This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-05-177T 
entitled 'Flu Vaccine: Recent Supply Shortages Underscore Ongoing 
Challenges' which was released on November 18, 2004.

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov.

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately.

Testimony:

Before the Subcommittee on Health and the Subcommittee on Oversight and 
Investigations, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of 
Representatives:

United States Government Accountability Office:

GAO:

For Release on Delivery Expected at 9:30 a.m. EST:

Thursday, November 18, 2004:

Flu Vaccine:

Recent Supply Shortages Underscore Ongoing Challenges:

Statement of Janet Heinrich:

Director, Health Care--Public Health Issues:

GAO-05-177T:

GAO Highlights:

Highlights of GAO-05-177T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on 
Health and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee 
on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives: 

Why GAO Did This Study:

Influenza is associated with an average of 36,000 deaths and more than 
200,000 hospitalizations each year in the United States. Persons who 
are aged 65 and older, people with chronic medical conditions, children 
younger than 2 years, and pregnant women are more likely to get severe 
complications from influenza than other people. The best way to prevent 
influenza is to be vaccinated each fall. 

In early October 2004, one major manufacturer of flu vaccine for the 
United States announced that its facility’s license had been 
temporarily suspended and it would not be releasing any vaccine for the 
2004-2005 flu season. Because this manufacturer was expected to produce 
roughly one-half of the U.S. flu vaccine supply, the shortage resulting 
from its announcement has led to concern about the availability of flu 
vaccine, especially to those at high risk for flu-related 
complications. 

GAO was asked to discuss issues related to the supply, demand, and 
distribution of vaccine for this flu season in the context of the 
current shortage. GAO based this testimony on products we have issued 
since May 2001, as well as work we conducted to update key information. 

What GAO Found:

The current vaccine shortage demonstrates the challenges to ensuring an 
adequate and timely flu vaccine supply. Only three manufacturers 
produce flu vaccine for the U.S. market, and the potential for future 
manufacturing problems such as those experienced both this year and to 
a lesser degree in previous years is still present. When shortages 
occur, their effect can be exacerbated by the existing distribution 
system. Under this system, health providers and vaccine distributors 
generally order a particular manufacturer’s vaccine and have limited 
recourse, even for meeting the needs of high-risk persons, if that 
manufacturer’s production is adversely affected. By contrast, providers 
who purchased vaccine from a different manufacturer might receive more 
of their order and be able to vaccinate their high-risk patients.

The current situation also reflects another concern: the nation lacks a 
systematic approach for ensuring that seniors and others at high risk 
for flu-related complications receive flu vaccine when it is in short 
supply. Once this year’s shortage became apparent, the Centers for 
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) took a number of steps to 
influence distribution patterns to help providers get some vaccine for 
their high-risk patients. These steps are still playing themselves out, 
and it will take more time to assess how well they will work. Problems 
have not been totally averted, however, as there have been media 
reports of long lines to obtain limited doses of vaccine and of high-
risk individuals unable to find a flu vaccination in a timely fashion.

We shared the facts contained in this statement with CDC officials. 
They informed us they had no comments.

www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-177T.

To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on 
the link above. For more information, contact Janet Heinrich at (202) 
512-7119.

[End of section]

Messrs. Chairmen and Members of the Subcommittees:

Thank you for the opportunity to be here today as you discuss the 
nation's response to problems with the supply and distribution of 
influenza vaccine. This year's loss of roughly half of the country's 
supply of flu vaccine highlighted what has become a growing problem--
the fragility of the vaccine production and distribution system. We 
have been monitoring this issue for a number of years, and we are 
starting new work for the House Committee on Government Reform to 
analyze this year's situation in greater detail. My testimony today 
focuses on (1) the challenges in ensuring adequate supply to meet 
demand for vaccine and (2) the mechanisms in place to target high-risk 
populations when, as happened this year, a vaccine shortage occurs.

My remarks are based on reports and testimony we have issued since May 
2001[Footnote 1] as well as work conducted to update key information. 
Our prior work on flu vaccine included analysis of information provided 
by and interviews with Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) 
officials, vaccine manufacturers, medical distributors and their trade 
associations, companies that provide flu vaccinations at retail outlets 
and work sites, physician and other professional associations, and 
other purchasers. We also surveyed physician group practices and 
interviewed health department officials in all 50 states about their 
experiences in the 2000-2001 flu season. In September and November 2004 
we updated this work with analysis of information provided by Centers 
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) officials, one major 
manufacturer, and other sources. We obtained information on (1) the 
available doses and demand for the 2002-2003 and 2003-2004 flu seasons, 
(2) the status of this year's flu vaccine, and (3) CDC activities, 
including actions taken following the announcement that one major 
manufacturer could not supply any vaccine for the U.S. market this 
year. We conducted all of our work in accordance with generally 
accepted government auditing standards.

