larger hospital that focuses on 
adult care.[Footnote 3] In contrast, some medical centers that treat 
adults have a designated pediatric inpatient unit.[Footnote 4] Both 
children's hospitals and medical centers specialize in treating 
children with certain rare and complex conditions, performing 
procedures such as pediatric heart surgeries.[Footnote 5] Community 
hospitals, on the other hand, typically provide children with more 
routine services, such as newborn care.[Footnote 6] 

Like many other hospitals that participate in TRICARE, children's 
hospitals are generally paid under a prospective payment system. In a 
prospective payment system, hospitals receive a fixed, predetermined 
amount per hospital stay.[Footnote 7] Payment is based on the patient's 
diagnosis and procedures performed during the hospital stay. Stays are 
classified into diagnosis-related groups (DRG) based on the information 
that hospitals submit on their claims. Each DRG is assigned a weight, 
which is a measure of the resources typically required to treat 
patients whose hospital stays are classified in that DRG, with higher 
weights reflecting greater use of resources. Because the most resource- 
intensive cases can be considered the most complex cases, the DRG 
weight is also called a measure of complexity. 

Under the prospective payment system, to determine the amount a 
hospital is to be paid for a single stay the DRG weight is multiplied 
by the base payment.[Footnote 8] For all hospitals other than 
children's hospitals, the base payment equals the adjusted standardized 
amount (ASA), which is TRICARE's annual estimate of the average cost 
per hospital stay. For children's hospitals, the base payment equals 
the ASA plus an add-on payment known as the children's hospital 
differential.[Footnote 9] Children's hospitals have received the 
differential since their payment began under DOD's prospective payment 
system on April 1, 1989. Previously, children's hospitals were paid 
based on their charges--the amount they billed for their services--and 
DOD viewed payments based on charges as excessive. The purpose of the 
differential was to recognize that children's hospitals typically had 
higher charges than other hospitals for the same services and to 
prevent any reduction in payments to children's hospitals as a result 
of the transition from a charge-based system to a prospective payment 
system. Medical centers and community hospitals that treat children 
admitted as TRICARE patients do not receive the children's hospital 
differential. 

Representatives of the National Association of Children's Hospitals 
(NACH) have stated that TRICARE's prospective payment system does not 
adequately compensate children's hospitals.[Footnote 10] In particular, 
these representatives contend that TRICARE pays children's hospitals at 
rates that are below their costs of care. In addition, NACH 
representatives state that the children treated at children's hospitals 
typically have more complex conditions than children at other types of 
hospitals. 

Recognizing concerns over TRICARE's payments to children's hospitals, 
the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2006 directed us 
to study the effectiveness of the current system of differential 
payments to children's hospitals under TRICARE.[Footnote 11] 
Specifically, as discussed with the committees of jurisdiction, this 
report examines (1) the effect of the differential on TRICARE's base 
payments to children's hospitals, (2) differences in diagnosis and 
complexity between TRICARE pediatric patients at children's hospitals 
and those at other hospitals, (3) the extent to which TRICARE payment 
differences across hospitals reflect differences in patient complexity, 
and (4) recent trends in TRICARE pediatric patients' use of children's 
hospital services. 

To examine the effect of the differential on children's hospital base 
payments, we analyzed TRICARE data on base payments from fiscal year 
1989 to fiscal year 2007. To compare the diagnoses and complexity of 
patients at children's hospitals with patients at other hospital types, 
we used information from TRICARE claims data for all pediatric 
inpatient admissions to civilian hospitals in the United States for 
fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006 and a tool to measure patient 
complexity that was developed by a health information company with 
input from NACH.[Footnote 12] This tool classifies hospital stays into 
a more refined set of diagnostic groups than TRICARE's DRG system. We 
used the same claims data and classification tool to determine the 
extent to which differences between TRICARE's payments to children's 
hospitals and TRICARE's payments to other hospitals reflect differences 
in patient complexity. To identify recent trends in TRICARE pediatric 
patients' use of children's hospital services, we also analyzed TRICARE 
pediatric inpatient claims data from fiscal year 2003 through fiscal 
year 2006. In addition, we interviewed DOD officials on hospital 
payment policy and representatives of children's hospitals to learn 
their perspective on the effect of TRICARE's payment policies on 
TRICARE beneficiaries' access to children's hospital services. We did 
not attempt to calculate the costs of admissions at children's 
hospitals because we determined that sufficiently reliable data on 
children's hospital costs for TRICARE admissions were not 
available.[Footnote 13] We found that some data fields in the TRICARE 
claims data were not sufficiently reliable, and we therefore did not 
use these fields in our analyses. We determined the remaining TRICARE 
claims data to be sufficiently reliable for the purposes of this 
report. (See app. I for a detailed explanation of our scope and 
methodology.) We conducted our work from July 2006 through June 2007 in 
accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

Results in Brief: 

In fiscal year 2007, TRICARE's base payments, a key component of 
TRICARE's hospital payment formula, were 61 percent higher for 
facilities that TRICARE defines as children's hospitals than for other 
hospital types. Base payments to children's hospitals have been 
substantially higher than base payments to other hospitals since 1989. 
However, the relative difference in base payments has decreased over 
time. The relative difference in base payments will continue to 
decrease, as the children's hospital differential is not adjusted for 
inflation. 

From fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006, excluding newborns, the 
types of diagnoses for TRICARE pediatric patients at children's 
hospitals were similar to those treated at medical centers. TRICARE 
pediatric patients at children's hospitals had a similar level of 
complexity to those at medical centers and were substantially more 
complex than those at community hospitals. We measured the complexity 
of patients using a tool that classifies hospital stays into a more 
refined set of groups than TRICARE's system. Indirect measures of 
complexity, such as the length of a hospital stay, also showed 
similarities between TRICARE pediatric patients at children's hospitals 
and those at medical centers. 

