This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-15-214 entitled 'Private Health Insurance: Geographic Variation in Spending for Certain High-Cost Procedures Driven by Inpatient Prices' which was released on January 28, 2015. This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. United States Government Accountability Office: GAO: Private Health Insurance: Geographic Variation in Spending for Certain High-Cost Procedures Driven by Inpatient Prices: Geographic Variation: Report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives: December 2014: GAO-15-214: GAO Highlights: Highlights of GAO-15-214, a report to the Ranking Member, Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives. Why GAO Did This Study: Research shows that spending on health care varies by geographic area and that higher spending in an area is not always associated with better quality of care. While a substantial body of research exists on geographic variation in spending in Medicare, less research has been done on variation in private sector health care spending, although this spending accounts for about a third of overall health care spending. As U.S. health expenditures continue to rise, policymakers and others have expressed interest in better understanding spending variation and how health care systems can operate efficiently-—that is, providing equivalent or higher quality care while maintaining or lowering current spending levels. GAO was asked to examine geographic variation in private sector health care spending. GAO examined (1) how spending per episode of care for certain high-cost procedures varies across geographic areas for private payers, and (2) how the mix of service types, and the volume, intensity, and price of services contribute to variation in episode spending across geographic areas for private payers. Using a large private sector claims database for 2009 and 2010, GAO examined spending by MSA for episodes of care for three commonly performed inpatient procedures and examined spending by hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, postdischarge, professional, and ancillary service categories. For inpatient and professional services, GAO examined the volume, intensity, and price of services. GAO's findings may not be generalizable to all private insurers due to data limitations. What GAO Found: Spending for an episode of care in the private sector varied across metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) for coronary stent placement, laparoscopic appendectomy, and Total hip replacement, even after GAO adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in enrollee demographics and health status. MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had average adjusted episode spending that was 74 to 94 percent higher than MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile, depending on the procedure. MSAs with higher spending on one procedure generally had higher spending on the other two procedures. High- or low-spending MSAs were not concentrated in particular regions of the nation. The price of the initial hospital inpatient admission accounted for 91 percent or more of the difference in episode spending between MSAs in the lowest- and highest-spending quintiles. The price of the initial admission was the largest contributor to the difference for two reasons. First, it represented the largest percentage of adjusted episode spending. For example, for Total hip replacement, the average price of the initial admission was $17,134, representing 76 percent of the $22,463 in Total episode spending for MSAs in the lowest- spending quintile and $30,332, representing 82 percent of the $36,969 in Total episode spending for MSAs in the highest-spending quintile. Second, the price of the initial admission varied considerably across MSAs. For MSAs in the highest-spending quintile, the average price of the initial admission for Total hip replacement was 77 percent higher than for MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile. Professional services—- office visits and other services provided by a physician or other health professional—-were the second largest contributor to geographic differences in episode spending, but accounted for 7 percent or less of the difference in episode spending between MSAs in the lowest- and highest-spending quintiles. (See table.) MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had higher average prices and intensity (a measure of the resources needed to provide a service) but fewer services (volume) than MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile for all three procedures. Table: Contributions of Each Service Category to Differences in Average Episode Spending between MSAs in Lowest- and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Service category: Hospital inpatient—-Price of initial admission Coronary stent placement: 92%: Laparoscopic appendectomy: 96%: Total hip replacement: 91%. Service category: Hospital inpatient-—Readmissions Coronary stent placement: 1%: Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0%: Total hip replacement: 0%. Service category: Hospital outpatient: Coronary stent placement: 1%: Laparoscopic appendectomy: 1%: Total hip replacement: 1%. Service category: Postdischarge: Coronary stent placement: 0%: Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0%: Total hip replacement: 0%. Service category: Professional: Coronary stent placement: 5%: Laparoscopic appendectomy: 3%: Total hip replacement: 7%. Service category: Ancillary and unclassified: Coronary stent placement: 1%: Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0%: Total hip replacement: 1%. Service category: Total; Coronary stent placement: 100%: Laparoscopic appendectomy: 100%: Total hip replacement: 100%. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. [End of table] The Department of Health and Human Services provided technical comments on a draft of this report, which were incorporated as appropriate. View [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-15-214]. For more information, contact James Cosgrove at (202) 512-7114 or cosgrovej@gao.gov. [End of section] Contents: Letter: Background: Episode Spending Was 74 to 94 Percent Higher in Highest-Compared with Lowest-Spending Areas, with High-Spending Areas Generally High for All Three Procedures: Price per Initial Inpatient Admission Was Largest Contributor to Geographic Differences in Episode Spending: Agency Comments: Appendix I: Data and Methods: Appendix II: Episode Spending, by Procedure, within Metropolitan Statistical Areas GAO Analyzed: Appendix III: Distribution of Episode Spending: Appendix IV: Episode Spending, by Procedure, for Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Appendix V: Hospital Inpatient Spending and Other Information, by Metropolitan Statistical Area and Procedure: Appendix VI: Professional Services Spending and Other Information, by Metropolitan Statistical Area and Procedure: Appendix VII: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments: Tables: Table 1: Contributions of Each Service Category to Differences in Average Episode Spending between Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in the Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Table 2: Professional Services: Difference in Average Spending, Volume, Intensity, and Price: Table 3: Ranking of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) by Adjusted Episode Spending for Coronary Stent Placement Episodes: Table 4: Ranking of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) by Adjusted Episode Spending for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Episodes: Table 5: Ranking of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) by Adjusted Episode Spending for Total Hip Replacement Episodes: Table 6: Average Adjusted Episode Spending for Coronary Stent Placement, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in Lowest-and Highest- Spending Quintiles: Table 7: Average Adjusted Episode Spending for Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Table 8: Average Adjusted Episode Spending for Total Hip Replacement, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Table 9: Hospital Inpatient Spending, Initial Admission Price, and Number of Days, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Coronary Stent Placement Episodes: Table 10: Hospital Inpatient Spending, Initial Admission Price, and Number of Days, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Episodes: Table 11: Hospital Inpatient Spending, Initial Admission Price, and Number of Days, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Total Hip Replacement Episodes: Table 12: Professional Services Spending, Number of Services, Intensity, and Price, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Coronary Stent Placement Episodes: Table 13: Professional Services Spending, Number of Services, Intensity, and Price, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Episodes: Table 14: Professional Services Spending, Number of Services, Intensity, and Price, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Total Hip Replacement Episodes: Figures: Figure 1: Distribution of Average Episode Spending Across Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA): Figure 2: Correlation of Average Episode Spending between Procedures: Figure 3: Average Prices of Initial Hospital Inpatient Admissions for Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in the Lowest-and Highest- Spending Quintiles: Figure 4: Average Spending on Professional Services in Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in the Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Abbreviations: GDP: gross domestic product: IOM: Institute of Medicine: MedPAC: Medicare Payment Advisory Commission: MSA: metropolitan statistical area: RVU: relative value unit: [End of section] United States Government Accountability Office: GAO: 441 G St. N.W. Washington, DC 20548: December 29, 2014: The Honorable Henry A. Waxman: Ranking Member: Committee on Energy and Commerce: House of Representatives: Dear Mr. Waxman: National health expenditures are projected to grow from $2.8 trillion in 2012 to over $5 trillion in 2023, outpacing gross domestic product (GDP) growth over this period, and accounting for almost 20 percent of GDP by 2023.[Footnote 1] The United States spends significantly more on health care than any other nation, yet health outcomes in the United States are not necessarily better than those of other nations with lower spending. Further, research on U.S. health care spending has shown that spending can vary by geographic area and that this variation remains even after accounting for important differences across areas, such as differing health status of populations and differing costs of doing business. Studies have also shown that higher spending is not always associated with better quality of care.[Footnote 2] As U.S. health expenditures continue to rise, there is widespread interest among policymakers and others in improving their understanding of drivers of spending and in learning more about where and how health care systems operate efficiently--that is, provide equivalent or higher quality care while maintaining or lowering current spending levels. While researchers have developed a substantial body of work on geographic variation in Medicare spending,[Footnote 3] less research has been done on geographic variation in private sector health care spending. Researchers have primarily focused on Medicare spending because of the availability of Medicare spending data. However, private sector spending on health care accounts for about one-third of U.S. health expenditures and more comprehensive private sector data has become available in recent years.[Footnote 4] Additional research on private sector spending will provide important contributions to an overall understanding of geographic variation in health care spending. A useful framework for exploring geographic variation and reasons behind geographic spending differences is examining spending within an episode of care--defined as the care and services provided for a specific medical problem, condition, or illness during a specific time period. Using the episode, we can examine the contribution of components that drive spending variation. These components include the mix of services provided--hospital inpatient, hospital outpatient, physician and other professional services, postdischarge, and ancillary services--and the volume, intensity, and price of those services.[Footnote 5] A greater understanding of the reasons for higher or lower spending in certain areas may provide insights into the policy options that are most likely to be effective at promoting efficiencies and cost savings. You asked us to examine geographic variation in private sector health care spending. We examined: * how spending per episode of care for certain high-cost procedures varies across geographic areas for private payers and: * how the mix of service types, and the volume, intensity, and price of services contribute to variation in episode spending across geographic areas for private payers. To examine how spending per episode of care for certain high-cost procedures varies across geographic areas, we calculated average episode spending by metropolitan statistical areas (MSA).[Footnote 6] We created episodes based on an inpatient admission for each of the following procedures: coronary stent placement, Laparoscopic appendectomy, and Total hip replacement.[Footnote 7] For the years we analyzed in the private sector database--2009 and 2010--these procedures were commonly performed and associated with high levels of national spending.[Footnote 8] These procedures also represent different medical specialties. In addition, we selected hospital-based procedures because the United States spends more nationally on hospital services than any other type of health care service.[Footnote 9] To create the episodes, which included all services from the day of admission to 30 days after discharge and certain services in the 3 days prior to admission,[Footnote 10] we used private sector health insurance claims and enrollment data from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database for 2009 and 2010. This database contains claims for over 50 million enrollees paid by over 100 private insurers across 50 states and the District of Columbia in 2009 and 2010. We assigned episodes to MSAs based on the location of the hospital inpatient admission, keeping only MSAs that had a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses.[Footnote 11] We calculated unadjusted spending by using the payment amounts on the claims. We then adjusted spending for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in the demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA.[Footnote 12] Using all MSAs included in our analyses, we determined the distribution of average episode spending for each procedure, and, using the 78 MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes for all three procedures, we calculated the extent to which MSAs with high or low episode spending for one procedure also had high or low episode spending for another procedure. To examine how the mix of service types, and the volume, intensity, and price of services contribute to variation in episode spending across geographic areas, we calculated and reported on differences in these components for the 78 MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes for all three procedures, focusing on MSAs in the lowest-and highest- spending quintile for each procedure. We analyzed the mix of service types by assigning all spending within an episode to one of five service categories: (1) hospital inpatient, (2) hospital outpatient, (3) postdischarge, (4) professional, and (5) ancillary.[Footnote 13] For hospital inpatient and professional services, we also examined volume, intensity, and price of services.[Footnote 14] For hospital inpatient services, we measured volume as the number of days in the hospital stay, and we measured price by the amount spent on the initial hospital inpatient admission (which excluded spending on any subsequent readmissions), because hospitals are generally paid one amount per admission regardless of the patient's length of stay or the services delivered. For professional services, we measured volume as the number of services provided, and we measured intensity by using the relative value unit (RVU), which is an estimate of the resources needed to provide a given service.[Footnote 15] We calculated the price per unit of intensity by dividing average spending on professional services by the Total units of intensity (number of RVUs) associated with those services. See appendix I for a more detailed description of our methodology. We assessed the reliability of the MarketScan database by reviewing documentation, discussing the database with knowledgeable officials, and performing data reliability checks, and we determined the data were sufficiently reliable for our purposes. Our study had some limitations. We reported results only for those MSAs in which we had a sufficient number of episodes to ensure the reliability of our results for each procedure, but our results included MSAs that constituted a majority of the U.S. population. Depending on the procedure, 60 to 63 percent of the U.S. population lives in the MSAs included.[Footnote 16] In addition, although we chose procedures that were commonly performed and associated with high levels of national spending, our results may not be generalizable to other procedures not included in our analysis. Also, while the data used for our analyses were from one of the largest private insurance data sources, the data did not include all private payers and are not necessarily representative of the private health insurance market in the United States. As such, our findings may not be generalizable to this broader private health insurance market. For example, in 2009 and 2010, the percentage of enrollees in the data were disproportionately from large self-insured firms, which tend to have more generous benefit packages compared with other payers, and they were also disproportionately from the South. Finally, 2009 and 2010 data do not reflect the impact of more recent policy or other changes potentially affecting private sector health care spending, such as the implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. We conducted our work from January 2012 to December 2014 in accordance with all sections of GAO's Quality Assurance Framework that are relevant to our objectives. The framework requires that we plan and perform the engagement to obtain sufficient and appropriate evidence to meet our stated objectives and to discuss any limitations in our work. We believe that the information and data obtained, and the analysis conducted, provide a reasonable basis for any findings and conclusions in this product. Background: Private sector data have become increasingly available to researchers, and several studies have established that significant geographic variation in spending exists in the private sector. For example, in a recent comprehensive assessment of geographic variation in private sector spending, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reported on the presence of substantial spending variation, concluding that a large amount of the variation remained unexplained after adjusting for enrollee demographic and health status factors, insurance plan factors, and market-level factors, and suggesting that inefficiency is one of the causes of the current levels of variation.[Footnote 17] Using private sector claims data from two nationwide databases from 2007 through 2009, IOM found unadjusted spending for the area at the 90th percentile was 36 to 42 percent higher than the area at the 10th percentile, depending on the database used.[Footnote 18] The spending differences existed at all levels of geography IOM studied, including MSAs, and these differences persisted over time. IOM also found that price is a major determinant of geographic variation in the private sector, and estimated that, after adjusting for underlying costs, price accounted for 70 percent of the geographic variation in private sector spending. The researchers attributed the large impact of price in explaining private sector geographic spending variation to the relatively strong market power of providers in some areas. Other studies, including one by GAO, have reached similar conclusions. The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) examined geographic variation in private sector spending and estimated that in 2008, hospital inpatient spending for the MSA at the 90th percentile was 90 percent higher than for the MSA at the 10th percentile.[Footnote 19] MedPAC also found that spending for physician services varied, but less so than hospital inpatient spending. Physician spending at the 90th percentile was 50 percent higher than that at the 10th percentile. Early work by GAO analyzing 2001 private sector claims in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program also found substantial geographic variation in private sector hospital inpatient prices, physician prices, and spending.[Footnote 20] IOM also found that areas with relatively high prices tended to have relatively low utilization and vice versa. In addition, IOM found that private sector utilization varied more for some service types than others. For example, emergency department use was 50 to 100 percent higher for the area at the 90th percentile of utilization relative to the 10th percentile, and hospital outpatient visits were 30 to 46 percent higher. In addition, consistent with other research, use of discretionary services varied substantially. For example, the utilization rate for hip replacement, considered a discretionary procedure, for the area at the 90th percentile was 53 percent higher than the area at the 10th percentile, and other discretionary procedures, such as hysterectomies, lower back surgeries, and nuclear stress tests, had even larger differences.[Footnote 21] Researchers from the National Institute for Health Care Reform recently examined geographic variation in spending for hip and knee replacement episodes of care using 2011 claims data for autoworkers and their dependents in nine geographic areas in six states.[Footnote 22] They defined episodes as those beginning with a hospital admission and including all services up to 30 days postdischarge. Average spending per episode across the nine markets ranged from below $25,000 in Louisville, Kentucky, to above $30,000 in Buffalo, New York. [Footnote 23] However, variation across the 36 hospitals within these markets varied more than twofold, and all but one of the markets had a lower-spending hospital option, defined as having average episode spending below $25,000. To get a broader measure of variation in episode spending, these researchers also examined all episode types across hospitals. The spending variations observed for knee and hip replacements held true for other conditions, and hospitals with high spending for one service line (cardiology, orthopedics, etc.) were also likely to have high spending for other service lines. In addition, the price of the initial hospital stay accounted for more than 80 percent of the variation in overall spending. Variation in the prices and volume of physician and other services together accounted for less than one-tenth of the variation in episode spending. These researchers noted that reasons for higher-priced hospitals in some areas included their provision of specialized service lines that other nearby hospitals did not offer, being part of a local hospital system with greater bargaining clout, having unusually good clinical reputations, and being part of a large teaching hospital. Episode Spending Was 74 to 94 Percent Higher in Highest-Compared with Lowest-Spending Areas, with High-Spending Areas Generally High for All Three Procedures: Episode Spending Was 74 to 94 Percent Higher in the Highest-Compared with Lowest-Spending Areas, Depending on Procedure: We noted variation in episode spending across MSAs for all three procedures, even after adjusting for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. For example, average adjusted episode spending across all MSAs in our analysis for Laparoscopic appendectomy was $12,506; however, MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had average adjusted episode spending of $17,047, which was almost 94 percent higher than the average adjusted episode spending of $8,802 for MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile. Average adjusted episode spending for this procedure for individual MSAs ranged from $25,924 in Salinas, California, to $6,166 in Joplin, Missouri. We found similar results for the other two procedures we studied, coronary stent placement and Total hip replacement. Average adjusted episode spending for MSAs in the highest-spending quintile was about 84 percent and 74 percent higher than for MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile, respectively. (See figure 1; also, see appendix II for complete rankings of MSAs by procedure.) We found greater geographic variation in average episode spending than the research from the National Institute for Health Care Reform, likely because our study included many more geographic areas.[Footnote 24] For all three procedures, adjustments to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and for differences in demographics and health status of enrollees reduced the extent of variation in spending across MSAs. For example, before adjustment, average episode spending for Laparoscopic appendectomy in the highest- spending MSA (Salinas, California) was 511 percent higher than the lowest-spending MSA (Joplin, Missouri); and, after adjustment, spending was 320 percent higher. Figure 1: Distribution of Average Episode Spending Across Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA): [Refer to PDF for image: interactive graphic] Interactivity instructions: Roll over on one of the three procedures to see data. See appendix III for additional details. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 155 MSAs for coronary stent placement episodes, 139 MSAs for Laparoscopic appendectomy episodes, and 141 MSAs for Total hip replacement episodes. For each procedure, we included all MSAs for which we had a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [End of figure] High-Spending Areas Generally Were High-Spending for All Three Procedures: MSAs with higher spending on one procedure generally had higher spending on the other two procedures. For example, Salinas, California, and Fort Wayne, Indiana, were among the highest-spending MSAs for all three procedures, while Hartford, Connecticut, and Youngstown, Ohio, were among the lowest-spending MSAs for all three procedures. We examined average adjusted episode spending in the 78 MSAs that had a sufficient number of episodes for all three procedures and found that the extent of correlation for each pair of procedures for the 78 MSAs ranged from 0.68 to 0.83,[Footnote 25] consistent with the research from the National Institute for Health Care Reform. [Footnote 26] (See figure 2.) Figure 2: Correlation of Average Episode Spending between Procedures: [Refer to PDF for image: 3 plotted point graphs] Figure 2 has three graphs, each of which shows the relationship between average episode spending for two of the procedures in our analysis and is based on data for the 78 MSAs that had a sufficient number of episodes for all three procedures. In the first graph, there is one point for each MSA based on average episode spending for coronary stent placement along the vertical axis and average episode spending for Laparoscopic appendectomy along the horizontal axis. This cluster of points generally trends up and to the right, indicating that MSAs with high spending for coronary stent placement also tend to have high spending for Laparoscopic appendectomy, and vice versa. This relationship is described quantitatively as having a correlation of 0.72 on a scale of negative 1 to 1. Each of the other two graphs also shows a cluster of points, one for each of the 78 MSA, that trends up and to the right, indicating a similar relationship between the other two combinations of procedures. In the second graph, the correlation between coronary stent placement episode spending along the vertical axis and Total hip replacement episode spending along the horizontal axis is 0.83. In the third graph, the correlation between Laparoscopic appendectomy episode spending along the vertical axis and Total hip replacement episode spending along the horizontal axis is 0.68. These graphs are based on the average adjusted episode spending amounts for each MSA, which are listed in Appendix V. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: All correlations shown are significant at p<0.0001. Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [End of figure] Despite the overall pattern that MSAs tended to be in the same spending quintiles for all three procedures, there were some exceptions. Notably, Albany, New York, was in the highest-spending quintile for coronary stent placement and Total hip replacement but was in the lowest-spending quintile for Laparoscopic appendectomy; San Antonio, Texas, was in the highest-spending quintile for Total hip replacement but was in the lowest-spending quintile for Laparoscopic appendectomy; and Allentown, Pennsylvania, was in the highest-spending quintile for coronary stent placement but was in the lowest-spending quintile for Total hip replacement. We also examined whether high-or low-spending MSAs were concentrated in particular regions of the nation, and we found that they were not. [Footnote 27] For example, we found 11 MSAs that were in the highest- spending quintile for at least two of the three procedures we examined, and these MSAs were located in different regions of the nation, such as Albany, New York; Fort Wayne, Indiana; Houston, Texas; Madison, Wisconsin; Milwaukee, Wisconsin; Nashville, Tennessee; Salinas, California; and San Diego, California. In addition, some states had MSAs in both the highest- and lowest-spending quintiles for a given procedure. For example, in California, Salinas and San Diego were both in the highest-spending quintile for Laparoscopic appendectomy episode spending, whereas Fresno, Oxnard, Riverside, San Jose, and Santa Rosa were all in the lowest-spending quintile. Similarly, in New York, Albany was in the highest-spending quintile for Total hip replacement, whereas Rochester was in the lowest- spending quintile. Price per Initial Inpatient Admission Was Largest Contributor to Geographic Differences in Episode Spending: The price of the initial hospital inpatient admission was the largest contributor to differences in private sector episode spending across MSAs.[Footnote 28] Differences in the price of the initial admission accounted for 91 percent or more of the difference in average adjusted episode spending between the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles. For example, for Total hip replacement, the difference in average adjusted episode spending in the MSAs in the lowest-and highest- spending quintiles was $14,506, and $13,198 of that difference--or 91 percent--was attributable to differences in the price of the initial inpatient admission. Similarly, differences in initial inpatient admission prices accounted for 92 and 96 percent of the differences in episode spending between MSAs in the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles for coronary stent placement and Laparoscopic appendectomy, respectively (see table 1). The role of inpatient admission price as the primary driver of geographic differences in spending in the private sector has been reported in the literature, such as by the National Institute for Health Care Reform. Table 1: Contributions of Each Service Category to Differences in Average Episode Spending between Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in the Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Service category: Hospital inpatient--Price of initial admission[A]; Coronary stent placement: 92%; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 96%; Total hip replacement: 91%. Service category: Hospital inpatient--Readmissions; Coronary stent placement: 1%; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0%; Total hip replacement: 0%. Service category: Hospital outpatient; Coronary stent placement: 1%; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 1%; Total hip replacement: 1%. Service category: Postdischarge; Coronary stent placement: 0%; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0%; Total hip replacement: 0%. Service category: Professional; Coronary stent placement: 5%; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 3%; Total hip replacement: 7%. Service category: Ancillary and unclassified; Coronary stent placement: 1%; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0%; Total hip replacement: 1%. Service category: Total; Coronary stent placement: 100%; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 100%; Total hip replacement: 100%. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. For each procedure, the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles each consist of 16 MSAs. Prices and spending were adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [A] We identified price as the amount spent on the initial hospital inpatient admission (which excluded spending on any subsequent readmissions), because hospitals are generally paid one amount per admission regardless of the patient's length of stay or the services delivered. In addition, measures of intensity for hospital inpatient spending--such as diagnosis-related groups--are assigned based on the patient's clinical condition. Instead, we reported prices adjusted for differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [End of table] The price of the initial inpatient admission contributed most to geographic differences in average adjusted episode spending for two reasons. First, the price of the initial admission represented the largest percentage of adjusted episode spending. For the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles in each of the three procedures, at least two-thirds of episode spending was for the price of the hospital inpatient admission. For example, for Total hip replacement, the price of the initial admission was $17,134, representing 76 percent of the $22,463 in Total episode spending for MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile and $30,332, representing 82 percent of the $36,969 in Total episode spending for MSAs in the highest-spending quintile. Second, the average price of the initial inpatient admission varied considerably across MSAs.[Footnote 29] The difference in the price of the initial inpatient admission in MSAs in the lowest-and highest- spending quintiles ranged from 77 percent to 121 percent, depending on the procedure. For example, for Laparoscopic appendectomy, the price of the initial admission was 121 percent higher for MSAs in the highest-spending quintile compared with MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile (see figure 3). Specifically, MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had an average price of $13,177 for the initial admission-- and ranged from $11,087 in Colorado Springs, Colorado, to $23,432 in Salinas, California--whereas MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile had an average price of $5,971 for the initial admission--and ranged from $4,528 in Las Vegas, Nevada, to $7,430 in San Antonio, Texas. (See appendix IV for average adjusted episode spending by procedure and service category, and appendix V for complete rankings of hospital inpatient spending, initial admission price, and number of days by MSA and procedure.) Figure 3: Average Prices of Initial Hospital Inpatient Admissions for Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in the Lowest-and Highest- Spending Quintiles: [Refer to PDF for image: stacked vertical bar graph] Average MSA spending in dollars: Coronary stent placement: Lowest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $21,540): Adjusted price of initial hospital inpatient admission: $17,639; Adjusted spending on all other categories: $3,901. Highest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $37,996): Adjusted price of initial hospital inpatient admission: $32,809 (86% higher); Adjusted spending on all other categories: $5,186. Laparoscopic appendectomy: Lowest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $8,839): Adjusted price of initial hospital inpatient admission: $5,971; Adjusted spending on all other categories: $2,868. Highest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $16,314): Adjusted price of initial hospital inpatient admission: $13,177 (121% higher); Adjusted spending on all other categories: $3,136. Total hip replacement: Lowest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $22,463): Adjusted price of initial hospital inpatient admission: $17,134; Adjusted spending on all other categories: $5,330. Highest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $36,969): Adjusted price of initial hospital inpatient admission: $30,332 (77% higher); Adjusted spending on all other categories: $6,636. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. For each procedure, the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles each consist of 16 MSAs. Prices and spending were adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. Prices and spending may not add to totals because of rounding. [End of figure] Although professional services--office visits, hospital consultations, surgeries, and other services provided by a physician or other health professional--were the second largest contributor to geographic differences in average adjusted episode spending, they contributed to a much smaller extent than did the price of the initial inpatient admission. For each of the three procedures, differences in spending on professional services accounted for only 3 to 7 percent of the difference in overall episode spending between MSAs in the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles. First, professional services contributed a smaller amount to geographic differences in episode spending because they represented a much smaller percentage of episode spending than the price of the initial inpatient admission. For MSAs in the lowest- and highest-spending quintiles in each of the three procedures, 10 to 29 percent of episode spending was for professional services. For example, for Total hip replacement, spending on professional services was $4,157, representing 19 percent of the $22,463 in Total episode spending for MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile and $5,221, representing 14 percent of the $36,969 in Total episode spending for MSAs in the highest-spending quintile. Second, professional services contributed a smaller amount to geographic differences in episode spending because spending on professional services varied less across MSAs. Spending on professional services for MSAs in the highest- spending quintile was between 8 percent and 26 percent higher than in the lowest-spending quintile, depending on the procedure (see figure 4).[Footnote 30] Overall, spending on professional services ranged widely--for example, from $3,110 in Akron, Ohio, to $9,794 in Madison, Wisconsin, for Total hip replacement. (See appendix IV for average adjusted episode spending by procedure and service category, and appendix VI for complete rankings of professional services spending, number of services, intensity, and price by MSA and procedure.) Figure 4: Average Spending on Professional Services in Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in the Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: [Refer to PDF for image: stacked vertical bar graph] Average MSA spending in dollars: Coronary stent placement: Lowest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $21,540): Adjusted spending on professional services: $3,099; Adjusted spending on all other categories: $18,441. Highest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $37,996): Adjusted spending on professional services: $3,890 (26% higher); Adjusted spending on all other categories: $34,105. Laparoscopic appendectomy: Lowest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $8,839): Adjusted spending on professional services: $2,535; Adjusted spending on all other categories: $6,304. Highest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $16,314): Adjusted spending on professional services: $2,726 (8% higher); Adjusted spending on all other categories: $13,587. Total hip replacement: Lowest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $22,463): Adjusted spending on professional services: $4,157; Adjusted spending on all other categories: $18,307. Highest-spending quintile (Total episode of care: $36,969): Adjusted spending on professional services: $5,221 (26% higher); Adjusted spending on all other categories: $31,747. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. For each procedure, the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles each consist of 16 MSAs. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. Spending may not add to totals because of rounding. [End of figure] When we examined how volume, intensity, and prices contributed to differences in spending on professional services, we found that for all three procedures services in MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had higher average prices and higher average intensity than services in MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile, with price having a greater impact than intensity. However, MSAs in the highest-spending quintile used fewer services than MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile, somewhat offsetting the impact of prices on spending. For example, for coronary stent placement, MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had $791 more in spending, 11.4 percent lower volume, 4.0 percent higher intensity, and 39.8 percent higher prices, compared to MSAs in the lowest-spending quintile (see table 2). (See also appendix VI for complete rankings of professional services spending, number of services, intensity, and price by MSA and procedure.) These findings are consistent with our finding on hospital inpatient spending and with existing research on private sector data, which has generally found that variation in prices drives overall variation in spending across geographic areas. While high-priced areas tend to have lower utilization and vice versa, the variation in prices has a larger effect. Table 2: Professional Services: Difference in Average Spending, Volume, Intensity, and Price: Comparison of averages for MSAs in highest- and lowest-spending quintiles: Procedure: Coronary stent placement; Adjusted spending: $791 higher; Volume (number of services): 11.4% lower; Intensity: 4.0% higher; Comparison of averages for MSAs in highest- and lowest-spending quintiles: Price per unit of intensity: 39.8% higher. Procedure: Laparoscopic appendectomy; Adjusted spending: $191 higher; Volume (number of services): 12.6% lower; Intensity: 7.3% higher; Comparison of averages for MSAs in highest- and lowest-spending quintiles: Price per unit of intensity: 14.4% higher. Procedure: Total hip replacement; Adjusted spending: $1,064 higher; Volume (number of services): 14.8% lower; Intensity: 12.5% higher; Comparison of averages for MSAs in highest- and lowest-spending quintiles: Price per unit of intensity: 33.4% higher. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. For each procedure, the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles each consist of 16 MSAs. Spending, volume, and intensity were adjusted to control for geographic differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA; spending was also adjusted for differences in the cost of doing business. Intensity is measured by the relative value unit (RVU) assigned to each service. [End of table] Agency Comments: We provided a draft of this product to the Department of Health and Human Services, which did not comment on our findings but provided technical comments. We incorporated these technical comments as appropriate. As agreed with your office, unless you publicly announce the contents of this report earlier, we plan no further distribution until 30 days from the report date. At that time, we will send copies to the Secretary of Health and Human Services and the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. In addition, the report is available at no charge on the GAO website at [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. If you or your staff have any questions about this report, please contact me at (202) 512-7114 or cosgrovej@gao.gov. Contact points for our Offices of Congressional Relations and Public Affairs may be found on the last page of this report. GAO staff who made major contributions to this report are listed in appendix VII. Sincerely yours, Signed by: James Cosgrove: Director, Health Care: [End of section] Appendix I: Data and Methods: This appendix describes the data and methods we used in our study. Creating Episodes of Care from Private Health Insurance Claims Data: We created episodes of care based on inpatient admissions for three procedures--coronary stent placement, Laparoscopic appendectomy, and Total hip replacement[Footnote 31]--using private health insurance claims and enrollment data from the Truven Health Analytics MarketScan® Commercial Claims and Encounters Database for 2009 and 2010.[Footnote 32] We identified procedures based on the presence of specific procedure codes in the hospital inpatient and professional service claims.[Footnote 33] We selected these procedures because they were commonly performed in the years we analyzed and were associated with high levels of national spending in the MarketScan database. In addition, we selected procedures that were generally provided by different medical specialties,[Footnote 34] and we selected hospital- based procedures because the United States spends more nationally on hospital services than any other type of health care service.[Footnote 35] We included all services in the episode from the day of admission to 30 days after discharge, and certain services in the 3 days prior to admission. Specifically, we included any outpatient services received by an enrollee in the 3 days prior to admission at the same hospital where the inpatient admission occurred, because those services may be related to the admission. In the episode, we included any drugs provided during the hospital inpatient admission because these drugs were part of the hospital inpatient claims. However, we excluded outpatient drugs, such as prescription drugs, due to limitations of the claims in the MarketScan database. We excluded enrollees from our study who had inpatient admissions for any of the three procedures outside the 50 states and the District of Columbia, had secondary insurance, or were enrolled in a managed care or other capitated plan.[Footnote 36] We also excluded enrollees with certain conditions that could increase spending for reasons unrelated to the procedure analyzed. For example, we excluded enrollees who received the procedure more than one time during the episode, enrollees whose overall initial hospital admission was coded as being for a reason unrelated to the procedure analyzed, enrollees with diagnoses of end-stage renal disease, enrollees who were pregnant, and enrollees with a hospice stay. In addition, we excluded enrollees under the age of 18 for coronary stent placement and Total hip replacement episodes, and we excluded enrollees with a diagnosis of appendix rupture for Laparoscopic appendectomy episodes. Analyzing Average Episode Spending across Geographic Areas: We analyzed average episode spending across metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) for each procedure.[Footnote 37] We assigned episodes to MSAs based on the location of the hospital inpatient admission, and we had a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses of coronary stent placement in 155 MSAs, Laparoscopic appendectomy in 139 MSAs, and Total hip replacement in 141 MSAs.[Footnote 38] For some analyses where we draw comparisons across procedures, we report data on only the 78 MSAs that had a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. For each procedure, we estimated unadjusted spending and spending adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in the demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. To estimate unadjusted spending, we summed the insurer's allowed payment amount for all services within the episode, including the amount paid by the insurer and any cost-sharing paid by the enrollee. [Footnote 39] We adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of doing business by using Medicare's payment-adjustment methodology. For services provided by physicians and certain other health professionals, we applied the Geographic Practice Cost Index, which is Medicare's estimate of the geographic differences in the costs of operating a medical practice, to the unadjusted spending for professional services. For services provided by hospitals, such as during an inpatient admission, and by certain other facilities, we applied the Hospital Wage Index value, which is Medicare's estimate of differences in the wage-related component of the costs of doing business, to a portion of the unadjusted spending for those services. We additionally adjusted for differences in the demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA by using a regression-based approach. In the regression, the dependent variable was Total cost- adjusted episode spending, and the independent variables were enrollee- level factors (such as age, gender, number of readmissions, and certain comorbidities) and MSA-level indicator variables to identify the portion of the remaining variation in episode spending that was attributable to specific geographic areas. Using all MSAs in our analyses, we reported the distribution of average adjusted episode spending for each procedure. Using the 78 MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes for all three procedures, we reported the correlation coefficient to show the extent to which MSAs with high or low episode spending for one procedure also had high or low episode spending for another procedure.[Footnote 40] We also examined whether MSAs in the lowest-and highest-spending quintile were concentrated in particular regions of the nation. Analyzing Mix of Service Types: To examine how one of the components of spending--mix of service types--contributes to variation in episode spending across geographic areas, we assigned all adjusted spending within an episode to one of five service categories based on the procedure code for the service and place of service. The five service categories were (1) hospital inpatient, (2) hospital outpatient, (3) postdischarge, (4) professional, and (5) ancillary.[Footnote 41] For the 78 MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes for all three procedures, we compared the MSAs in the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles for each procedure, and we reported the extent to which those differences in spending for each service category contributed to differences in episode spending.[Footnote 42] We also reported the difference in adjusted spending by service category between the quintiles. Analyzing Volume, Intensity, and Price of Services: To examine how the other components of spending contribute to variation in episode spending for private payers, we analyzed volume, intensity, and price of services for hospital inpatient and professional services.[Footnote 43] For hospital inpatient services, we measured volume as the number of days of the hospital stay, and we measured price by the amount of spending on the initial hospital inpatient admission (which excluded spending on any subsequent readmissions) because hospitals are generally paid one amount per admission regardless of the patient's length of stay or the services delivered. In addition, we calculated the extent to which the price of the initial inpatient admission contributed to differences in episode spending between MSAs in the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles. For professional services, we measured volume as the number of services, measured intensity based on the relative value unit (RVU), which is an estimate of the resources needed to provide a given service,[Footnote 44] and calculated the price per unit of intensity by dividing average spending on professional services by the Total units of intensity (number of RVUs) associated with those services. [Footnote 45] Similar to our adjustments for spending, we used a regression-based approach to control for differences in the demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. In addition, we compared differences in volume, intensity, and price per unit of intensity between MSAs in the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles. [End of section] Appendix II: Episode Spending, by Procedure, within Metropolitan Statistical Areas GAO Analyzed: This appendix ranks metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) by average adjusted episode spending for each of the three procedures we analyzed- -coronary stent placement, Laparoscopic appendectomy, and Total hip replacement. Table 3: Ranking of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) by Adjusted Episode Spending for Coronary Stent Placement Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA; Number of episodes: 38; Average adjusted episode spending: $60,375. Rank: 2; MSA: Albany, GA; Number of episodes: 48; Average adjusted episode spending: $45,204. Rank: 3; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 87; Average adjusted episode spending: $44,470. Rank: 4; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 51; Average adjusted episode spending: $43,824. Rank: 5; MSA: Asheville, NC; Number of episodes: 36; Average adjusted episode spending: $43,578. Rank: 6; MSA: Cape Girardeau-Jackson, MO-IL; Number of episodes: 42; Average adjusted episode spending: $42,318. Rank: 7; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 62; Average adjusted episode spending: $39,827. Rank: 8; MSA: Charleston, WV; Number of episodes: 134; Average adjusted episode spending: $39,782. Rank: 9; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA; Number of episodes: 80; Average adjusted episode spending: $39,683. Rank: 10; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 77; Average adjusted episode spending: $39,438. Rank: 11; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 165; Average adjusted episode spending: $39,339. Rank: 12; MSA: Rome, GA; Number of episodes: 59; Average adjusted episode spending: $39,248. Rank: 13; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 28; Average adjusted episode spending: $39,229. Rank: 14; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI; Number of episodes: 194; Average adjusted episode spending: $38,596. Rank: 15; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $38,305. Rank: 16; MSA: York-Hanover, PA; Number of episodes: 56; Average adjusted episode spending: $38,198. Rank: 17; MSA: Mansfield, OH; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,808. Rank: 18; MSA: Valdosta, GA; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,748. Rank: 19; MSA: Lafayette, IN; Number of episodes: 47; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,612. Rank: 20; MSA: Johnson City, TN; Number of episodes: 36; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,363. Rank: 21; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 56; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,324. Rank: 22; MSA: Madison, WI; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,248. Rank: 23; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 163; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,858. Rank: 24; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 475; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,388. Rank: 25; MSA: Baton Rouge, LA; Number of episodes: 35; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,327. Rank: 26; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 42; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,222. Rank: 27; MSA: Duluth, MN-WI; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,123. Rank: 28; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX; Number of episodes: 634; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,097. Rank: 29; MSA: Winston-Salem, NC; Number of episodes: 38; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,029. Rank: 30; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 100; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,478. Rank: 31; MSA: Chico, CA; Number of episodes: 24; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,415. Rank: 32; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA; Number of episodes: 70; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,358. Rank: 33; MSA: Parkersburg-Marietta-Vienna, WV-OH; Number of episodes: 47; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,323. Rank: 34; MSA: Bowling Green, KY; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,847. Rank: 35; MSA: Appleton, WI; Number of episodes: 29; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,614. Rank: 36; MSA: Elkhart-Goshen, IN; Number of episodes: 53; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,607. Rank: 37; MSA: Green Bay, WI; Number of episodes: 68; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,539. Rank: 38; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA; Number of episodes: 237; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,388. Rank: 39; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN; Number of episodes: 185; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,307. Rank: 40; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN; Number of episodes: 253; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,258. Rank: 41; MSA: South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI; Number of episodes: 40; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,229. Rank: 42; MSA: Redding, CA; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,218. Rank: 43; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 302; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,974. Rank: 44; MSA: Athens-Clarke County, GA; Number of episodes: 46; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,528. Rank: 45; MSA: Evansville, IN-KY; Number of episodes: 70; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,510. Rank: 46; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ; Number of episodes: 244; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,398. Rank: 47; MSA: Winchester, VA-WV; Number of episodes: 46; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,041. Rank: 48; MSA: Santa Fe, NM; Number of episodes: 37; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,920. Rank: 49; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA; Number of episodes: 86; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,807. Rank: 50; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL; Number of episodes: 180; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,605. Rank: 51; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Number of episodes: 232; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,156. Rank: 52; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,143. Rank: 53; MSA: Chattanooga, TN-GA; Number of episodes: 56; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,134. Rank: 54; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Number of episodes: 183; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,068. Rank: 55; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Number of episodes: 63; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,879. Rank: 56; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX; Number of episodes: 916; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,847. Rank: 57; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA; Number of episodes: 43; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,797. Rank: 58; MSA: Lincoln, NE; Number of episodes: 33; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,748. Rank: 59; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO; Number of episodes: 51; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,017. Rank: 60; MSA: Syracuse, NY; Number of episodes: 46; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,008. Rank: 61; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 255; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,680. Rank: 62; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Number of episodes: 114; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,607. Rank: 63; MSA: Niles-Benton Harbor, MI; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,341. Rank: 64; MSA: Sherman-Denison, TX; Number of episodes: 35; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,269. Rank: 65; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 68; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,243. Rank: 66; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 89; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,156. Rank: 67; MSA: Hagerstown-Martinsburg, MD-WV; Number of episodes: 28; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,013. Rank: 68; MSA: Fresno, CA; Number of episodes: 62; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,925. Rank: 69; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI; Number of episodes: 48; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,684. Rank: 70; MSA: Ocala, FL; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,547. Rank: 71; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Number of episodes: 389; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,489. Rank: 72; MSA: Worcester, MA; Number of episodes: 36; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,427. Rank: 73; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 142; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,393. Rank: 74; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Number of episodes: 67; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,302. Rank: 75; MSA: Bloomington-Normal, IL; Number of episodes: 40; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,073. Rank: 76; MSA: Columbia, MO; Number of episodes: 43; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,995. Rank: 77; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 54; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,717. Rank: 78; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Number of episodes: 169; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,698. Rank: 79; MSA: Fayetteville-Springdale-Rogers, AR-MO; Number of episodes: 49; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,682. Rank: 80; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Number of episodes: 1,944; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,640. Rank: 81; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA; Number of episodes: 1,066; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,629. Rank: 82; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Number of episodes: 64; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,607. Rank: 83; MSA: Punta Gorda, FL; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,560. Rank: 84; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Number of episodes: 141; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,553. Rank: 85; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Number of episodes: 331; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,474. Rank: 86; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 192; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,276. Rank: 87; MSA: Decatur, IL; Number of episodes: 45; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,250. Rank: 88; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,065. Rank: 89; MSA: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY; Number of episodes: 24; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,003. Rank: 90; MSA: Muncie, IN; Number of episodes: 54; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,822. Rank: 91; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Number of episodes: 153; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,705. Rank: 92; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Number of episodes: 376; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,544. Rank: 93; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX; Number of episodes: 235; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,489. Rank: 94; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Number of episodes: 63; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,480. Rank: 95; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Number of episodes: 175; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,308. Rank: 96; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Number of episodes: 263; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,067. Rank: 97; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 66; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,047. Rank: 98; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 673; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,746. Rank: 99; MSA: Oklahoma City, OK; Number of episodes: 551; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,468. Rank: 100; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 55; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,366. Rank: 101; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 87; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,349. Rank: 102; MSA: Tyler, TX; Number of episodes: 132; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,953. Rank: 103; MSA: Terre Haute, IN; Number of episodes: 54; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,896. Rank: 104; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 80; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,813. Rank: 105; MSA: Rochester, NY; Number of episodes: 83; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,523. Rank: 106; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA; Number of episodes: 78; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,322. Rank: 107; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL; Number of episodes: 500; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,288. Rank: 108; MSA: Fort Smith, AR-OK; Number of episodes: 33; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,286. Rank: 109; MSA: Toledo, OH; Number of episodes: 249; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,210. Rank: 110; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Number of episodes: 838; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,203. Rank: 111; MSA: Albuquerque, NM; Number of episodes: 220; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,015. Rank: 112; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Number of episodes: 494; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,914. Rank: 113; MSA: Washington-Arlington-Alexandria, DC-VA-MD-WV; Number of episodes: 210; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,872. Rank: 114; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,862. Rank: 115; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Number of episodes: 40; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,848. Rank: 116; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 280; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,753. Rank: 117; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 55; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,682. Rank: 118; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,456. Rank: 119; MSA: Columbus, OH; Number of episodes: 450; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,310. Rank: 120; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Number of episodes: 262; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,088. Rank: 121; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 146; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,938. Rank: 122; MSA: Knoxville, TN; Number of episodes: 102; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,935. Rank: 123; MSA: Reno-Sparks, NV; Number of episodes: 47; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,852. Rank: 124; MSA: Naples-Marco Island, FL; Number of episodes: 32; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,830. Rank: 125; MSA: San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA; Number of episodes: 37; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,785. Rank: 126; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 32; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,665. Rank: 127; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 203; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,647. Rank: 128; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT; Number of episodes: 109; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,135. Rank: 129; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 55; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,848. Rank: 130; MSA: Springfield, MO; Number of episodes: 48; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,784. Rank: 131; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA; Number of episodes: 486; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,768. Rank: 132; MSA: Savannah, GA; Number of episodes: 57; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,585. Rank: 133; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 223; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,570. Rank: 134; MSA: Little Rock-North Little Rock-Conway, AR; Number of episodes: 69; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,439. Rank: 135; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 84; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,391. Rank: 136; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT; Number of episodes: 353; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,357. Rank: 137; MSA: Columbus, GA-AL; Number of episodes: 37; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,336. Rank: 138; MSA: Bay City, MI; Number of episodes: 58; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,236. Rank: 139; MSA: Dayton, OH; Number of episodes: 174; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,073. Rank: 140; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA; Number of episodes: 40; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,023. Rank: 141; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 213; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,952. Rank: 142; MSA: Springfield, MA; Number of episodes: 50; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,937. Rank: 143; MSA: Joplin, MO; Number of episodes: 60; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,699. Rank: 144; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 1,585; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,664. Rank: 145; MSA: Akron, OH; Number of episodes: 128; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,664. Rank: 146; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 66; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,651. Rank: 147; MSA: Canton-Massillon, OH; Number of episodes: 55; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,225. Rank: 148; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV; Number of episodes: 115; Average adjusted episode spending: $20,969. Rank: 149; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY; Number of episodes: 196; Average adjusted episode spending: $20,602. Rank: 150; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 332; Average adjusted episode spending: $20,590. Rank: 151; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA; Number of episodes: 216; Average adjusted episode spending: $18,829. Rank: 152; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN; Number of episodes: 277; Average adjusted episode spending: $18,677. Rank: 153; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL; Number of episodes: 63; Average adjusted episode spending: $17,768. Rank: 154; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $17,710. Rank: 155; MSA: Huntsville, AL; Number of episodes: 33; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,448. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 155 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of coronary stent placement episodes to support our analyses. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [A] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [End of table] Table 4: Ranking of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) by Adjusted Episode Spending for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA; Number of episodes: 68; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,924. Rank: 2; MSA: Janesville, WI; Number of episodes: 20; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,677. Rank: 3; MSA: Fort Collins-Loveland, CO; Number of episodes: 21; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,766. Rank: 4; MSA: Anchorage, AK; Number of episodes: 20; Average adjusted episode spending: $20,746. Rank: 5; MSA: Reading, PA; Number of episodes: 50; Average adjusted episode spending: $18,142. Rank: 6; MSA: Madison, WI; Number of episodes: 32; Average adjusted episode spending: $18,123. Rank: 7; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI; Number of episodes: 170; Average adjusted episode spending: $18,096. Rank: 8; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $18,085. Rank: 9; MSA: Lynchburg, VA; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $17,745. Rank: 10; MSA: Charleston, WV; Number of episodes: 33; Average adjusted episode spending: $17,640. Rank: 11; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $17,328. Rank: 12; MSA: Port St. Lucie, FL; Number of episodes: 21; Average adjusted episode spending: $17,104. Rank: 13; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 36; Average adjusted episode spending: $16,588. Rank: 14; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 83; Average adjusted episode spending: $16,323. Rank: 15; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 67; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,724. Rank: 16; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI; Number of episodes: 30; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,444. Rank: 17; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,318. Rank: 18; MSA: Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,307. Rank: 19; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL; Number of episodes: 215; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,267. Rank: 20; MSA: Farmington, NM; Number of episodes: 48; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,244. Rank: 21; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 134; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,202. Rank: 22; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 162; Average adjusted episode spending: $15,052. Rank: 23; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA; Number of episodes: 174; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,859. Rank: 24; MSA: Pensacola-Ferry Pass-Brent, FL; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,835. Rank: 25; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 106; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,761. Rank: 26; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,704. Rank: 27; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Number of episodes: 56; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,678. Rank: 28; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA; Number of episodes: 349; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,644. Rank: 29; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,543. Rank: 30; MSA: Columbus, OH; Number of episodes: 164; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,478. Rank: 31; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Number of episodes: 219; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,337. Rank: 32; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN; Number of episodes: 72; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,335. Rank: 33; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Number of episodes: 38; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,327. Rank: 34; MSA: Baton Rouge, LA; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,149. Rank: 35; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 110; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,115. Rank: 36; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 157; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,042. Rank: 37; MSA: Omaha-Council Bluffs, NE-IA; Number of episodes: 56; Average adjusted episode spending: $14,017. Rank: 38; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Number of episodes: 100; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,986. Rank: 39; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 42; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,933. Rank: 40; MSA: Kalamazoo-Portage, MI; Number of episodes: 17; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,926. Rank: 41; MSA: Lima, OH; Number of episodes: 35; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,851. Rank: 42; MSA: Deltona-Daytona Beach-Ormond Beach, FL; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,842. Rank: 43; MSA: Akron, OH; Number of episodes: 22; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,788. Rank: 44; MSA: Palm Bay-Melbourne-Titusville, FL; Number of episodes: 18; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,685. Rank: 45; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ; Number of episodes: 108; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,634. Rank: 46; MSA: Jacksonville, FL; Number of episodes: 95; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,618. Rank: 47; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Number of episodes: 202; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,374. Rank: 48; MSA: El Paso, TX; Number of episodes: 93; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,229. Rank: 49; MSA: Lawton, OK; Number of episodes: 22; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,106. Rank: 50; MSA: Modesto, CA; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,103. Rank: 51; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 57; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,063. Rank: 52; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 20; Average adjusted episode spending: $13,004. Rank: 53; MSA: Dayton, OH; Number of episodes: 49; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,973. Rank: 54; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Number of episodes: 60; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,897. Rank: 55; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Number of episodes: 198; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,879. Rank: 56; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA; Number of episodes: 153; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,862. Rank: 57; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Number of episodes: 1,398; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,800. Rank: 58; MSA: Salt Lake City, UT; Number of episodes: 44; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,655. Rank: 59; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Number of episodes: 99; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,596. Rank: 60; MSA: Sioux City, IA-NE-SD; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,572. Rank: 61; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Number of episodes: 446; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,571. Rank: 62; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Number of episodes: 120; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,477. Rank: 63; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX; Number of episodes: 1,033; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,413. Rank: 64; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Number of episodes: 42; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,403. Rank: 65; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA; Number of episodes: 103; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,394. Rank: 66; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 41; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,364. Rank: 67; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 67; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,358. Rank: 68; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 23; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,350. Rank: 69; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 197; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,336. Rank: 70; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA; Number of episodes: 1,711; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,252. Rank: 71; MSA: Spokane, WA; Number of episodes: 17; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,161. Rank: 72; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 20; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,088. Rank: 73; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $12,011. Rank: 74; MSA: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL; Number of episodes: 562; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,985. Rank: 75; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL; Number of episodes: 64; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,960. Rank: 76; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 67; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,865. Rank: 77; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 84; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,851. Rank: 78; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 122; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,851. Rank: 79; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 42; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,840. Rank: 80; MSA: Boulder, CO; Number of episodes: 22; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,715. Rank: 81; MSA: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA; Number of episodes: 309; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,523. Rank: 82; MSA: Bloomington-Normal, IL; Number of episodes: 19; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,498. Rank: 83; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX; Number of episodes: 722; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,496. Rank: 84; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 24; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,478. Rank: 85; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Number of episodes: 384; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,417. Rank: 86; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Number of episodes: 554; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,403. Rank: 87; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Number of episodes: 440; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,351. Rank: 88; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Number of episodes: 143; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,314. Rank: 89; MSA: Rochester, NY; Number of episodes: 32; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,144. Rank: 90; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Number of episodes: 122; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,078. Rank: 91; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 80; Average adjusted episode spending: $11,037. Rank: 92; MSA: Springfield, MA; Number of episodes: 68; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,958. Rank: 93; MSA: Mobile, AL; Number of episodes: 22; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,957. Rank: 94; MSA: Stockton, CA; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,920. Rank: 95; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY; Number of episodes: 59; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,831. Rank: 96; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT; Number of episodes: 154; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,821. Rank: 97; MSA: Springfield, OH; Number of episodes: 30; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,804. Rank: 98; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 52; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,775. Rank: 99; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN; Number of episodes: 90; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,771. Rank: 100; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 38; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,766. Rank: 101; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Number of episodes: 65; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,695. Rank: 102; MSA: Toledo, OH; Number of episodes: 89; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,693. Rank: 103; MSA: Madera-Chowchilla, CA; Number of episodes: 24; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,579. Rank: 104; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 32; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,555. Rank: 105; MSA: Waco, TX; Number of episodes: 52; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,505. Rank: 106; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 209; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,470. Rank: 107; MSA: Virginia Beach-Norfolk-Newport News, VA-NC; Number of episodes: 81; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,458. Rank: 108; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 52; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,393. Rank: 109; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Number of episodes: 99; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,372. Rank: 110; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA; Number of episodes: 941; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,351. Rank: 111; MSA: Poughkeepsie-Newburgh-Middletown, NY; Number of episodes: 105; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,227. Rank: 112; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Number of episodes: 60; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,191. Rank: 113; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX; Number of episodes: 238; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,163. Rank: 114; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 60; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,116. Rank: 115; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA; Number of episodes: 95; Average adjusted episode spending: $10,108. Rank: 116; MSA: Sherman-Denison, TX; Number of episodes: 23; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,889. Rank: 117; MSA: Knoxville, TN; Number of episodes: 29; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,887. Rank: 118; MSA: Santa Cruz-Watsonville, CA; Number of episodes: 50; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,789. Rank: 119; MSA: San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, CA; Number of episodes: 44; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,584. Rank: 120; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT; Number of episodes: 354; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,304. Rank: 121; MSA: Syracuse, NY; Number of episodes: 17; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,285. Rank: 122; MSA: Savannah, GA; Number of episodes: 44; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,281. Rank: 123; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 55; Average adjusted episode spending: $9,136. Rank: 124; MSA: Chico, CA; Number of episodes: 23; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,939. Rank: 125; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY; Number of episodes: 72; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,922. Rank: 126; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 1,122; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,880. Rank: 127; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA; Number of episodes: 115; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,848. Rank: 128; MSA: Tucson, AZ; Number of episodes: 84; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,776. Rank: 129; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA; Number of episodes: 53; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,747. Rank: 130; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA; Number of episodes: 19; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,618. Rank: 131; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 52; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,512. Rank: 132; MSA: Lafayette, LA; Number of episodes: 24; Average adjusted episode spending: $8,042. Rank: 133; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA; Number of episodes: 64; Average adjusted episode spending: $7,993. Rank: 134; MSA: Albuquerque, NM; Number of episodes: 276; Average adjusted episode spending: $7,989. Rank: 135; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV; Number of episodes: 179; Average adjusted episode spending: $7,773. Rank: 136; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL; Number of episodes: 325; Average adjusted episode spending: $7,698. Rank: 137; MSA: Fresno, CA; Number of episodes: 33; Average adjusted episode spending: $7,096. Rank: 138; MSA: Trenton-Ewing, NJ; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $6,731. Rank: 139; MSA: Joplin, MO; Number of episodes: 33; Average adjusted episode spending: $6,166. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 139 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of Laparoscopic appendectomy episodes to support our analyses. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [A] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [End of table] Table 5: Ranking of Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) by Adjusted Episode Spending for Total Hip Replacement Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA; Number of episodes: 38; Average adjusted episode spending: $57,990. Rank: 2; MSA: Anchorage, AK; Number of episodes: 30; Average adjusted episode spending: $54,738. Rank: 3; MSA: Albany, GA; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $49,874. Rank: 4; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 49; Average adjusted episode spending: $45,491. Rank: 5; MSA: Santa Barbara-Santa Maria-Goleta, CA; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $42,976. Rank: 6; MSA: Michigan City-La Porte, IN; Number of episodes: 29; Average adjusted episode spending: $41,377. Rank: 7; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX; Number of episodes: 954; Average adjusted episode spending: $41,129. Rank: 8; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 35; Average adjusted episode spending: $38,417. Rank: 9; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA; Number of episodes: 102; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,906. Rank: 10; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 262; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,669. Rank: 11; MSA: Wausau, WI; Number of episodes: 30; Average adjusted episode spending: $37,266. Rank: 12; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 65; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,936. Rank: 13; MSA: Madison, WI; Number of episodes: 26; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,258. Rank: 14; MSA: Lancaster, PA; Number of episodes: 106; Average adjusted episode spending: $36,049. Rank: 15; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI; Number of episodes: 272; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,963. Rank: 16; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 47; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,957. Rank: 17; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA; Number of episodes: 1,198; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,682. Rank: 18; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 49; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,421. Rank: 19; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX; Number of episodes: 603; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,332. Rank: 20; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX; Number of episodes: 189; Average adjusted episode spending: $35,319. Rank: 21; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 53; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,965. Rank: 22; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 296; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,856. Rank: 23; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN; Number of episodes: 147; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,711. Rank: 24; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA; Number of episodes: 128; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,420. Rank: 25; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN; Number of episodes: 196; Average adjusted episode spending: $34,311. Rank: 26; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 96; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,944. Rank: 27; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 50; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,899. Rank: 28; MSA: Elkhart-Goshen, IN; Number of episodes: 36; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,512. Rank: 29; MSA: Reading, PA; Number of episodes: 85; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,497. Rank: 30; MSA: South Bend-Mishawaka, IN-MI; Number of episodes: 73; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,235. Rank: 31; MSA: Salt Lake City, UT; Number of episodes: 43; Average adjusted episode spending: $33,057. Rank: 32; MSA: Jacksonville, FL; Number of episodes: 136; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,471. Rank: 33; MSA: Green Bay, WI; Number of episodes: 75; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,395. Rank: 34; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY; Number of episodes: 85; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,246. Rank: 35; MSA: Santa Fe, NM; Number of episodes: 35; Average adjusted episode spending: $32,035. Rank: 36; MSA: Macon, GA; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,877. Rank: 37; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 166; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,726. Rank: 38; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO; Number of episodes: 71; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,648. Rank: 39; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 154; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,550. Rank: 40; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,429. Rank: 41; MSA: Charleston, WV; Number of episodes: 68; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,376. Rank: 42; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 53; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,371. Rank: 43; MSA: Spokane, WA; Number of episodes: 34; Average adjusted episode spending: $31,076. Rank: 44; MSA: Boulder, CO; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,958. Rank: 45; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Number of episodes: 217; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,535. Rank: 46; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL; Number of episodes: 153; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,473. Rank: 47; MSA: Athens-Clarke County, GA; Number of episodes: 57; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,424. Rank: 48; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Number of episodes: 67; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,422. Rank: 49; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA; Number of episodes: 405; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,398. Rank: 50; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Number of episodes: 173; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,380. Rank: 51; MSA: Springfield, MO; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,335. Rank: 52; MSA: Evansville, IN-KY; Number of episodes: 68; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,323. Rank: 53; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 88; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,205. Rank: 54; MSA: Ocala, FL; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,106. Rank: 55; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 54; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,072. Rank: 56; MSA: Lima, OH; Number of episodes: 33; Average adjusted episode spending: $30,003. Rank: 57; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 168; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,817. Rank: 58; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 29; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,692. Rank: 59; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,480. Rank: 60; MSA: Knoxville, TN; Number of episodes: 84; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,470. Rank: 61; MSA: Greensboro-High Point, NC; Number of episodes: 42; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,389. Rank: 62; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Number of episodes: 87; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,073. Rank: 63; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Number of episodes: 41; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,035. Rank: 64; MSA: El Paso, TX; Number of episodes: 52; Average adjusted episode spending: $29,019. Rank: 65; MSA: Atlanta-Sandy Springs-Marietta, GA; Number of episodes: 863; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,927. Rank: 66; MSA: Asheville, NC; Number of episodes: 30; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,827. Rank: 67; MSA: Appleton, WI; Number of episodes: 30; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,648. Rank: 68; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA; Number of episodes: 88; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,626. Rank: 69; MSA: Oklahoma City, OK; Number of episodes: 295; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,597. Rank: 70; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Number of episodes: 80; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,162. Rank: 71; MSA: Davenport-Moline-Rock Island, IA-IL; Number of episodes: 67; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,098. Rank: 72; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 470; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,090. Rank: 73; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Number of episodes: 73; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,065. Rank: 74; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Number of episodes: 252; Average adjusted episode spending: $28,042. Rank: 75; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA; Number of episodes: 86; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,936. Rank: 76; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 53; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,898. Rank: 77; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Number of episodes: 1,965; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,774. Rank: 78; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Number of episodes: 197; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,770. Rank: 79; MSA: Anderson, IN; Number of episodes: 25; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,753. Rank: 80; MSA: Binghamton, NY; Number of episodes: 24; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,721. Rank: 81; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Number of episodes: 104; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,709. Rank: 82; MSA: Miami-Fort Lauderdale-Pompano Beach, FL; Number of episodes: 228; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,551. Rank: 83; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 42; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,450. Rank: 84; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Number of episodes: 533; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,354. Rank: 85; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 81; Average adjusted episode spending: $27,349. Rank: 86; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Number of episodes: 484; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,945. Rank: 87; MSA: Savannah, GA; Number of episodes: 114; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,937. Rank: 88; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Number of episodes: 549; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,868. Rank: 89; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT; Number of episodes: 153; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,858. Rank: 90; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Number of episodes: 274; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,856. Rank: 91; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Number of episodes: 121; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,651. Rank: 92; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Number of episodes: 186; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,628. Rank: 93; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Number of episodes: 642; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,618. Rank: 94; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,580. Rank: 95; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 304; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,557. Rank: 96; MSA: Albuquerque, NM; Number of episodes: 234; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,481. Rank: 97; MSA: Wichita, KS; Number of episodes: 46; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,355. Rank: 98; MSA: Peoria, IL; Number of episodes: 89; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,320. Rank: 99; MSA: Durham-Chapel Hill, NC; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,254. Rank: 100; MSA: North Port-Bradenton-Sarasota, FL; Number of episodes: 48; Average adjusted episode spending: $26,075. Rank: 101; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Number of episodes: 561; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,683. Rank: 102; MSA: Columbus, OH; Number of episodes: 442; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,627. Rank: 103; MSA: Kalamazoo-Portage, MI; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,413. Rank: 104; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 107; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,409. Rank: 105; MSA: Worcester, MA; Number of episodes: 44; Average adjusted episode spending: $25,125. Rank: 106; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA; Number of episodes: 711; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,972. Rank: 107; MSA: Springfield, MA; Number of episodes: 49; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,914. Rank: 108; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA; Number of episodes: 60; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,908. Rank: 109; MSA: Naples-Marco Island, FL; Number of episodes: 27; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,878. Rank: 110; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA; Number of episodes: 36; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,548. Rank: 111; MSA: Modesto, CA; Number of episodes: 31; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,539. Rank: 112; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV; Number of episodes: 113; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,490. Rank: 113; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI; Number of episodes: 62; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,475. Rank: 114; MSA: Rochester, NY; Number of episodes: 90; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,365. Rank: 115; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN; Number of episodes: 213; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,199. Rank: 116; MSA: Redding, CA; Number of episodes: 29; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,169. Rank: 117; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ; Number of episodes: 215; Average adjusted episode spending: $24,117. Rank: 118; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 55; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,894. Rank: 119; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL; Number of episodes: 434; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,816. Rank: 120; MSA: Dayton, OH; Number of episodes: 181; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,614. Rank: 121; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA; Number of episodes: 84; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,361. Rank: 122; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 77; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,348. Rank: 123; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 243; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,314. Rank: 124; MSA: Akron, OH; Number of episodes: 69; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,100. Rank: 125; MSA: Tucson, AZ; Number of episodes: 47; Average adjusted episode spending: $23,076. Rank: 126; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT; Number of episodes: 392; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,478. Rank: 127; MSA: Saginaw-Saginaw Township North, MI; Number of episodes: 40; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,396. Rank: 128; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY; Number of episodes: 87; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,274. Rank: 129; MSA: Toledo, OH; Number of episodes: 158; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,242. Rank: 130; MSA: Columbus, GA-AL; Number of episodes: 55; Average adjusted episode spending: $22,224. Rank: 131; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 80; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,834. Rank: 132; MSA: Reno-Sparks, NV; Number of episodes: 68; Average adjusted episode spending: $21,718. Rank: 133; MSA: Fresno, CA; Number of episodes: 82; Average adjusted episode spending: $20,508. Rank: 134; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 1,406; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,794. Rank: 135; MSA: Huntsville, AL; Number of episodes: 39; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,758. Rank: 136; MSA: Tyler, TX; Number of episodes: 90; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,731. Rank: 137; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 65; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,518. Rank: 138; MSA: Canton-Massillon, OH; Number of episodes: 36; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,300. Rank: 139; MSA: [A]; Number of episodes: 104; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,240. Rank: 140; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL; Number of episodes: 74; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,166. Rank: 141; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA; Number of episodes: 132; Average adjusted episode spending: $19,164. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 141 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of Total hip replacement episodes to support our analyses. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [A] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [End of table] [End of section] Appendix III: Distribution of Episode Spending: Range of average adjusted episode spending: $1 to 2,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $2,501 to 5,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $5,001 to 7,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 3; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $7,501 to 10,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 21; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $10,001 to 12,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 54; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $12,501 to 15,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 1; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 39; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $15,001 to 17,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 12; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $17,501 to 20,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 4; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 6; Total hip replacement: 8. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $20,001 to 22,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 17; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 2; Total hip replacement: 8. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $22,501 to 25,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 22; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 1; Total hip replacement: 20. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $25,001 to 27,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 19; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 1; Total hip replacement: 23. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $27,501 to 30,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 25; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 26. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $30,001 to 32,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 17; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 25. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $32,501 to 35,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 17; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 11. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $35,001 to 37,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 14; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 10. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $37,501 to 40,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 13; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 3. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $40,001 to 42,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 1; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 2. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $42,501 to 45,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 3; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 1. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $45,001 to 47,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 1; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 1. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $47,501 to 50,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 1. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $50,001 to 52,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $52,501 to 55,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 1. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $55,001 to 57,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $57,501 to 60,000; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 0; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 1. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $60,001 to 62,500; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 1; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 0; Total hip replacement: 0. Range of average adjusted episode spending: $Total; Number of metropolitan statistical areas (MSA): Coronary stent placement: 155; Laparoscopic appendectomy: 139; Total hip replacement: 141. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 155 MSAs for coronary stent placement episodes, 139 MSAs for Laparoscopic appendectomy episodes, and 141 MSAs for Total hip replacement episodes. For each procedure, we included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [End of table] [End of section] Appendix IV: Episode Spending, by Procedure, for Metropolitan Statistical Areas in Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: This appendix presents average adjusted episode spending for each of the three procedures we analyzed--coronary stent placement, Laparoscopic appendectomy, and Total hip replacement--by service category for metropolitan statistical areas (MSA) in the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles. Table 6: Average Adjusted Episode Spending for Coronary Stent Placement, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in Lowest-and Highest- Spending Quintiles: Service category: Hospital inpatient; Lowest-spending quintile: $17,908; Highest-spending quintile: $33,297; Comparison: 86% higher. Service category: Hospital outpatient; Lowest-spending quintile: $353; Highest-spending quintile: $537; Comparison: 52% higher. Service category: Postdischarge; Lowest-spending quintile: $15; Highest-spending quintile: $13; Comparison: 13% lower. Service category: Professional; Lowest-spending quintile: $3,099; Highest-spending quintile: $3,890; Comparison: 26% higher. Service category: Ancillary and unclassified; Lowest-spending quintile: $165; Highest-spending quintile: $258; Comparison: 56% higher. Service category: Total, episode of care; Lowest-spending quintile: $21,540; Highest-spending quintile: $37,996; Comparison: 76% higher. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. The lowest-and highest-spending quintiles each consist of 16 MSAs. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. Spending may not add to totals because of rounding. [End of table] Table 7: Average Adjusted Episode Spending for Laparoscopic Appendectomy, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Service category: Hospital inpatient; Lowest-spending quintile: $6,113; Highest-spending quintile: $13,331; Comparison: 118% higher. Service category: Hospital outpatient; Lowest-spending quintile: $97; Highest-spending quintile: $159; Comparison: 64% higher. Service category: Postdischarge; Lowest-spending quintile: $9; Highest-spending quintile: $14; Comparison: 56% higher. Service category: Professional; Lowest-spending quintile: $2,535; Highest-spending quintile: $2,726; Comparison: 8% higher. Service category: Ancillary and unclassified; Lowest-spending quintile: $85; Highest-spending quintile: $83; Comparison: 2% lower. Service category: Total, episode of care; Lowest-spending quintile: $8,839; Highest-spending quintile: $16,314; Comparison: 85% higher. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. The lowest-and highest-spending quintiles each consist of 16 MSAs. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. Spending may not add to totals because of rounding. [End of table] Table 8: Average Adjusted Episode Spending for Total Hip Replacement, Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSA) in Lowest-and Highest-Spending Quintiles: Service category: Hospital inpatient; Lowest-spending quintile: $17,323; Highest-spending quintile: $30,570; Comparison: 76% higher. Service category: Hospital outpatient; Lowest-spending quintile: $113; Highest-spending quintile: $186; Comparison: 65% higher. Service category: Postdischarge; Lowest-spending quintile: $673; Highest-spending quintile: $700; Comparison: 4% higher. Service category: Professional; Lowest-spending quintile: $4,157; Highest-spending quintile: $5,221; Comparison: 26% higher. Service category: Ancillary and unclassified; Lowest-spending quintile: $199; Highest-spending quintile: $291; Comparison: 46% higher. Service category: Total, episode of care; Lowest-spending quintile: $22,463; Highest-spending quintile: $36,969; Comparison: 65% higher. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. The lowest-and highest-spending quintiles each consist of 16 MSAs. Spending was adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. Spending may not add to totals because of rounding. [End of table] [End of section] Appendix V: Hospital Inpatient Spending and Other Information, by Metropolitan Statistical Area and Procedure: This appendix presents hospital inpatient spending, initial admission price, and number of days, by metropolitan statistical area (MSA), for each of the three procedures we analyzed--coronary stent placement, Laparoscopic appendectomy, and Total hip replacement. Table 9: Hospital Inpatient Spending, Initial Admission Price, and Number of Days, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Coronary Stent Placement Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: 60,375; Hospital inpatient services: 54,802; Average for initial admission: Price: $54,012; Days: 2.55. Rank: 2; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: 39,827; Hospital inpatient services: 36,068; Average for initial admission: Price: $35,345; Days: 2.98. Rank: 3; MSA: Charleston, WV[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: 39,782; Hospital inpatient services: 35,589; Average for initial admission: Price: $34,940; Days: 2.66. Rank: 4; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: 39,683; Hospital inpatient services: 34,709; Average for initial admission: Price: $34,032; Days: 1.93. Rank: 5; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: 38,596; Hospital inpatient services: 31,550; Average for initial admission: Price: $31,273; Days: 2.02. Rank: 6; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: 38,305; Hospital inpatient services: 34,776; Average for initial admission: Price: $34,580; Days: 2.67. Rank: 7; MSA: Madison, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $37,248; Hospital inpatient services: $27,109 Average for initial admission: Price: $26,731; Days: 1.67. Rank: 8; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,858; Hospital inpatient services: $32,864 Average for initial admission: Price: $32,537; Days: 2.38. Rank: 9; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,097; Hospital inpatient services: $31,711 Average for initial admission: Price: $31,291; Days: 2.87. Rank: 10; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,478; Hospital inpatient services: $31,442 Average for initial admission: Price: $30,861; Days: 1.95. Rank: 11; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,358; Hospital inpatient services: $31,528 Average for initial admission: Price: $31,329; Days: 2.53. Rank: 12; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,388; Hospital inpatient services: $30,169 Average for initial admission: Price: $29,391; Days: 2.19. Rank: 13; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,307; Hospital inpatient services: $30,059 Average for initial admission: Price: $29,655; Days: 2.13. Rank: 14; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,258; Hospital inpatient services: $29,953 Average for initial admission: Price: $29,609; Days: 2.18. Rank: 15; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $33,974; Hospital inpatient services: $30,930 Average for initial admission: Price: $30,422; Days: 1.84. Rank: 16; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $33,398; Hospital inpatient services: $29,498 Average for initial admission: Price: $28,942; Days: 2.35. Rank: 17; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,807; Hospital inpatient services: $28,396 Average for initial admission: Price: $28,232; Days: 1.91. Rank: 18; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,605; Hospital inpatient services: $29,032 Average for initial admission: Price: $28,711; Days: 2.37. Rank: 19; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,156; Hospital inpatient services: $28,796 Average for initial admission: Price: $28,488; Days: 2.21. Rank: 20; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,143; Hospital inpatient services: $28,148 Average for initial admission: Price: $27,765; Days: 2.31. Rank: 21; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,068; Hospital inpatient services: $27,927 Average for initial admission: Price: $27,182; Days: 2.19. Rank: 22; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,879; Hospital inpatient services: $27,839 Average for initial admission: Price: $27,612; Days: 2.62. Rank: 23; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,847; Hospital inpatient services: $28,020 Average for initial admission: Price: $27,729; Days: 2.47. Rank: 24; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,797; Hospital inpatient services: $26,527 Average for initial admission: Price: $25,914; Days: 2.23. Rank: 25; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,017; Hospital inpatient services: $27,341 Average for initial admission: Price: $26,959; Days: 1.88. Rank: 26; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,680; Hospital inpatient services: $26,833 Average for initial admission: Price: $26,425; Days: 2.28. Rank: 27; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,607; Hospital inpatient services: $25,683 Average for initial admission: Price: $25,308; Days: 2.39. Rank: 28; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,243; Hospital inpatient services: $26,522 Average for initial admission: Price: $26,355; Days: 2.16. Rank: 29; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,156; Hospital inpatient services: $23,922 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,796; Days: 2.36. Rank: 30; MSA: Fresno, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,925; Hospital inpatient services: $26,998 Average for initial admission: Price: $26,704; Days: 1.73. Rank: 31; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,684; Hospital inpatient services: $26,069 Average for initial admission: Price: $25,874; Days: 2.10. Rank: 32; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,489; Hospital inpatient services: $25,999 Average for initial admission: Price: $25,227; Days: 2.14. Rank: 33; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,393; Hospital inpatient services: $25,436 Average for initial admission: Price: $24,863; Days: 2.62. Rank: 34; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,302; Hospital inpatient services: $25,518 Average for initial admission: Price: $25,033; Days: 2.39. Rank: 35; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,698; Hospital inpatient services: $24,578 Average for initial admission: Price: $24,085; Days: 2.36. Rank: 36; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,640; Hospital inpatient services: $24,452 Average for initial admission: Price: $24,048; Days: 2.30. Rank: 37; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,629; Hospital inpatient services: $24,931 Average for initial admission: Price: $24,515; Days: 1.97. Rank: 38; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,607; Hospital inpatient services: $24,567 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,940; Days: 2.56. Rank: 39; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,553; Hospital inpatient services: $23,916 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,726; Days: 2.06. Rank: 40; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,474; Hospital inpatient services: $24,025 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,662; Days: 2.40. Rank: 41; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,276; Hospital inpatient services: $24,273 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,869; Days: 2.51. Rank: 42; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,065; Hospital inpatient services: $23,103 Average for initial admission: Price: $22,956; Days: 2.08. Rank: 43; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,705; Hospital inpatient services: $24,019 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,766; Days: 3.00. Rank: 44; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,544; Hospital inpatient services: $24,443 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,744; Days: 2.48. Rank: 45; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,489; Hospital inpatient services: $24,032 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,618; Days: 2.45. Rank: 46; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,480; Hospital inpatient services: $23,568 Average for initial admission: Price: $23,074; Days: 2.40. Rank: 47; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,308; Hospital inpatient services: $21,497 Average for initial admission: Price: $21,057; Days: 1.98. Rank: 48; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,067; Hospital inpatient services: $22,739 Average for initial admission: Price: $22,222; Days: 2.05. Rank: 49; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,746; Hospital inpatient services: $22,779 Average for initial admission: Price: $22,545; Days: 2.16. Rank: 50; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,349; Hospital inpatient services: $22,732 Average for initial admission: Price: $21,887; Days: 2.85. Rank: 51; MSA: Rochester, NY; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,523; Hospital inpatient services: $22,354 Average for initial admission: Price: $22,015; Days: 1.96. Rank: 52; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,322; Hospital inpatient services: $21,342 Average for initial admission: Price: $20,944; Days: 2.37. Rank: 53; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,288; Hospital inpatient services: $21,714 Average for initial admission: Price: $21,294; Days: 2.39. Rank: 54; MSA: Toledo, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,210; Hospital inpatient services: $21,601 Average for initial admission: Price: $21,371; Days: 2.34. Rank: 55; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,203; Hospital inpatient services: $21,875 Average for initial admission: Price: $21,471; Days: 2.19. Rank: 56; MSA: Albuquerque, NM; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,015; Hospital inpatient services: $21,232 Average for initial admission: Price: $20,794; Days: 2.40. Rank: 57; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,914; Hospital inpatient services: $21,232 Average for initial admission: Price: $20,836; Days: 2.35. Rank: 58; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,848; Hospital inpatient services: $18,990 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,805; Days: 2.55. Rank: 59; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,753; Hospital inpatient services: $20,678 Average for initial admission: Price: $20,124; Days: 1.79. Rank: 60; MSA: Columbus, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,310; Hospital inpatient services: $21,266 Average for initial admission: Price: $20,767; Days: 2.21. Rank: 61; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,088; Hospital inpatient services: $20,619 Average for initial admission: Price: $20,108; Days: 2.45. Rank: 62; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,938; Hospital inpatient services: $19,648 Average for initial admission: Price: $19,401; Days: 2.23. Rank: 63; MSA: Knoxville, TN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,935; Hospital inpatient services: $19,013 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,768; Days: 2.43. Rank: 64; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,647; Hospital inpatient services: $20,084 Average for initial admission: Price: $19,776; Days: 2.43. Rank: 65; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,135; Hospital inpatient services: $19,218 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,995; Days: 2.18. Rank: 66; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,768; Hospital inpatient services: $19,135 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,815; Days: 1.98. Rank: 67; MSA: Savannah, GA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,585; Hospital inpatient services: $18,596 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,596; Days: 2.19. Rank: 68; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,357; Hospital inpatient services: $18,511 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,279; Days: 2.27. Rank: 69; MSA: Dayton, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,073; Hospital inpatient services: $18,839 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,504; Days: 2.55. Rank: 70; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,023; Hospital inpatient services: $18,290 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,290; Days: 1.60. Rank: 71; MSA: Springfield, MA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $21,937; Hospital inpatient services: $17,580 Average for initial admission: Price: $17,159; Days: 2.96. Rank: 72; MSA: [B,C] Average adjusted spending: Episode: $21,664; Hospital inpatient services: $18,528 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,233; Days: 2.32. Rank: 73; MSA: Akron, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $21,664; Hospital inpatient services: $18,627 Average for initial admission: Price: $18,327; Days: 2.25. Rank: 74; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $20,969; Hospital inpatient services: $17,618 Average for initial admission: Price: $17,278; Days: 2.65. Rank: 75; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $20,602; Hospital inpatient services: $18,089 Average for initial admission: Price: $17,824; Days: 1.75. Rank: 76; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,829; Hospital inpatient services: $15,758 Average for initial admission: Price: $15,420; Days: 2.41. Rank: 77; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,677; Hospital inpatient services: $15,706 Average for initial admission: Price: $15,447; Days: 2.66. Rank: 78; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $17,768; Hospital inpatient services: $12,939 Average for initial admission: Price: $12,519; Days: 2.41. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. Spending and prices were adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [A] MSA was in the highest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had an average of $33,297 in spending on hospital inpatient services. [B] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [C] MSA was in the lowest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the lowest- spending quintile had an average of $17,908 in spending on hospital inpatient services. [End of table] Table 10: Hospital Inpatient Spending, Initial Admission Price, and Number of Days, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,924; Hospital inpatient services: $23,432; Average for initial admission: Price: $23,432; Days: 1.56. Rank: 2; MSA: Madison, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,123; Hospital inpatient services: $13,671; Average for initial admission: Price: $13,480; Days: 1.22. Rank: 3; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,096; Hospital inpatient services: $14,070; Average for initial admission: Price: $13,873; Days: 1.44. Rank: 4; MSA: Charleston, WV[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $17,640; Hospital inpatient services: $14,924; Average for initial admission: Price: $14,673; Days: 1.76. Rank: 5; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $16,588; Hospital inpatient services: $13,745; Average for initial admission: Price: $13,337; Days: 1.44. Rank: 6; MSA: a,b; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $16,323; Hospital inpatient services: $14,070; Average for initial admission: Price: $13,984; Days: 1.58. Rank: 7; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $15,444; Hospital inpatient services: $13,283; Average for initial admission: Price: $13,067; Days: 1.33. Rank: 8; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $15,318; Hospital inpatient services: $11,087; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,087; Days: 1.90. Rank: 9; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $15,267; Hospital inpatient services: $12,638; Average for initial admission: Price: $12,501; Days: 1.90. Rank: 10; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,859; Hospital inpatient services: $11,527; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,345; Days: 1.70. Rank: 11; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,761; Hospital inpatient services: $12,619; Average for initial admission: Price: $12,534; Days: 1.38. Rank: 12; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,678; Hospital inpatient services: $11,430; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,191; Days: 1.27. Rank: 13; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,644; Hospital inpatient services: $11,654; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,491; Days: 1.37. Rank: 14; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,543; Hospital inpatient services: $11,690; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,690; Days: 1.44. Rank: 15; MSA: Columbus, OH[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,478; Hospital inpatient services: $11,905; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,726; Days: 1.76. Rank: 16; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,337; Hospital inpatient services: $11,552; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,419; Days: 1.43. Rank: 17; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,335; Hospital inpatient services: $11,268; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,268; Days: 2.19. Rank: 18; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,327; Hospital inpatient services: $11,706; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,585; Days: 2.32. Rank: 19; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,115; Hospital inpatient services: $11,711; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,625; Days: 1.67. Rank: 20; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,042; Hospital inpatient services: $11,450; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,341; Days: 1.90. Rank: 21; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,986; Hospital inpatient services: $11,915; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,915; Days: 1.35. Rank: 22; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,933; Hospital inpatient services: $10,996; Average for initial admission: Price: $10,996; Days: 1.95. Rank: 23; MSA: Akron, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,788; Hospital inpatient services: $11,251; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,251; Days: 2.64. Rank: 24; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,634; Hospital inpatient services: $11,335; Average for initial admission: Price: $11,251; Days: 1.39. Rank: 25; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,374; Hospital inpatient services: $10,264; Average for initial admission: Price: $10,117; Days: 1.78. Rank: 26; MSA: Dayton, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,973; Hospital inpatient services: $10,367; Average for initial admission: Price: $10,136; Days: 1.96. Rank: 27; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,897; Hospital inpatient services: $10,320; Average for initial admission: Price: $10,320; Days: 1.73. Rank: 28; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,879; Hospital inpatient services: $10,899; Average for initial admission: Price: $10,724; Days: 1.86. Rank: 29; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,862; Hospital inpatient services: $9,362; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,311; Days: 1.42. Rank: 30; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,800; Hospital inpatient services: $10,152; Average for initial admission: Price: $10,038; Days: 1.76. Rank: 31; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,596; Hospital inpatient services: $9,867; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,689; Days: 1.99. Rank: 32; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,571; Hospital inpatient services: $10,069; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,938; Days: 1.61. Rank: 33; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,477; Hospital inpatient services: $9,379; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,336; Days: 1.39. Rank: 34; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,413; Hospital inpatient services: $9,273; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,193; Days: 1.64. Rank: 35; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,403; Hospital inpatient services: $9,281; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,281; Days: 1.83. Rank: 36; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,394; Hospital inpatient services: $9,978; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,813; Days: 2.00. Rank: 37; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,358; Hospital inpatient services: $10,014; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,845; Days: 1.72. Rank: 38; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,336; Hospital inpatient services: $9,554; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,458; Days: 1.66. Rank: 39; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,252; Hospital inpatient services: $7,832; Average for initial admission: Price: $7,716; Days: 1.57. Rank: 40; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,011; Hospital inpatient services: $8,831; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,706; Days: 2.13. Rank: 41; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,960; Hospital inpatient services: $8,853; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,759; Days: 2.05. Rank: 42; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,851; Hospital inpatient services: $9,524; Average for initial admission: Price: $9,524; Days: 2.19. Rank: 43; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,496; Hospital inpatient services: $8,598; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,475; Days: 1.77. Rank: 44; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,417; Hospital inpatient services: $8,412; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,310; Days: 1.52. Rank: 45; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,403; Hospital inpatient services: $7,978; Average for initial admission: Price: $7,833; Days: 1.59. Rank: 46; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,351; Hospital inpatient services: $8,910; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,828; Days: 1.53. Rank: 47; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,314; Hospital inpatient services: $8,976; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,626; Days: 1.50. Rank: 48; MSA: Rochester, NY; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,144; Hospital inpatient services: $8,542; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,542; Days: 2.22. Rank: 49; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,078; Hospital inpatient services: $8,537; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,537; Days: 1.86. Rank: 50; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,037; Hospital inpatient services: $8,807; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,679; Days: 1.71. Rank: 51; MSA: Springfield, MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,958; Hospital inpatient services: $8,113; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,113; Days: 1.69. Rank: 52; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,831; Hospital inpatient services: $8,702; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,682; Days: 1.63. Rank: 53; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,821; Hospital inpatient services: $7,604; Average for initial admission: Price: $7,554; Days: 1.51. Rank: 54; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,775; Hospital inpatient services: $8,969; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,908; Days: 2.19. Rank: 55; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,771; Hospital inpatient services: $8,562; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,412; Days: 2.20. Rank: 56; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,766; Hospital inpatient services: $8,413; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,085; Days: 1.47. Rank: 57; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,695; Hospital inpatient services: $7,816; Average for initial admission: Price: $7,607; Days: 1.94. Rank: 58; MSA: Toledo, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,693; Hospital inpatient services: $8,249; Average for initial admission: Price: $8,040; Days: 2.00. Rank: 59; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,470; Hospital inpatient services: $7,234; Average for initial admission: Price: $7,045; Days: 1.65. Rank: 60; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,372; Hospital inpatient services: $7,004; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,948; Days: 1.57. Rank: 61; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,351; Hospital inpatient services: $7,117; Average for initial admission: Price: $7,010; Days: 1.61. Rank: 62; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,191; Hospital inpatient services: $6,880; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,796; Days: 1.90. Rank: 63; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,163; Hospital inpatient services: $7,580; Average for initial admission: Price: $7,430; Days: 1.83. Rank: 64; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,116; Hospital inpatient services: $7,122; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,880; Days: 2.03. Rank: 65; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,108; Hospital inpatient services: $6,935; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,728; Days: 1.72. Rank: 66; MSA: Knoxville, TN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $9,887; Hospital inpatient services: $6,890; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,564; Days: 2.38. Rank: 67; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $9,304; Hospital inpatient services: $6,412; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,340; Days: 1.60. Rank: 68; MSA: Savannah, GA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $9,281; Hospital inpatient services: $6,727; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,575; Days: 2.18. Rank: 69; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,922; Hospital inpatient services: $6,456; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,261; Days: 1.57. Rank: 70; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,880; Hospital inpatient services: $6,787; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,672; Days: 1.77. Rank: 71; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,848; Hospital inpatient services: $5,302; Average for initial admission: Price: $5,302; Days: 1.43. Rank: 72; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,747; Hospital inpatient services: $6,857; Average for initial admission: Price: $6,857; Days: 1.72. Rank: 73; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,618; Hospital inpatient services: $5,608; Average for initial admission: Price: $5,202; Days: 1.47. Rank: 74; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,993; Hospital inpatient services: $5,377; Average for initial admission: Price: $5,290; Days: 1.30. Rank: 75; MSA: Albuquerque, NM[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,989; Hospital inpatient services: $5,167; Average for initial admission: Price: $5,122; Days: 1.55. Rank: 76; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,773; Hospital inpatient services: $4,576; Average for initial admission: Price: $4,528; Days: 1.54. Rank: 77; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,698; Hospital inpatient services: $5,014; Average for initial admission: Price: $4,905; Days: 1.70. Rank: 78; MSA: Fresno, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,096; Hospital inpatient services: $4,993; Average for initial admission: Price: $4,882; Days: 1.61. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. Spending and prices were adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [A] MSA was in the highest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had an average of $13,331 in spending on hospital inpatient services. [B] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [C] MSA was in the lowest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the lowest- spending quintile had an average of $6,113 in spending on hospital inpatient services. [End of table] Table 11: Hospital Inpatient Spending, Initial Admission Price, and Number of Days, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Total Hip Replacement Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $57,990; Hospital inpatient services: $52,757; Average for initial admission: Price: $52,757; Days: 3.39. Rank: 2; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $41,129; Hospital inpatient services: $35,488; Average for initial admission: Price: $35,183; Days: 2.95. Rank: 3; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $37,906; Hospital inpatient services: $31,283; Average for initial admission: Price: $31,005; Days: 2.79. Rank: 4; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $37,669; Hospital inpatient services: $31,896; Average for initial admission: Price: $31,611; Days: 3.14. Rank: 5; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,936; Hospital inpatient services: $31,129; Average for initial admission: Price: $30,508; Days: 3.11. Rank: 6; MSA: Madison, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,258; Hospital inpatient services: $25,671; Average for initial admission: Price: $25,671; Days: 2.65. Rank: 7; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,963; Hospital inpatient services: $28,392; Average for initial admission: Price: $27,935; Days: 2.87. Rank: 8; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,682; Hospital inpatient services: $25,800; Average for initial admission: Price: $25,378; Days: 3.29. Rank: 9; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,332; Hospital inpatient services: $29,510; Average for initial admission: Price: $29,231; Days: 2.93. Rank: 10; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,319; Hospital inpatient services: $30,041; Average for initial admission: Price: $29,734; Days: 2.93. Rank: 11; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,711; Hospital inpatient services: $30,406; Average for initial admission: Price: $30,140; Days: 2.45. Rank: 12; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,420; Hospital inpatient services: $27,594; Average for initial admission: Price: $27,594; Days: 2.93. Rank: 13; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,311; Hospital inpatient services: $28,079; Average for initial admission: Price: $27,886; Days: 2.59. Rank: 14; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $33,899; Hospital inpatient services: $28,450; Average for initial admission: Price: $28,450; Days: 3.38. Rank: 15; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,246; Hospital inpatient services: $26,505; Average for initial admission: Price: $26,246; Days: 2.38. Rank: 16; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,726; Hospital inpatient services: $26,125; Average for initial admission: Price: $25,983; Days: 2.74. Rank: 17; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,648; Hospital inpatient services: $26,345; Average for initial admission: Price: $26,135; Days: 2.49. Rank: 18; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,550; Hospital inpatient services: $25,757; Average for initial admission: Price: $25,360; Days: 2.78. Rank: 19; MSA: Charleston, WV; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,376; Hospital inpatient services: $25,999; Average for initial admission: Price: $25,604; Days: 2.46. Rank: 20; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,371; Hospital inpatient services: $25,170; Average for initial admission: Price: $24,840; Days: 3.25. Rank: 21; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,535; Hospital inpatient services: $25,071; Average for initial admission: Price: $24,880; Days: 2.48. Rank: 22; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,473; Hospital inpatient services: $25,314; Average for initial admission: Price: $25,127; Days: 3.22. Rank: 23; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,422; Hospital inpatient services: $25,235; Average for initial admission: Price: $25,103; Days: 2.75. Rank: 24; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,398; Hospital inpatient services: $24,612; Average for initial admission: Price: $24,406; Days: 2.75. Rank: 25; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,380; Hospital inpatient services: $24,265; Average for initial admission: Price: $23,762; Days: 3.16. Rank: 26; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,205; Hospital inpatient services: $22,953; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,389; Days: 3.02. Rank: 27; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,072; Hospital inpatient services: $24,631; Average for initial admission: Price: $24,210; Days: 3.20. Rank: 28; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,817; Hospital inpatient services: $24,239; Average for initial admission: Price: $24,154; Days: 2.86. Rank: 29; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,480; Hospital inpatient services: $23,488; Average for initial admission: Price: $23,127; Days: 2.82. Rank: 30; MSA: Knoxville, TN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,470; Hospital inpatient services: $24,060; Average for initial admission: Price: $23,862; Days: 2.45. Rank: 31; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,073; Hospital inpatient services: $22,607; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,198; Days: 3.18. Rank: 32; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,035; Hospital inpatient services: $23,439; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,986; Days: 3.05. Rank: 33; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,626; Hospital inpatient services: $22,145; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,967; Days: 3.00. Rank: 34; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,162; Hospital inpatient services: $22,407; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,407; Days: 3.03. Rank: 35; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,090; Hospital inpatient services: $22,561; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,368; Days: 2.62. Rank: 36; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,065; Hospital inpatient services: $22,695; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,522; Days: 2.88. Rank: 37; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,042; Hospital inpatient services: $22,545; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,355; Days: 2.66. Rank: 38; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,936; Hospital inpatient services: $21,568; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,392; Days: 3.64. Rank: 39; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,774; Hospital inpatient services: $21,231; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,060; Days: 2.95. Rank: 40; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,770; Hospital inpatient services: $22,098; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,944; Days: 2.84. Rank: 41; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,709; Hospital inpatient services: $22,896; Average for initial admission: Price: $22,539; Days: 3.44. Rank: 42; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,354; Hospital inpatient services: $21,643; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,300; Days: 2.67. Rank: 43; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,945; Hospital inpatient services: $21,762; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,404; Days: 3.10. Rank: 44; MSA: Savannah, GA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,937; Hospital inpatient services: $20,052; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,912; Days: 2.12. Rank: 45; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,868; Hospital inpatient services: $21,591; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,338; Days: 2.76. Rank: 46; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,858; Hospital inpatient services: $19,894; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,823; Days: 3.33. Rank: 47; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,856; Hospital inpatient services: $20,222; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,995; Days: 2.55. Rank: 48; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,651; Hospital inpatient services: $21,459; Average for initial admission: Price: $21,318; Days: 2.12. Rank: 49; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,628; Hospital inpatient services: $19,928; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,649; Days: 2.78. Rank: 50; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,618; Hospital inpatient services: $20,720; Average for initial admission: Price: $20,568; Days: 3.47. Rank: 51; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,580; Hospital inpatient services: $20,471; Average for initial admission: Price: $20,181; Days: 2.94. Rank: 52; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,557; Hospital inpatient services: $20,284; Average for initial admission: Price: $20,093; Days: 3.21. Rank: 53; MSA: Albuquerque, NM; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,481; Hospital inpatient services: $20,098; Average for initial admission: Price: $20,001; Days: 3.22. Rank: 54; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,683; Hospital inpatient services: $20,483; Average for initial admission: Price: $20,256; Days: 3.06. Rank: 55; MSA: Columbus, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,627; Hospital inpatient services: $21,205; Average for initial admission: Price: $20,977; Days: 2.28. Rank: 56; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,409; Hospital inpatient services: $19,379; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,193; Days: 2.92. Rank: 57; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,972; Hospital inpatient services: $19,558; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,380; Days: 2.66. Rank: 58; MSA: Springfield, MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,914; Hospital inpatient services: $19,062; Average for initial admission: Price: $18,964; Days: 3.37. Rank: 59; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,908; Hospital inpatient services: $18,695; Average for initial admission: Price: $18,565; Days: 2.78. Rank: 60; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,548; Hospital inpatient services: $17,284; Average for initial admission: Price: $17,284; Days: 2.78. Rank: 61; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,490; Hospital inpatient services: $18,655; Average for initial admission: Price: $17,986; Days: 3.10. Rank: 62; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,475; Hospital inpatient services: $19,899; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,580; Days: 2.76. Rank: 63; MSA: Rochester, NY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,365; Hospital inpatient services: $19,508; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,266; Days: 2.91. Rank: 64; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,199; Hospital inpatient services: $19,258; Average for initial admission: Price: $19,155; Days: 2.84. Rank: 65; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,117; Hospital inpatient services: $18,181; Average for initial admission: Price: $17,938; Days: 3.00. Rank: 66; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,894; Hospital inpatient services: $17,750; Average for initial admission: Price: $17,457; Days: 2.85. Rank: 67; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,816; Hospital inpatient services: $18,817; Average for initial admission: Price: $18,557; Days: 2.65. Rank: 68; MSA: Dayton, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,614; Hospital inpatient services: $18,820; Average for initial admission: Price: $18,670; Days: 2.80. Rank: 69; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,361; Hospital inpatient services: $18,457; Average for initial admission: Price: $18,183; Days: 3.13. Rank: 70; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,314; Hospital inpatient services: $18,492; Average for initial admission: Price: $18,262; Days: 2.88. Rank: 71; MSA: Akron, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,100; Hospital inpatient services: $19,155; Average for initial admission: Price: $18,886; Days: 3.14. Rank: 72; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,478; Hospital inpatient services: $16,600; Average for initial admission: Price: $16,388; Days: 2.86. Rank: 73; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,274; Hospital inpatient services: $17,646; Average for initial admission: Price: $17,646; Days: 2.75. Rank: 74; MSA: Toledo, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,242; Hospital inpatient services: $17,487; Average for initial admission: Price: $17,160; Days: 2.78. Rank: 75; MSA: Fresno, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $20,508; Hospital inpatient services: $16,380; Average for initial admission: Price: $16,352; Days: 2.04. Rank: 76; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $19,794; Hospital inpatient services: $14,410; Average for initial admission: Price: $14,243; Days: 3.09. Rank: 77; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $19,166; Hospital inpatient services: $12,103; Average for initial admission: Price: $12,036; Days: 2.81. Rank: 78; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $19,164; Hospital inpatient services: $14,095; Average for initial admission: Price: $13,945; Days: 3.42. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. Spending and prices were adjusted to control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business and differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA. [A] MSA was in the highest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had an average of $30,570 in spending on hospital inpatient services. [B] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [C] MSA was in the lowest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the lowest- spending quintile had an average of $17,323 in spending on hospital inpatient services. [End of table] [End of section] Appendix VI: Professional Services Spending and Other Information, by Metropolitan Statistical Area and Procedure: This appendix presents professional service spending, number of services, intensity, and price, by metropolitan statistical area (MSA), for each of the three high-cost procedures we analyzed-- coronary stent placement, Laparoscopic appendectomy, and Total hip replacement. Table 12: Professional Services Spending, Number of Services, Intensity, and Price, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Coronary Stent Placement Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $60,375; Professional services: $4,454; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.25; Intensity: 3.93; Price per unit of Intensity: 69.76. Rank: 2; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $39,827; Professional services: $3,278; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.22; Intensity: 4.02; Price per unit of Intensity: 57.34. Rank: 3; MSA: Charleston, WV[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $39,782; Professional services: $3,403; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.28; Intensity: 5.04; Price per unit of Intensity: 44.16. Rank: 4; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $39,683; Professional services: $4,481; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.34; Intensity: 3.97; Price per unit of Intensity: 73.48. Rank: 5; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $38,596; Professional services: $5,833; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.65; Intensity: 3.93; Price per unit of Intensity: 101.21. Rank: 6; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $38,305; Professional services: $2,614; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.64; Intensity: 3.84; Price per unit of Intensity: 43.54. Rank: 7; MSA: Madison, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $37,248; Professional services: $9,022; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.60; Intensity: 4.18; Price per unit of Intensity: 186.03. Rank: 8; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,858; Professional services: $3,422; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.14; Intensity: 4.12; Price per unit of Intensity: 63.14. Rank: 9; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,097; Professional services: $3,523; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.80; Intensity: 3.87; Price per unit of Intensity: 54.13. Rank: 10; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,478; Professional services: $3,054; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.87; Intensity: 4.93; Price per unit of Intensity: 41.66. Rank: 11; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,358; Professional services: $3,135; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 17.87; Intensity: 3.53; Price per unit of Intensity: 49.67. Rank: 12; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,388; Professional services: $3,499; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 10.37; Intensity: 3.71; Price per unit of Intensity: 91.05. Rank: 13; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,307; Professional services: $3,373; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.94; Intensity: 3.76; Price per unit of Intensity: 60.05. Rank: 14; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,258; Professional services: $3,356; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.77; Intensity: 3.96; Price per unit of Intensity: 61.48. Rank: 15; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $33,974; Professional services: $2,683; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.22; Intensity: 4.43; Price per unit of Intensity: 53.92. Rank: 16; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $33,398; Professional services: $3,117; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.64; Intensity: 4.78; Price per unit of Intensity: 41.72. Rank: 17; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,807; Professional services: $4,006; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.29; Intensity: 3.79; Price per unit of Intensity: 69.08. Rank: 18; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,605; Professional services: $2,842; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.88; Intensity: 3.90; Price per unit of Intensity: 45.93. Rank: 19; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,156; Professional services: $2,765; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.20; Intensity: 3.94; Price per unit of Intensity: 43.29. Rank: 20; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,143; Professional services: $3,020; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 17.65; Intensity: 3.73; Price per unit of Intensity: 45.84. Rank: 21; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,068; Professional services: $3,189; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.34; Intensity: 3.98; Price per unit of Intensity: 55.90. Rank: 22; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,879; Professional services: $3,603; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.89; Intensity: 4.07; Price per unit of Intensity: 59.49. Rank: 23; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,847; Professional services: $3,021; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.20; Intensity: 3.88; Price per unit of Intensity: 51.26. Rank: 24; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,797; Professional services: $4,464; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.11; Intensity: 3.92; Price per unit of Intensity: 70.74. Rank: 25; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,017; Professional services: $2,902; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.88; Intensity: 4.08; Price per unit of Intensity: 51.28. Rank: 26; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,680; Professional services: $3,371; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.00; Intensity: 4.83; Price per unit of Intensity: 43.58. Rank: 27; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,607; Professional services: $4,178; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.61; Intensity: 3.62; Price per unit of Intensity: 73.91. Rank: 28; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,243; Professional services: $3,161; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.67; Intensity: 3.74; Price per unit of Intensity: 57.67. Rank: 29; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,156; Professional services: $4,544; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.91; Intensity: 4.02; Price per unit of Intensity: 75.84. Rank: 30; MSA: Fresno, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,925; Professional services: $2,546; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.63; Intensity: 3.96; Price per unit of Intensity: 41.08. Rank: 31; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,684; Professional services: $2,764; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.31; Intensity: 3.80; Price per unit of Intensity: 50.83. Rank: 32; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,489; Professional services: $2,899; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.05; Intensity: 4.22; Price per unit of Intensity: 48.92. Rank: 33; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,393; Professional services: $3,255; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.94; Intensity: 3.89; Price per unit of Intensity: 60.06. Rank: 34; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,302; Professional services: $3,084; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.60; Intensity: 3.67; Price per unit of Intensity: 50.59. Rank: 35; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,698; Professional services: $3,157; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.04; Intensity: 3.86; Price per unit of Intensity: 50.95. Rank: 36; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,640; Professional services: $3,414; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.08; Intensity: 3.94; Price per unit of Intensity: 53.85. Rank: 37; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,629; Professional services: $3,196; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.31; Intensity: 3.93; Price per unit of Intensity: 53.15. Rank: 38; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,607; Professional services: $3,538; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.67; Intensity: 3.74; Price per unit of Intensity: 56.69. Rank: 39; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,553; Professional services: $4,179; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.51; Intensity: 4.15; Price per unit of Intensity: 74.50. Rank: 40; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,474; Professional services: $3,648; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.13; Intensity: 3.75; Price per unit of Intensity: 60.36. Rank: 41; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,276; Professional services: $2,891; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.47; Intensity: 3.82; Price per unit of Intensity: 48.88. Rank: 42; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,065; Professional services: $4,651; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.24; Intensity: 3.82; Price per unit of Intensity: 75.05. Rank: 43; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,705; Professional services: $2,725; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.73; Intensity: 4.08; Price per unit of Intensity: 42.42. Rank: 44; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,544; Professional services: $2,747; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 17.27; Intensity: 3.67; Price per unit of Intensity: 43.28. Rank: 45; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,489; Professional services: $2,688; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.93; Intensity: 4.10; Price per unit of Intensity: 41.16. Rank: 46; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,480; Professional services: $3,324; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.48; Intensity: 3.57; Price per unit of Intensity: 56.44. Rank: 47; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,308; Professional services: $4,788; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.22; Intensity: 4.20; Price per unit of Intensity: 80.21. Rank: 48; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,067; Professional services: $3,581; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.22; Intensity: 4.33; Price per unit of Intensity: 54.31. Rank: 49; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,746; Professional services: $2,991; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.25; Intensity: 4.05; Price per unit of Intensity: 51.83. Rank: 50; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,349; Professional services: $3,327; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.23; Intensity: 3.51; Price per unit of Intensity: 62.27. Rank: 51; MSA: Rochester, NY; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,523; Professional services: $2,587; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 12.88; Intensity: 4.11; Price per unit of Intensity: 48.82. Rank: 52; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,322; Professional services: $3,638; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.48; Intensity: 4.16; Price per unit of Intensity: 56.53. Rank: 53; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,288; Professional services: $2,982; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.95; Intensity: 3.94; Price per unit of Intensity: 50.66. Rank: 54; MSA: Toledo, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,210; Professional services: $2,934; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.42; Intensity: 3.95; Price per unit of Intensity: 51.58. Rank: 55; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,203; Professional services: $2,866; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.18; Intensity: 3.90; Price per unit of Intensity: 48.42. Rank: 56; MSA: Albuquerque, NM; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,015; Professional services: $3,264; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.54; Intensity: 3.84; Price per unit of Intensity: 54.64. Rank: 57; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,914; Professional services: $3,004; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.83; Intensity: 3.81; Price per unit of Intensity: 49.79. Rank: 58; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,848; Professional services: $4,818; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.10; Intensity: 4.16; Price per unit of Intensity: 82.16. Rank: 59; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,753; Professional services: $3,610; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 12.93; Intensity: 4.29; Price per unit of Intensity: 65.07. Rank: 60; MSA: Columbus, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,310; Professional services: $2,476; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.71; Intensity: 3.79; Price per unit of Intensity: 44.37. Rank: 61; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,088; Professional services: $2,990; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.24; Intensity: 4.07; Price per unit of Intensity: 51.54. Rank: 62; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,938; Professional services: $3,753; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.93; Intensity: 4.44; Price per unit of Intensity: 70.79. Rank: 63; MSA: Knoxville, TN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,935; Professional services: $4,027; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.27; Intensity: 3.62; Price per unit of Intensity: 68.31. Rank: 64; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,647; Professional services: $2,907; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 17.21; Intensity: 4.70; Price per unit of Intensity: 35.90. Rank: 65; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,135; Professional services: $3,248; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.58; Intensity: 3.99; Price per unit of Intensity: 55.80. Rank: 66; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,768; Professional services: $3,207; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.49; Intensity: 3.91; Price per unit of Intensity: 53.00. Rank: 67; MSA: Savannah, GA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,585; Professional services: $3,274; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.78; Intensity: 4.13; Price per unit of Intensity: 57.51. Rank: 68; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,357; Professional services: $3,276; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.07; Intensity: 3.65; Price per unit of Intensity: 55.83. Rank: 69; MSA: Dayton, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,073; Professional services: $2,661; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.17; Intensity: 4.02; Price per unit of Intensity: 43.64. Rank: 70; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,023; Professional services: $3,465; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.30; Intensity: 4.26; Price per unit of Intensity: 53.18. Rank: 71; MSA: Springfield, MA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $21,937; Professional services: $3,593; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 20.95; Intensity: 3.14; Price per unit of Intensity: 54.70. Rank: 72; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $21,664; Professional services: $2,712; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.72; Intensity: 4.90; Price per unit of Intensity: 33.10. Rank: 73; MSA: Akron, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $21,664; Professional services: $2,506; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.31; Intensity: 3.74; Price per unit of Intensity: 43.72. Rank: 74; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $20,969; Professional services: $3,019; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 20.50; Intensity: 3.61; Price per unit of Intensity: 40.78. Rank: 75; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $20,602; Professional services: $2,140; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.11; Intensity: 3.97; Price per unit of Intensity: 41.06. Rank: 76; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,829; Professional services: $2,677; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 18.54; Intensity: 3.97; Price per unit of Intensity: 36.34. Rank: 77; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,677; Professional services: $2,534; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 17.94; Intensity: 3.62; Price per unit of Intensity: 38.97. Rank: 78; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $17,768; Professional services: $4,339; Average for Professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.59; Intensity: 4.27; Price per unit of Intensity: 69.64. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. Spending, volume, and intensity were adjusted to control for differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA; spending was also adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of doing business. Intensity was measured by the relative value unit (RVU) assigned to each service. [A] MSA was in the highest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had an average of $3,890 in spending on professional services. For those professional services, the 16 MSAs had an average of 14.48 services, average intensity of 4.13, and average price per unit of intensity of $68.27. [B] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [C] MSA was in the lowest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the lowest- spending quintile had an average of $3,099 in spending on professional services. For those professional services, the 16 MSAs had an average of 16.35 services, average intensity of 3.97, and average price per unit of intensity of $48.84. [End of table] Table 13: Professional Services Spending, Number of Services, Intensity, and Price, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Laparoscopic Appendectomy Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,924; Professional services: $2,106; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.06; Intensity: 5.51; Price per unit of Intensity: 75.59. Rank: 2; MSA: Madison, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,123; Professional services: $4,090; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.45; Intensity: 5.67; Price per unit of Intensity: 161.98. Rank: 3; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $18,096; Professional services: $3,752; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.68; Intensity: 5.77; Price per unit of Intensity: 138.82. Rank: 4; MSA: Charleston, WV[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $17,640; Professional services: $2,632; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.16; Intensity: 6.45; Price per unit of Intensity: 98.06. Rank: 5; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $16,588; Professional services: $2,613; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.75; Intensity: 5.77; Price per unit of Intensity: 95.28. Rank: 6; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $16,323; Professional services: $2,104; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 3.53; Intensity: 6.51; Price per unit of Intensity: 91.45. Rank: 7; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $15,444; Professional services: $2,058; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.54; Intensity: 6.42; Price per unit of Intensity: 70.67. Rank: 8; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $15,318; Professional services: $4,054; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.38; Intensity: 5.95; Price per unit of Intensity: 155.40. Rank: 9; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $15,267; Professional services: $2,423; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.20; Intensity: 5.77; Price per unit of Intensity: 80.79. Rank: 10; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,859; Professional services: $3,130; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.19; Intensity: 5.64; Price per unit of Intensity: 106.89. Rank: 11; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,761; Professional services: $1,999; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.03; Intensity: 6.31; Price per unit of Intensity: 78.63. Rank: 12; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,678; Professional services: $2,873; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.22; Intensity: 6.11; Price per unit of Intensity: 89.99. Rank: 13; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,644; Professional services: $2,814; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.13; Intensity: 5.17; Price per unit of Intensity: 131.72. Rank: 14; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,543; Professional services: $2,178; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.37; Intensity: 6.02; Price per unit of Intensity: 82.70. Rank: 15; MSA: Columbus, OH[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,478; Professional services: $2,153; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.80; Intensity: 5.62; Price per unit of Intensity: 79.83. Rank: 16; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,337; Professional services: $2,644; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.63; Intensity: 5.68; Price per unit of Intensity: 100.45. Rank: 17; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,335; Professional services: $2,831; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.87; Intensity: 5.75; Price per unit of Intensity: 100.97. Rank: 18; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,327; Professional services: $2,445; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.55; Intensity: 5.88; Price per unit of Intensity: 74.89. Rank: 19; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,115; Professional services: $2,196; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 3.45; Intensity: 6.44; Price per unit of Intensity: 99.00. Rank: 20; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $14,042; Professional services: $2,273; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.08; Intensity: 5.40; Price per unit of Intensity: 82.86. Rank: 21; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,986; Professional services: $1,969; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.05; Intensity: 5.67; Price per unit of Intensity: 68.82. Rank: 22; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,933; Professional services: $2,508; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.40; Intensity: 6.16; Price per unit of Intensity: 92.51. Rank: 23; MSA: Akron, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,788; Professional services: $2,177; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.66; Intensity: 5.21; Price per unit of Intensity: 73.83. Rank: 24; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,634; Professional services: $2,095; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.16; Intensity: 4.76; Price per unit of Intensity: 71.40. Rank: 25; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $13,374; Professional services: $2,761; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.23; Intensity: 5.19; Price per unit of Intensity: 85.26. Rank: 26; MSA: Dayton, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,973; Professional services: $2,449; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.40; Intensity: 5.55; Price per unit of Intensity: 81.69. Rank: 27; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,897; Professional services: $2,229; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.72; Intensity: 5.95; Price per unit of Intensity: 79.30. Rank: 28; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,879; Professional services: $1,801; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.07; Intensity: 5.40; Price per unit of Intensity: 65.82. Rank: 29; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,862; Professional services: $3,257; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.09; Intensity: 5.56; Price per unit of Intensity: 115.17. Rank: 30; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,800; Professional services: $2,377; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.44; Intensity: 5.53; Price per unit of Intensity: 79.13. Rank: 31; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,596; Professional services: $2,436; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.92; Intensity: 5.34; Price per unit of Intensity: 77.04. Rank: 32; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,571; Professional services: $2,365; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.85; Intensity: 5.77; Price per unit of Intensity: 84.40. Rank: 33; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,477; Professional services: $2,951; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.50; Intensity: 5.20; Price per unit of Intensity: 103.29. Rank: 34; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,413; Professional services: $2,854; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.69; Intensity: 5.86; Price per unit of Intensity: 103.99. Rank: 35; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,403; Professional services: $2,803; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.56; Intensity: 6.07; Price per unit of Intensity: 101.15. Rank: 36; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,394; Professional services: $2,309; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.01; Intensity: 5.43; Price per unit of Intensity: 84.84. Rank: 37; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,358; Professional services: $2,107; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 3.41; Intensity: 6.92; Price per unit of Intensity: 89.23. Rank: 38; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,336; Professional services: $2,379; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.20; Intensity: 6.29; Price per unit of Intensity: 90.21. Rank: 39; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,252; Professional services: $4,250; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.77; Intensity: 5.22; Price per unit of Intensity: 141.25. Rank: 40; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $12,011; Professional services: $3,008; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.09; Intensity: 5.49; Price per unit of Intensity: 107.60. Rank: 41; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,960; Professional services: $2,835; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.29; Intensity: 6.05; Price per unit of Intensity: 109.22. Rank: 42; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,851; Professional services: $2,172; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.21; Intensity: 4.97; Price per unit of Intensity: 70.38. Rank: 43; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,496; Professional services: $2,492; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.93; Intensity: 5.68; Price per unit of Intensity: 88.96. Rank: 44; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,417; Professional services: $2,777; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.67; Intensity: 5.76; Price per unit of Intensity: 103.22. Rank: 45; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,403; Professional services: $3,194; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.37; Intensity: 5.14; Price per unit of Intensity: 97.47. Rank: 46; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,351; Professional services: $2,266; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.08; Intensity: 5.54; Price per unit of Intensity: 80.53. Rank: 47; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,314; Professional services: $2,050; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 3.51; Intensity: 7.21; Price per unit of Intensity: 81.08. Rank: 48; MSA: Rochester, NY; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,144; Professional services: $2,456; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.13; Intensity: 6.32; Price per unit of Intensity: 94.11. Rank: 49; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,078; Professional services: $2,300; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.54; Intensity: 5.95; Price per unit of Intensity: 85.17. Rank: 50; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $11,037; Professional services: $1,975; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.44; Intensity: 5.31; Price per unit of Intensity: 68.36. Rank: 51; MSA: Springfield, MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,958; Professional services: $2,660; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.73; Intensity: 5.82; Price per unit of Intensity: 96.57. Rank: 52; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,831; Professional services: $1,910; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.64; Intensity: 5.86; Price per unit of Intensity: 70.23. Rank: 53; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,821; Professional services: $2,941; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.16; Intensity: 5.30; Price per unit of Intensity: 107.53. Rank: 54; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,775; Professional services: $1,613; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 3.72; Intensity: 5.99; Price per unit of Intensity: 72.42. Rank: 55; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,771; Professional services: $1,929; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.88; Intensity: 5.90; Price per unit of Intensity: 67.05. Rank: 56; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,766; Professional services: $2,139; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.44; Intensity: 8.49; Price per unit of Intensity: 39.14. Rank: 57; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,695; Professional services: $2,563; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.16; Intensity: 5.44; Price per unit of Intensity: 91.40. Rank: 58; MSA: Toledo, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,693; Professional services: $2,285; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.37; Intensity: 4.87; Price per unit of Intensity: 73.61. Rank: 59; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,470; Professional services: $3,041; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.08; Intensity: 5.53; Price per unit of Intensity: 108.20. Rank: 60; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,372; Professional services: $3,043; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.96; Intensity: 5.46; Price per unit of Intensity: 112.29. Rank: 61; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,351; Professional services: $3,020; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.21; Intensity: 5.03; Price per unit of Intensity: 96.65. Rank: 62; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,191; Professional services: $3,122; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.86; Intensity: 5.95; Price per unit of Intensity: 107.95. Rank: 63; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,163; Professional services: $2,364; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.27; Intensity: 5.41; Price per unit of Intensity: 82.85. Rank: 64; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,116; Professional services: $2,828; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 3.91; Intensity: 6.10; Price per unit of Intensity: 118.54. Rank: 65; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $10,108; Professional services: $2,907; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.48; Intensity: 5.26; Price per unit of Intensity: 100.73. Rank: 66; MSA: Knoxville, TN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $9,887; Professional services: $2,820; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.30; Intensity: 5.21; Price per unit of Intensity: 102.16. Rank: 67; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $9,304; Professional services: $2,726; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.59; Intensity: 5.83; Price per unit of Intensity: 101.79. Rank: 68; MSA: Savannah, GA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $9,281; Professional services: $2,388; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.33; Intensity: 6.13; Price per unit of Intensity: 90.02. Rank: 69; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,922; Professional services: $2,338; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.90; Intensity: 5.96; Price per unit of Intensity: 80.11. Rank: 70; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,880; Professional services: $1,924; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.14; Intensity: 5.14; Price per unit of Intensity: 60.98. Rank: 71; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,848; Professional services: $3,273; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.54; Intensity: 5.19; Price per unit of Intensity: 113.79. Rank: 72; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,747; Professional services: $1,765; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.33; Intensity: 5.34; Price per unit of Intensity: 62.06. Rank: 73; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $8,618; Professional services: $2,780; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.38; Intensity: 5.43; Price per unit of Intensity: 95.23. Rank: 74; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,993; Professional services: $2,449; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.21; Intensity: 4.96; Price per unit of Intensity: 79.43. Rank: 75; MSA: Albuquerque, NM[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,989; Professional services: $2,631; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.73; Intensity: 5.68; Price per unit of Intensity: 98.04. Rank: 76; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,773; Professional services: $2,982; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.54; Intensity: 5.09; Price per unit of Intensity: 89.66. Rank: 77; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,698; Professional services: $2,448; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.97; Intensity: 5.58; Price per unit of Intensity: 88.14. Rank: 78; MSA: Fresno, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $7,096; Professional services: $1,935; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.01; Intensity: 5.65; Price per unit of Intensity: 68.30. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. Spending, volume, and intensity were adjusted to control for differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA; spending was also adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of doing business. Intensity was measured by the relative value unit (RVU) assigned to each service. [A] MSA was in the highest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had an average of $2,726 in spending on professional services. For those professional services, the 16 MSAs had an average of 4.57 services, average intensity of 5.90, and average price per unit of intensity of $102.39. [B] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [C] MSA was in the lowest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the lowest- spending quintile had an average of $2,535 in spending on professional services. For those professional services, the 16 MSAs had an average of 5.23 services, average intensity of 5.50, and average price per unit of intensity of $89.49. [End of table] Table 14: Professional Services Spending, Number of Services, Intensity, and Price, by Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), for Total Hip Replacement Episodes: Rank: 1; MSA: Salinas, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $57,990; Professional services: $4,048; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.30; Intensity: 6.52; Price per unit of intensity: $74.72. Rank: 2; MSA: Dallas-Fort Worth-Arlington, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $41,129; Professional services: $4,181; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.35; Intensity: 6.68; Price per unit of intensity: $74.91. Rank: 3; MSA: San Diego-Carlsbad-San Marcos, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $37,906; Professional services: $5,450; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.74; Intensity: 6.38; Price per unit of intensity: $97.81. Rank: 4; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $37,669; Professional services: $4,792; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.05; Intensity: 4.89; Price per unit of intensity: $75.05. Rank: 5; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,936; Professional services: $4,450; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.78; Intensity: 7.49; Price per unit of intensity: $87.72. Rank: 6; MSA: Madison, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $36,258; Professional services: $9,794; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.11; Intensity: 9.47; Price per unit of intensity: $202.36. Rank: 7; MSA: Milwaukee-Waukesha-West Allis, WI[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,963; Professional services: $6,774; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.67; Intensity: 7.78; Price per unit of intensity: $130.68. Rank: 8; MSA: New York-Northern New Jersey-Long Island, NY-NJ-PA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,682; Professional services: $7,839; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.23; Intensity: 4.46; Price per unit of intensity: $123.44. Rank: 9; MSA: Houston-Sugar Land-Baytown, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,332; Professional services: $5,003; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 10.08; Intensity: 5.92; Price per unit of intensity: $83.92. Rank: 10; MSA: San Antonio-New Braunfels, TX[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $35,319; Professional services: $4,099; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.03; Intensity: 4.03; Price per unit of intensity: $67.62. Rank: 11; MSA: Fort Wayne, IN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,711; Professional services: $3,978; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.84; Intensity: 10.07; Price per unit of intensity: $81.70. Rank: 12; MSA: Sacramento-Arden-Arcade-Roseville, CA[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,420; Professional services: $4,741; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.12; Intensity: 7.76; Price per unit of intensity: $85.80. Rank: 13; MSA: Nashville-Davidson-Murfreesboro-Franklin, TN[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $34,311; Professional services: $5,103; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.31; Intensity: 4.27; Price per unit of intensity: $89.68. Rank: 14; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $33,899; Professional services: $4,306; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.91; Intensity: 6.33; Price per unit of intensity: $86.03. Rank: 15; MSA: Albany-Schenectady-Troy, NY[A]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $32,246; Professional services: $4,335; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.42; Intensity: 5.82; Price per unit of intensity: $79.01. Rank: 16; MSA: [A,B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,726; Professional services: $4,642; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.64; Intensity: 7.47; Price per unit of intensity: $93.58. Rank: 17; MSA: Colorado Springs, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,648; Professional services: $4,383; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.30; Intensity: 4.91; Price per unit of intensity: $79.01. Rank: 18; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,550; Professional services: $4,792; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.42; Intensity: 7.98; Price per unit of intensity: $93.59. Rank: 19; MSA: Charleston, WV; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,376; Professional services: $5,079; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.33; Intensity: 5.83; Price per unit of intensity: $104.53. Rank: 20; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $31,371; Professional services: $5,052; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.08; Intensity: 5.22; Price per unit of intensity: $87.39. Rank: 21; MSA: Portland-Vancouver-Hillsboro, OR-WA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,535; Professional services: $4,882; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.66; Intensity: 8.12; Price per unit of intensity: $90.19. Rank: 22; MSA: Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,473; Professional services: $3,857; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.66; Intensity: 6.32; Price per unit of intensity: $63.16. Rank: 23; MSA: Cape Coral-Fort Myers, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,422; Professional services: $3,797; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.40; Intensity: 7.18; Price per unit of intensity: $71.40. Rank: 24; MSA: Seattle-Tacoma-Bellevue, WA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,398; Professional services: $4,961; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.53; Intensity: 6.68; Price per unit of intensity: $134.30. Rank: 25; MSA: Tampa-St. Petersburg-Clearwater, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,380; Professional services: $4,225; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.92; Intensity: 5.99; Price per unit of intensity: $71.16. Rank: 26; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,205; Professional services: $5,688; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.78; Intensity: 6.99; Price per unit of intensity: $104.61. Rank: 27; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $30,072; Professional services: $4,345; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.73; Intensity: 15.45; Price per unit of intensity: $23.97. Rank: 28; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,817; Professional services: $4,335; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.61; Intensity: 5.76; Price per unit of intensity: $78.39. Rank: 29; MSA: Lakeland-Winter Haven, FL; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,480; Professional services: $4,029; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.85; Intensity: 10.46; Price per unit of intensity: $49.05. Rank: 30; MSA: Knoxville, TN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,470; Professional services: $4,664; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.44; Intensity: 6.22; Price per unit of intensity: $88.93. Rank: 31; MSA: Memphis, TN-MS-AR; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,073; Professional services: $5,566; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 12.28; Intensity: 4.51; Price per unit of intensity: $100.39. Rank: 32; MSA: New Orleans-Metairie-Kenner, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $29,035; Professional services: $4,022; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.16; Intensity: 6.87; Price per unit of intensity: $71.68. Rank: 33; MSA: San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,626; Professional services: $5,681; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.47; Intensity: 6.55; Price per unit of intensity: $102.36. Rank: 34; MSA: Raleigh-Cary, NC; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,162; Professional services: $4,623; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.64; Intensity: 7.73; Price per unit of intensity: $78.27. Rank: 35; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,090; Professional services: $4,487; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.52; Intensity: 5.94; Price per unit of intensity: $79.35. Rank: 36; MSA: Huntington-Ashland, WV-KY-OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,065; Professional services: $4,212; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.51; Intensity: 8.44; Price per unit of intensity: $66.41. Rank: 37; MSA: Denver-Aurora-Broomfield, CO; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $28,042; Professional services: $4,663; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 10.83; Intensity: 6.02; Price per unit of intensity: $71.46. Rank: 38; MSA: Providence-New Bedford-Fall River, RI-MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,936; Professional services: $4,667; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.28; Intensity: 6.58; Price per unit of intensity: $85.70. Rank: 39; MSA: Chicago-Joliet-Naperville, IL-IN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,774; Professional services: $5,042; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 12.56; Intensity: 4.91; Price per unit of intensity: $81.76. Rank: 40; MSA: Kansas City, MO-KS; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,770; Professional services: $4,197; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.48; Intensity: 6.71; Price per unit of intensity: $65.92. Rank: 41; MSA: Ann Arbor, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,709; Professional services: $3,784; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.13; Intensity: 7.40; Price per unit of intensity: $71.76. Rank: 42; MSA: Philadelphia-Camden-Wilmington, PA-NJ-DE-MD; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $27,354; Professional services: $4,452; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 12.18; Intensity: 4.72; Price per unit of intensity: $77.41. Rank: 43; MSA: Detroit-Warren-Livonia, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,945; Professional services: $3,704; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.97; Intensity: 5.57; Price per unit of intensity: $66.73. Rank: 44; MSA: Savannah, GA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,937; Professional services: $4,590; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.17; Intensity: 8.57; Price per unit of intensity: $86.71. Rank: 45; MSA: Cincinnati-Middletown, OH-KY-IN; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,868; Professional services: $4,231; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 10.85; Intensity: 5.09; Price per unit of intensity: $76.59. Rank: 46; MSA: Bridgeport-Stamford-Norwalk, CT; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,858; Professional services: $6,051; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 12.67; Intensity: 4.58; Price per unit of intensity: $104.35. Rank: 47; MSA: Phoenix-Mesa-Glendale, AZ; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,856; Professional services: $5,394; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.21; Intensity: 6.10; Price per unit of intensity: $78.87. Rank: 48; MSA: Tulsa, OK; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,651; Professional services: $4,136; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.14; Intensity: 8.15; Price per unit of intensity: $71.06. Rank: 49; MSA: Minneapolis-St. Paul-Bloomington, MN-WI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,628; Professional services: $6,107; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.82; Intensity: 6.78; Price per unit of intensity: $115.13. Rank: 50; MSA: Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, MA-NH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,618; Professional