In summary, the current situation demonstrates the challenges of 
ensuring an adequate and timely flu vaccine supply. Only three 
manufacturers produce flu vaccine for the U.S. market, and the 
potential for future manufacturing problems such as those experienced 
both this year and to a lesser degree in previous years is still 
present. When shortages occur, their effect can be exacerbated by the 
existing distribution system. Under this system, health providers and 
vaccine distributors generally order a particular manufacturer's 
vaccine and have limited recourse, even for meeting the needs of high-
risk persons, if that manufacturer's production is adversely affected. 
By contrast, providers who purchased vaccine from a different 
manufacturer might receive more of their order and be able to vaccinate 
their high-risk patients.

The current situation also reflects another concern: the nation lacks a 
systematic approach for ensuring that seniors and others at high risk 
for flu-related complications receive flu vaccine when it is in short 
supply. Once this year's shortage became apparent, CDC took a number of 
steps to influence distribution patterns to help providers get some 
vaccine for their high-risk patients. These steps are still playing 
themselves out, and it will take more time to assess how well they will 
work. Problems have not been totally averted, however, as there have 
been media reports of long lines to obtain limited doses of vaccine and 
of high-risk individuals unable to find a flu vaccination in a timely 
fashion.

Background:

Influenza is associated with an average of more than 200,000 
hospitalizations and 36,000 deaths each year in the United States. Most 
people who get the flu recover completely in 1 to 2 weeks, but some 
develop serious and life-threatening medical complications, such as 
pneumonia. People who are aged 65 and older, people of any age with 
chronic medical conditions, children younger than 2 years, and pregnant 
women are more likely to get severe complications from influenza than 
other people.[Footnote 2]

For the 2004-2005 flu season, CDC initially recommended in May 2004 
that about 185 million Americans--about 85 million in high-risk groups 
and over 100 million in other target groups--receive the vaccine, which 
is the primary method for preventing influenza. Groups at high-risk for 
flu-related complications included people aged 65 years or older; 
residents of nursing homes and other chronic-care facilities; people 
with chronic conditions such as asthma and diabetes; children and 
adolescents aged 6 months to 18 years who are receiving long-term 
aspirin therapy; pregnant women; and children aged 6 to 23 months. 
Other target groups identified in the May 2004 recommendations included 
persons aged 50 to 64 years and people who can transmit influenza to 
those at high-risk, such as health care workers, employees of nursing 
homes, chronic-care facilities, and assisted living facilities, and 
household contacts of and those who provide home care to high-risk 
individuals.[Footnote 3] Not everyone in these high-risk and target 
groups, however, receives a vaccination each year. For example, based 
on the 2002 National Health Interview Survey and other sources, CDC 
estimates that only about 44 percent of individuals at high-risk and 
about 20 percent of individuals in the other target groups were 
vaccinated.

It takes about 2 weeks after vaccination for antibodies to develop in 
the body and provide protection against influenza virus infection. CDC 
recommends October through November as the best time to get vaccinated 
because the flu season often starts in late November to December and 
peaks between late December and early March. However, if influenza 
activity peaks late, vaccination in December or later can still be 
beneficial.

Producing sufficient quantities of influenza vaccine is a complex 
process that involves growing viruses in millions of fertilized chicken 
eggs. This process, which requires several steps, generally takes at 
least 6 to 8 months from January through August each year, so vaccine 
manufacturers must predict demand and decide on the number of doses to 
produce well before the onset of the flu season. Each year's vaccine is 
made up of three different strains of influenza viruses, and, 
typically, each year one or two of the strains is changed to better 
protect against the strains that are likely to be circulating during 
the coming flu season. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and its 
advisory committee decide which strains to include based on CDC 
surveillance data, and FDA also licenses and regulates the 
manufacturers that produce the vaccine for distribution in the United 
States.

In a typical year, manufacturers make flu vaccine available before the 
optimal fall season for administering flu vaccine. For the 2003-2004 
flu season, two manufacturers--one with production facilities in the 
United States and one with production facilities in the United Kingdom-
-produced about 95 percent of the vaccine for the United States. A 
third U.S. manufacturer produces a flu vaccine that is given by nasal 
spray and is only approved for healthy persons aged 5 through 49 years. 
This nasal spray vaccine is not recommended for individuals at high 
risk for flu-related complications. According to CDC, this manufacturer 
produced about 4 million doses of the nasal spray vaccine for the 2003-
2004 season.