We found that after we adjusted for differences in patient complexity, 
TRICARE payments to children's hospitals were substantially greater per 
admission than TRICARE payments to medical centers and community 
hospitals. Specifically, holding patient complexity constant, 
children's hospitals were paid 22 percent more than medical centers and 
53 percent more than community hospitals. 

The number of TRICARE pediatric admissions at children's hospitals 
increased from 5,027 in fiscal year 2003 to 7,083 in fiscal year 2006. 
The percentage of TRICARE pediatric admissions in civilian hospitals 
that occurred at children's hospitals also increased during this time 
period. The increase in the use of children's hospital services is 
consistent with statements from representatives of children's 
hospitals, who said that their hospitals are committed to accepting and 
caring for TRICARE patients. 

Our findings show TRICARE's hospital payment system functioning largely 
as DOD expected, as the difference in base payments to children's 
hospitals and other hospitals was designed to endure but diminish over 
time. We have no data on other factors that might support payment 
differences, however, our findings suggest that further increasing 
payments to children's hospitals is not supported on the basis of 
patient complexity. 

In its comments on a draft of this report, DOD stated that it agreed 
with our findings and concluding observations. NACH agreed with our 
findings that TRICARE pediatric patients at children's hospitals were 
clinically similar to TRICARE pediatric patients at medical centers, 
and that TRICARE pays children's hospitals more than other hospitals, 
after accounting for patient complexity. 

Background: 

Children's hospitals constitute a small fraction of civilian hospitals 
providing inpatient services to TRICARE pediatric patients. Children's 
hospitals have been paid the children's hospital differential since 
1989, when they were incorporated under DOD's prospective payment 
system. 

The Number and Location of TRICARE Admissions at Children's Hospitals: 

In fiscal year 2006, there were 7,083 TRICARE pediatric admissions to 
children's hospitals (see fig. 1). A similar number of admissions, 
6,416, occurred in medical centers. In contrast, 77,866 pediatric 
admissions took place in community hospitals.[Footnote 14] The number 
of community hospitals that treated TRICARE pediatric patients was 
substantially higher than the number of children's hospitals or medical 
centers that treated TRICARE pediatric patients in fiscal year 2006. 
Specifically, 3,441 community hospitals treated TRICARE pediatric 
patients compared with 67 children's hospitals and 62 medical centers. 

Figure 1: Civilian Hospital Types Treating TRICARE Pediatric Patients 
in Fiscal Year 2006, by Number of Admissions and Number of Hospitals: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. In this report, a 
medical center refers to a teaching hospital that includes a pediatric 
inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a "children's hospital 
within a hospital." A community hospital is any hospital that was not a 
children's hospital or medical center under our definitions. 

[End of figure] 

TRICARE admissions to children's hospitals were concentrated in a 
subset of these hospitals in fiscal year 2006. Of the 67 children's 
hospitals that treated TRICARE pediatric patients, 14 accounted for 
more than half of the TRICARE children's hospital admissions, and 30 
children's hospitals accounted for 84 percent. Children's hospitals 
that treated TRICARE pediatric patients in fiscal year 2006 are spread 
throughout the United States (see fig. 2). Similarly, children's 
hospitals that had more than 200 TRICARE admissions were located in 
areas that were diverse geographically. States that were home to these 
high-volume children's hospitals include California, Virginia, 
Pennsylvania, Texas, Washington, and Alabama. 

Figure 2: Location of Children's Hospitals That Admitted TRICARE 
Pediatric Patients in Fiscal Year 2006: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data and MapInfor (map). 

Note: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. 

[End of figure] 

The Establishment of the Children's Hospital Differential: 

DOD began paying hospitals under its prospective payment system in 
October 1987, although children's hospitals and certain other types of 
hospitals were initially exempted.[Footnote 15] TRICARE's prospective 
payment system was modeled on Medicare's prospective payment system. 
DOD is required by law to follow Medicare's rules with regard to 
payment to providers to the extent practicable.[Footnote 16] In 1988, 
after discussions with children's hospital representatives, DOD 
proposed including children's hospitals under the prospective payment 
system and recommended paying those hospitals the children's hospital 
differential. In December 1988, DOD issued a final rule placing 
children's hospitals under the prospective payment system and 
establishing the differential.[Footnote 17] DOD began paying children's 
hospitals under the prospective payment system on April 1, 1989. 

DOD established the differential with the goal of ensuring that 
payments to children's hospitals were not reduced as a result of the 
transition from the previous charge-based payment system to the 
prospective payment system as well as to recognize that children's 
hospitals typically charged more than other hospitals for the same 
services. The value of the differential is based on a calculation made 
by DOD that sought to ensure revenue neutrality to children's 
hospitals. The regulation that established the differential states that 
it is not to be updated for inflation, and it has not been.[Footnote 
18] As of 2007, the value of the differential was set at $2,635.41, and 
it has changed only twice since 1989.[Footnote 19] 

When DOD first proposed adopting the children's hospital differential, 
it expressed concern about the prospective payment system's ability to 
account for the complexity of children's hospital patients.[Footnote 
20] DOD noted that children's hospitals could be particularly 
susceptible to issues in measuring complexity since children's 
hospitals often treat complex cases. Like other prospective payment 
systems, DOD's system does not capture every difference in complexity. 
For example, patients whose hospital stays are classified into DRG 98, 
pediatric cases of bronchitis and asthma, may vary in levels of 
complexity: one patient may have a severe case of bronchitis, while 
another patient may have a mild case.[Footnote 21] However, all 
hospital stays in DRG 98 receive the same DRG weight and therefore are 
paid the same rate.[Footnote 22] As a result, a hospital that 
consistently treats patients with severe cases of bronchitis will be 
paid no more for those admissions than a hospital that consistently 
treats patients with less severe cases of bronchitis, even though the 
hospital would likely incur higher costs for treating the more severe 
cases.[Footnote 23] However, it is also expected that at most 
hospitals, these differences in complexity will "balance out." In other 
words, a hospital may treat some patients who have severe cases of 
bronchitis, but the hospital will also treat some patients who have 
mild cases of bronchitis, so that overall the hospital will treat 
children who are at the average complexity of the DRG. 