services: $4,353; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.39; Intensity: 6.96; Price per unit of intensity: $84.64. Rank: 51; MSA: Shreveport-Bossier City, LA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,580; Professional services: $5,292; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.00; Intensity: 6.74; Price per unit of intensity: $98.06. Rank: 52; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,557; Professional services: $5,229; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 10.76; Intensity: 5.33; Price per unit of intensity: $91.20. Rank: 53; MSA: Albuquerque, NM; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $26,481; Professional services: $5,099; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.91; Intensity: 7.88; Price per unit of intensity: $93.65. Rank: 54; MSA: Cleveland-Elyria-Mentor, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,683; Professional services: $4,037; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.23; Intensity: 6.09; Price per unit of intensity: $71.73. Rank: 55; MSA: Columbus, OH; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,627; Professional services: $3,717; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.15; Intensity: 6.05; Price per unit of intensity: $67.19. Rank: 56; MSA: [B]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $25,409; Professional services: $5,168; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 4.46; Intensity: 11.04; Price per unit of intensity: $104.92. Rank: 57; MSA: Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,972; Professional services: $4,432; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 10.00; Intensity: 5.86; Price per unit of intensity: $75.59. Rank: 58; MSA: Springfield, MA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,914; Professional services: $4,570; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.71; Intensity: 7.14; Price per unit of intensity: $83.01. Rank: 59; MSA: Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,908; Professional services: $4,160; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.05; Intensity: 5.03; Price per unit of intensity: $74.76. Rank: 60; MSA: Santa Rosa-Petaluma, CA; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,548; Professional services: $5,962; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 11.09; Intensity: 4.99; Price per unit of intensity: $107.64. Rank: 61; MSA: Las Vegas-Paradise, NV; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,490; Professional services: $4,815; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 16.18; Intensity: 4.51; Price per unit of intensity: $65.98. Rank: 62; MSA: Grand Rapids-Wyoming, MI; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,475; Professional services: $4,178; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 6.55; Intensity: 7.76; Price per unit of intensity: $82.26. Rank: 63; MSA: Rochester, NY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,365; Professional services: $3,340; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 5.95; Intensity: 9.18; Price per unit of intensity: $61.17. Rank: 64; MSA: Louisville-Jefferson County, KY-IN[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,199; Professional services: $3,816; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.89; Intensity: 6.52; Price per unit of intensity: $65.87. Rank: 65; MSA: Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $24,117; Professional services: $4,530; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.13; Intensity: 4.47; Price per unit of intensity: $71.81. Rank: 66; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,894; Professional services: $5,745; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.00; Intensity: 6.98; Price per unit of intensity: $102.79. Rank: 67; MSA: St. Louis, MO-IL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,816; Professional services: $3,804; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.37; Intensity: 7.14; Price per unit of intensity: $72.26. Rank: 68; MSA: Dayton, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,614; Professional services: $3,925; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 7.33; Intensity: 8.49; Price per unit of intensity: $63.08. Rank: 69; MSA: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,361; Professional services: $3,855; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.15; Intensity: 5.97; Price per unit of intensity: $70.55. Rank: 70; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,314; Professional services: $3,880; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 12.93; Intensity: 4.19; Price per unit of intensity: $71.67. Rank: 71; MSA: Akron, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $23,100; Professional services: $3,110; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.33; Intensity: 5.58; Price per unit of intensity: $59.78. Rank: 72; MSA: Hartford-West Hartford-East Hartford, CT[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,478; Professional services: $4,924; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 8.33; Intensity: 7.10; Price per unit of intensity: $83.32. Rank: 73; MSA: Lexington-Fayette, KY[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,274; Professional services: $3,817; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 10.77; Intensity: 5.44; Price per unit of intensity: $65.19. Rank: 74; MSA: Toledo, OH[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $22,242; Professional services: $4,286; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 14.92; Intensity: 4.08; Price per unit of intensity: $70.34. Rank: 75; MSA: Fresno, CA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $20,508; Professional services: $3,732; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 13.05; Intensity: 4.64; Price per unit of intensity: $61.66. Rank: 76; MSA: [B,C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $19,794; Professional services: $4,018; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.52; Intensity: 3.90; Price per unit of intensity: $66.41. Rank: 77; MSA: Birmingham-Hoover, AL[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $19,166; Professional services: $5,827; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 9.56; Intensity: 6.06; Price per unit of intensity: $100.68. Rank: 78; MSA: Youngstown-Warren-Boardman, OH-PA[C]; Average adjusted spending: Episode: $19,164; Professional services: $3,893; Average for professional services: Volume (number of services): 15.72; Intensity: 3.91; Price per unit of intensity: $63.28. Source: GAO analysis of 2009 and 2010 claims data from Truven Health Analytics. GAO-15-214. Note: Data were from 78 MSAs. We included all MSAs with a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses for all three procedures. Spending, volume, and intensity were adjusted to control for differences in demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA; spending was also adjusted for geographic differences in the cost of doing business. Intensity was measured by the relative value unit (RVU) assigned to each service. [A] MSA was in the highest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the highest-spending quintile had an average of $5,221 in spending on professional services. For those professional services, the 16 MSAs had an average of 9.10 services, average intensity of 6.58, and average price per unit of intensity of $95.88. [B] MSA name withheld to protect the confidentiality of entities that contributed private data. [C] MSA was in the lowest-spending quintile. The 16 MSAs in the lowest- spending quintile had an average of $4,157 in spending on professional services. For those professional services, the 16 MSAs had an average of 10.68 services, average intensity of 5.85, and average price per unit of intensity of $71.86. [End of table] [End of section] Appendix VII: GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments: GAO Contact: James Cosgrove, (202) 512-7114 or cosgrovej@gao.gov: Staff Acknowledgments: In addition to the contact named above, Christine Brudevold, Assistant Director; Ramsey Asaly; Greg Giusto; Andy Johnson; Corissa Kiyan; Elizabeth T. Morrison; Vikki Porter; and Dan Ries made key contributions to this report. [End of section] Footnotes: [1] See Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Table 1: National Health Expenditures and Selected Economic Indicators, Levels and Annual Percent Change: Calendar Years 2007-2023, accessed October 28, 2014, [hyperlink, http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and- Systems/Statistics-Trends-and- Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/Proj2013tables.zip]. [2] See, for example, E. Fisher et al., "The Implications of Regional Variations in Medicare Spending. Part 1: The Content, Quality, and Accessibility of Care," Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 138, no.4 (2003). [3] Medicare is the federally financed health insurance program for persons aged 65 and over, certain individuals with disabilities, and individuals with end-stage renal disease. [4] In 2012, private sector spending accounted for $917 billion of the $2.8 trillion in overall national health expenditures. [5] Volume is the number of services used, and intensity is the resources needed to provide a service--for example, a 30-minute office visit has greater intensity than a 15-minute office visit. [6] The Office of Management and Budget defines MSAs as having at least one urbanized area with a population of 50,000 or more, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core. Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, OMB Bulletin No. 13-01, Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Delineations of These Areas (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 28, 2013). [7] Coronary stent placement, also known as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, is a surgical cardiology procedure to open a blocked coronary artery and insert a stent (an expandable metal coil) into the newly opened artery to help prevent renarrowing or reclosure. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a general surgical procedure to remove an infected appendix using instruments placed into small abdominal incisions. Total hip replacement, also known as Total hip arthroplasty, is a surgical orthopedic procedure where cartilage and bone from the hip joint are replaced with prosthetic components. [8] These procedures also have high levels of volume among all patients in the United States. For example, according to the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, which includes data for all privately insured, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured, and all other patients, these 3 procedures were among the 20 procedures with the most discharges in 2009. During that year, there were approximately 614,000 discharges for coronary stent placement, approximately 200,000 discharges for Laparoscopic appendectomy, and approximately 274,000 discharges for Total hip replacement. [9] In 2012, about one-third of all health care spending in the United States was for hospital services. Spending for professional services represented over one-quarter of spending, and the remainder of spending included services such as prescription drugs, nursing home care, and home health care, as well as administrative costs. See Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Table 2: National Health Expenditures; Aggregate and Per Capita Amounts, Annual Percent Change and Percent Distribution, by Type of Expenditure: Selected Calendar Years 1960-2012, accessed October 28, 2014, [hyperlink, http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics- Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/tables.pdf]. [10] Specifically, we included any outpatient services received by an enrollee in the 3 days prior to admission at the same hospital where the inpatient admission occurred, because those services may be related to the admission. [11] We excluded MSAs that had fewer than 24 coronary stent placement episodes, fewer than 17 Laparoscopic appendectomy episodes, or fewer than 24 Total hip replacement episodes. We had a sufficient number of episodes to support our analyses of coronary stent placement in 155 MSAs, Laparoscopic appendectomy in 139 MSAs, and Total hip replacement in 141 MSAs. For some analyses where we drew comparisons across procedures, we reported data on only those MSAs that had a sufficient number of episodes for all three procedures, and 78 MSAs fell into this category. We took steps to remove and limit the effect of atypical episodes. For example, we excluded enrollees who received the procedure more than one time during the episode, enrollees whose overall initial hospital admission was coded as being for a reason unrelated to the procedure analyzed, enrollees with diagnoses of end- stage renal disease, enrollees who were pregnant, and enrollees with a hospice stay. [12] "Enrollee" also refers to any dependents, unless otherwise specified. To control for geographic differences in the cost of doing business, we applied Medicare's payment-adjustment methodology--the Geographic Practice Cost Index or the Hospital Wage Index, as appropriate--to the unadjusted spending for services within each episode. To control for differences in the demographics and health status of enrollees in each MSA, we used a regression-based approach with enrollee-level variables such as age, gender, number of readmissions, and certain comorbidities. See appendix I for a description of our approach. [13] Examples of postdischarge services are services at a skilled nursing facility and home health services. Professional services include office visits, hospital consultations, surgeries, and other services provided by a physician or other health professional, such as a physician assistant. Examples of ancillary services are lab tests and ambulance services. [14] We calculated volume, intensity, and price for hospital outpatient services but did not report them because we found that hospital outpatient spending constituted only 1 to 2 percent of episode spending. We could not calculate consistent measures of volume, intensity, and price for postdischarge care and ancillary services because of the variability of services within these categories and the absence of a measure of intensity for these services. [15] Medicare bases its payment rates for physician services on RVUs, which reflect estimates of the resources needed to provide a given service relative to other services--including physician time and intensity; other clinical labor, equipment, and supplies; and premiums paid for malpractice. [16] We did not report the names of certain MSAs to protect the confidentiality of entities contributing private data to the MarketScan database. [17] See Institute of Medicine, Variation in Health Care Spending: Target Decision Making, Not Geography (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, July 24, 2013). Health status was accounted for by IOM using diagnosis information recorded on claims; insurance plan factors included measures such as benefit generosity and plan type; and market-level factors included measures such as hospital competition, payer mix, and percentage of population uninsured. [18] To do this work, IOM commissioned original analyses of public and private payer databases, and focused on describing and accounting for geographic variation in health care spending, utilization, and quality for the overall population, as well as for populations with specific diseases or conditions. IOM contractors quantified geographic variation in spending, utilization, and quality across various populations, payers, and geographic units; identified types of health care services with disproportionately high rates of variation; and identified factors that drove variation, such as enrollee health status and demographic characteristics, health plan, and price and market factors, among other things. [19] Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, "Chapter 7, Variation in private-sector payment rates," in Report to the Congress: Medicare and the Health Care Delivery System (June 15, 2011). [20] GAO, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Competition and Other Factors Linked to Wide Variation in Health Care Prices, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-856] (Washington, D.C.: Aug. 15, 2005). [21] These findings appear in a subcontractor report commissioned by IOM. See Michael McKellar et al., Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending, Utilization, and Quality among the Privately Insured, a special report prepared at the request of The Institute of Medicine Committee on Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending and Promotion of High-Value Care (Boston, Mass.: Harvard Medical School Department of Health Care Policy, Aug. 29, 2012). [22] Chapin White, James D. Reschovsky, and Amelia M. Bond, Inpatient Hospital Prices Drive Spending Variation for Episodes of Care for Privately Insured Patients, Brief No. 14 (Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Health Care Reform, February 2014). [23] The markets in this analysis included Louisville, Kentucky; Cleveland, Ohio; Lansing, Michigan; Flint, Michigan; Warren, Michigan; Detroit, Michigan; Kansas City, Missouri; Indianapolis, Indiana; and Buffalo, New York. [24] The National Institute for Health Care Reform study included nine areas. IOM also reported less geographic variation in private sector spending per enrollee compared to our episode spending. Our study, with its focus on three hospital-based, surgical episodes of care, likely had a different composition of utilization of services (mix, quantity, and intensity) and prices, compared to the IOM's measure of Total spending since not all services provided in medical practices are associated with inpatient admissions or surgical procedures. [25] The correlation coefficient captures the relationship between two variables of interest and takes a value between negative 1 and 1. A correlation coefficient of 0 would indicate that there was no relationship between the variables. A correlation coefficient close to 1 would indicate a strong positive relationship, while a correlation coefficient close to negative 1 would indicate a strong negative relationship. [26] Researchers at the National Institute for Health Care Reform found a correlation of 0.68 when comparing hospitals' spending on knee and hip replacements to spending across all types of episodes, and found a correlation of 0.80 when comparing cardiology episodes to all episodes. They concluded that a high-spending hospital for one episode type is also likely to have high spending for other episode types. IOM also studied this issue by conducting an episode-based analysis on a subset of conditions and, although finding correlation, the extent of the correlation depended on conditions examined. For example, the correlation between episode spending for diabetes and coronary heart disease was 0.79, but the correlation between spending on stroke and prostate cancer was 0.29. [27] In addition, we examined whether the number of episodes in an MSA had an effect on average episode spending for that MSA, and did not find evidence of an effect. [28] We identified price as the amount spent on the initial hospital inpatient admission (which excluded spending on any subsequent readmissions), because hospitals are generally paid one amount per admission regardless of the patient's length of stay or the services delivered. [29] There was little or no difference across MSAs in the number of days in the initial admission. The average number of days was 2.32 in the lowest-spending quintile and 2.31 in the highest-spending quintile for coronary stent placement, 1.71 and 1.53 for Laparoscopic appendectomy, and 2.87 and 2.91 for Total hip replacement. Hospital inpatient prices generally cover all hospital services during an inpatient admission regardless of the length of stay or the services delivered, so there is no financial incentive for hospitals to keep patients for additional days in an inpatient setting. [30] MSAs in the lowest-or highest-spending quintiles did not necessarily have spending on professional services that coincided with these quintiles. For example, for each of the three procedures, San Jose, California, had a level of spending on professional services that was among the 10 highest-spending MSAs, even though it was not in the highest-spending quintile for episode spending for any procedure. In contrast, Madison, Wisconsin, had the highest or second-highest level of spending on professional services for all three procedures and was also in the highest-spending quintile for episode spending for all three procedures. [31] Coronary stent placement, also known as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, is a surgical cardiology procedure to open a blocked coronary artery and insert a stent (an expandable metal coil) into the newly opened artery to help prevent renarrowing or reclosure. Laparoscopic appendectomy is a general surgical procedure to remove an infected appendix using instruments placed into small abdominal incisions. Total hip replacement, also known as Total hip arthroplasty, is a surgical orthopedic procedure where cartilage and bone from the hip joint are replaced with prosthetic components. [32] The MarketScan database contains claims for over 50 million enrollees paid by over 100 private insurers across 50 states and the District of Columbia in 2009 and 2010. [33] For coronary stent placement, we identified enrollees with claims with a principal hospital procedure code for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty or for coronary atherectomy and a professional procedure code for inserting an intracoronary stent, and we excluded enrollees with claims that indicated placement of a stent in more than one artery. For Laparoscopic appendectomy, we identified enrollees with a principal hospital procedure code and a professional procedure code for Laparoscopic appendectomy, and we excluded enrollees with claims that indicated extra work or additional procedures. For Total hip replacement, we identified enrollees with claims with a principal hospital procedure code for Total hip replacement and a professional procedure code for Total hip arthroplasty, and we excluded enrollees with claims that indicated bilateral procedures. [34] These procedures also have high levels of volume among all patients. For example, according to the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, which includes data for all privately insured, Medicare, Medicaid, uninsured, and all other patients, these 3 procedures were among the 20 procedures with the most discharges in 2009. During that year, there were approximately 614,000 discharges for coronary stent placement, approximately 200,000 discharges for Laparoscopic appendectomy, and approximately 274,000 discharges for Total hip replacement. [35] In 2012, about one-third of all health care spending in the United States was for hospital services. Spending for professional services represented over one-quarter of spending, and the remainder of spending included services such as prescription drugs, nursing home care, and home health care, as well as administrative costs. See Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Table 2: National Health Expenditures; Aggregate and Per Capita Amounts, Annual Percent Change and Percent Distribution, by Type of Expenditure: Selected Calendar Years 1960-2012, accessed October 28, 2014, [hyperlink, http://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics- Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/tables.pdf]. [36] We excluded enrollees who had secondary insurance or were enrolled in a managed care or other capitated care plan because the claims data may not provide a complete record of all the services and spending associated with an episode of care. [37] The Office of Management and Budget defines MSAs as having at least one urbanized area with a population of 50,000 or more, plus adjacent territory that has a high degree of social and economic integration with the core. Office of Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President, OMB Bulletin No. 13-01, Revised Delineations of Metropolitan Statistical Areas, Micropolitan Statistical Areas, and Combined Statistical Areas, and Guidance on Uses of the Delineations of These Areas (Washington, D.C.: Feb. 28, 2013). [38] Before assigning episodes to MSAs, we excluded episodes with Total spending that was three standard deviations above or below the national average of the lognormal distribution. After assigning episodes to MSAs, we excluded MSAs with less than 40 percent of episodes in either 2009 or 2010. We also excluded MSAs that had fewer than 24 coronary stent placement episodes, fewer than 17 Laparoscopic appendectomy episodes, or fewer than 24 Total hip replacement episodes. We established these thresholds by sequentially dropping the MSA with the fewest episodes and analyzing the change in the national coefficient of variation of average episode spending for the remaining MSAs. The threshold for each procedure was based on the point at which the change in national coefficient of variation stabilized. [39] We included any out-of-network claims because these claims are part of Total spending by both the insurer and the enrollee on the episode. Therefore, to the extent that an insurer paid a higher rate to a non-network provider, we included those higher payments in our data. However, we did not include any balance billing because the MarketScan database does not include information on the billed charges. [40] The correlation coefficient captures the relationship between two variables of interest and takes a value between negative 1 and 1. A correlation coefficient of 0 would indicate that there was no relationship between the variables. A correlation coefficient close to 1 would indicate a strong positive relationship, while a correlation coefficient close to negative 1 would indicate a strong negative relationship. [41] Examples of postdischarge services are services at a skilled nursing facility and home health services. Professional services include office visits; hospital consultations; surgeries; and other services provided by a physician or other health professional, such as a physician assistant. Examples of ancillary services are lab tests and ambulance services. [42] Although we compared MSAs in the lowest-and highest-spending quintiles for each procedure, we determined that our overall results would be similar if we compared MSAs based on the bottom and top 10th, 15th, or 25th percentile. [43] We calculated volume, intensity, and price for hospital outpatient services but did not report them because we found that hospital outpatient spending constituted only 1 to 2 percent of episode spending. We could not calculate consistent measures of volume, intensity, and price for postdischarge care and ancillary services because of the variability of services within these categories and the absence of a measure of intensity for these services. [44] Medicare bases its payment rates for physician services on RVUs, which reflect estimates of the resources needed to provide a given service relative to other services--including physician time and intensity; other clinical labor, rent, equipment, and supplies; and premiums paid for malpractice. [45] We did not include volume for anesthesia services, which are measured in units of time and not the number of services. We also did not include intensity for anesthesia services, which are not assigned RVUs. [End of section] GAO's Mission: The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability of the federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost is through GAO's website [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each weekday afternoon, GAO posts on its website newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] and select "E-mail Updates." Order by Phone: The price of each GAO publication reflects GAO's actual cost of production and distribution and depends on the number of pages in the publication and whether the publication is printed in color or black and white. Pricing and ordering information is posted on GAO's website, [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/ordering.htm]. Place orders by calling (202) 512-6000, toll free (866) 801-7077, or TDD (202) 512-2537. Orders may be paid for using American Express, Discover Card, MasterCard, Visa, check, or money order. Call for additional information. Connect with GAO: Connect with GAO on facebook, flickr, twitter, and YouTube. Subscribe to our RSS Feeds or E mail Updates. Listen to our Podcasts. Visit GAO on the web at [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: Contact: Website: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]; E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov; Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470. Congressional Relations: Katherine Siggerud, Managing Director, siggerudk@gao.gov: (202) 512-4400: U.S. Government Accountability Office: 441 G Street NW, Room 7125: Washington, DC 20548. Public Affairs: Chuck Young, Managing Director, youngc1@gao.gov: (202) 512-4800: U.S. Government Accountability Office: 441 G Street NW, Room 7149: Washington, DC 20548. [End of document]