Flu vaccine production and distribution are largely private-sector 
responsibilities. Like other pharmaceutical products, flu vaccine is 
sold to thousands of purchasers by manufacturers, numerous medical 
supply distributors, and other resellers such as pharmacies. These 
purchasers provide flu vaccinations at physicians' offices, public 
health clinics, nursing homes, and at nonmedical locations such as 
workplaces and various retail outlets. Millions of individuals receive 
flu vaccinations through mass immunization campaigns in these 
nonmedical settings, where organizations such as visiting nurse 
agencies under contract administer the vaccine.[Footnote 4] In a 
typical year, most influenza vaccine distribution and administration 
are accomplished within the private sector, with relatively small 
amounts of vaccine purchased and distributed by CDC or by state and 
local health departments.

For the 2004-2005 season, CDC had estimated that about 100 million 
doses of flu vaccine would be available for distribution through this 
network. On August 26, 2004, one major manufacturer announced a small 
quantity of its flu vaccine did not meet sterility specifications and 
that distribution of its vaccine would be delayed until after further 
tests were completed. On October 5, 2004, this manufacturer announced 
that the regulatory body in the United Kingdom, the Medicines and 
Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), had temporarily suspended 
the company's license to manufacture flu vaccine in its facility in 
Liverpool, England. The manufacturer stated that this action prevented 
the company from releasing any vaccine for the 2004-2005 flu season--
effectively reducing the anticipated U.S. supply by nearly half. This 
sudden disruption of the supply set off the chain of events the nation 
has experienced in the past 6 weeks, and has focused national attention 
on the flu vaccine supply and distribution system.

Challenges Exist in Ensuring an Adequate and Timely Flu Vaccine Supply:

Ensuring an adequate and timely supply of vaccine is a difficult task. 
It has become even more difficult because there are few manufacturers. 
As we are witnessing this year, problems at one or more manufacturers 
can significantly upset the traditional fall delivery of influenza 
vaccine. These problems, in turn, can create variability in who has 
ready access to the vaccine.

Matching flu vaccine supply and demand is a challenge because the 
available supply and demand for vaccine can vary from month to month 
and year to year, as the following examples illustrate.

* In 2000-2001, when a substantial proportion of flu vaccine was 
distributed much later than usual due to manufacturing difficulties, 
temporary shortages during the prime period for vaccinations were 
followed by decreased demand as additional vaccine became available 
later in the year. Despite efforts by CDC and others to encourage 
people to seek flu vaccinations later in the season, providers still 
reported a drop in demand in December. The light flu season in 2000-
2001, which had relatively low influenza mortality, probably also 
contributed to the lack of interest. As a result of the waning demand 
that year, manufacturers and distributors reported having more vaccine 
than they could sell. In addition, some physicians' offices, employee 
health clinics, and other organizations that administered flu 
vaccinations reported having unused doses in December and later.

* For the 2002-2003 flu season, according to CDC officials, vaccine 
manufacturers produced about 95 million doses of vaccine, of which 
about 83 million doses were used and about 12 million doses went 
unused.

* For the 2003-2004 flu season, shortages of vaccine were attributed to 
an earlier than expected and more severe flu season and to higher than 
normal demand, likely resulting from media coverage of pediatric deaths 
associated with influenza. According to CDC officials, this increased 
demand occurred in a year in which manufacturers had produced about the 
same number of doses used in the previous season--about 87 million 
doses total--and that supply was not adequate to meet the demand.

If production problems delay or disrupt the availability of vaccine in 
a given year, the timing for an individual provider to obtain flu 
vaccine may depend on which manufacturer's vaccine it ordered. This 
happened in the 2000-2001 season, and there are reports of similar 
problems this season after one manufacturer that had previously stated 
it expected to supply 46 million to 48 million doses announced that it 
would not deliver any flu vaccine to the U.S. market. Those who ordered 
from this manufacturer did not receive their expected vaccine--a 
different situation than those who ordered from the other manufacturer, 
which reported sending its vaccine on schedule beginning in August and 
September. As a result, one provider could have held vaccination 
clinics in early October that would be available to anyone who wanted a 
flu vaccination, while another provider may not yet have had any 
vaccine for its high-risk patients.