TRICARE's Base Payments to Children's Hospitals Substantially Higher 
Than Base Payments to Other Hospitals, Though Relative Difference in 
Payments Decreases over Time: 

TRICARE's base payments to children's hospitals have been substantially 
higher than base payments to other hospital groups, although the 
relative difference in base payments has declined over time. For fiscal 
year 2007, TRICARE's base payments to children's hospitals were set 61 
percent higher than base payments to all other hospitals. However, the 
relative difference between TRICARE's base payments to children's 
hospitals and base payments to other hospitals has decreased, and it 
will continue to decrease over time. 

Due to the Differential, Children's Hospitals Have Received 
Substantially Higher Base Payments from TRICARE: 

As a result of the children's hospital differential, children's 
hospitals have received substantially higher base payments than other 
hospitals under TRICARE's prospective payment system--61 percent higher 
in fiscal year 2007. Base payments to children's hospitals have been 
substantially higher than base payments to other hospitals since the 
children's hospital differential was established in 1989 (see fig. 3). 
So long as the TRICARE prospective payment system continues to include 
a children's hospital differential, base payments to children's 
hospitals will always be higher than base payments to other hospitals. 

Figure 3: TRICARE Base Payments to Children's Hospitals Compared to 
TRICARE Base Payments to Other Hospitals, Fiscal Year 1989 through 
Fiscal Year 2007: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE payment data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. Other hospitals include 
medical centers, which in this report are teaching hospitals that 
include a pediatric inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a 
"children's hospital within a hospital," and community hospitals, which 
in this report are hospitals that were not children's hospitals or 
medical centers under our definitions. 

This figure reflects the two changes to the children's hospital 
differential. The first change occurred in fiscal year 1992, when the 
children's hospital differential for hospitals in large urban areas and 
hospitals in other areas was adjusted (the adjustment for the 
differential for children's hospitals in large urban areas was so 
slight that it is difficult to discern from the figure). In fiscal year 
2005, the children's hospital differential was increased for hospitals 
located in areas other than large urban areas. In this figure, that 
change is reflected in the data for fiscal year 2007, which is the 
first year shown after the fiscal year 2005 change. 

[End of figure] 

Relative Difference in TRICARE's Base Payments between Children's 
Hospitals and Other Hospitals Has Decreased over Time: 

Although TRICARE's base payment to children's hospitals remains higher 
than the base payment to other hospitals, the relative difference 
between the two base payments has decreased, as the ASA has been 
adjusted for inflation and the children's hospital differential has 
not. In fiscal year 1989, the base payment to children's hospitals in 
large urban areas was 92 percent greater than the base payment to other 
hospitals in those areas (see fig. 4). Eighteen years later, the 
relative difference in base payments has been reduced. By fiscal year 
2007, TRICARE's base payment to children's hospitals in large urban 
areas exceeded TRICARE's base payment to other hospitals in large urban 
areas by 61 percent. 

The relative difference in base payments between children's hospitals 
and other hospitals in areas other than large urban areas has also 
decreased. In fiscal year 1989, the base payment to children hospitals 
in other areas was 79 percent greater than the base payment to other 
hospitals in those areas. In fiscal year 2007, the base payment to 
children's hospitals in other areas exceeded the base payment to other 
hospitals in those areas by 61 percent.[Footnote 24] 

Figure 4: Relative Difference between TRICARE's Base Payment to 
Children's Hospitals and Other Hospitals, in Percentages, Fiscal Year 
1989 through Fiscal Year 2007: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE payment data. 

Notes: Percentages represent the amount by which children's hospital 
base payments are higher than base payments to other hospitals--for 
example, 92 means that children's hospital base payments were 92 
percent higher than base payments to other hospitals. Projections are 
based on the assumption that the ASA continues to increase at an annual 
rate of 2.4 percent. 

A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 percent 
of a hospital's patients are children. Other hospitals include medical 
centers, which in this report are teaching hospitals that include a 
pediatric inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a "children's 
hospital within a hospital," and community hospitals, which in this 
report are hospitals that were not children's hospitals or medical 
centers under our definitions. 

[End of figure] 

The relative difference in base payments will continue to decline so 
long as the ASA is increased to account for inflation and the 
children's hospital differential is not. Since 1989, the ASA for 
hospitals in large urban areas has increased at an average annual rate 
of 2.4 percent. If that rate continues, the base payment to children's 
hospitals will be 45 percent higher than the base payment to other 
hospitals in 2020. The relative difference will never disappear 
entirely, however, as long as children's hospitals continue to receive 
the children's hospital differential. 

TRICARE Pediatric Patients at Children's Hospitals Similar to Those at 
Medical Centers in Terms of Diagnoses and Complexity: 

From fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006, children's hospitals 
treated TRICARE pediatric patients for the same types of diagnoses as 
medical centers, with the exception of newborns, which more often 
received care at medical centers than at children's hospitals. TRICARE 
patients at children's hospitals were similar in complexity levels to 
TRICARE pediatric patients treated at medical centers. In contrast, 
TRICARE patients at children's hospitals were more than three times as 
complex as those at community hospitals. 

Children's Hospitals and Medical Centers Treated TRICARE Pediatric 
Patients for Similar Types of Diagnoses: 

Children's hospitals and medical centers treated TRICARE pediatric 
patients for similar types of diagnoses from fiscal year 2003 through 
fiscal year 2006, although children's hospitals were less likely to 
treat newborns. Once newborns are excluded, the pattern of diagnoses at 
children's hospitals was very similar to the pattern of diagnoses at 
medical centers (see fig. 5). Newborns accounted for about 10 percent 
of TRICARE pediatric patients at children's hospitals, 35 percent of 
TRICARE pediatric patients at medical centers, and 73 percent of 
TRICARE pediatric patients at community hospitals. 

Figure 5: Most Common TRICARE Children's Hospital Admissions by Major 
Diagnostic Category (MDC) and Hospital Type, Excluding Newborns, Fiscal 
Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. In this report, a 
medical center refers to a teaching hospital that includes a pediatric 
inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a "children's hospital 
within a hospital." 