Shortages of flu vaccine can result in temporary spikes in the price of 
vaccine. When vaccine supply is limited relative to public demand for 
flu vaccinations, distributors and others who have supplies of the 
vaccine have the ability--and the economic incentive--to sell their 
supplies to the highest bidders rather than filling the lower priced 
orders they had already received. When there was a delay causing a 
temporary shortage of vaccine in 2000, those who purchased vaccine that 
fall--because their earlier orders had been canceled, reduced, or 
delayed, or because they simply ordered later--found they paid much 
higher prices. For example, one physician's practice ordered flu 
vaccine from a supplier in April 2000 at $2.87 per dose. When none of 
that vaccine had arrived by November 1, the practice placed three 
smaller orders in November with a different supplier at the escalating 
prices of $8.80, $10.80, and $12.80 per dose. On December 1, the 
practice ordered more vaccine from a third supplier at $10.80 per dose. 
The four more expensive orders were delivered immediately, before any 
vaccine had been received from the original April order.

With the severely reduced vaccine supply this year, opportunities exist 
for vendors who have vaccine to significantly inflate the price of 
available supplies. CDC is collecting information on allegations of 
such price increases and is providing information to respective state 
attorneys general. To date, CDC officials report receiving and 
forwarding over 100 reports of alleged price gouging that they received 
from 33 states.

Following the 2000-2001 flu season, HHS undertook several initiatives 
to address supply and demand of flu vaccine and to protect high-risk 
individuals from flu-related complications when vaccine is in short 
supply. Actions taken include the following:

* Extending the optimal period for getting a flu vaccination until the 
end of November, to encourage more people to get vaccinations later in 
the season.

* Expanding the target population to include children aged 6 through 23 
months.

* Including the flu vaccine in the Vaccines for Children (VFC) 
stockpile to help improve flu vaccine supply. For the 2004-2005 flu 
season, CDC had originally contracted for a stockpile of approximately 
4.5 million doses of flu vaccine through its VFC authority--of which 2 
million doses were ordered from the manufacturer whose license was 
temporarily suspended and therefore will not be available. CDC 
officials said the remaining 2.5 million doses intended for the 
stockpile will be apportioned as they become available.

* Taking steps to identify additional sources of influenza vaccine from 
foreign manufacturers that, once approved for safe use, could help 
increase the flu vaccine supply in the United States.

Challenges Persist in Targeting Flu Vaccine to High-Risk Individuals:

Our work has also found continuing obstacles to delivering flu vaccine 
to high-risk individuals in a time of short supply. During the fall 
2000 vaccine shortage, for example, targeting limited doses to high-
risk individuals was problematic because all types of providers served 
at least some high-risk individuals. Some physicians and public health 
officials were upset when their local grocery stores were offering flu 
vaccinations to everyone when they, the health care providers, were 
unable to obtain vaccine for their high-risk patients. Many physicians 
reported that they felt they did not receive priority for vaccine 
delivery, even though about two-thirds of seniors--one of the largest 
high-risk groups--generally get their flu vaccinations in medical 
offices.

For the 2004-2005 flu season, despite early indications that one 
manufacturer was having production difficulties, CDC published guidance 
in September 2004 stating that it did not envision any need for tiered 
vaccination recommendations or prioritization of vaccine for those at 
higher risk of flu-related complications. Following the suspension of 
one manufacturer's license and the announcement it would not supply any 
vaccine to the U.S. market this season, CDC revised its recommendations 
and took steps to mitigate the vaccine shortage.

Although HHS has limited authority to control flu vaccine 
distribution,[Footnote 5] upon learning that nearly half of the 
nation's expected flu vaccine supply was in jeopardy, it took steps to 
help direct the available vaccine to help providers get some vaccine 
for their high-risk patients. In particular, CDC officials have worked 
with the remaining major manufacturer, as well as state and local 
health departments, to assess needs, prioritize customers, and make 
plans to distribute the remaining vaccine.

CDC also convened its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices 
(ACIP) to reassess and revise the recommended vaccination priorities 
for the flu season.[Footnote 6] The revised priority groups for the 
2004-2005 flu vaccine include the estimated 85 million people in high-
risk groups, but they do not include many of the other target groups. 
In addition to high-risk individuals, the revised priority groups 
include an estimated 7 million health care workers and an estimated 6 
million household contacts of children aged 6 months or younger, for a 
total population of about 98 million in the revised priority groups.

While CDC can recommend and encourage providers to immunize high-risk 
patients first, it does not have direct control over the distribution 
of vaccine (other than the generally small amount that is distributed 
through public health departments); thus, CDC cannot ensure that its 
priorities will be implemented. As these actions play out, more time is 
needed to gauge the success of CDC's efforts to mitigate the current 
flu vaccine shortage.