[End of figure] 

For patients at both children's hospitals and medical centers, the 
three most common major diagnostic categories were related to the 
respiratory system, nervous system, and digestive system. Common 
diagnoses related to these systems include asthma, seizure and 
headache, and appendicitis, respectively. Compared to medical centers, 
children's hospitals were slightly more likely to treat children with 
circulatory system disorders, such as hypertension and heart failure. 

TRICARE Pediatric Patients at Children's Hospitals Were Similar to 
Those at Medical Centers Based on Measures of Complexity: 

We found that from fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006, the 
average complexity of TRICARE pediatric patients at children's 
hospitals was about 10 percent higher than the average complexity of 
TRICARE pediatric patients at medical centers. For the same time 
period, the average complexity of pediatric patients at children's 
hospitals was more than three times as high as the average complexity 
of pediatric patients at community hospitals. 

In conducting this analysis, we used a tool that measures the 
complexity of diagnostic groups; a score of 1.0 serves as a reference 
point for relative complexity.[Footnote 25] Using this reference, we 
found that the average patient complexity of pediatric admissions at 
children's hospitals was 1.62, while at medical centers the score was 
1.47 (see table 1). In contrast, the average pediatric patient 
complexity at community hospitals was .52. The relatively low level of 
complexity of patients at community hospitals is driven by the large 
percentage of normal newborns, babies that do not have any 
complications and therefore have a low level of complexity.[Footnote 
26] 

Table 1: Average TRICARE Patient Complexity by Hospital Type, Fiscal 
Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Hospital type: Children's hospitals; 
Average patient complexity[A]: 1.62. 

Hospital type: Medical centers; 
Average patient complexity[A]: 1.47. 

Hospital type: Community hospitals; 
Average patient complexity[A]: .52. 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. In this report, a 
medical center refers to a teaching hospital that includes a pediatric 
inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a "children's hospital 
within a hospital." A community hospital is any hospital that was not a 
children's hospital or medical center under our definitions. 

[A] The average patient complexity is often called the case mix index. 

[End of table] 

Indirect measures of complexity--length of hospital stay, hospital 
transfers, and in-hospital deaths--show comparable differences. From 
fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006, length of hospital stay for 
pediatric admissions at children's hospitals and medical centers 
averaged about 6 days; transfers from another hospital were somewhat 
more frequent at children's hospitals than at medical centers; and 
frequency of pediatric admissions ending in death was about 1 percent 
in both settings (see table 2). In contrast, stays at community 
hospitals averaged 3.5 days and percentages of transfers and in- 
hospital deaths at community hospitals were substantially lower, at 
about 3 percent and less than 1 percent, respectively. 

Table 2: Indirect Measures of TRICARE Pediatric Patient Complexity by 
Hospital Type, Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Hospital type: Children's hospitals; 
Average length of stay per admission (in days): 6.1; 
Percentage of admissions that are transfers from other hospitals: 8.8; 
Percentage of admissions ending in death: 1.1. 

Hospital type: Medical centers; 
Average length of stay per admission (in days): 6.2; 
Percentage of admissions that are transfers from other hospitals: 5.5; 
Percentage of admissions ending in death: 1.4. 

Hospital type: Community hospitals; 
Average length of stay per admission (in days): 3.5; 
Percentage of admissions that are transfers from other hospitals: 3.3; 
Percentage of admissions ending in death: 0.4. 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. In this report, a 
medical center refers to a teaching hospital that includes a pediatric 
inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a "children's hospital 
within a hospital." A community hospital is any hospital that was not a 
children's hospital or medical center under our definitions. 

[End of table] 

After Adjusting for Patient Complexity, Children's Hospitals Were Paid 
More per TRICARE Pediatric Admission Than Other Hospitals: 

After comparing pediatric patients at children's hospitals to patients 
at other hospital types, we examined hospitals' payments per admission, 
adjusting for patient complexity. Using claims data from fiscal year 
2003 through fiscal year 2006, we found that after adjusting for 
patient complexity, children's hospitals were paid substantially more 
per admission than both medical centers and community hospitals (see 
table 3). 

Table 3: Average TRICARE Payment per Pediatric Admission, Patient 
Complexity, and Payment Adjusted for Complexity, by Hospital Type, 
Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

Hospital type: Children's hospitals; 
Average payment per admission: $16,367; 
Average patient complexity: 1.62; 
Average payment adjusted for complexity: $10,089. 

Hospital type: Medical centers; 
Average payment per admission: $12,131; 
Average patient complexity: 1.47; 
Average payment adjusted for complexity: $8,275. 

Hospital type: Community hospitals; 
Average payment per admission: $3,401; 
Average patient complexity: .52; 
Average payment adjusted for complexity: $6,596. 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. In this report, a 
medical center refers to a teaching hospital that includes a pediatric 
inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a "children's hospital 
within a hospital." A community hospital is any hospital that was not a 
children's hospital or medical center under our definitions. 

The average payment per admission has been adjusted upwards for medical 
centers and community hospitals to account for payments for capital and 
direct medical education expenses. Average payment adjusted for 
complexity equals average payment per admission divided by average 
patient complexity. However, due to rounding, the calculations do not 
work out perfectly. 

[End of table] 

We adjusted for patient complexity for the three hospital types by 
dividing the average payment per pediatric admission by the average 
patient complexity. For example, across the 4-year period, TRICARE 
payments to children's hospitals--adjusted for the average patient 
complexity--averaged $10,089 per patient, based on an average payment 
of $16,367 per admission and an average complexity of 1.62. This 
average complexity-adjusted payment to children's hospitals was 22 
percent higher than the equivalent amount paid to medical centers, 
which was $8,275. TRICARE payments to children's hospitals were 53 
percent higher than those made to community hospitals for pediatric 
patients, which were $6,596 after adjusting for patient complexity. 