Despite the efforts by CDC and others, many high-risk individuals 
appear to be experiencing problems getting a flu vaccination. Media 
across the country are reporting that some seniors are waiting hours 
for flu vaccinations and others are so frustrated they are traveling to 
Canada or Mexico to get vaccinated. There are other media reports of 
anxious seniors unable to get vaccinated in a timely fashion. How many 
high-risk individuals ultimately get vaccinated against influenza this 
season remains to be seen. We are beginning new work to analyze this 
year's vaccine shortage and the federal response.

Concluding Observations:

Ensuring an adequate and timely supply of vaccine to protect high-risk 
individuals from influenza and flu-related complications remains a 
challenge. The limited number of manufacturers and the manufacturing 
problems experienced in recent years illustrate the fragility of 
vaccine production. The abrupt loss of nearly half of the nation's 
vaccine supply has further highlighted the potential inequities that 
can result from the current vaccine distribution system. Under this 
system, some providers can be left with little immediate recourse for 
meeting the needs of those most at risk. CDC is responding by working 
with the remaining major flu vaccine manufacturer and states and local 
public health agencies to better target high-risk populations. 
Nonetheless, with this flu season, there are reports of long lines, 
people crossing international boundaries to obtain their flu 
vaccinations, and anxious seniors unable to obtain a vaccination on a 
timely basis. Whatever the outcome of this flu season, ensuring that 
vaccine can be made available as expeditiously as possible to those who 
need it most in times of shortage remains a challenge.

Agency Comments:

We shared the facts contained in this statement with CDC officials. 
They informed us they had no comments.

This concludes my statement. I would be happy to answer any questions 
the Chairmen or other Members of the Subcommittees may have.

Contact and Staff Acknowledgments:

For further information about this testimony, please contact Janet 
Heinrich at (202) 512-7119. Jennifer Major, Terry Saiki, Stan 
Stenersen, and Kim Yamane also made key contributions to this 
statement.

[End of section]

Related GAO Products:

Infectious Disease Preparedness: Federal Challenges in Responding to 
Influenza Outbreaks. GAO-04-1100T, Washington, D.C.: September 28, 
2004.

SARS Outbreak: Improvements to Public Health Capacity Are Needed for 
Responding to Bioterrorism and Emerging Infectious Diseases. GAO-03-
769T, Washington, D.C.: May 7, 2003.

Infectious Disease Outbreaks: Bioterrorism Preparedness Efforts Have 
Improved Public Health Response Capacity, but Gaps Remain. GAO-03-654T, 
Washington, D.C.: April 9, 2003.

Flu Vaccine: Steps Are Needed to Better Prepare for Possible Future 
Shortages. GAO-01-786T, Washington, D.C.: May 30, 2001.

Flu Vaccine: Supply Problems Heighten Need to Ensure Access for High-
Risk People. GAO-01-624, Washington, D.C.: May 15, 2001.

FOOTNOTES

[1] See "Related GAO Products," at the end of this testimony, for a 
list of our earlier work related to flu vaccine.

[2] Influenza and pneumonia rank as the fifth leading cause of death 
among persons aged 65 and older. Persons aged 65 and older are involved 
in more than 1 of 2 hospitalizations and 9 of 10 deaths related to 
influenza.

[3] See HHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Prevention 
and Control of Influenza: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on 
Immunization Practices (ACIP)," Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 
vol. 53 (2004). CDC also recommended a vaccination for anyone who 
wanted one.

[4] Data collected by states through the CDC Behavioral Risk Factor 
Surveillance System during 2002 indicate that among persons aged 18 
years or older reporting receipt of flu vaccine, about two-thirds 
reported getting their last flu vaccination at a health care facility, 
such as a doctor's office, health center, or health department, while 
about one-third reported getting vaccinated at a workplace, community 
center, store, or other location.

[5] Under the Federal Food Drug and Cosmetic Act, FDA ensures 
compliance with good manufacturing practice and has limited authority 
to regulate the resale of prescription drugs, including influenza 
vaccine, that have been purchased by health care entities such as 
public or private hospitals. This authority would not extend to resale 
of the vaccine for emergency medical reasons. The term health care 
entity does not include wholesale distributors. CDC has a role in 
encouraging appropriate public health actions.

[6] See HHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Interim 
Influenza Vaccination Recommendations, 2004-2005 Influenza Season," 
Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, vol. 53 (2004).