Rising Number of TRICARE Admissions at Children's Hospitals Suggests No 
Decline in Access: 

From fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006, TRICARE pediatric 
admissions at children's hospitals rose steadily, suggesting that 
access to children's hospital services has not decreased in recent 
years. Specifically, the total number of TRICARE pediatric admissions 
rose from 5,027 admissions in fiscal year 2003 to 7,083 admissions in 
fiscal year 2006 (see fig. 6). This change represents an increase of 41 
percent for the time period. 

Figure 6: TRICARE Pediatric Admissions to Children's Hospitals, Fiscal 
Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 2006: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Note: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. 

[End of figure] 

The proportion of TRICARE pediatric civilian hospital admissions that 
occurred in children's hospitals also increased in recent years. In 
fiscal year 2006, children's hospitals accounted for 7.8 percent of all 
TRICARE pediatric admissions to civilian hospitals, up from 6.2 percent 
in fiscal year 2003 (see fig. 7). 

Figure 7: Percentage of TRICARE Pediatric Civilian Hospital Admissions 
Occurring in Children's Hospitals, Fiscal Year 2003 through Fiscal Year 
2006: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Note: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. 

[End of figure] 

The increase in the use of children's hospital services is consistent 
with statements made by representatives of children's hospitals about 
their policy toward TRICARE patients.[Footnote 27] These 
representatives stated that children's hospitals are committed to 
treating all children, including TRICARE patients, because of their 
legal obligations as nonprofit hospitals as well as their mission to 
serve all patients.[Footnote 28] These statements, coupled with recent 
trends in utilization, suggest that TRICARE pediatric patients' access 
to children's hospitals has not declined in recent years. 

Concluding Observations: 

The current children's hospital payment system is functioning largely 
as DOD expected. In establishing a policy of inflation updates to the 
ASA, but no inflation updates to the children's hospital differential, 
DOD set up a system in which the difference between children's hospital 
base payments and base payments to other hospitals would endure, but 
would be reduced gradually over time. This reduction has taken place as 
planned. 

Given the lack of reliable data, we cannot know the cost to children's 
hospitals of treating TRICARE beneficiaries and thus cannot know how 
their costs compared to payment amounts. Although greater patient 
complexity has been cited as a rationale for larger payments to 
children's hospitals, our analysis shows that patient complexity for 
children's hospital admissions was roughly comparable to those at 
medical centers. While we have only limited indicators of the extent to 
which TRICARE pediatric patients have access to children's hospitals, 
we did not find data that would support concerns about access problems. 

Agency and Professional Association Comments and Our Evaluation: 

We obtained written comments on a draft of this report from DOD, which 
are reprinted in appendix II. DOD concurred with our findings and 
conclusions and said that the report was technically accurate. 

We also obtained oral comments from representatives of NACH. They 
agreed with our finding that TRICARE pays children's hospitals more 
than other hospitals, after accounting for patient complexity, and 
agreed with our finding that TRICARE pediatric patients at children's 
hospitals were clinically similar to TRICARE pediatric patients at 
medical centers. Despite this similarity, NACH said the two types of 
hospitals have important differences--most notably that medical centers 
are typically larger institutions than children's hospitals and 
therefore can achieve greater economies of scale. Given this 
difference, NACH officials noted the importance of examining whether 
TRICARE's payments met children's hospital costs. However, as we state 
in the report, this analysis was beyond the scope of our work--as 
agreed to with the committees of jurisdiction--because sufficiently 
reliable data on children's hospital costs were not available. 

NACH officials raised a concern related to our analysis of the 
percentage difference in complexity-adjusted payments to children's 
hospitals and other hospital types. Specifically, they suggested that 
the percentage difference between complexity-adjusted payments at 
children's hospitals and other hospital types would change if outlier 
claims--claims with unusually high charges given their DRGs--were 
analyzed separately. We could not perform this analysis because the 
TRICARE claims data base could not be used to reliably identify all 
claims that were cost outliers. 

Noting that utilization of children's hospital services is an imperfect 
measure of access, NACH officials suggested that the increase in the 
use of children's hospital services could have resulted from community 
hospitals providing fewer specialty pediatric services. NACH officials 
also said that our findings could have resulted from increases in the 
number of children enrolled in TRICARE. However, as noted in our 
report, the percentage of all TRICARE pediatric admissions that 
occurred in children's hospitals also increased, supporting our finding 
that access to children's hospitals does not appear to have declined. 

Additionally, we received technical comments from NACH, which we 
incorporated as appropriate. 

We are sending copies of this report to the Secretary of Defense, and 
other interested parties. We will also provide copies to others on 
request. In addition, the report is available at no charge on GAO's Web 
site at http://www.gao.gov. 

If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please 
contact me at (202) 512-7114 or ekstrandl@gao.gov. Contact points for 
our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found 
on the last page of this report. GAO staff who made major contributions 
to this report are listed in appendix III. 

Signed by: 

Laurie Ekstrand: 
Director, Health Care: 

List of Committees: 

The Honorable Carl Levin: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable John McCain: 
Ranking Member: 
Committee on Armed Services: 
United States Senate: 

The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable Ted Stevens: 
Ranking Member: 
Subcommittee on Defense: 
Committee on Appropriations: 
United States Senate: 

The Honorable Ike Skelton: 
Chairman:
The Honorable Duncan Hunter: 
Ranking Member: 
Committee on Armed Services: 
House of Representatives: 

The Honorable John P. Murtha: 
Chairman: 
The Honorable C.W. Bill Young: 
Ranking Member: 
Subcommittee on Defense: 
Committee on Appropriations: 
House of Representatives: 

[End of section] 

Appendix I: Scope and Methodology: 

To analyze the change in TRICARE base payments over time, we obtained 
data on the adjusted standardized amount (ASA) and the children's 
hospital differential from the TRICARE Management Activity (TMA), the 
office that manages TRICARE. Using these data, we calculated the base 
payment to children's hospitals and to other hospitals for each year 
since 1989. 

Most of the remainder of our analysis was based on claims data we 
obtained from TMA. The data include TRICARE claims from U.S. civilian 
hospitals from fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006 for all 
patients under the age at 18 at the time of admission. To analyze the 
claims data, we divided providers into three separate categories: 
children's hospitals, medical centers, and community hospitals. We 
identified children's hospitals as those designated as such by TRICARE. 
A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 percent 
of a hospital's patients are children. We identified hospitals as 
medical centers if they contained a pediatric inpatient unit that was 
designated as a "children's hospital within a hospital" by the National 
Association of Children's Hospitals (NACH). We classified all other 
hospitals as community hospitals. 

In analyzing diagnoses and complexity, we examined a subset of claims. 
Our analysis was of TRICARE's prospective payment system, and therefore 
we aimed to exclude all claims that were paid outside the prospective 
payment system. We excluded claims from hospitals that are exempt from 
TRICARE's prospective payment system. This group of providers includes 
psychiatric hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals, sole community 
hospitals, and all institutions in Maryland (hospitals in Maryland are 
exempt from TRICARE's prospective payment system).[Footnote 29] We 
excluded claims that had an indicator stating that they were paid 
according to an alternative payment system, such as a per diem payment 
system. We excluded claims that were paid by a health insurance program 
other than TRICARE, since these claims can be paid according to the 
payment rules of the other payer, with TRICARE as the secondary payer. 
We excluded all claims related to bone marrow transplants, cystic 
fibrosis, or care for children with HIV, since those claims are 
excluded from TRICARE's prospective payment system in cases for which 
the patient is a child. As a result of these exclusions, our universe 
of claims was reduced from 348,225 claims to 265,857 claims. 

We included claims that were paid under a discount rate agreement. 
These claims accounted for about half of the claims in our analysis. 
The discounted claims can be paid as a percentage discount off the 
prospective payment rate, or they can be paid under an alternate 
payment methodology. We included these claims even though some of these 
claims may not have been paid under the prospective payment system. We 
concluded that regardless of whether these claims were paid under a 
prospective payment system, the terms of the discount rate agreement 
were based on the fact that the hospital was eligible to be paid under 
a prospective payment system. 

Measuring Complexity of Admissions: 

To account for the complexity of admissions, we obtained the All 
Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Group (APR-DRG) grouper program from 
3M Health Information Systems (3M). The APR-DRG grouper program was 
developed by 3M with input from NACH, which offered its expertise on 
classifying pediatric admissions. The APR-DRG grouper program divides 
claims into groups, known as APR-DRGs. We applied the APR-DRG program 
to the subset of claims that we analyzed. (We also excluded claims that 
the APR-DRG grouper program could not categorize). We also obtained a 
file of APR-DRG weights from 3M, and we merged this file with our 
claims data based on the APR-DRG assigned to each claim. We used this 
APR-DRG weight as our refined measure of complexity. 

Like TRICARE's DRG grouper program, the APR-DRG grouper program assigns 
claims to a diagnosis group (called an APR-DRG in the case of the APR- 
DRG grouper) based on diagnostic, procedural, and demographic 
information on the claim. However, the APR-DRG grouper divides claims 
into a greater number of categories than the TRICARE DRG grouper 
program. The APR-DRG grouper program divides claims into 1,258 
categories; in comparison, the TRICARE DRG grouper program divides 
claims into 553 categories. Since the APR-DRG grouper divides claims 
into more groups that are more clinically homogeneous, there is less 
variation in complexity within those groups. For example, TRICARE's DRG 
grouper program would classify a severe case of pediatric asthma into 
the same category as a mild case of pediatric asthma, so long as the 
patient did not require ventilator support. The APR-DRG grouper 
program, on the other hand, would place these two cases into separate 
categories and therefore assign them different weights. As a result, 
the APR-DRG grouper program produces a more refined measure of 
complexity, as compared to the TRICARE DRG grouper program. 

The average complexity of children's hospital claims varied depending 
on which grouper program was used to measure complexity. The average 
complexity of TRICARE pediatric admissions to children's hospitals was 
1.62 using the APR-DRG grouper, 4 percent higher than the average 
complexity of TRICARE pediatric admissions to children's hospitals when 
the TRICARE DRG grouper was used to measure complexity (see table 4). 
The average complexity of TRICARE pediatric admissions at medical 
centers was approximately the same, regardless of which grouper program 
was used to measure complexity. In contrast, the average complexity of 
TRICARE pediatric admissions at community hospitals was lower when the 
APR-DRG grouper was used to measure complexity than when the TRICARE 
DRG grouper was used to measure complexity. 

Table 4: Average Complexity per TRICARE Pediatric Admission by Hospital 
Type, Using Both TRICARE DRGs and APR-DRGs, Fiscal Year 2003 through 
Fiscal Year 2006: 

Hospital type: Children's hospitals; 
Average complexity per admission: Using TRICARE's DRGs: 1.56; 
Average complexity per admission: Using APR-DRGs: 1.62; 
Percentage difference between APR-DRG complexity and TRICARE DRG 
complexity: 4. 

Hospital type: Medical centers; 
Average complexity per admission: Using TRICARE's DRGs: 1.47; 
Average complexity per admission: Using APR-DRGs: 1.47; 
Percentage difference between APR-DRG complexity and TRICARE DRG 
complexity: 0. 

Hospital type: Community hospitals; 
Average complexity per admission: Using TRICARE's DRGs: .56; 
Average complexity per admission: Using APR- DRGs: .52; 
Percentage difference between APR-DRG complexity and TRICARE DRG 
complexity: -8. 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE claims data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. In this report, a 
medical center refers to a teaching hospital that includes a pediatric 
inpatient unit that is designated by NACH as a "children's hospital 
within a hospital." A community hospital is any hospital that was not a 
children's hospital or medical center under our definitions. 

[End of table] 

In comparing payments to complexity, we adjusted for complexity by 
dividing the payment for the claim by the APR-DRG weight. For claims 
that occurred at medical centers and community hospitals, the payment 
on the claim was increased by a percentage adjustment. We applied this 
percentage adjustment to account for payments that medical centers and 
community hospitals receive for their direct medical education and 
capital expenses, payments that children's hospitals do not receive. We 
calculated a percentage adjustment of 8.7 percent for community 
hospitals and 9.6 percent for medical centers based on data on capital 
and direct medical education payments provided by TMA. 

Measuring Inflation: 

To assess the level of hospital inflation, we analyzed data from the 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on the agency's 
Inpatient Prospective Payment System Hospital 2002 Input Price Index 
and compared it to TRICARE base payments to children's hospitals. Since 
1992, the percentage increase in TRICARE base payments to children's 
hospitals has been less than the percentage increase in hospital costs. 
From fiscal years 1992 through 2006, hospital inflation has increased 
an average of 3.2 percent annually (see table 5). In contrast, base 
payments to children's hospitals in large urban areas have increased by 
1.2 percent annually, while base payments to children's hospitals in 
other areas have increased by 2.1 percent annually. 

Table 5: Change in TRICARE Base Payments to Children's Hospitals 
Compared to the Change in Hospital Inflation, Fiscal Year 1992 through 
Fiscal Year 2006: 

Measure: Hospital inflation; 
Percentage increase, FY 1992 through FY 2006: Average annual increase: 
3.2; 
Percentage increase, FY 1992 through FY 2006: Cumulative increase: 
56.0. 

Measure: Base payment to children's hospitals in large urban areas; 
Percentage increase, FY 1992 through FY 2006: Average annual increase: 
1.2; 
Percentage increase, FY 1992 through FY 2006: Cumulative increase: 
18.5. 

Measure: Base payment to children's hospitals in other areas; 
Percentage increase, FY 1992 through FY 2006: Average annual increase: 
2.1; 
Percentage increase, FY 1992 through FY 2006: Cumulative increase: 
34.5. 

Source: GAO analysis of TRICARE payment data and CMS hospital inflation 
data. 

Notes: A children's hospital under TRICARE is one in which at least 50 
percent of a hospital's patients are children. Hospital inflation is 
measured by the CMS Inpatient Prospective Payment System Hospital 2002 
Input Price Index. 

[End of table] 

TRICARE base payments to children's hospitals in other areas increased 
at a faster rate than TRICARE base payments to children's hospitals in 
large urban areas for two primary reasons. In fiscal year 2003, the ASA 
for children's hospitals in other areas was increased to match the 
higher ASA for children's hospitals in large urban areas. In addition, 
in fiscal year 2005 the differential for children's hospitals in other 
areas was increased to the level of the higher differential for 
children's hospitals in large urban areas. As a result of these two 
changes, TRICARE base payments to children's hospitals in other areas 
increased by 24 percent from fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2005. 

We conducted our work from July 2006 through June 2007 in accordance 
with generally accepted government auditing standards. 

[End of section] 

Appendix II: Comments from the Department of Defense: 

Health Affairs: 
The Assistant Secretary Of Defense: 
1200 Defense Pentagon: 
Washington, DC 20301-1200: 

Jul 16 2007: 

Ms. Laurie Ekstrand: 
Director, Health Care: 
U.S. Government Accountability Office: 
441 G Street, N. W. 
Washington, DC 20548: 

Dear Ms. Ekstrand: 

This is the Department of Defense (DoD) response to the General 
Accountability Office (GAO) draft report, GAO-07-947, "Defense Health 
Care: Under TRICARE, Children's Hospitals Paid More than Other 
Hospitals After Accounting for Patient Complexity," dated June 27, 2007 
(GAO Code 290560). 

Thank you for the opportunity to review and provide comments on the 
Draft Report. We have reviewed the report for technical accuracy and 
agree with all of the findings. In addition, I concur with the Draft 
Report's conclusions. DoD is pleased that the GAO found that TRICARE's 
hospital payment system for children's hospitals is functioning largely 
as expected. 

My points of contact are Ms. Reta Michak (Functional) at (303) 676-3440 
and Mr. Gunther Zimmerman (Audit Liaison) at (703) 681-3492. 

Sincerely, 

Signed by: 

S. Ward Casscells, MD: 

[End of section] 

Appendix III: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments: 

GAO Contact: 

Laurie Ekstrand, (202) 512-7114 or ekstrandl@gao.gov: 

Acknowledgments: 

In addition to the contact above, Phyllis Thorburn, Assistant Director; 
Alexander Dworkowitz; Hannah Fein; Jenny Grover; Darryl Joyce; Richard 
Lipinski; and Dae Park made key contributions to this report. 

FOOTNOTES 

[1] In this report, a children's hospital refers to a hospital that 
TRICARE identifies as a children's hospital. At least 50 percent of a 
hospital's patients must be children in order for TRICARE to identify 
the hospital as a children's hospital. In addition, TRICARE officials 
use information from the American Hospital Association to confirm that 
a hospital is a children's hospital. 

[2] In this report, we define pediatric admissions as admissions of 
children under age 18. 

[3] Examples of children's hospitals are Children's Hospital of 
Philadelphia and Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters in 
Norfolk, Virginia. 

[4] Examples of medical centers with a designated pediatric inpatient 
unit are the University of Michigan Health System, which includes C.S. 
Mott Children's Hospital, and the University of California Los Angeles 
Medical Center, which includes Mattel Children's Hospital. 

[5] In this report, we define medical centers as hospitals that contain 
a pediatric inpatient unit that is designated by the National 
Association of Children's Hospitals as a "children's hospital within a 
hospital." Some hospitals commonly described as medical centers are 
included in this category--if these hospitals do not contain a 
specialized pediatric unit and do not meet the criteria of a children's 
hospital, they are categorized as community hospitals. See app. I for 
more information. 

[6] In this report, we define any hospital that is not a children's 
hospital or a medical center as a community hospital. This group of 
community hospitals includes some hospitals that may be referred to as 
medical centers elsewhere. 

[7] Prospective payment systems are designed to give hospitals 
incentives to contain costs in that hospitals are allowed to retain any 
funds not spent on care. 

[8] Hospitals also have their payment adjusted based on the area wage 
level and for their indirect medical education expenses, which are 
calculated based on the ratio of medical residents to hospital beds. In 
addition, all hospitals except children's hospitals can receive 
separate payments for their capital and direct medical educational 
expenses. 

[9] The term base payment is not used by TRICARE in the same context. 
In this report, our definition of base payment is the amount that is 
multiplied by the DRG weight to determine actual payment, before 
adjustments for the area wage level and indirect medical education 
expenses are applied. Our use of the term reflects language used by the 
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. 

[10] Members of this organization include more than 120 hospitals that 
focus on treating children. 

[11] See Pub. L. No. 109-163, § 734, 119 Stat. 3136, 3353-55; S. Rep. 
No. 109-69, at 337 (2006). 

[12] Our unit of analysis was a hospital admission. Multiple admissions 
of the same patient during our period of analysis would be counted 
separately. 

[13] Prior to the release of this report, DOD and NACH were planning to 
produce a reliable measurement of children's hospital costs of treating 
TRICARE beneficiaries. 

[14] An additional 61,438 pediatric admissions occurred in U.S.-based 
MTFs in fiscal year 2006. 

[15] TRICARE does not pay all hospitals under a prospective payment 
system. Rehabilitation hospitals and psychiatric hospitals, among 
others, are by regulation exempt from the system. In addition, TRICARE 
maintains networks of providers, and hospitals can join that network 
and negotiate a discount rate agreement with managed care support 
contractors (MCSC), organizations that manage provider networks on 
behalf of TRICARE. This discount can take the form of a discount off 
the prospective payment rate. Alternatively, MCSCs can negotiate to pay 
hospitals under a different methodology, such as a per diem rate. 
Claims that were paid at a discount were included in our analysis. For 
more information, see app. I. 

[16] See 10 U.S.C. § 1079(j)(2). 

[17] See 53 Fed. Reg. 50515-20 (Dec. 16, 1988). This final rule was 
consistent with the Department of Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal 
Year 1989, Pub. L. No. 100-463, § 8091, 102 Stat. 2270, 2270-33 to 2270-
34 (1988). 

[18] See 32 C.F.R. § 199.14(a)(1)(iii)(E)(4)(v) (2006). 

[19] From April 1, 1989, to April 1, 1992, children's hospitals that 
had a high volume of TRICARE admissions (defined as 50 or more TRICARE 
admissions per year) received a hospital-specific children's hospital 
differential, and the remaining hospitals were assigned one of two 
national differentials: one for children's hospitals in large urban 
areas and another, lower differential for children's hospitals in other 
areas. (A hospital was considered to be located in a large urban area 
if was located in a metropolitan statistical area, as defined by the 
Office of Management and Budget, that had a population of more than 1 
million, or in a New England County Metropolitan Area with a population 
of more than 970,000.) On April 1, 1992, DOD stopped paying high-volume 
hospitals a hospital-specific differential and recalculated the values 
of the national differentials to include data from the high-volume 
children's hospitals. This was the first change in the differential. 
The second change occurred at the beginning of fiscal year 2005, when 
the value of the differential for children's hospitals in other areas 
was increased to the value of the differential for children's hospitals 
in large urban areas. 

[20] See 53 Fed. Reg. 20576, 20579-80 (June 3, 1988). 

[21] Children who are suffering from asthma or bronchitis and need to 
be placed on a ventilator are typically classified into DRGs other than 
DRG 98. 

[22] This assumes the admission is not classified as an outlier. 

[23] This assumes the two hospitals have the same wage adjustment and 
are paid the same amount for their indirect medical education expenses. 

[24] The decline in the relative difference in base payments between 
children's hospitals and other hospitals in other areas was mitigated 
by the 2005 increase in the children's hospital differential for 
children's hospitals in other areas. 

[25] We measured complexity using the All Patient Refined Diagnosis- 
Related Group (APR-DRG) grouper program, which is a more refined 
measure of complexity than that used by TRICARE. The company that 
developed the APR-DRG grouper refers to patient complexity as severity 
of illness. For more information, see app. I. 

[26] From fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2006, the average 
pediatric patient complexity, excluding normal newborns, was 1.65 at 
children's hospitals, 1.73 at medical centers, and .96 at community 
hospitals. 

[27] Any hospital that participates in Medicare is legally required to 
accept TRICARE patients, and many children's hospitals accept Medicare 
patients. See 42 U.S.C. § 1395cc(a)(1)(J). However, hospitals are not 
required to join TRICARE's network of providers. TRICARE beneficiaries 
who need a referral to see an out-of-network provider could face 
restrictions in accessing children's hospital services if many 
children's hospitals declined to join TRICARE's network. 

[28] Children's hospital representatives did express concern about the 
level of TRICARE payments affecting their ability to maintain readily 
available services and noted that this could have a negative impact on 
patient waiting times. 

[29] Maryland hospitals are also exempted from Medicare's prospective 
payment system. 

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation and 
investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting 
its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance 
and accountability of the federal government for the American people. 
GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and 
policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance 
to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding 
decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core 
values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through GAO's Web site (www.gao.gov). Each weekday, GAO posts 
newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence on its Web site. 
To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products every afternoon, 
go to www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to Updates." 

Order by Mail or Phone: 

The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent 
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or 
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. 
Orders should be sent to: 

U.S. Government Accountability Office 441 G Street NW, Room LM 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

To order by Phone: Voice: (202) 512-6000 TDD: (202) 512-2537 Fax: (202) 
512-6061: 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov 
Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Congressional Relations: 

Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, JarmonG@gao.gov (202) 512-4400 U.S. 
Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7125 
Washington, D.C. 20548: 

Public Affairs: 

Paul Anderson, Managing Director, AndersonP1@gao.gov (202) 512-4800 
U.S. Government Accountability Office, 441 G Street NW, Room 7149 
Washington, D.C. 20548: